The Digital ID Repeal Bill 2024 repeals the entire Digital ID Act 2024 and its accompanying Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Act 2024, and removes specific references to the Digital ID regime from several Commonwealth statutes. The repeal is drafted to commence only if — and immediately after — the Digital ID Act 2024 itself commences.
This is consequential legislation: it does more than strike a title from the statute books. The bill also eliminates discrete amendments and definitions that other laws would have relied on, which creates immediate questions about statutory coherence, regulatory architecture, and the legal status of any preparatory steps taken by agencies or private parties toward implementing a national digital identity framework.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill repeals the Digital ID Act 2024 and the Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Act 2024 in full and removes specific consequential amendments and cross‑references in at least six Commonwealth Acts. Its commencement is triggered only upon the commencement of the Digital ID Act 2024, and it explicitly does not commence if the Digital ID Act never commences.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies that would implement or rely on the Digital ID framework (including revenue, social services and security bodies), private identity‑service providers and businesses that planned to integrate Digital ID for customer onboarding (banks, telcos, fintechs, healthcare providers), and individuals for whom a national digital identity would have changed verification and privacy practices.
Why It Matters
The bill removes the statutory basis for a previously legislated national digital identity scheme and simultaneously strips related changes in other Acts — a move that produces legal and operational uncertainty about anything already done in anticipation of the scheme, and forces agencies and the private sector to reassess identity, privacy and compliance pathways.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
At its core the bill does one thing: it wipes out the Digital ID Act 2024 and its transitional companion. The drafting is conditional: the repeal takes effect only once the Digital ID Act actually commences, and then it takes effect immediately after that commencement.
If the Digital ID Act never commences, the repeal never starts. That sequencing means the bill is designed to ensure the primary Act cannot remain on the statute book in force beyond the moment it would otherwise start operating.
Beyond the headline repeal, the bill removes a package of statutory tweaks that had been linked to the Digital ID scheme. It repeals a paragraph in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 schedule, removes a table item from the Age Discrimination Act 2004, excises defined references in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, strips a reference from the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, repeals a paragraph of the Privacy Act 1988, and removes section 3J of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.
Those are discrete edits: they don’t recreate substitute provisions, they simply delete the targeted lines from existing Acts.The bill contains no express savings or transitional provisions that preserve the legal validity of acts taken under the Digital ID Act before the repeal takes effect. That omission raises immediate legal questions about the status of preparatory decisions, instruments, delegated rules, contracts and any data‑sharing arrangements that rely on the now‑repealed provisions.
Agencies and private parties that have begun build, procurement or contractual work tied to Digital ID have no statutory guarantee in this bill that those actions remain valid or enforceable once repeal occurs.Finally, the bill imposes no new duties or replacement regime. It does not substitute alternative identity verification rules or create transitional governance for identity operations at the Commonwealth level.
The practical result, if enacted as written, is a legislative clean‑out of the Digital ID architecture and its statutory footholds in other laws — leaving existing non‑Digital ID verification frameworks in place but without the planned national overlay many stakeholders were preparing to use.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Commencement is conditional: the repeal commences only on the later of Royal Assent and immediately after the commencement of the Digital ID Act 2024, and it will not commence at all if the Digital ID Act does not commence.
Schedule 1 repeals the Digital ID Act 2024 in full; Schedule 2 Part 1 repeals the Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Act 2024 in full.
Schedule 2 Part 2 removes specific amendments and references across multiple Acts, including: paragraph (zj) of Schedule 1 to the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 and table item 11 in Schedule 2 of the Age Discrimination Act 2004.
The bill repeals paragraph 33C(1)(g) of the Privacy Act 1988 and omits references to the Digital ID Act from subsections 19(1) and 19(7) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, which erases statutory hooks for privacy and consumer law adjustments tied to Digital ID.
Section 3J of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 is repealed and two defined paragraphs in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (35(1)(ca) and 36(1)(bb)) are removed, creating discrete interpretive and operational gaps in revenue and national security statutes.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Repeal triggers only upon the Digital ID Act commencing
The bill ties its own start date to the commencement of the Digital ID Act 2024: it begins on the later of Royal Assent and immediately after the Digital ID Act commences, and it expressly never commences if the Digital ID Act never does. Practically, that design means the repeal is a contingent instrument set up to take effect at the precise moment the Digital ID Act would otherwise start operating — effectively nullifying the primary Act at its birth. That sequencing is deliberate and creates operational complexity because agencies must track the triggering event to know whether the repeal is in force.
Full repeal of the Digital ID Act 2024
This Schedule contains the single operative instruction: repeal the whole Digital ID Act 2024. There are no savings clauses or transitional provisions in this Schedule preserving actions taken under the repealed Act. Repeal in this form removes the statutory authority for the Digital ID scheme, its objects, powers, regulatory mechanisms and any delegated instruments that rested solely on that Act.
Full repeal of the transitional and consequential Act
Schedule 2 Part 1 repeals the Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Act 2024 in its entirety. That Act would have provided the legal transition from prior law to the new Digital ID regime; repealing it eliminates any engineered transitional safeguards or temporary rules that Parliament may have put in place to manage the shift to Digital ID.
Remove Digital ID references from ADJR and Age Discrimination Act
This item repeals paragraph (zj) from Schedule 1 of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 and removes a table item in Schedule 2 to the Age Discrimination Act 2004. Those deletions erase specific cross‑references that would have adjusted judicial review and discrimination law in light of the Digital ID regime, potentially altering review pathways and statutory exceptions that had been tailored to Digital ID functions.
Narrow or eliminate Digital ID hooks in ASIO and Consumer Law
The bill repeals two defined paragraphs used in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 and omits references to the Digital ID Act from subsections 19(1) and 19(7) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. Removing those lines narrows the statutory framework whereby national security and consumer protections had interfaced with Digital ID capabilities; it may require agencies to re‑read existing powers without a Digital ID overlay.
Strip Digital ID hooks from the Privacy Act and Taxation Administration Act
Paragraph 33C(1)(g) of the Privacy Act 1988 is repealed and section 3J of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 is repealed. These targeted removals delete specific privacy exceptions or definitions and a taxation provision that had been tied to Digital ID operation, leaving no replacement text and raising questions about how privacy obligations and taxation identity processes will function absent the planned Digital ID references.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Technology across all five countries.
Explore Technology in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Privacy‑focused individuals and civil society groups: The repeal removes the statutory basis for a national Digital ID, which preserves the status quo of decentralised identity verification and reduces the prospect of a single Commonwealth‑mandated identity architecture and associated data centralisation.
- Organisations opposed to mandatory integration: Businesses and industry groups that objected to a compulsory obligation to integrate with a national Digital ID (for example, providers that would have had to alter business models or accept government credentials) avoid new statutory compliance mandates and potential forced interoperability requirements.
- State or private identity providers skeptical of Commonwealth primacy: Entities that planned to compete with or offer alternative identity systems retain a more open market environment because the national statutory overlay is removed.
Who Bears the Cost
- Commonwealth agencies that invested in Digital ID implementation (procurement, systems, staffing): Those agencies face sunk costs and will need to unwind or repurpose programs developed under the expectation that Digital ID would operate under a statutory framework.
- Private sector implementers and contractors: Vendors, integrators and banks that contracted to build or integrate Digital ID capabilities will face contract, compliance and commercial disruption if the statutory basis for their work disappears without transitional protections.
- Regulators and courts: Administrative and interpretive burdens increase because statutory cross‑references are removed without substitution, producing likely litigation and regulatory guidance requirements to clarify the legal effect of the deletions.
- Service users relying on planned Digital ID conveniences: Consumers and businesses expecting streamlined digital verification pathways (KYC, online government transactions) will lose the promised efficiencies and may face higher costs or slower onboarding under fragmented alternatives.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between preventing a centralised, government‑sanctioned digital identity regime (and the privacy and control concerns that generate) and the practical consequences of removing that regime without substitute arrangements: repeal protects privacy and autonomy at a policy level but also abandons a coordinated solution that promised efficiency, interoperability and clearer legal foundations for identity use across agencies and industries.
Two implementation problems sit at the center of this repeal. First, the bill contains no savings or validation clauses for actions already taken under the Digital ID Act or under instruments made in reliance on it.
If any delegated instruments, contracts, or data‑sharing arrangements come into existence in the brief window between the Digital ID Act’s commencement and the immediate repeal the bill requires, the statutory validity of those acts is unclear. That creates legal risk for agencies and third parties who have been preparing or have already acted in reliance on the Digital ID legislation.
Second, the bill’s consequential deletions across other Commonwealth Acts are surgical rather than constructive: they delete references and paragraphs but do not replace them with alternate rules or transitional mechanisms. The effect may be statutory fragmentation and interpretive uncertainty in areas such as privacy compliance, revenue administration and national security where the Digital ID references had been intended to harmonise practice.
Repeal therefore resolves one policy debate (removing the digital ID’s statutory basis) while creating a second set of technical and operational problems that government and affected parties must solve without statutory direction.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.