The Electoral Legislation Amendment (Lowering the Voting Age) Bill 2023 changes dozens of statutory age references in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 and the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984 to lower the voting and enrolment age from 18 to 16. The bill also inserts on‑the‑day enrolment mechanics: a provisional vote by a person entitled to enrol will count as a claim to enrolment, and polling officials must accept specific forms of identity evidence (driver’s licence, Australian passport, an attestation by an enrolled person, or other prescribed evidence).
This matters for administrators, schools and campaigns. The Australian Electoral Commission will need to update enrolment processes, roll maintenance, forms and communication; electoral officers will get new, day‑of verification duties; and political actors must plan for a sizable cohort of 16–17 year‑old electors who are newly enrolled and—because Australian voting is compulsory—subject to participation obligations and enforcement rules that the bill does not substantially alter.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill replaces many statutory references to ‘18’ with ‘16’ across the Commonwealth Electoral Act and the Referendum Act to enfranchise 16‑ and 17‑year‑olds. It adds provisions allowing claims for enrolment on polling/voting day, treats certain provisional votes as enrolment claims, and prescribes acceptable identity evidence for on‑the‑day claims.
Who It Affects
Directly affects 16–17 year‑olds (newly eligible electors), the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) and polling officials, state and territory agencies that supply identity data, schools (as channels for enrolment drives), and political parties and campaigns that will recruit and communicate with a younger electorate.
Why It Matters
The change expands the compulsory Australian electorate, forces operational changes to roll management and polling procedures, and creates new integrity and verification questions—especially for electors without standard identity documents or for on‑the‑day attestation procedures.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill’s core change is straightforward: it amends multiple provisions in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 and the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984 so that where the law previously referenced age 18 it now references age 16. That makes 16‑ and 17‑year‑olds eligible for enrolment and voting in federal elections and referendums under the same statutory framework that currently governs adults.
On the mechanics of enrolment at polling places, the bill explicitly permits a person who is entitled to enrol but not yet on the roll to make a claim for enrolment on polling (or voting) day and prescribes how polling staff must handle those claims. It treats a provisional vote cast under section 235 as a claim to enrolment and requires polling officials to accept either a current state/territory driver’s licence, an Australian passport, an attestation in an approved form signed by another enrolled person, or any other identity evidence the regulations prescribe.The bill also shifts some internal age thresholds from 16 down to 14 in specified provisions.
Those changes adjust ancillary references that currently use 16 as a trigger in limited contexts (for example headings and eligibility cross‑references) so those internal mechanisms continue to operate once the main voting age is 16. Finally, the bill mirrors the on‑the‑day enrolment and identity evidence rules in the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act so the same procedures apply during referendums.Taken together, the bill creates a single statutory pathway for 16–17 year‑olds to be enrolled and to vote, while adding explicit procedures for polling‑day verification and enrolment claims.
It does not otherwise amend compulsory voting obligations, offence provisions for false claims, or funding for public awareness and administrative rollout; those matters remain governed by the existing statutory and regulatory framework unless changed elsewhere.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends multiple provisions in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 so statutory references of ‘18’ are replaced with ‘16’, enfranchising 16–17 year‑olds at the federal level.
It inserts a rule that a provisional vote cast under section 235 by a person entitled to enrol qualifies as a claim for enrolment under the Act.
The bill requires polling officials to accept one of four forms of identity for on‑the‑day enrolment claims: a state/territory driver’s licence, an Australian passport, an attestation in an approved form by another enrolled person, or other identity evidence prescribed by regulation.
Several internal thresholds previously set at age 16 are moved to 14 in specified provisions (for example subsection 4(3), section 98, section 100 heading and related paragraphs) to preserve cross‑references once the voting age drops to 16.
The on‑the‑day enrolment claim and identity‑evidence provisions are duplicated into the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act so the same polling‑day mechanics apply at referendums.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Replace ‘18’ with ‘16’ across electoral and referendum provisions
These grouped items systematically substitute the age ‘18’ with ‘16’ where voting or enrolment eligibility is referenced. Practically, that changes who is described as eligible to enrol and vote. The changes are mechanical but comprehensive: they update eligibility, offences/penalty cross‑references, and clauses that determine who may be included on the roll or cast a valid vote.
Shift certain 16‑year thresholds down to 14
These items replace select occurrences of ‘16’ with ‘14’ in specific subsections and headings. The bill does this to maintain the internal logic of provisions that previously used 16 as a trigger (for example, transitional enrolment rules or headings) after the primary voting age is moved to 16. The change is technical: it relocates an embedded threshold to 14 so related procedural rules still function as intended.
Provisional vote counts as claim to enrolment
The bill adds a paragraph stating that a provisional vote cast under section 235 by a person who is entitled to enrol, but is not currently enrolled, qualifies as a claim to enrolment under section 98. That creates an explicit statutory link between casting a provisional ballot and initiating an enrolment claim, which affects how such votes are processed and how enrolment dates are treated.
Allow polling‑day enrolment claims and specify identity evidence
The bill adds that a person may make a claim for enrolment on polling day and requires that person to present a claim under section 101 plus specified identity evidence. The listed acceptable evidence is: a state/territory driver’s licence, an Australian passport, an attestation in an approved form signed by another enrolled person, or any other identity evidence prescribed by regulation. This creates a standardised, limited menu of proofs for polling‑day enrolment to guide polling officials.
Treat polling‑day claims as received before suspension period
The bill inserts subsection (5A) to ensure that a claim made under subsection 101 on polling day is regarded as received before the start of the suspension period and that, if entered on the Roll, the enrolment is treated as having been effected before suspension for the purposes of any vote recorded by the claimant. This prevents technical roll‑closure rules from invalidating votes by those who claim enrolment on polling day.
Mirror polling‑day enrolment and identity rules for referendums
The bill adds parallel language to the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act to allow on‑the‑day enrolment claims at referendums and to require the same identity evidence options. That alignment ensures that referendum polling officials follow the same practical procedures when handling young or newly enrolling voters.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Elections across all five countries.
Explore Elections in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- 16– and 17‑year‑old Australians: They gain the formal right to enrol and vote in federal elections and referendums, bringing them into the compulsory electorate and giving political actors a new demographic to engage.
- Youth advocacy and civic education groups: They obtain a statutory opening to scale civic education and enrolment drives targeted at younger teens, increasing the relevance of school‑based engagement programs.
- Political parties and campaigns: Parties benefit from an expanded electorate and a defined cohort for targeted outreach and messaging, with potential long‑term effects on party membership and engagement pipelines.
- Enrolled electors who provide attestations: Enrolled community members acting as attestors gain a formal role in enabling polling‑day enrolment for peers who lack standard ID, making local mobilisation of first‑time voters more feasible.
Who Bears the Cost
- Australian Electoral Commission (AEC): The AEC must update roll procedures, forms, training, IT systems, and public communications; process more provisional votes; and handle increased verification work at polling places.
- Polling officials and electoral staff: They face new on‑the‑spot identity‑checking duties and the administrative burden of processing poll‑day enrolment claims and attestations under time pressure.
- State and territory identity data providers and registrars: Coordination needs (for example for data matching) may increase, and jurisdictions may be asked to adjust identity‑document issuance or verification practices for younger people.
- Taxpayers/local budgets for civic education: If governments do not reallocate resources, schools and community organisations may absorb most of the outreach and education costs needed to integrate new young electors.
- Enrolled attestors and vulnerable young people: The attestation route transfers a verification responsibility and potential social pressure to enrolled signatories and could expose young people to improper influence or risks if safeguards are not tightened.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits two legitimate objectives against each other: expanding democratic inclusion by enfranchising younger citizens versus preserving electoral integrity and administrability through reliable identity verification and manageable polling processes. The statutory changes solve the first objective directly but shift many practical costs and integrity risks into operational design and subordinate regulation.
The bill is mechanically comprehensive but leaves significant implementation questions unanswered. It creates on‑the‑day enrolment and attestation pathways that depend on credential availability: many 16–17 year‑olds lack passports or licences, so the attestation route is likely to be the dominant verification mechanism.
That raises fraud and coercion risks—especially in environments where peers or gatekeepers can influence the attestor—or practical dilemmas for polling officials who must accept or reject attestations under time pressure. The bill leaves the form and content of the attestation to ‘approved form’ rules and regulations, which concentrates substantial discretion in subordinate instruments rather than the primary Act.
Operationally, treating provisional votes as enrolment claims and regarding polling‑day claims as received before suspension resolves one technical barrier to last‑minute enrolment, but it also increases the volume of provisional ballots that require post‑poll examination and data matching. The bill does not add funding, explicit timelines for processing those claims, or clear delegation of responsibility between the AEC and state/territory agencies for identity verification.
Finally, moving certain internal thresholds from 16 to 14 is a technical fix, but it introduces an opaque mix of ages in the statute book (14, 16, 18 across different clauses) that could confuse administrators, lawyers and voters unless consolidated guidance is published.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.