Codify — Article

Creates a national Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation for mobile coverage

Establishes a new legal regime requiring carriers to make mobile coverage reasonably available outdoors across Australia and gives the Minister broad powers to designate providers, set standards and benchmarks, and delegate enforcement to ACMA.

The Brief

This bill establishes a dedicated universal outdoor mobile regime that makes it an express legal obligation to ensure mobile coverage is reasonably available outdoors across Australia. It adds definitions for designated mobile services and outdoor coverage, creates instruments for standards, benchmarks and rules, and adjusts existing telecommunications and competition law references to incorporate the new regime.

The measure gives the Minister power to determine which services are "designated", to name primary universal outdoor mobile providers for defined coverage areas, and to set performance standards and minimum benchmarks. The ACMA can be delegated functions and directed responsibilities under the new framework.

The change moves beyond voluntary targets: it creates statutory duties that will shape network planning, commercial negotiations for wholesale capacity, and compliance programmes at carriers and providers.

At a Glance

What It Does

Creates a statutory 'universal outdoor mobile obligation' requiring mobile coverage to be reasonably available outdoors across Australia; empowers the Minister to designate service types, assign primary providers for coverage areas, and make standards, benchmarks and rules to implement the obligation.

Who It Affects

Mobile network operators, carriage service providers, wholesale infrastructure suppliers and tower owners; the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) as the delegated regulator; and end users dependent on outdoor mobile voice and messaging services, especially in regional and remote areas.

Why It Matters

For the first time the law links a universal-service style obligation specifically to outdoor mobile availability rather than legacy payphone or fixed-line duties. That transforms regulatory risk for major carriers, creates compliance obligations tied to technical and commercial outcomes, and gives the Minister substantial rule‑making discretion that will determine practical coverage requirements.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill inserts a standalone universal outdoor mobile regime into the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999. It defines a mobile telecommunications service (moving use, no physical contact with the network equipment, supplied to the public), and distinguishes 'outdoors' (explicitly excluding being inside buildings, vehicles, underground or underwater).

The regime centres on an obligation: mobile coverage must be "reasonably available outdoors to all people in Australia on an equitable basis." The Minister can narrow or split that obligation by legislative instrument, including by creating multiple "outdoor mobile obligations" and specifying what compliance looks like for each.

It identifies certain service types as "designated mobile telecommunications services"—initially voice calls and short message services—and allows the Minister to add other kinds by legislative instrument after consulting providers and considering technical and market factors and consumer impact. The Minister also determines what constitutes an outdoor mobile coverage area and may exclude particular areas by instrument; on commencement the Radiocommunications Australian Radio Quiet Zone in Western Australia is treated specially but may be revoked by the Minister.The Minister may name "primary universal outdoor mobile providers" for specified obligations and coverage areas.

If more than one provider is named for the same area and obligation, each provider is individually required to meet the obligation regardless of whether the other provider complies. The Act takes the step of creating default primary providers on a future date unless the Minister acts earlier—those defaults apply to the general Australian outdoor mobile coverage area unless displaced by a later determination.

The Minister can postpone that default-start day up to three times by 12 months each, subject to consultation and having regard to technical and market readiness.Compliance architecture sits on several layers. The Minister may make standards, minimum performance benchmarks and rules by legislative instrument for primary providers (subdivision C) and separately for carriers and carriage service providers (a new Part 5A).

Primary providers must comply with standards and benchmarks set under the universal outdoor mobile subdivision. The statute also says where an inconsistency arises between the universal‑obligation instruments and carrier‑level instruments, primary providers are not required to follow the carrier‑level instrument to the extent it is inconsistent with their universal obligation.

The ACMA may be delegated Ministerial functions and powers and may direct former providers to notify customers when provider assignments change; such directions are explicitly not legislative instruments.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The Minister may, by legislative instrument, add other kinds of designated mobile telecommunications services beyond voice and SMS after consulting primary providers and considering technical, market and consumer impacts.

2

The Act creates a mechanism for default primary providers to take effect on a specified 'default day' (the default day named in the bill is 1 December 2027) but allows the Minister to postpone that date up to three times, each postponement extending the date by 12 months.

3

If multiple primary universal outdoor mobile providers are designated for the same area and obligation, each provider must comply individually with the obligation; one provider’s failure does not relieve the others.

4

A primary provider that becomes unable to fulfil its obligation must notify the Minister and the ACMA in writing—either at least 12 months before the likely cessation if reasonably practicable, or as soon as reasonably practicable but no later than 10 business days after it actually ceases.

5

The ACMA can direct a former provider to give written notice to its customers about the change in provider (including timing and the identity of the new provider); that direction is binding on the former provider and is not a legislative instrument.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Part 1 (in Schedule 1) — Definitions and objects

New definitions and a stated object for outdoor mobile coverage

The bill expands the Act’s object clauses to include a universal outdoor mobile regime and inserts new definitions for terms such as 'designated mobile telecommunications service', 'outdoor mobile coverage area', 'general Australian outdoor mobile coverage area' and 'outdoors'. Practically, those definitions set legal boundaries for coverage obligations (for example, 'outdoors' excludes inside buildings, vehicles, underground or underwater), and they create the taxonomy the Minister will use when making instruments.

Division 2A — Universal outdoor mobile obligation (Sections 12F–12S)

Core obligation, service availability and ministerial rule‑making powers

Section 12F states the core obligation: ensuring outdoor mobile coverage is reasonably available to all people in Australia on an equitable basis and requires supply of each kind of designated mobile service. Sections 12G–12H let the Minister split the obligation into multiple obligations, specify what fulfilment looks like, and define when a service is available outdoors (an enduser outdoors can use it). Subdivision C (12Q–12S) gives the Minister statutory power to make standards, minimum benchmarks and rules for primary providers and to allow the ACMA to make further instruments under those standards.

Subdivision B — Primary universal outdoor mobile providers (Sections 12J–12N)

How primary providers are chosen, default appointments and notification duties

Section 12J lets the Minister determine, in writing, who is a primary universal outdoor mobile provider for a named obligation and coverage area; such determinations are legislative instruments except where the bill provides otherwise. Section 12L sets default primary providers (Telstra, Optus, TPG) for the general Australian outdoor mobile coverage area to be taken as appointed on the 'default day' unless the Minister acts earlier. Section 12N creates a mandatory notification regime for primary providers that become aware they will likely cease to fulfil an obligation, with specific timing windows and ACMA‑approved notice forms.

3 more sections
Section 12P — Former provider customer communications

ACMA can require outgoing providers to notify affected customers

If a provider stops being a primary provider and another continues, the ACMA may direct the former provider to notify customers who were supplied the designated service. The ACMA can specify timing and content (including the new provider’s identity); the former provider must comply. The bill clarifies that these directions are not legislative instruments, which streamlines administrative enforcement but reduces parliamentary oversight of the content of those directions.

Part 2 / New Part 5A (Sections 125A–125E)

Mobile telecommunications standards, benchmarks and rules for all carriers

The bill creates a separate Part enabling the Minister to set standards, benchmarks and rules for 'mobile telecommunications services' that apply to carriers and carriage service providers generally. However, primary universal outdoor mobile providers are carved out from complying with carrier-level standards to the extent they conflict with their universal‑obligation instruments, creating a statutory hierarchy between universal‑obligation instruments and general carrier standards.

Sections 73 and 73A / 125F–125G — Delegation and subdelegation

Delegation of Ministerial functions to ACMA and SES staff

The Act broadens delegation: the Minister may delegate functions under the new provisions to the ACMA or to senior departmental SES Band 2 staff. The ACMA may subdelegate to members or senior APS employees. When the ACMA subdelegates a delegated Ministerial function, the function execution is legally treated as if performed by the Minister—this has chain‑of‑authority and accountability effects for enforcement and administrative decision making.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Technology across all five countries.

Explore Technology in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Regional, rural and remote consumers — They gain a statutory right (not just policy targets) that mobile coverage be made reasonably available outdoors, improving access to voice and messaging services for safety, business and everyday use.
  • Tourists and transient populations — Clearer obligations to provide outdoor coverage improve expectations for coverage along roads, parks and outdoor public spaces that affect safety and commerce.
  • ACMA and federal policymakers — The bill centralises regulatory authority, giving ACMA delegated powers and the Minister structured instruments to set enforceable technical benchmarks, simplifying oversight compared with ad hoc policy targets.
  • Public safety and emergency services planners — A statutory outdoor coverage floor makes it easier to integrate mobile coverage expectations into emergency planning and location‑based services.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Major mobile network operators (likely Telstra, Optus and TPG under the bill’s default list) — They face new statutory obligations, infrastructure roll‑out expectations and compliance costs; where designated as primary providers they bear direct liability to meet obligations even if others are also tasked for the same area.
  • Smaller carriers and wholesale providers — They may face contractual and commercial pressure as primary providers seek wholesale capacity; they could also be required to comply with new carrier‑level standards that increase operational costs.
  • Commonwealth Department/ACMA — Expanded delegation, monitoring, and enforcement duties will generate administrative costs and require technical capability to measure 'outdoor' availability and enforce benchmarks.
  • Consumers indirectly — If carriers pass compliance and rollout costs into retail pricing, urban and regional consumers may see higher prices or reduced promotional offers as MNOs reallocate capital.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is between guaranteeing nationwide outdoor mobile access as a public good and preserving commercially sustainable incentives for network investment. Strong, prescriptive obligations deliver consumer access goals but risk imposing high infrastructure and operational costs on carriers (and ultimately consumers), while lighter, principle‑based obligations preserve commercial flexibility but may fail to deliver consistent outdoor coverage in low‑return areas. The bill hands the Minister and ACMA the tools to decide where on that spectrum Australia will sit, but leaves the politically and technically fraught choices to future instruments and decisions.

The bill creates strong ministerial discretion paired with relatively few hard technical definitions. 'Reasonably available outdoors' is the statutory objective, but the practical threshold for compliance will be set later by standards, benchmarks and rules made by the Minister and (potentially) the ACMA. That sequencing leaves a period where obligations exist in principle but lack precise measurable metrics, posing transitional uncertainty for carriers planning investment and for compliance teams designing monitoring regimes.

The statutory carve‑out that exempts primary universal outdoor providers from complying with carrier‑level standards where inconsistent with their universal obligations creates a hierarchy of instruments but also a risk of regulatory fragmentation: different obligations (and different compliance tests) could apply to primary providers versus other carriers, complicating wholesale negotiations and network sharing. The bill also concentrates appointment and instrument‑making powers in the Minister with delegated administrative power to ACMA and senior departmental staff; while this speeds decision making it raises questions about procedural safeguards and the appropriate scope of consultation before instruments take effect.

Finally, measuring and enforcing 'outdoor availability' raises significant technical challenges—coverage maps, signal quality metrics, and the difference between nominal footprint and usable service experience—any of which will shape the real-world burden on providers.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.