The bill replaces the Australian Accounting Standards Board and the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board offices with a single statutory entity called External Reporting Australia (ERA). ERA will hold the legal functions to make accounting, auditing and new sustainability standards for the Corporations Act and to formulate other standards and guidance for public use.
This is a structural reform with practical effects: it centralises standard‑setting under a Governing Council and discrete standardsetting boards, requires cost/benefit analysis for proposed standards where practicable, mandates public meetings on standards content, and gives the Minister a formal, disallowable power to direct ERA on the role of international standards. The changes preserve existing standards and provide detailed transitional arrangements for staff, appointments and documents.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill creates External Reporting Australia as a listed Commonwealth entity, vests it with functions to make accounting, auditing and sustainability standards, and allows the Governing Council to establish and authorise specialist standardsetting boards. It authorises ERA to adopt international standards (with specified local modifications) and to issue non‑legally binding guidance and conceptual frameworks.
Who It Affects
Corporations required to prepare financial reports, auditors and audit firms, preparers of sustainability reports, the accounting and audit professions, and government agencies that reference accounting, auditing or sustainability standards. It also affects current members and staff of the AASB, AUASB and the Financial Reporting Council through transitional arrangements.
Why It Matters
Professionals should note a single central body will now own standard design and public consultation processes, with stronger ministerial and Governing Council levers over boards. That changes accountability lines, the pathway for international standard adoption, and how new sustainability obligations may be introduced.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill dismantles the current split model and creates External Reporting Australia (ERA) as the successor organisation to the Office of the Australian Accounting Standards Board. ERA is established as a listed Commonwealth entity with a Governing Council as its accountable authority and with staff and consultants formally attached.
That legal identity means ERA — not separate offices — will appear across Commonwealth law and instruments going forward.
Operationally, the Governing Council appoints and oversees one or more standardsetting boards, each authorised to cover a single category of standards (accounting, auditing and assurance, or sustainability). The Council can give written directions to boards in relation to particular standards, and boards perform their functions on behalf of ERA once authorised.
The bill expressly permits ERA to adopt the text of international standards and to modify them where necessary to fit Australian legal or institutional settings.Transparency and procedural checks are built into the framework: meetings (or parts of meetings) that relate to the content of accounting, auditing or sustainability standards must be held in public; ERA has to carry out cost/benefit analyses of proposed standards to the extent reasonably practicable; and the Governing Council’s annual report must disclose directions given to boards and reasons for major standard decisions. The Minister also gains a statutory power to direct ERA, by legislative instrument, about the role international standards play; that direction is subject to parliamentary disallowance.The bill provides detailed transitional provisions to preserve continuity: existing standards continue in force under ERA; current Financial Reporting Council members are treated as Governing Council members for the balance of their terms; staff, consultants and records transfer across on the same terms and conditions; and specific interim powers permit the Financial Reporting Council to establish boards and make appointments during the transition period.
Several consequential amendments update references across Commonwealth statutes to point to ERA.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill replaces the AASB/AUASB offices with a single statutory body — External Reporting Australia — that will both make and formulate accounting, auditing and sustainability standards for Commonwealth law and other purposes.
The Governing Council will have between 5 and 9 members (a Chair plus 4–8 others), appoint part‑time board members for standardsetting boards for up to five years, and can set remuneration by instrument or Remuneration Tribunal determination.
Standardsetting boards must be authorised for single categories (accounting, auditing and assurance, sustainability); the Governing Council may give binding written directions to a board about a particular standard where specified governance thresholds are met.
ERA may make accounting, auditing or sustainability standards by issuing the text of international standards, and may modify those texts to account for the Australian legal or institutional environment; the Minister may issue a legislative‑instrument direction on the role of international standards that is subject to disallowance.
Transitional rules preserve continuity: existing standards remain in force as ERA standards, current Financial Reporting Council members and AASB/AUASB staff transfer across with continuity of terms, and the Financial Reporting Council has limited interim powers to establish boards before ERA formally starts.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establish External Reporting Australia and list its core functions
These sections create ERA as the successor to the Office of the AASB and define it as a listed Commonwealth entity for finance‑law purposes, with the Governing Council as accountable authority. They enumerate ERA’s core functions — making accounting, auditing and sustainability standards for corporations law, formulating other standards and guidance, developing conceptual frameworks and participating in international standard‑setting. Practically, this centralises statutory standard‑making power in one legal person, which matters for instrument drafting, interagency cooperation and legal citations.
Set up the Governing Council and governance rules
These sections prescribe Council composition, appointment mechanics, tenure (max five years), disclosure and meeting rules, quorum thresholds and reporting obligations. They require a minimum level of independence from the auditing sector to be considered when appointing members and mandate at least four Council meetings a year. The provisions also authorise the Council to determine strategic direction for boards and to report publicly on directions and major standard decisions — building accountability into the governance layer.
Authorise and constrain standardsetting boards
The Governing Council may, by instrument, establish named standardsetting boards and specify the kinds of standards each will handle; boards must be limited to a single category (accounting, auditing and sustainability) unless the function arises under a Minister‑specified instrument. Boards perform ERA functions on ERA’s behalf, their members are appointed by the Council, and the Council can give written directions to boards about particular standards subject to a high vote threshold or other specified conditions. This creates a two‑tiered model: political/governance oversight above operational technical boards.
Staffing, consultants and resourcing
ERA’s staff will include APS employees engaged under the Public Service Act and other ERA‑designated employees; ERA may engage consultants and be assisted by other agency personnel whose services are made available under instrument. The Council Chair and APS employees assisting the Chair constitute a Statutory Agency with the Chair as Head. Those mechanics determine employment continuity, procurement flexibility, and how Commonwealth agency resources can be marshalled in practice.
Standards, public access and interpretation rules
Standards may be general or specific, can differ by time/place/circumstance and ERA must prefer constructions that promote the Part’s objects. ERA must, so far as reasonably practicable, do cost/benefit analysis before making standards and hold public meetings when discussions relate to a standard’s content. The Minister can also issue a binding direction on the role of international standards, but that direction is a legislative instrument subject to disallowance — a procedural check with political visibility.
Transition mechanics to preserve continuity
This Part lays out definitions for the transition period, extends appointments that would otherwise lapse, treats Financial Reporting Council members as Governing Council members for the remainder of their terms, transfers staff, consultants and records on existing terms, and continues existing standards. It also grants the Financial Reporting Council limited interim powers to set up boards and make certain instruments before ERA formally begins, and permits the Minister to make transitional rules by legislative instrument within stated limits.
Update cross‑references across Commonwealth law
The bill replaces references to the AASB, AUASB and the Financial Reporting Council throughout a raft of Acts (Corporations Act, Income Tax Assessment Acts, PGPA Act, charities, superannuation and others) with references to External Reporting Australia. That sweep ensures statutory coherence but requires agencies and practitioners to update internal policies, regulatory guidance and compliance materials to reflect the new statutory nomenclature.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Investors and creditors — they gain a single, visible body responsible for the coherence of accounting, auditing and sustainability standards and clearer public consultation processes that increase transparency of how standards are made.
- Multinational and listed Australian corporations — ERA’s formal power to adopt international standard texts with limited modifications is likely to reduce divergence between Australian and international practice, simplifying cross‑border reporting and group consolidation for entities operating in multiple jurisdictions.
- Users of sustainability information — the bill places sustainability standards within ERA’s statutory remit, signalling a pathway for mandatory or broadly applicable sustainability reporting standards developed through the same legal framework as accounting standards.
- Regulators and standard users — government agencies and statutory regulators that rely on accounting or audit standards get a single interlocutor for technical advice, guidance and standard interpretation, and the ERA annual reporting obligations increase visibility of policy choices.
Who Bears the Cost
- Audit firms and preparers — adopting new or modified international standards and any new sustainability requirements will generate implementation costs, systems changes and potential training or assurance cost increases for preparers and auditors.
- Commonwealth budget and agencies — standing up ERA, managing staff transfers, and supporting public consultation and transparency obligations will require resourcing; the bill leaves funding and resourcing choices to existing budget processes.
- Independent standard offices and sectoral stakeholders — consolidation reduces the institutional independence and separate institutional identity of the AASB/AUASB, concentrating decision‑making in the Governing Council, which may increase compliance and engagement burdens on affected stakeholder groups.
- Smaller entities and sectors — if ERA applies standards more broadly or tightens sustainability reporting rules, small and medium‑sized entities could face disproportionate compliance burdens unless ERA uses differential application rules as permitted by the bill.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between technical independence and accountable, central governance: the bill concentrates technical standard‑making into one statutory entity to improve coherence and accountability, but it also places powerful levers (Governing Council directions and a ministerial legislative‑instrument power) over those technical processes — trading independence for centralized control and political accountability.
The bill tightens governance but centralises power. Concentration under ERA promises administrative efficiency and clearer lines of responsibility, but it also creates single‑point failure risks: a Governing Council decision or Ministerial direction can reshape whole categories of standards.
While the Council’s duty to report and the disallowable nature of ministerial directions provide transparency, they are imperfect substitutes for technical independence if political pressure or resource constraints influence appointments or directions.
Mechanically, the ability to issue the text of international standards and to modify them for the Australian environment raises implementation questions. Deciding what modifications are “necessary” will be contested, and the requirement that ERA perform cost/benefit analysis “so far as reasonably practicable” introduces scope for challenge about when rigorous economic assessment is required — particularly for complex sustainability standards.
Public meetings increase transparency but can make the deliberative technical process more political and expose commercially sensitive drafting to public scrutiny.
Finally, the transitional rules prioritise continuity (preserving current standards and appointments) but leave open liability, interpretive and administrative questions — for example, how legacy legal opinions, contracts referencing old bodies, or unsettled consultation processes are to be finally resolved. The rules vest interim powers in the Financial Reporting Council to set up boards ahead of ERA’s start, which reduces implementation risk but creates a short window where legacy actors exercise new powers under unfamiliar constraints.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.