This bill instructs the provincial government to create three linked pieces of work: a detailed plan to integrate energy storage (including storage-as-a-service) into distribution planning and procurement; a separate plan to develop Alberta’s battery supply chain; and a task force to study barriers to long-duration storage. The legislation sets out the topics each plan must cover, requires consultation with system operators, the utilities regulator, Indigenous Peoples and sector experts, and mandates public publication of the outputs.
The bill matters because it moves storage from a niche technology into formal provincial planning. By directing attention to valuation, procurement, cost recovery and supply-chain measures, it would change how utilities, regulators and investors treat storage — potentially accelerating projects, shifting procurement toward third-party and aggregated resources, and shaping incentives for local battery manufacturing and recycling.
The text focuses on creating market conditions that favor investment while tying policy goals to lower costs, reliability and environmental benefits.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act obliges the Minister to produce an energy storage plan that lays out regulatory frameworks, procurement options, cost-effectiveness tests and cost-recovery models that recognize storage’s grid value. It also mandates a battery supply chain plan with program measures and establishes a task force to recommend how to clear economic and procedural barriers for long-duration storage.
Who It Affects
Electric utilities, independent storage providers and aggregators, the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) and the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) are the primary targets, with implications for battery manufacturers, miners and recycling firms and for Indigenous communities in siting and participation.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a provincial-level architecture for valuing and procuring storage at the distribution level and links distribution planning to transmission cost allocation—an arrangement that could change investment signals, procurement methods and how grid upgrades are deferred or built.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act directs the Minister to design a provincial strategy that treats energy storage as an integral grid resource rather than an ad hoc add-on. The storage plan must consider how storage should be paid for — including how to capture avoided wires costs and environmental benefits — and how to let non-utility and aggregated projects compete to provide distribution-level services.
The objective is to create procurement and regulatory approaches that let storage compete with traditional wiring investments on a fair basis.
A separate strand of the legislation focuses on industrial policy: building out Alberta’s battery supply chain. The responsible Minister must craft program measures and coordinate with ministries responsible for research, investment attraction and mineral development.
That plan is framed as an operational exercise — it requires implementation steps and public reporting on progress so that the province can track whether policy measures are translating into commercial activity.For long-duration storage — technologies that can discharge over extended periods — the Act sets up an expert Task Force to analyze economic barriers, research gaps and market or rule obstacles inside ISO and regulator processes. The Task Force’s role is investigative and advisory: it will gather data, consult sector stakeholders and produce recommendations intended to lower the bar for commercialization and integration of these technologies into provincial markets.Across all three elements the bill emphasizes consultation and transparency.
It directs engagement with the AESO, the Commission, Indigenous Peoples, academics and industry actors, and requires publication of plans and (for the battery plan) periodic progress reporting. The legislation does not itself re-write ISO or AUC rules; instead it creates a policy architecture and asks executive actors to propose regulatory or legislative changes needed to align system rules with the province’s storage objectives.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill defines “long duration energy storage” as storage capable of delivering electricity output for at least 8 hours.
The Minister must complete and publish the province’s energy storage plan within 12 months after the Act comes into force.
The battery supply chain plan must be published within 12 months and followed by annual progress reports published each year before December 31.
The Long Duration Energy Storage Task Force must be established within 3 months, include 7–10 members with prescribed expertise and deliver a report within 2 years.
The storage plan must include cost-effectiveness tests and a stated preference for non-wires solutions when their cost does not exceed the cost of wires solutions, plus options for pre-approval of eligible investments in distribution system plans.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and scope
Section 1 supplies working definitions — notably ‘energy storage as a service’, ‘energy storage facility’, ‘energy storage resource’, ‘battery supply chain’ and the 8-hour definition of long-duration storage — and ties unspecified terms to the Electric Utilities Act. Practically, these definitions determine what projects qualify for the plan’s procurement, valuation and coordination mechanisms; for example, the inclusion of component recycling and upstream mining in the battery supply chain widens the policy footprint to resource development and manufacturing.
Statutory purposes
Section 2 frames the Act’s dual aims: coordinated planning for grid modernization and targeted support for investment-friendly conditions that lower costs, improve reliability and increase low-emissions supply. That purpose clause will guide interpretation of the plans and any recommended legislative amendments; authors and implementers must balance commercial development goals against consumer protection and reliability objectives.
Energy storage plan — required content and objectives
Section 3 sets out the content requirements for the Minister’s storage plan: mechanisms to ensure revenue streams reflect storage’s full grid value; use of storage as a distribution-level non-wires solution; procurement options including competitive methods and aggregator models; cost-effectiveness tests comparing non-wires and wires investments; pre-approval of eligible investments in distribution plans; simplified rules for small or aggregated projects; and cost-recovery and performance-incentive models. The provision also asks the Minister to identify possible legislative amendments to ISO cost-allocation and transmission reinforcement payments so transmission charging rules align with storage integration. For utilities and regulators, this section signals likely changes in how distribution-level investments are evaluated, how third-party services are contracted, and where the AUC and AESO may need to adjust rules or procedures.
Battery supply chain plan, consultation and reporting
Section 4 assigns responsibility for a battery supply chain plan to the Minister responsible for mineral development and requires consultation across executive council portfolios tied to research and investment attraction. The section demands the publication of both the plan and a summary of the Executive Council feedback, and it obliges the Minister to implement measures in the plan and produce annual progress reports. From an operational view this converts a strategy document into a continuing program with public accountability — and creates an inter-ministerial coordination task that could involve incentives, workforce planning, permitting reforms or targeted R&D funding.
Long Duration Energy Storage Task Force — mandate and powers
Section 5 requires the Minister to form a Task Force of 7–10 members with a mix of academic researchers, economists, utility and industry representatives and a membership-association voice. The Task Force must research barriers, consult the AESO and other stakeholders, request data from ministers, and submit a public report with recommendations. The practical implication is a legislated horizon for expert advice on LDES commercialization and clearance of procedural obstacles inside ISO and Commission processes; however, the section makes the Task Force advisory rather than rule-making, so its impact depends on subsequent executive or regulatory follow-through.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Distribution customers seeking lower bills: the bill prioritizes non-wires solutions and cost-effectiveness comparisons that can defer expensive wire upgrades and, if implemented as written, could reduce near-term capital expenditure passed to ratepayers.
- Independent storage providers and aggregators: the Act explicitly contemplates third-party procurement, simplified participation rules for small/aggregated projects and competitive procurement models that open markets to non-utility actors.
- Battery supply-chain firms and investors: the battery plan and its program measures create a coordinated provincial signal for investment in mining, processing, component manufacturing and recycling that can attract capital and support local industrial development.
- Researchers, clean-tech developers and commercialization partners: the Task Force’s mandate to identify research and commercialization pathways for long-duration technologies creates a mechanism to prioritize and potentially fund early-stage work.
- Indigenous communities: the Act requires engagement ‘that respects best practices’ for participation, which — if implemented in spirit — can secure early involvement in projects, procurement opportunities and partnership arrangements.
Who Bears the Cost
- Electric utilities (distribution and potentially transmission): they will face new planning requirements, potential changes to procurement practices, and the need to integrate third-party services and new cost-recovery models into their rates and distribution system plans.
- Regulators and system operators (AUC, AESO): the bill anticipates rule and process changes, data requests and coordination tasks that will increase workload and may require new rule-making and adjudicative resources.
- Provincial government departments: coordinating the battery supply chain plan, implementing program measures and publishing reports create staffing, policy and possible fiscal obligations for multiple ministries.
- Ratepayers (indirectly): while the stated purpose is to lower costs, new incentives, performance-based cost recovery or support for local manufacturing could shift costs or risks to customers depending on program design.
- Small developers and project sponsors: new pre-approval criteria, competitive procurement processes and simplified participation rules can benefit some but impose new compliance, bidding and aggregation costs on nascent firms.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between creating generous, rapid incentives to attract private investment in storage (and local battery industry) and protecting electricity customers and market integrity from the cost and complexity of those incentives; speeding deployment favors liberalized procurement and high reimbursement for multiple value streams, while protecting ratepayers and wholesale market signals favors cautious, tightly regulated valuation and slow rule changes — the bill directs action on both fronts without prescribing how to resolve the trade-off.
The Act creates a policy scaffolding but leaves crucial implementation choices unresolved. It requires plans, consultations and a Task Force, but it stops short of granting direct rule-making authority to reorder ISO or AUC obligations; meaningful change to transmission cost allocation or connection-payment practices will likely require either regulatory rule changes or further legislative amendments.
That gap means the bill’s effectiveness depends heavily on the willingness and capacity of the AESO, the AUC and ministries to follow through.
Valuing storage’s full ‘grid benefit’ is technically complex and contested. The plan instructs the Minister to ensure revenue streams reflect avoided wires costs, environmental benefits and reliability value, but methodologies for measuring and monetizing those benefits are nascent and contentious.
There is a material risk of double-counting avoided costs, overcompensating technologies in the short term, or creating conflicting incentives between distribution-level procurement and wholesale market signals. Similarly, the battery supply chain measures may require subsidies, tax or permitting changes to be commercially effective — raising fiscal and regulatory trade-offs that the legislation does not resolve.
Finally, the bill mandates Indigenous engagement and public reporting but does not prescribe dispute-resolution or benefit-sharing mechanisms; without clear processes, engagement can become procedural rather than substantive and slow project timelines. The Task Force is advisory; its recommendations can be comprehensive yet unimplemented if political or agency priorities shift, making timelines and accountability central practical questions left open by the text.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.