Bill 25 amends Alberta’s Early Learning and Child Care Act to broaden the statutory director’s enforcement and oversight authorities for facility‑based child care and family day home agencies. It adds explicit closure powers for premises, creates a probationary licence mechanism for family day home agencies, authorizes administrative penalties (with per‑day caps), and expands the regulatory grounds that can justify refusing, suspending or cancelling licences.
For operators and compliance teams this shifts the enforcement landscape: regulators gain faster, more flexible tools to stop unsafe operations and to publicize penalties, while licence holders face new posting, notification and inspection obligations plus monetary exposure up to prescribed limits. The Act also delegates substantial detail to regulations — meaning many operative standards and processes will appear later in regulatory instruments.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes the statutory director to order closure of premises or parts of premises where licensed care is provided, suspend family day home agency licences and issue time‑limited probationary licences, and levy administrative penalties subject to regulatory rules and monetary caps. It also expands what the statutory director can consider — adding a public‑interest standard and delegating additional grounds to the regulations.
Who It Affects
Facility‑based licence holders, family day home agencies and individual family day home programs bear the direct operational and compliance effects. Parents and guardians receive new mandatory notices and public posting requirements; the statutory director and Ministry staff gain enforcement discretion; courts may see more ex parte applications to compel inspections or enforcement.
Why It Matters
The package increases the speed and range of regulatory responses to non‑compliance — from immediate closure to monetary penalties and public disclosure — which changes the compliance risk profile for all licensed providers. It also places emphasis on regulations to define many of the key thresholds (grounds for action, penalty calculation, communication requirements), so the practical effect will depend heavily on forthcoming regulations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 25 rewrites several parts of the Early Learning and Child Care Act to give the statutory director stronger, clearer tools to manage safety and compliance risks at licensed child care facilities and family day home agencies. The Act adds a specific power to issue written closure orders for premises (or portions of them) and requires licence holders to stop providing programs at those locations while an order is in force.
A closure order must identify the non‑compliance, the remedial measures required and the deadline for remedy; the order stays in force until the statutory director is satisfied the issues are fixed and then must be formally rescinded in writing.
For family day home agencies the Act creates a suspension-and-probation regime. The statutory director may suspend an agency’s licence and issue a probationary licence that cannot exceed three months (and cannot be renewed).
Probationary licences must spell out the non‑compliance, required remedies and timelines; if the agency does not comply within the probationary period the director may refuse reinstatement and both licences expire at the end of the probation. Separately, the Act allows the director to set a discretionary ineligibility period of up to two years for anyone refused or cancelled as a family day home agency oversight provider.The bill establishes a formal administrative‑penalty regime.
The director may issue written notices requiring payment of penalties determined under regulations; the Act caps penalties at $10,000 per contravention and $10,000 per day for ongoing breaches, and forbids issuing a notice more than two years after the director first became aware of evidence of the contravention. A person who pays the administrative penalty cannot later be prosecuted for the same contravention under the Act, and unpaid penalties can be filed with the court and enforced like a judgment.
The director may also publicly post particulars of penalties or orders “in the manner the statutory director considers appropriate.”The Act tightens transparency and inspection duties: licence holders must post licences, probationary licences, certain reports and notices of cancellation or administrative penalties in prominent places and must share licence copies and specific notifications with overseen family day home programs and parents as set out in the regulations. The statutory director gains explicit inspection and monitoring authority over family day home premises and principal places of business, including temporary removal of records with a receipt and a statutory obligation to provide a post‑inspection report.
The legislation also enlarges the kinds of regulatory provisions the Minister may make — including additional grounds for enforcement actions, staffing and qualification rules, standards for family day home programs, methods and timing for communications, and rules governing collection and publication of certification information.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The statutory director may order closure of premises or parts of premises where licensed facility‑based programs are offered; those locations must cease operations until the director rescinds the order.
Administrative penalties can be imposed by notice and are capped at $10,000 per contravention and $10,000 per day for ongoing breaches, with a two‑year limitation on issuing notices after evidence first came to the director's attention.
The statutory director can suspend a family day home agency licence and issue a probationary licence of up to 3 months; probationary licences list required remedies and timelines and cannot be renewed.
A person refused or cancelled as a family day home agency oversight provider may be ineligible to apply for an initial oversight licence for up to 2 years at the director’s discretion.
The Act authorizes the statutory director to publish particulars of orders and administrative penalties and to file unpaid penalties with the court for enforcement as if they were judgments.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Expanded refusal grounds and compliance with wider legislation
The bill adds a public‑interest test and a catch‑all for additional grounds (to be prescribed by regulation) to the list of reasons the statutory director can refuse or not renew a licence. It also redefines the licence condition to require compliance not just with local zoning, health and safety 'requirements' but with broader 'legislation,' specifically calling out the Public Health Act, Safety Codes Act and municipal bylaws. Practically, that imports other statutory regimes into licensing compliance and gives the director firmer footing to refuse licences when those laws are not met.
Closure orders for facilities or parts of premises
This new provision gives the statutory director authority to order the closure of premises (or portions) used for facility‑based programs. Orders must state the non‑compliance, required remedy measures and the remedial time frame, be served on the licence holder, and remain in effect until the director is satisfied the problems have been fixed. The requirement for written rescission and the specific content requirements create a record trail but also put operational immediacy into the director’s hands.
Public‑interest discretionary enforcement
The Act supplements the director’s existing authority by allowing actions under Part 2 whenever the director considers it 'in the public interest' or when additional regulatory grounds are met. That elevates a policy criterion (public interest) as a standalone trigger for enforcement actions — broadening discretionary scope beyond strict regulatory breaches and making regulatory guidance and record-keeping for 'public interest' decisions especially important.
Probationary licences, suspension, cancellation and ineligibility
The bill formalizes a probationary licence process for family day home agencies: a suspension can be accompanied by a probationary licence of no more than three months, specifying required corrective measures and deadlines. Failure to comply can result in non‑reinstatement and expiry of licences. The Act also allows the director to render someone ineligible to apply for oversight of family day home programs for up to two years after a refusal, suspension‑denial or cancellation.
Posting, notification and inspection obligations
Licence holders (facility‑based and family day home agencies) must post licences, probationary licences, varied licence provisions, cancellation notices and certain director reports in prominent locations; family day home agencies must provide copies of licences to overseen programs and notify parents/guardians of key actions. The statutory director’s inspection powers are clarified: entry at reasonable hours, removal of records with receipts, post‑inspection reports, and court remedies (including ex parte applications) when entry or cooperation is refused.
Administrative penalties regime
The new administrative penalty scheme gives the statutory director authority to issue written penalty notices with prescribed content and to set amounts under regulations, subject to explicit maximums ($10,000 per contravention; $10,000 per day for continuing contraventions). Notices must be paid within 30 days unless appealed; payment precludes subsequent prosecution for the same contravention; unpaid notices can be filed with the court and enforced as a judgment; and the director may publicly post penalty information.
Delegation to regulations: grounds, standards, communications and certification
The Minister gains broader regulatory authority to prescribe additional enforcement grounds, staffing models, family day home standards, communication methods/timelines, rules for administrative penalties (including calculation and required notice content), and the collection/publication of certification information. Many operational details and thresholds therefore depend on forthcoming regulations rather than the statute itself.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Children and parents/guardians — gain faster protections and more transparency: closure orders, mandatory postings and parental notifications aim to reduce exposure to unsafe care and increase parents’ access to licence and enforcement information.
- Statutory director and Ministry regulators — receive clearer, explicit statutory tools (closure orders, probationary licences, administrative penalty authority and publication powers) to address non‑compliance without resorting immediately to criminal prosecution or lengthy court processes.
- Compliant operators — benefit from stronger enforcement against unsupervised or unsafe competitors, which can level the playing field where non‑compliance previously lowered costs for some providers.
Who Bears the Cost
- Licensed facility operators and family day home agencies — face increased compliance costs (posting, record access, remediation plans), reputational risk from public postings, and potential monetary exposure from administrative penalties.
- Small and solo providers — are likely to feel the burden most acutely because closure orders, probationary terms and the threat of daily penalties can threaten viability, especially where corrective measures require capital or operational changes.
- Ministry administration and courts — the Ministry must allocate staff and resources to implement inspections, closure orders, probationary monitoring and penalty collection; courts may see more ex parte enforcement or production orders, adding transactional demand on judicial resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is trade‑off between swift, discretionary powers to protect children and the need for clear, predictable procedural safeguards: stronger enforcement tools reduce the time to intervene in unsafe settings but concentrate discretionary authority that can cause reputational and economic harm unless tightly bounded by regulations and transparent decision‑making.
The Act gives the statutory director far more discretionary authority, but delegates much of the operational detail to regulations. That creates two implementation risks: inconsistent enforcement while regulators and operators await regulatory clarity, and a large rule‑making load that will determine how blunt or precise the new powers actually are.
For instance, terms like 'public interest' and the 'additional grounds' to be prescribed could be interpreted broadly; without detailed regulatory criteria those concepts may produce uneven decision‑making or challengeable decisions.
The administrative penalty design balances efficiency and finality (payment bars prosecution for the same act) but raises procedural questions. The two‑year limitation for issuing penalty notices is an important restraint, yet the ability to file unpaid penalties as court judgments and to publicly post penalty particulars may produce severe reputational damage before any appeal is resolved.
The probationary licence regime for family day home agencies is fast—three months and non‑renewable—so timely, clear criteria for what remedies suffice will be essential to avoid arbitrary expirations or cascades of licence loss that disrupt care.
Operationally, the Ministry must resource inspection, monitoring and communications functions, and coordinate with other statutory regimes (Public Health Act, Safety Codes Act, municipal bylaws) that are now explicitly woven into licensing compliance. The success of the package therefore depends less on statutory breadth and more on regulatory specifics, published enforcement guidance, and transparent record‑keeping to protect due process and predictability for licence holders.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.