Alberta’s Appropriation (Supplementary Supply) Act, 2013 authorizes $533.451 million from the General Revenue Fund for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013. The money covers expenses, capital investment and non-budgetary disbursements that were not otherwise provided for in the province’s existing appropriations.
The Act does not itself create a new program or prescribe how departments must deliver services. It supplies legal spending authority for specified votes and requires the government to account for the proper application of the money.
Most of the funding goes to Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, while Enterprise and Advanced Education receives the full non-budgetary allocation.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act authorizes three classes of withdrawals from Alberta’s General Revenue Fund: $401.004 million for expense, $54.996 million for capital investment and $77.451 million for non-budgetary disbursements. The Schedule assigns those amounts to particular government departments and votes.
Who It Affects
The direct users of the authority are Alberta departments, particularly Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Municipal Affairs, Transportation, Education, and Enterprise and Advanced Education. Suppliers, municipalities, educational institutions and other parties receiving payments through those departments may be indirectly affected by the additional spending authority.
Why It Matters
Supplementary supply closes a gap between the spending authority originally approved for the fiscal year and the amounts departments require or expect to use. The Act also illustrates the Legislature’s control mechanism: departments receive authority by spending category and vote rather than an unrestricted increase to the government’s overall budget.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act works as an additional appropriation for the final fiscal year covered by the legislation. Section 1 authorizes up to $401.004 million for ordinary operating expenses, including the costs of delivering government programs and services.
Section 2 adds $54.996 million for capital investment, while section 3 authorizes $77.451 million in non-budgetary disbursements. Each authority is limited to the amount shown in the Schedule.
The Schedule allocates the operating expense authority across five areas. Environment and Sustainable Resource Development receives the largest operating allocation at $286.497 million.
Municipal Affairs receives $59.318 million, Education receives $24.289 million, and Enterprise and Advanced Education receives $30.900 million. Those figures are not interchangeable: they identify the departmental votes against which the expense authority may be used.Capital authority is divided between Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, with $16.010 million, and Transportation, with $38.986 million.
The separate classification matters for financial reporting and legislative oversight because capital spending is treated differently from the recurring costs of operating government programs.Enterprise and Advanced Education receives the entire $77.451 million non-budgetary disbursement authority. The bill text does not identify individual projects or recipients within that amount; those details would have to be traced through the Supplementary Supply Estimates, departmental financial records and subsequent public accounts.
Section 4 provides the accountability rule by requiring an account of the due application of all money expended under the Act.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act authorizes a combined maximum of $533.451 million from the General Revenue Fund across three spending classes: expense, capital investment and non-budgetary disbursements.
Environment and Sustainable Resource Development receives $286.497 million in expense authority and $16.010 million in capital investment authority, making it the largest departmental recipient.
Enterprise and Advanced Education receives $30.900 million in expense authority plus the entire $77.451 million non-budgetary disbursement allocation.
Transportation receives $38.986 million in capital investment authority, while Municipal Affairs receives $59.318 million in expense authority.
Section 4 requires the government to account for the due application of all money spent under the Act; the statute does not itself set out a project-by-project reporting format.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Authorize additional operating expenses
Section 1 permits the government to withdraw up to $401.004 million from the General Revenue Fund for further expense charges of Alberta’s Public Service during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013. The authority applies only to amounts shown in the Schedule and only to expense, not capital or non-budgetary spending.
The provision gives departments legal authority to incur or settle additional operating costs that existing appropriations did not cover. It does not independently establish a service entitlement, funding formula or procurement requirement.
Authorize capital investment
Section 2 authorizes a further $54.996 million for capital investment. The Schedule assigns $16.010 million to Environment and Sustainable Resource Development and $38.986 million to Transportation.
Separating this amount from operating expense preserves the Legislature’s ability to distinguish investments in assets or infrastructure from the ongoing cost of running programs. Departments cannot treat the capital authority as a general-purpose operating increase.
Authorize non-budgetary disbursements
Section 3 provides $77.451 million for non-budgetary disbursements, all allocated in the Schedule to Enterprise and Advanced Education. This category is distinct from both ordinary departmental expense and capital investment, so the authorization does not simply increase that department’s operating budget by the full amount.
The bill does not describe the underlying transactions in the operative section. Their nature and recipients must therefore be identified in the accompanying estimates and government financial records rather than inferred from the appropriation clause alone.
Require accountability for spending
Section 4 requires an account of the due application of all money expended under the Act. The provision establishes a broad accountability obligation but does not prescribe a new audit process, deadline, reporting template or enforcement mechanism.
In practice, the section operates alongside Alberta’s existing financial administration, estimates and public-accounting systems. Its significance is control-oriented: the spending authority comes with an obligation to show that the money was applied for authorized purposes.
Assign authority to departmental votes
The Schedule converts the aggregate authorities in sections 1 through 3 into departmental votes. It assigns expense funding to Education, Enterprise and Advanced Education, Environment and Sustainable Resource Development and Municipal Affairs; capital authority to Environment and Sustainable Resource Development and Transportation; and non-budgetary authority to Enterprise and Advanced Education.
Because the Schedule fixes both the department and the spending class, it limits the practical flexibility of the appropriation. A department cannot rely on another department’s vote or shift capital authority into expense merely because the total amount authorized by the Act has not been exhausted.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, which receives $302.507 million across operating and capital categories and gains the largest increase in available spending authority.
- Transportation, which receives $38.986 million in capital authority for investments that could support transportation assets or infrastructure-related work.
- Municipal Affairs, which receives $59.318 million in additional expense authority and may use it for authorized departmental or municipal-facing expenditures.
- Education and Enterprise and Advanced Education, whose departmental votes receive additional resources for fiscal-year obligations and transactions not covered by earlier appropriations.
- Provincial suppliers, contractors, municipalities, institutions and other payment recipients, which may gain access to expenditures that could not lawfully proceed without sufficient appropriation authority.
Who Bears the Cost
- Alberta taxpayers and the General Revenue Fund, which bear the fiscal cost of the additional $533.451 million authorized for withdrawal.
- The affected departments, which must control expenditures within separate vote and spending-category ceilings rather than treating the appropriation as unrestricted funding.
- Treasury Board and Finance officials, who must monitor the classifications, reconcile the spending and support the required account of how the money was applied.
- The Legislative Assembly and public-accountability institutions, which must review whether the additional authority was used for the purposes and amounts set out in the Act.
- Future budget planners, who may face less flexibility if supplementary appropriations reflect obligations or commitments that were not fully anticipated in the original fiscal-year estimates.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances the government’s need to meet legitimate fiscal-year obligations against the Legislature’s interest in controlling public money through specific votes and categories. A broad appropriation would give departments more flexibility but weaken oversight; a highly itemized statute would improve transparency but slow the government’s ability to respond to costs and commitments that emerge during the year.
The Act provides spending authority, but it leaves much of the policy detail outside the statute. The Schedule identifies departments and broad financial categories, not the individual contracts, grants, projects or transactions behind each allocation.
A reader assessing the actual policy impact must therefore consult the Supplementary Supply Estimates and later financial reporting. The accountability clause supports that review, but it does not add a detailed disclosure regime of its own.
The classification of $77.451 million as non-budgetary disbursements is another point requiring care. That category may involve transactions that affect the government’s financial position without operating like ordinary program expenses, so treating the entire amount as service delivery spending would misstate the bill’s effect.
More generally, the Act authorizes a substantial late-year increase while preserving departmental and category-specific limits; that structure improves legislative control but can make it harder for outsiders to see the underlying policy choices from the bill alone.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.