Alberta’s Statutes Amendment Act, 2013 makes targeted changes to condominium reserve funds, official provincial emblems, the rule against perpetuities and the appointment of the Director of Surveys. It also updates dozens of statutes to reflect changes in government departments, ministerial titles and administrative responsibilities.
Most of the act is legislative maintenance rather than a new regulatory program. The substantive changes matter most to condominium corporations, owners of bare land units, parties holding long-term mineral leases, users of Alberta emblems and public bodies that rely on statutory references to particular ministers or departments.
At a Glance
What It Does
The act permits condominium corporations to use capital replacement reserve funds for certain property belonging to owners of bare land units when their bylaws require the corporation to repair and replace that property. It also excludes mineral leases from the specific perpetuities rules governing possibilities of reverter and related interests, creates a statutory provincial shield and revises numerous government references throughout Alberta legislation.
Who It Affects
Condominium corporations and bare land unit owners face the most direct private-law consequences. Mineral rights holders, businesses reproducing Alberta emblems, provincial officials, regulated bodies and organizations that serve documents on the Crown will also encounter revised statutory rules or terminology.
Why It Matters
The act illustrates how an omnibus statute can combine small operational fixes with changes that affect property rights and legal administration. The ministerial-reference provisions are largely technical, but they reduce the risk that outdated department names or office titles will create uncertainty about who holds statutory powers or must receive legal documents.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The condominium amendment expands the permitted purpose of a corporation’s capital replacement reserve fund. The fund may now cover property owned by an individual bare land unit owner when the corporation’s bylaws make the corporation responsible for repairing and replacing that property.
The act also validates earlier collections and expenditures for that purpose, but only if they occurred after the relevant bylaw took effect and would have complied with the new rule. This gives statutory support to arrangements that may otherwise have rested on an uncertain reading of the existing Act.
The changes to Alberta’s emblems legislation separate the provincial shield from the broader concept of Alberta’s armorial bearings and formally designate the shield as a provincial emblem. They also give the responsible minister regulation-making authority over the reproduction, use and display of official emblems or portions of them.
Contravening a regulation remains an offence punishable by a fine of up to $1,000, while the enforcement provision continues to allow the minister to seek an injunction against unauthorized use.The Perpetuities Act receives a targeted property-law clarification. Its existing 40-year framework for possibilities of reverter, resulting trusts and rights of re-entry does not apply to a mineral lease, regardless of whether the lease predates or follows the amendment.
The definition of mineral lease covers a lease of minerals in the nature of a profit à prendre for a term of uncertain duration, and the definition of minerals expressly reaches a broad range of substances, including petroleum, natural gas, coal, oil sands, metals, salts, sand, gravel and clay.The act also changes the appointment language for the Director of Surveys. Instead of requiring the minister to designate an employee under the minister’s administration who is a surveyor, the provision simply requires the minister to designate a surveyor.
The remaining provisions update statutory references to Alberta’s current organizational structure, including the President of Treasury Board and Minister of Finance, the Minister of Justice and Solicitor General, the Minister of Health, and renamed departments such as Treasury Board and Finance, Health, Human Services, and Enterprise and Advanced Education.
The Five Things You Need to Know
A condominium corporation may use its capital replacement reserve fund for an owner’s bare land unit property when a bylaw requires the corporation to repair and replace that property. The act also validates qualifying historical collections and expenditures made after the bylaw took effect.
The provincial shield of Alberta becomes a separately recognized official emblem. Regulations may govern the reproduction, use or display of an official emblem or any portion of one, with contraventions carrying a fine of up to $1,000.
A mineral lease is excluded from the specific section 19 perpetuities rules, whether the lease was made before or after the amendment. The act defines such a lease as a mineral profit à prendre for a term of uncertain duration.
The Director of Surveys must be a surveyor, but the statute no longer requires that person to be an employee under the minister’s administration.
The act changes statutory references across dozens of enactments, including provisions governing service on the Crown, public-sector pensions, health professions, environmental regulation, courts, municipalities and financial administration.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Expands condominium reserve-fund authority
Section 1 adds property belonging to an owner of a bare land unit to the list of assets that a condominium corporation may fund through its capital replacement reserve, but only where the corporation’s bylaws make it responsible for repair and replacement. This aligns the reserve-fund power with condominium developments in which infrastructure or other property remains individually owned while the corporation undertakes the maintenance obligation.
The transitional rule is important. It validates earlier collections and expenditures if the bylaw was already in force and the conduct would have satisfied the amended provision. The protection is conditional rather than blanket: it does not validate activity that would fail the new statutory test.
Recognizes the provincial shield and regulates emblem use
Section 2 identifies the provincial shield as a distinct official emblem and makes related terminology consistent across the Emblems of Alberta Act. The minister may regulate the reproduction, use and display of an official emblem or any portion of one, extending the regulatory framework beyond complete emblems.
The offence provision carries a maximum fine of $1,000 for violating a regulation. The act also preserves injunction-based enforcement, giving the minister a civil remedy to stop unauthorized use even where a prosecution has not occurred.
Excludes mineral leases from the specified perpetuities rule
Section 3 defines minerals broadly and identifies a mineral lease as a lease of minerals in the nature of a profit à prendre for an uncertain term. It then states that section 19 of the Perpetuities Act does not apply to such leases, whether created before or after the amendment.
The change addresses the interaction between long-duration mineral arrangements and rules designed to prevent certain future interests from remaining unresolved indefinitely. Its practical reach depends on whether an instrument qualifies as a mineral lease rather than another form of property interest, making the characterization of the transaction significant.
Simplifies appointment of the Director of Surveys
Section 4 removes the requirement that the minister appoint an employee within the minister’s administration. The statute instead requires the minister to designate a surveyor, broadening the apparent pool of eligible appointees while preserving the professional qualification.
Updates departmental and ministerial titles
These provisions revise references in agricultural, health-care, housing, research, school-board and wheat-and-barley legislation. The changes reflect reorganized portfolios, including the transition to the President of Treasury Board and Minister of Finance and the renaming of departments and ministries.
For regulated organizations, the amendments primarily affect statutory interpretation and administrative correspondence rather than substantive duties. They help ensure that powers, approvals and reporting lines continue to point to the intended office after a cabinet or department reorganization.
Aligns individual statutes with the new government structure
This group makes corresponding amendments across statutes covering animal health, auditing, Crown recovery, health professions, hospitals, courts, municipalities, public utilities, traffic safety and other areas. It changes outdated references to departments and offices and, in the Proceedings Against the Crown Act, specifies who may receive service on behalf of the Crown: the Minister or Deputy Minister of Justice, or a barrister or solicitor employed in that department.
The provisions are mostly technical, but they have practical value. A current statutory title can determine whether a notice, approval, delegation or court document reaches the legally designated recipient, particularly when legislation assigns a function to a named minister rather than to the government generally.
Performs bulk terminology corrections
Sections 32 through 37 apply standardized replacements across extensive schedules of statutes. They update references to the finance, justice, health and other departments, replace references to obsolete deputy-minister titles, and account for the separation or consolidation of departmental responsibilities.
Because the amendments operate through lists of enactments and sections, their effect is cumulative rather than concentrated in one policy area. Compliance teams, government counsel and organizations that use statutory forms or templates may need to update references even where the underlying legal obligation remains unchanged.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Bare land condominium corporations that already collect reserve contributions for owner-owned property benefit from clearer statutory authority and a limited validation of past collections and expenditures.
- Bare land unit owners benefit from a clearer framework for allocating repair and replacement responsibilities through condominium bylaws and reserve funds.
- Mineral rights lessors and lessees gain greater certainty that qualifying uncertain-term mineral leases are not subject to the specified section 19 perpetuities regime.
- Businesses, institutions and public bodies that use Alberta symbols receive clearer terminology distinguishing the provincial shield from the broader armorial bearings, although regulated uses remain subject to ministerial rules.
- Provincial departments, agencies and regulated organizations benefit from current statutory names that reduce ambiguity in delegations, approvals, notices and interdepartmental responsibilities.
Who Bears the Cost
- Condominium corporations may need to review reserve studies, budgets and bylaws to determine whether owner-owned bare land property falls within their repair and replacement obligations.
- Bare land unit owners may bear higher condominium contributions or indirect costs when a corporation’s bylaws make it responsible for maintaining property that the owners individually own.
- Businesses and organizations that reproduce or display Alberta emblems may face additional compliance work and potential fines or injunctions if their practices do not comply with regulations.
- Government departments, public bodies and regulated entities may need to revise contracts, forms, policies, legal notices and internal systems to reflect the updated ministerial and departmental titles.
- Legal practitioners and parties structuring mineral interests may face additional classification questions when determining whether an arrangement is a qualifying mineral lease or another property interest subject to different rules.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The act seeks to make legal administration match real-world government structures and property practices, but precision in one area can create uncertainty in another. Clear authority for condominium reserve spending and long-term mineral arrangements reduces immediate ambiguity, while the need to classify specific bylaws, leases and emblem uses leaves room for disputes at the boundaries of the new rules.
The condominium amendment solves a practical mismatch between ownership and maintenance. A corporation can be responsible under its bylaws for property that belongs to an individual owner, but using collective reserve funds for that property raises allocation and governance questions.
The act confirms the funding power without resolving every dispute about whether a particular bylaw actually imposes the required repair obligation, how costs should be shared, or whether a reserve contribution is proportionate to the benefit received.
The mineral-lease exclusion creates certainty for a sector that relies on long-lived property arrangements, but it also shifts importance to legal characterization. The act does not provide a detailed test for every uncertain-term mineral instrument.
Parties may therefore still dispute whether a document is a mineral lease, a profit à prendre, a determinable interest or another arrangement. The emblem provisions present a smaller but similar issue: regulation of portions of official emblems gives the government flexibility, while users must determine how much of a design is protected and what future regulations permit.
The bulk title changes are designed to prevent administrative friction, not to change policy. Even so, omnibus terminology corrections can create implementation risk if organizations update some references but miss others, or if older documents continue to use superseded titles.
The practical effect is therefore partly legal and partly operational: the statute changes the words in the legislation, but institutions must change the systems and habits that depend on those words.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.