Alberta’s Bill 31 replaces the Fair Trading Act with the Consumer Protection Act and adds targeted rules for recurring consumer contracts, ticket resale, automotive sales and repairs, high-cost credit, online reviews and consumer lawsuits. It also requires veterinarians to disclose and obtain authorization for specified fees and services, subject to regulations.
The bill’s practical effect is to move several consumer-protection expectations from general standards into detailed statutory duties. Many of the operative details—including notice formats, exemptions, warranties, licensing rules and fee categories—depend on regulations, so regulated businesses would need to track both the Act and its subordinate rules.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill restricts unilateral changes to substantive terms in ongoing consumer transactions, including price and renewal provisions. It requires refunds in specified ticket-sale failures, prohibits software that circumvents ticket-purchasing controls, licenses high-cost credit businesses, and creates disclosure, authorization and recordkeeping powers for automotive and veterinary services.
Who It Affects
The rules apply to suppliers offering recurring goods or services, primary and secondary ticket sellers, ticketing platforms, automotive businesses, lenders offering credit at rates of 32% or more, and registered veterinarians. Consumers, small commercial fleets, ticket purchasers and owners of domestic animals receive corresponding protections or remedies.
Why It Matters
The bill combines several sector-specific compliance regimes with broader enforcement tools, including direct consumer actions, publication of enforcement information and protections for reviews and complaints. Its reliance on future regulations gives the executive branch substantial control over the final operational requirements.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill renames Alberta’s Fair Trading Act as the Consumer Protection Act and adds a statutory Consumer Bill of Rights. The rights document must be publicly available, but it is informational rather than independently enforceable: failing to follow it does not itself create a lawsuit, offence or administrative proceeding.
The bill also gives the Minister broader authority to define terms used in the Act and its regulations.
For ongoing consumer transactions, suppliers cannot change a substantive term—such as price, renewal, or contract duration—unless the consumer expressly consents within the permitted period or the contract already authorizes the change and the supplier provides written notice. That notice must identify each proposed change, state when it takes effect, explain the total financial impact of a cost change, and tell the consumer how to cancel without charge.
The bill makes a non-compliant change ineffective and requires suppliers to provide the amended agreement within 30 days of a request.The bill adds protections in ticket markets by requiring secondary sellers and secondary ticketing platforms to provide full refunds for cancelled events, counterfeit or misdescribed tickets, denied admission and tickets cancelled because of prohibited purchasing software. It prohibits software intended to bypass security, access, fairness or ticket-quantity controls, while preserving exceptions for security research, investigations and prescribed educational purposes.
Primary sellers must use reasonable diligence to detect such purchases and cancel affected tickets.Several regulated industries receive new rule-making frameworks. Automotive businesses must follow future requirements for sales disclosures, standard bills of sale, repair warranties, estimates and customer authorization.
High-cost credit businesses—defined around a rate of at least 32%, excluding payday loans—must obtain licences and comply with disclosure and prescribed contract requirements. Veterinarians must disclose and obtain authorization for prescribed fees and services, and may advertise service fees only through information that is true, objective, complete, accurate, factual, verifiable and not misleading.Finally, the bill expands private and public accountability.
Consumers may sue suppliers and responsible principals, directors, managers, employees or agents for losses caused by statutory or regulatory breaches, with possible damages, punitive awards, restitution, rescission, injunctions and specific performance. The Minister or Director may publish enforcement and licensing information, while businesses cannot suppress consumer reviews and people receive protection for good-faith complaints, investigative assistance and related claims.
The Five Things You Need to Know
A supplier’s unilateral change to a substantive term is ineffective if it does not comply with the Act or regulations. Substantive terms include price and renewal or extension provisions, plus any terms later designated by regulation.
A notice of an authorized contract change must generally arrive at least 60 days, but no more than 120 days, before the change takes effect. Consumers must receive a cost-free cancellation option for at least 60 days after receiving the notice.
A secondary ticket seller or ticketing platform must provide a full refund for a cancelled event, counterfeit or misdescribed ticket, denied admission, or a ticket cancelled because prohibited purchasing software was used.
High-cost credit means a credit agreement, including a lease but excluding a payday loan, with a rate of 32% or more as calculated under the regulations. Operators need a licence and may face separate licensing requirements for multiple locations.
A consumer action can target not only the supplier but also a principal, director, manager, employee or agent who engaged in or acquiesced in the breach that caused the loss. Available relief includes punitive or exemplary damages, restitution, rescission and injunctions.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
New consumer rights and recurring-contract controls
The bill changes the statute’s name, adds a non-enforceable Consumer Bill of Rights and broadens the Minister’s power to define statutory terms. Its central recurring-contract rule covers ongoing supplies of goods or services and treats price, renewal and duration provisions as substantive terms.
A supplier can change those terms only with recent express consent or a contract-based notice process. The process requires detailed written disclosure and a no-cost cancellation right; a breach voids the change rather than merely exposing the supplier to a penalty.
Consumer access to court over arbitration
The bill generally prevents suppliers from enforcing arbitration clauses in consumer transactions and declares those clauses void and unenforceable. The exceptions are narrow: the parties may agree to arbitration after a dispute arises, or the original agreement may let the consumer choose between arbitration and court after the dispute arises.
This shifts control over dispute resolution toward consumers and prevents a supplier from using a pre-dispute contract term to remove court access.
Ticket sales, resale and purchasing software
The new ticket provisions impose refund duties on secondary sellers and secondary ticketing platforms and prohibit software designed to defeat ticket-business security, access, fairness or purchase-limit controls. The law does not treat all automated software as prohibited; it excludes specified investigative, security-research and educational uses.
Primary sellers must take reasonable steps to detect prohibited purchases and cancel tickets they reasonably believe were acquired that way. Ticket purchasers and ticket businesses may seek restitution, damages, punitive damages, injunctions and other relief, although punitive damages are unavailable where the defendant took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence.
Automotive sales and repair requirements
The bill creates a dedicated automotive consumer regime covering individuals and businesses with commercial fleets of five or fewer vehicles. Automotive sales operators must provide prescribed disclosures and use a standard bill of sale; repair operators must provide prescribed warranties, estimates on request and obtain authorization before performing specified work.
The statute leaves the operational content to regulations, including vehicle-history disclosures, minimum warranty periods, written estimates, time-stamped authorizations and exemptions for vehicles or vehicle classes. Automotive businesses therefore face obligations that cannot be determined from the Act alone.
Licensing for high-cost credit businesses
The bill establishes licensing for businesses that offer, arrange or enter into high-cost credit agreements. The threshold is a regulated rate of 32% or more, and the definition includes leases but expressly excludes payday loans.
Licensed operators must disclose prescribed information and use prescribed agreements or contract terms. The Minister may regulate advertising, lending practices, staff qualifications, premises, financial responsibility, records, licence suspension or cancellation, and the treatment of businesses that breach the regime.
Consumer lawsuits, publication and review protections
The bill creates a direct court remedy for consumers who lose money or suffer damage because a supplier or associated responsible person breached the Act or regulations. Courts may award damages and punitive damages or order restitution, rescission, specific performance or an injunction; consumers must also consider mitigation and reasonable efforts to resolve the dispute before suing.
The bill permits publication of enforcement, complaint, licensing and conviction information, including personal information, subject to regulations and good-faith protection. It also invalidates contract terms that bar consumer reviews and protects good-faith complaints, cooperation with investigations and certain claims from liability, while withholding protection for reviews that are malicious, vexatious, harassing or made in bad faith.
Veterinary fee disclosure and authorization
Veterinarians, partnerships and permit holders must comply with future rules requiring disclosure and client authorization for prescribed fees and veterinary services involving cats, dogs and other designated domestic animals. Regulations may define emergency or other circumstances in which the duties do not apply.
The bill also permits advertising of prescribed services and fees only when the information is truthful, objective, complete, accurate, factual, verifiable and not reasonably misleading. Regulations made under the bill prevail over conflicting veterinary council regulations or bylaws.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Consumers with subscription or recurring-service contracts gain advance notice of price and renewal changes and a statutory route to cancel without a fee.
- Ticket purchasers receive a full-refund remedy for counterfeit, misdescribed, unusable or event-cancelled tickets and a potential damages action over prohibited ticket-buying software.
- Small businesses operating commercial fleets of five or fewer vehicles receive consumer-style protections when buying or repairing vehicles for business use.
- Borrowers dealing with high-cost lenders receive licensing, disclosure and standardized-contract protections, although the details depend on regulations.
- Pet owners gain a right to receive and authorize specified veterinary fees and services before treatment is performed, subject to prescribed exceptions.
- Consumers and other complainants can publish good-faith reviews or report supplier conduct without facing contractual suppression or certain retaliatory claims.
Who Bears the Cost
- Suppliers with recurring contracts must redesign notices, consent workflows, cancellation processes and records, and may lose revenue from fee-free cancellations.
- Secondary ticket sellers and ticketing platforms bear refund exposure and may need systems to verify ticket descriptions, authenticity and admission rights.
- Primary ticket sellers must invest in detection controls and cancel tickets linked to prohibited software, creating operational and customer-service burdens.
- Automotive businesses must implement regulated disclosure, billing, warranty, estimate and authorization procedures, with additional requirements to be set by regulation.
- High-cost credit operators face licensing fees, location-specific licensing risks, prescribed contracts, disclosure duties, recordkeeping and potential advertising or lending restrictions.
- Veterinary practices may need new pricing, consent and advertising systems and may face conflicts between provincial regulations and professional council rules.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill seeks to give consumers simple, usable protections while delegating the details to regulations and imposing broad remedies. That flexibility can tailor rules to different industries, but it also makes compliance less predictable and shifts important policy choices away from the statute itself. The central trade-off is between fast, sector-specific consumer protection and the certainty businesses need to price, contract and operate consistently.
The bill creates meaningful statutory duties but leaves much of their practical scope unfinished. Regulations will determine which contract terms count as substantive, how notices are delivered and deemed received, how high-cost rates are calculated, which automotive and veterinary services trigger disclosure or authorization, and what exemptions apply.
Businesses cannot establish a complete compliance program from the primary legislation alone.
The enforcement design is unusually broad. Consumers can pursue not only contractual remedies but also statutory damages, punitive awards, rescission and injunctions, while regulators can publish information about complaints, investigations, penalties and licensing.
The responsible-person liability provision may widen litigation risk beyond the corporate supplier, although a claimant still must connect the individual’s conduct or acquiescence to the loss.
Several protections depend on judgment calls. Ticket businesses must use reasonable diligence to detect prohibited software without turning legitimate security research into a violation.
Review protections preserve criticism but exclude bad-faith communications, leaving disputes over motive and factual basis. The bill also creates a potential compliance hierarchy in veterinary medicine by allowing provincial regulations to prevail over professional council rules, which may require careful reconciliation in practice.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.