Bill 29 amends multiple Alberta statutes to carve out a new category called “preventative health testing services,” let regulated health professionals deliver those services on a self‑referral basis, and give the Minister power to specify which goods and services fit the category and to set benefit rates by ministerial order. The bill also makes the provincial health plan the payor of last resort for those services, requires residents to seek insurer payment first, and caps any Plan payment at the unpaid portion of a claim and at the minister‑set rate.
Separately, the bill adds a new written‑order regime in the Pharmacy and Drug Act that allows certain Schedule 1 drugs to be sold directly to regulated health professionals under written orders determined by the Minister, and it updates governance, terminology and administrative provisions across health statutes (including new disclosure, recordkeeping and severance‑recovery rules). For compliance officers and insurers this is primarily about coordinating payer responsibilities and new recordkeeping; for regulators and providers it creates new scope‑of‑practice and standards issues driven largely by ministerial discretion rather than conventional regulation‑making.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill creates a Minister‑defined class called “preventative health testing services,” authorizes self‑referrals to regulated members, makes the Plan the payor of last resort for those services, and empowers the Minister to set service lists and benefit rates by order. It also creates a written‑order pathway for selling certain Schedule 1 drugs to regulated health professionals and tightens pharmacy recordkeeping.
Who It Affects
Patients seeking preventative testing, regulated health professionals who may offer such tests under self‑referral, private insurers (now primary payers for those claims), Alberta Health (fiscal exposure and administrative duty), pharmacies required to record written orders and sales, and provincial health agencies facing governance and severance‑related reporting obligations.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts risk and operational responsibility from patients and providers to insurers and the provincial plan in defined situations, expands provider pathways outside traditional referral chains, and relies heavily on ministerial orders (not standard regulations) to set lists, limits and rates—changing how policy, rules and oversight will be exercised in practice.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 29 adds a new, named category — “preventative health testing services” — to the Alberta Health Care Insurance Act and treats those services as a subset of extended health services. The Minister can identify what counts as preventative testing and set benefit rates by order.
Important operational changes follow: residents can access those services via a self‑referral (a concept pulled from the Health Professions Act), the Plan may collect specified information — including individually identifying health information — to decide benefit eligibility, and the usual right to appeal a denial of benefits is removed for preventative testing claims.
On payer coordination, the bill makes the Plan the payor of last resort for preventative testing. That means an insured resident must first submit a claim to their insurer; the Plan will only pay what the insurer did not cover, and any Plan payment cannot exceed the minister‑set benefit rate.
The rules explicitly limit Plan payment to the unpaid portion of the claim and to the applicable ministerial rate, giving the Minister two levers—service designation and rates—to control Plan exposure.The Pharmacy and Drug Act additions create a written‑order stream for certain Schedule 1 drugs: a regulated health professional may issue a written order so a pharmacy can sell specified drugs directly to that professional. The Minister decides which Schedule 1 drugs are permitted, maximum quantities, and any processes or restrictions, and Ministerial orders under this new part are declared not to be regulations under the Regulations Act.
The Act also expands pharmacy recordkeeping to capture written orders, transfers, and sales to regulated health professionals.The Health Professions Act changes add an “eligible individual” concept and state that a self‑referral for preventative testing is not an order or prescription; the Minister can make regulations limiting or conditioning self‑referrals. Elsewhere Bill 29 updates terminology (e.g., replacing “hospital operator” with “hospital services facility operator”), adjusts inter‑Act cross‑references (including privacy statutes), adds a new Division to recover severance pay from employees rehired by the Crown, and makes a series of administrative and transitional amendments to the Provincial Health Agencies Act and related statutes.
Many of these operational details—what services, which drugs, what limits—depend on Ministerial orders or regulations the bill authorizes rather than being set in the statute itself.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Minister may, by order under section 6.1 of the Alberta Health Care Insurance Act, specify which goods or classes of goods are “preventative health testing services” and set the rates of benefits payable for them.
The Plan is the payor of last resort for preventative health testing: the resident must submit the claim to their insurer first and the Plan will only pay the insurer’s unpaid portion, capped by the Minister’s rate (section 26.1).
Residents lose the statutory right to appeal a denial of a claim for benefits for preventative health testing services (explicit removal of appeal rights in section 4(7)).
The Pharmacy and Drug Act creates Part 3.1: regulated health professionals may issue written orders for designated Schedule 1 drugs; the Minister can exempt these orders from the Regulations Act and set quantities, processes and limits by Ministerial order (sections 29.2–29.3).
The Minister may, via regulation, authorize collection, use and disclosure of prescribed information — including individually identifying health information — to determine benefit entitlement for preventative health testing services (new section 4(5.1) cross‑referenced to section 22(25)).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Creates 'preventative health testing services' and treats them as extended health services
The bill inserts a new definition for “preventative health testing services” and retools the definition of extended health services so those tests are treated as a distinct subset (section 1(k) and (w.01)). It also adds a statutory duty that the Minister provide extended health services that qualify as preventative testing in accordance with regulations (new s.3(2.1)). Practically, the Act separates preventative testing from other extended services and signals that coverage policy for those services will be managed through orders and regulations rather than detailed statutory lists.
Minister can specify services and set benefit rates by order; regulation‑making powers adjusted
Section 6.1 empowers the Minister to specify which goods and services are preventative testing and to set benefit rates for them by order. The bill also amends regulation‑making authority to carve out how this Part and regulations may apply to preventative health testing services and to allow regulations to prescribe information used to determine eligibility (s.16(1)(r); s.17(e)). Together these changes give the Minister broad, administrable authority to define scope and price without embedding those details into primary legislation.
Data collection for claims and removal of appeal rights for preventative testing denials
The bill permits the Minister to collect, use and disclose prescribed information — including individually identifying health information — to determine whether benefits are payable (new s.4(5.1)). It also removes a resident’s right to appeal the denial of payment of claims for preventative testing services (new s.4(7)). Operationally this centralizes adjudication inside the Ministry and narrows judicial/administrative review avenues for these specific claims.
Plan pays only after insurer action and only for unpaid portion up to the ministerial rate
Section 26.1 makes explicit that if a resident can claim preventative testing benefits from an insurer, the Plan will pay only if the resident has submitted a claim to that insurer and the insurer paid none/part or denied entitlement. The Plan’s payment is limited to the unpaid portion of the claim and cannot exceed the ministerially set benefit rate. This establishes a formal insurer‑first requirement and caps provincial liability for such services.
New written‑order pathway for sale of designated Schedule 1 drugs to regulated professionals
The bill creates a new Part 3.1 allowing regulated health professionals to issue written orders that let pharmacies sell certain Schedule 1 drugs directly to those professionals. The Minister decides, by order, which Schedule 1 drugs or classes are eligible, maximum quantities, processes, limits and other requirements. The bill also requires pharmacies to keep expanded records of written orders and sales. Importantly, Ministerial orders under this Part are exempted from the Regulations Act, reducing the normal procedural checks on those determinations.
Defines 'self‑referral' and 'eligible individual' and allows regulatory limits on self‑referral
The Health Professions Act gains definitions for “self‑referral” and “eligible individual” tied to preventative health testing, and clarifies that a self‑referral for those services does not count as an order or prescription. The Minister may make regulations imposing conditions, restrictions or limitations on self‑referrals or preventative testing services, giving the government control over scope of practice and access while keeping the designation flexible.
Terminology updates, transitional timelines and new severance‑recovery regime
The bill updates terminology (for example replacing references to the Alberta Health Act with Emergency Health Services Act in certain places), adjusts transitional periods to end December 31, 2026, makes several governance tweaks (co‑chairs, oversight Minister references), and adds Division 5 (s.5.0993) allowing the Crown to recover severance pay from employees rehired by the Crown — effectively requiring rehired employees to repay some or all severance as a condition of re‑employment. These are operational changes with labour‑law and administrative implications.
Cross‑Act edits for consistency and recordkeeping changes
Bill 29 amends several other Acts to align definitions and references (e.g., Crown's Right of Recovery now references 'hospital services facility', Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act and Provincial Health Agencies Act references updated, Financial Administration Act clause repealed). The Health Insurance Premiums and Pharmacy Acts receive targeted edits to align terminology and expand pharmacy recordkeeping obligations related to written orders and sales to regulated health professionals.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Patients seeking preventative testing: They can self‑refer for services specified by the Minister, increasing direct access without needing a referral from another regulated professional.
- Regulated health professionals who meet eligibility requirements: They gain a pathway to provide and, in some cases, receive drugs via written orders and to deliver preventative testing services directly to eligible individuals, potentially expanding practice and revenue opportunities.
- Pharmacies that adapt operations: Pharmacies that implement the new recordkeeping and written‑order processes may realize additional legitimate business selling designated Schedule 1 drugs to regulated professionals.
- Insurers that already administer extended benefits: Private insurers retain the primary payer role for these services under the payor‑first rule, allowing them to continue managing utilization and benefit design before provincial involvement.
Who Bears the Cost
- Alberta Health/the Plan: The province assumes contingent fiscal exposure as a payor of last resort and will face administrative costs implementing adjudication, data collection and ministerial orders and managing capped reimbursements.
- Private insurers: They must process claims first and see increased administrative interaction with the Plan; they also remain exposed to utilization changes if self‑referral increases demand for covered tests.
- Pharmacies and regulated health professionals: They face new compliance burdens—expanded records, adherence to Ministerial orders and potential inspection—and liability risks if written orders are misused.
- Regulatory bodies and the Minister’s staff: The Health Professions Act and Pharmacy Act changes require regulators to draft standards, eligibility rules and inspection frameworks, imposing workload and potential resource gaps.
- Regional health authorities, provincial health agencies and employers: The new severance‑recovery provisions and governance tweaks impose reporting and administrative responsibilities and may trigger litigation or labour relations disputes.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is access and flexibility versus oversight and fiscal control: the bill expands direct access to preventative testing and creates faster supply pathways (self‑referral and written orders) to give patients and providers more choice, while shifting cost control and many definitional choices to ministerial discretion—which reduces procedural safeguards, complicates coordination with private insurers, and exposes the Plan and administrators to uncertain financial and regulatory risk.
The bill centralizes substantive policy choices—what tests count, which drugs can be sold by written order, and how much the Plan pays—into Ministerial orders rather than detailed statutory rules or the ordinary regulation process. That increases the government’s operational agility but reduces parliamentary and public procedural checks (especially where the Regulations Act is explicitly not made applicable).
It raises questions about transparency, stakeholder consultation and the durability of any lists or limits the Minister sets by order.
Removing an appeal right for denied preventative testing claims and authorizing collection of individually identifying health information for benefit determination create both legal and reputational risks. Narrowing review avenues may speed adjudication but can also shift disputes into court challenges on administrative fairness or privacy grounds.
The written‑order pathway for Schedule 1 drugs increases non‑traditional dispensing flows; without clear standards and robust pharmacy oversight there is a heightened risk of diversion or off‑label distribution, particularly given that ministerial orders under Part 3.1 are not subject to the Regulations Act. Finally, the payor‑of‑last‑resort design puts insurers in front but still leaves the Province accountable for unpaid portions; the bill caps payments at ministerial rates, but aggregate fiscal exposure depends on service volumes, which are not modeled in the statutes.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.