Alberta’s Tenancies Statutes (Emergency Provisions) Amendment Act, 2020 creates temporary limits on rent increases and late-payment charges during the public-health emergency declared under Order in Council 80/2020. It applies to both residential tenancies and mobile home site tenancies, but the two regimes use different mechanisms for late-payment protections.
The Act also validates ministerial orders and the Late Payment Fees and Penalties Regulation, AR 55/2020. Those validation provisions are designed to preserve actions already taken under emergency authority and to remove procedural uncertainty around the regulation’s making and publication.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act prevents landlords from increasing rent during the emergency period in specified circumstances. It also freezes the rent level when a tenancy ends and the parties enter into a new agreement for the same premises or mobile home site. For mobile home sites, it directly voids late fees and penalties during the statutory period; for residential tenancies, it authorizes regulations addressing those charges and validates the existing regulation.
Who It Affects
Residential landlords and tenants, mobile home park operators and site tenants, and officials responsible for administering Alberta’s tenancy statutes are directly affected. Landlords must account for restrictions on rent notices, renewal agreements, late-payment charges, and the collection of certain charges after the protected period ends.
Why It Matters
The Act converts emergency measures into statutory protections with retroactive effect to March 27, 2020. It also illustrates a two-track legislative approach: direct substantive limits for mobile home sites, alongside regulation-making authority and validation for the residential tenancy system.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act amends Alberta’s Mobile Home Sites Tenancies Act and Residential Tenancies Act in parallel. Under both statutes, if a tenancy ends on or after March 27, 2020 and the same landlord and tenant enter a new agreement for the same site or premises before the emergency end date, the new rent cannot exceed the rent under the previous agreement for that period.
The rule addresses a potential workaround in which a landlord could end or replace an agreement and impose a higher rent during the emergency.
The Act separately delays certain rent increases already in progress. If the landlord gave the required written notice and the applicable notice period would expire between March 27, 2020 and the emergency end date, the landlord cannot increase the rent until after that date.
The emergency end date is tied to the lapse or termination of the public-health emergency under Order in Council 80/2020, although regulations may prescribe a different date.For mobile home site tenancies, the Act directly prohibits landlords from charging fees or penalties for late payment or non-payment of rent. The prohibition covers agreements in force on April 1, 2020 and agreements entered into between April 1 and the statutory end date, defined as June 30, 2020 unless regulations prescribe another date.
It also voids contractual terms that authorize those charges and prevents landlords from enforcing or collecting charges after the protected period when the charges relate to the protected period.The residential tenancy amendments take a different route for late-payment charges. They expand the minister’s regulation-making authority to prohibit fees and penalties, void contractual provisions, and address enforcement or collection.
The Act separately validates AR 55/2020, declaring the regulation valid from the date it was made and treating it as exempt from the filing-related requirement in section 3(5) of the Regulations Act. The Act also validates specified ministerial orders affecting both tenancy statutes, including actions taken under or in reliance on those orders.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The rent-freeze provisions operate from March 27, 2020, even though the Act amends the statutes afterward.
A replacement agreement for the same residential premises or mobile home site must use the prior rent until the applicable emergency end date.
The mobile home site late-fee ban covers agreements in effect on April 1, 2020 and agreements entered into through the prescribed end date, initially June 30, 2020.
For mobile home sites, the Act voids not only late-fee terms but also later enforcement or collection of charges attributable to the protected period.
The Act validates AR 55/2020 as though it had been properly published, and validates specified actions under Ministerial Orders SA:004/2020 and SA:006/2020.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Emergency rent and late-fee rules for mobile home sites
Section 1 adds sections 16.1 and 24.1 to the Mobile Home Sites Tenancies Act. Section 16.1 prevents a rent increase on a replacement agreement for the same site and pauses an already-noticed increase when the notice period expires during the emergency. The protection lasts until the public-health emergency ends, unless regulations prescribe another date.
Section 24.1 is more prescriptive about late payments. It applies to defined existing and newly entered agreements, invalidates late-fee and penalty clauses for the protected period, and blocks collection after that period for charges arising during it. This gives mobile home site tenants a statutory defence against both immediate charges and later recovery efforts.
Regulation-making authority and retroactive effect
The amendments expand the minister’s authority to prescribe alternative end dates for the mobile home site rent and late-fee provisions. That flexibility allows the emergency periods to be adjusted by regulation rather than requiring another Act of the Legislature.
The section takes effect on March 27, 2020. The retroactive date is significant because it reaches rent notices, replacement agreements, and other conduct occurring before enactment.
Validation of mobile home tenancy ministerial orders
Section 2 validates everything done under or in reliance on Ministerial Order SA:004/2020 and the portions of Ministerial Order SA:006/2020 relating to the Mobile Home Sites Tenancies Act. The provision treats those actions as valid for all purposes, addressing possible objections to the orders’ legal authority or operation.
For landlords and tenants, the practical effect is to reduce the risk that past emergency administration will be unwound because an order was later found procedurally or substantively defective.
Emergency rent protections for residential tenancies
Section 3 adds section 14.1 to the Residential Tenancies Act. It mirrors the mobile home site rules by limiting rent under replacement agreements for the same premises and delaying increases where a previously delivered notice would otherwise take effect during the emergency period.
The section also expands regulation-making powers concerning residential late-payment fees and penalties. Unlike the mobile home site provision, the text does not itself set out the full residential late-fee prohibition; it authorizes regulations to prohibit charges, void contractual terms, and address enforcement or collection.
Validation of residential tenancy ministerial orders
Section 4 validates everything done under or in reliance on Ministerial Order SA:006/2020 insofar as it concerns the Residential Tenancies Act. This protects actions taken under the emergency order from being invalidated solely because of a challenge to the order’s legal foundation.
Validation of the late-payment regulation
Section 5 validates the Late Payment Fees and Penalties Regulation, AR 55/2020, from the date it was made and validates everything done under or in reliance on it. It further declares that the regulation was not subject to section 3(5) of the Regulations Act and is as valid against all persons as if it had been published.
The provision is aimed at legal certainty. It does not merely preserve future operation; it retrospectively protects the regulation’s status and prior reliance on it, including against publication-related objections.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Residential tenants facing pandemic-related income disruption benefit from delayed rent increases and the protection against rent being raised through a replacement agreement for the same premises.
- Mobile home site tenants receive a direct statutory shield against late fees, penalties, and later collection of charges tied to the protected period.
- Tenants who had already received a rent-increase notice benefit when the notice period would have expired during the emergency, because the increase cannot take effect until afterward.
- Landlords and property managers gain clearer statutory rules for administering emergency agreements and charges, reducing uncertainty about whether ministerial orders and AR 55/2020 remain operative.
- Government administrators benefit from validation clauses that preserve emergency actions and reduce the risk of retroactive disruption to tenancy administration.
Who Bears the Cost
- Residential landlords may have to defer scheduled rent increases and absorb additional administrative work to identify affected agreements and notice periods.
- Mobile home park operators cannot impose or later collect late fees or penalties attributable to the protected period, even where their agreements otherwise authorize those charges.
- Property managers and accounting teams must distinguish prohibited emergency-period charges from later charges and maintain records showing the relevant agreement, date, and rent amount.
- Tenants who remain unable to pay rent are protected from specified fees and penalties but are not generally relieved of the underlying rent obligation, leaving arrears and collection issues to be resolved under the applicable rules.
- The provincial administration bears implementation and enforcement costs associated with revised regulations, alternative end dates, and the retroactive validation of emergency measures.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The Act tries to keep tenants from facing higher housing costs or punitive charges during an emergency without eliminating the basic rent obligation or permanently rewriting private tenancy agreements. That protects short-term housing stability, but it shifts financial pressure toward landlords and may defer rather than resolve the underlying arrears and cash-flow problems.
The Act draws an important line between rent and rent-related charges. It freezes or delays increases but does not, on its face, cancel the underlying obligation to pay rent.
A tenant may therefore avoid a late fee while still accumulating unpaid rent, creating a later arrears problem that the Act does not comprehensively resolve.
The two statutes also do not receive identical treatment. The mobile home provisions directly prohibit and void late fees and penalties, while the residential provisions rely on regulation-making authority and a separate validation of AR 55/2020.
That structure may simplify emergency action, but it makes the residential regime more dependent on the precise content, validity, and interpretation of the regulation.
The broad validation clauses protect past decisions and reliance, but they also limit the practical consequences of procedural challenges to emergency orders and regulations. Questions about notice, retroactivity, the calculation of the protected period, and the treatment of agreements that changed for reasons other than rent remain important for landlords and tenants applying the rules to individual files.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.