Alberta’s Bill 26 replaces the Constitutional Referendum Act with a broader Referendum Act. It allows the Lieutenant Governor in Council to order referendums on matters beyond constitutional questions, including stand-alone votes, votes held with provincial or local elections, and votes conducted by mail-in ballot.
The bill also builds a dedicated regulatory regime around referendum campaigns. It applies election-finance rules to referendum advertising, caps registered third-party spending at $500,000 subject to indexation, restricts who may contribute, requires periodic and post-vote disclosure, and limits certain government advertising during the referendum period.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes the Lieutenant Governor in Council to order a referendum on any matter of public interest or concern, subject to specified requirements in the order. The order must identify the question, voting areas, election date or context, whether the result is binding, and whether voting will occur by mail-in ballot. It creates Part 6.12 of the Election Finances and Contributions Disclosure Act to regulate third-party referendum advertising, including registration, contributions, spending, identification, reporting and late-filing consequences.
Who It Affects
The framework directly affects Alberta voters, the provincial government, third parties campaigning for or against referendum questions, trade unions, employee organizations, corporations, charities and advocacy groups. It also assigns operational and enforcement duties to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Election Commissioner. Departments and provincial corporations face restrictions on advertising about programs or activities connected to the referendum subject matter during the defined referendum period.
Why It Matters
The bill turns referendums from a largely constitutional mechanism into a general policy tool that the executive can deploy on matters of public concern. It also makes referendum campaigns subject to a standalone financial-compliance regime rather than leaving them to ordinary political advertising rules. The result is a more usable referendum process, but one that gives cabinet substantial control over the question, electorate, geography, timing and legal effect of each vote.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill changes the governing statute’s name and scope. A referendum no longer needs to concern a constitutional question or another question specifically identified in the existing Act.
Under new section 5.1, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may order a referendum whenever it considers public opinion desirable on a matter of public interest or concern. The order must specify the question or questions, the areas of Alberta covered, the voting arrangement, and whether the outcome will bind the government that initiated the referendum.
The bill separates political choice from legal effect. A referendum order may state that the result is binding, but the bill does not make every referendum binding automatically.
If a binding referendum receives a majority vote on the same side of the question, the initiating government must take steps it considers necessary or advisable, as soon as practicable, to implement the result within its competence. That language preserves judgment about the means of implementation and does not authorize action outside provincial jurisdiction.Voting can occur alongside a provincial general election, as a stand-alone referendum, or alongside general elections under the Local Authorities Election Act.
The bill also permits a stand-alone referendum to use mail-in ballots, subject to regulations. Regulations may modify or supplement the Election Act and its procedures, giving the executive considerable flexibility to adapt election administration to a referendum’s format.The financial rules create a campaign-accounting system tailored to referendum advertising.
A third party must use a referendum advertising account, appoint a chief financial officer, obtain and record permitted contributions, identify its advertising, and file weekly contribution reports during the referendum advertising period. A third party that spends $350,000 or more must file audited financial statements, while failure to meet filing deadlines can trigger a $500 fee, registration consequences and potential court enforcement.
Unspent funds must be returned, donated to a registered charity or remitted to the Chief Electoral Officer for deposit into the General Revenue Fund.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Lieutenant Governor in Council decides whether a non-constitutional referendum will be held and must specify its question, voting areas, format, timing and whether the result is binding.
A registered third party cannot incur more than $500,000 in referendum advertising expenses during a referendum advertising period, subject to inflation adjustment under section 41.5.
Contributions from people ordinarily resident outside Alberta, prohibited corporations, non-Alberta unions or employee organizations, registered charities and certain groups are barred.
Third parties must file weekly contribution reports during the referendum advertising period and a comprehensive return within six months after polling day; spending of at least $350,000 also requires an audit.
Government departments and provincial corporations generally cannot publish referendum-related information with a disproportionate impact on voters during the referendum period, subject to specified public-interest and legislative exceptions.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Rename the statute and add the new referendum authority
These provisions rename the Constitutional Referendum Act as the Referendum Act and update its chapter designation. They also adjust the existing voting and binding-result language so it applies to referendums ordered under the new non-constitutional referendum power.
The practical change is structural but significant: the statute no longer presents referendums as limited to constitutional matters. It becomes the general legislative home for provincial referendums.
Let cabinet order policy referendums
New section 5.1 allows the Lieutenant Governor in Council to order a referendum on any matter of public interest or concern other than questions already covered by sections 1 or 2. The order controls the question, geographic scope, relationship to provincial or local elections, binding status and mail-in-ballot option.
Section 5.2 makes a specified-as-binding result binding when a majority of valid ballots answer the question the same way. The initiating government must then take steps it considers necessary or advisable within provincial competence. Section 5.3 authorizes mail-in voting for a stand-alone referendum, subject to regulations.
Integrate referendums with election administration
These amendments apply the Election Act or the Local Authorities Election Act, with modifications, depending on how the referendum is held. A referendum held with local-authority elections receives a specific cross-reference to the Election Act’s applicable voting provisions.
The bill also confirms that the Election Finances and Contributions Disclosure Act applies to every referendum, including stand-alone votes and votes held with provincial or local elections. Regulation-making authority is expanded so the government can specify which election rules apply, differ from them or supplement them, including for mail-in-ballot referendums.
Update taxpayer-protection referendum references
The Alberta Taxpayer Protection Act is amended to refer to the renamed Referendum Act and to the relevant provisions governing referendum administration. The amendment preserves the relationship between taxpayer-protection votes and the general referendum framework while removing obsolete references to the former statute title.
This is primarily a coordination amendment, but it prevents taxpayer-protection referendums from operating under cross-references to a repealed or renamed statutory scheme.
Restrict referendum-related government advertising
The Election Act gains a definition of “referendum period” and a restriction on departments and provincial corporations publishing information about programs or activities related to the referendum subject matter when the communication has a disproportionate impact on voters in affected areas.
The restriction does not cover communications required by law, urgent public-health or safety information, certain continuing programs, procurement or employment notices, or matters before the Legislative Assembly such as a budget or bill. The timing differs depending on whether the referendum accompanies a provincial election, stands alone or accompanies local-authority elections.
Create referendum campaign-finance rules
Section 11 adds Part 6.12 to the Election Finances and Contributions Disclosure Act. The new Part defines referendum advertising, contributions, expenses, third parties and the advertising period; requires registration and dedicated accounts; limits spending; prohibits circumvention and collusion; and restricts contributions from specified out-of-province, prohibited or institutional sources.
It also regulates fundraising, loans, anonymous contributions, in-kind contributions and volunteer services. Advertising must identify its sponsor and authorization status, while the Chief Electoral Officer may issue guidelines and direct non-compliant advertising to be removed or discontinued.
Require disclosure, audits and disposition of funds
Registered third parties must file weekly contribution reports, a post-referendum advertising return and, when expenses reach $350,000, an audited financial statement. The return must include financial information, contributors above the applicable disclosure threshold, advertising details and the spending-limit report.
A $500 late filing fee applies to required reports and returns, with joint and several liability for the third party and its chief financial officer. Unspent campaign funds cannot remain indefinitely in the referendum account: they must be returned to contributors, donated to a registered charity or paid to the Chief Electoral Officer for the General Revenue Fund.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Alberta voters, who gain a formal mechanism for voting on policy questions beyond the constitutional and taxpayer-protection subjects previously covered by the statute.
- The Alberta government, which gains discretion to choose the referendum question, affected geographic areas, election setting, voting method and whether the outcome will be binding.
- Advocacy groups and organized campaigners, who receive a defined legal pathway for referendum advertising, fundraising, campaign accounts and public disclosure.
- The Chief Electoral Officer, who receives explicit authority to administer referendum finance rules, issue compliance guidelines, investigate financial affairs and address non-compliant advertising.
- Residents in jurisdictions where a referendum is held alongside a local-authority election, who can participate through an election-linked process rather than a separate provincial voting event.
Who Bears the Cost
- Third parties campaigning on referendum questions, which must register when required, appoint a chief financial officer, use a dedicated account, track in-kind support and comply with spending and reporting deadlines.
- Corporations, trade unions, employee organizations and advocacy groups, which face contribution-source restrictions and may need to redesign fundraising and internal allocation practices to document who actually provided campaign funds.
- The Chief Electoral Officer and election administrators, which must administer a new campaign-finance regime, review reports, issue guidance, monitor advertising and handle mail-in-ballot or election-concurrent procedures.
- Provincial departments and corporations, which lose flexibility to promote programs or activities connected to the referendum subject matter during the referendum period unless an exception applies.
- Chief financial officers of registered third parties, who bear personal joint and several liability for late filing fees and continuing responsibility for authorizing expenses and accepting contributions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill makes direct public voting easier to use while leaving the government that calls the referendum substantial control over its design and implementation. That combination can improve administrative flexibility, but it also creates a tension between treating the referendum as a meaningful expression of public direction and preserving executive discretion over the question, electorate, campaign environment and response.
The bill gives the executive control over the architecture of each referendum. Cabinet can decide not only whether to ask a question but also how broadly it applies geographically, whether the result binds the government and whether voters use a stand-alone or election-linked process.
The implementation duty for a binding result remains qualified by the government’s view of what is necessary or advisable and by provincial competence, leaving room for disputes about what it means to implement a popular vote.
The campaign-finance regime is detailed, but its compliance burden is substantial. The $500,000 spending ceiling operates alongside registration thresholds, weekly reporting, disclosure thresholds, account controls, audit requirements and anti-collusion rules.
Groups must distinguish genuine volunteer activity and member-funded contributions from reportable financial support, while digital and event-based campaigning may raise difficult classification questions under the definition of referendum advertising.
The government-advertising restriction also depends on judgment. Determining whether information has a “disproportionate impact” on voters and whether a communication is a continuation of an ongoing program can be fact-specific.
The public-health, legislative and procurement exceptions are practical, but they may require administrators to draw difficult lines between neutral public information and communications that could influence a referendum.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.