Alberta’s Bill 47 enacts a new Occupational Health and Safety Act, creates a $100,000 survivor benefit for eligible first responders and correctional officers, and substantially restructures the Workers’ Compensation Act. The package changes who carries workplace-safety obligations, how appeals proceed, how the province handles medical and occupational-disease issues, and how employers and workers interact during rehabilitation and return to work.
For employers, the bill expands formal duties across owners, prime contractors, staffing agencies, suppliers and service providers, while introducing administrative penalties of up to $10,000 per incident or continuing day and offence fines reaching $1 million. For workers, it preserves the right to refuse dangerous work, changes compensation and appeal mechanisms, adds cooperation and mitigation duties, and makes several previously mandatory programs or benefits discretionary.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill replaces Alberta’s 2017 Occupational Health and Safety Act with a new statute covering workplace duties, safety committees, refusal of dangerous work, inspections, orders, penalties and appeals. It also creates the Heroes’ Compensation Act and rewrites major parts of the Workers’ Compensation Act, including review rights, occupational-disease administration, compensation calculations and rehabilitation duties.
Who It Affects
The obligations reach employers, supervisors, workers, owners, prime contractors, contracting employers, temporary staffing agencies, suppliers and occupational-health service providers. Workers’ compensation changes directly affect injured workers, dependants, employers assessed by the Workers’ Compensation Board, first responders, correctional officers and organizations involved in medical or claims reviews.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts Alberta toward a more distributed workplace-safety model in which multiple participants can hold overlapping statutory duties. It also gives regulators broader operational flexibility through approvals, allowances, inter-jurisdictional recognitions and codes, while moving several compensation safeguards from fixed statutory rules to Board orders, regulations or discretionary decisions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The new Occupational Health and Safety Act starts with a broad allocation of responsibility. Employers must protect workers and others affected by workplace hazards, provide training and hazard information, address harassment and violence, and resolve safety concerns.
Supervisors, workers, suppliers, service providers, owners, contracting employers, prime contractors and temporary staffing agencies each receive their own duties. A person with multiple roles must satisfy the obligations attached to every role, although overlapping duties can be discharged by one party when duplicative compliance would add cost without reducing safety.
The bill formalizes workplace participation requirements. Employers with 20 or more regular workers generally must establish a joint health and safety committee, while employers with five to 19 workers must designate a health and safety representative.
Directors can require either arrangement at particular sites. Employers with 20 or more workers, or those directed by a Director, must also implement a health and safety program.
The right to refuse dangerous work remains, but the process is structured around prompt reporting, employer investigation, written findings and possible referral to an officer. Workers can challenge discipline through an officer, although the statutory process excludes workers bound by a collective agreement and imposes a 180-day complaint deadline.The enforcement framework combines regulatory flexibility with stronger formal consequences.
Directors can approve equivalent safety measures, allow deviations from the OHS Code where health and safety are not materially affected, recognize standards from other Canadian jurisdictions, and issue or revoke licences. Officers can inspect workplaces without warrants, require records, investigate incidents, issue compliance or stop-work orders, and impose administrative penalties.
Serious injuries, hospital admissions, specified structural or equipment failures, certain explosions and radiation overexposures trigger reporting and investigation duties. The Labour Relations Board hears appeals, generally within 30 days, while most orders remain effective during an appeal unless a stay is granted.The Workers’ Compensation Act changes the claims-review architecture by consolidating claim and assessment reviews in a new Board-appointed review body.
A person with a direct interest generally has one year to seek review, and the Appeals Commission generally receives appeals from review-body decisions within a further one-year period. The bill also replaces the independent Fair Practices Office with a Board employee serving as Fairness Review Officer, narrows the statutory mandate for fairness recommendations, and authorizes the Appeals Commission to create advice and advocacy programs.
Medical-panel administration is placed more directly under a Medical Panels Commissioner, while the former occupational-disease advisory committee is replaced by reviews required every 10 years.Other compensation changes are more substantive. The Board gains control over earnings calculations and cost-of-living adjustments, and it must continue temporary compensation when employment ends because of a worker’s egregious conduct.
The bill repeals the statutory employer duty to reinstate injured workers and maintain health-benefit contributions, replacing it with broader worker mitigation and cooperation duties and an employer duty to cooperate with return-to-work efforts. Separately, the Heroes’ Compensation Act requires a $100,000 lump-sum payment when an eligible first responder, correctional officer or prescribed worker dies from an accident, subject to a $1.5 million annual cap unless regulations increase it.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Heroes’ Compensation Act provides a single $100,000 payment to eligible dependants when a covered worker dies from an accident on or after April 1, 2020. The annual total is capped at $1.5 million unless regulations set a higher amount.
The new OHS Act requires joint health and safety committees for employers regularly employing 20 or more workers and health and safety representatives for employers regularly employing five to 19 workers, subject to site-specific direction and coordination rules.
An officer may impose an administrative penalty of up to $10,000 per incident and up to $10,000 for each continuing day. The same conduct cannot also support an offence charge under the Act once the penalty is paid.
The Workers’ Compensation Board’s new review body generally receives review requests within one year, and the Appeals Commission generally requires a notice of appeal within one year of the review-body decision. The bill also allows interim relief during review.
The bill repeals the statutory duty to reinstate injured workers and continue employer health-benefit contributions, while adding duties for workers to mitigate earnings losses and cooperate with rehabilitation and for employers to cooperate with early and safe return-to-work efforts.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Survivor payments for workplace heroes
The bill enacts the Heroes’ Compensation Act and directs the Workers’ Compensation Board to administer it. When a covered first responder, correctional officer or prescribed worker dies from an accident on or after April 1, 2020, the Board must pay a $100,000 lump sum, subject to eligibility rules governing spouses, adult interdependent partners, dependent children and estates.
The benefit is financed from Alberta’s General Revenue Fund rather than the Accident Fund, but the legislation limits annual payments to $1.5 million unless regulations increase the ceiling. Regulations can also expand the worker categories covered by the program.
A new Workers’ Compensation review and fairness system
The bill creates a single review body for compensation claims and assessments. It sets written-request requirements, permits medical examinations by independent physicians, allows interim relief and bars the people who made or participated in the original decision from conducting the review. Appeals Commission appeals generally must be filed within one year, replacing the former two-year period for the relevant appeals.
The bill replaces the Fair Practices Office with a Fairness Review Officer who is an employee designated by the Board’s directors. The officer can review administrative fairness and Code of Rights and Conduct issues, but the statute no longer gives the office the former standalone structure, advocacy mandate or broad access provisions. The bill also establishes transitional rules for pending reviews, appeals and fairness investigations.
Occupational disease and medical-panel administration
The bill changes the occupational-disease presumption so that a worker’s disablement is generally linked to covered employment if the worker was employed in the relevant industry or process during the preceding 12 months, unless the contrary is shown. It removes the Occupational Disease and Injury Advisory Committee and replaces its functions with a ministerial review every 10 years.
Medical-panel functions move to a Medical Panels Commissioner, who is responsible for operating the process under the regulations. The bill repeals the statutory case-conference provisions and removes the former rule requiring an approximately balanced medical dispute to be resolved in the worker’s favour.
Compensation calculations and return-to-work duties
The Board receives greater control over periodic compensation calculations, including the estimate of lost net earnings and the applicable maximum earnings ceiling. It may continue periodic compensation as though a worker remained employed when the worker’s employment ends because of egregious conduct. Cost-of-living adjustments for permanent disability and death benefits become something the Board may order rather than an automatic statutory adjustment tied to the Alberta Consumer Price Index.
The bill repeals the detailed employer reinstatement and health-benefit continuation regime. In its place, workers must take reasonable steps to mitigate earnings losses and cooperate with rehabilitation, while employers must cooperate with the Board and worker in achieving an early and safe return to employment. The Board may reduce or suspend compensation when a worker fails without good reason to cooperate or remain available for rehabilitation.
Expanded workplace duties and participation rights
The new Occupational Health and Safety Act assigns explicit duties to a larger group of workplace participants. Prime contractors must coordinate safety systems on specified multi-employer sites, owners must communicate hazards, staffing agencies must assess worker suitability and equipment, and service providers must ensure their services support legal compliance. Employers must address harassment and violence, provide training and hazard information, and maintain accessible copies of the Act, regulations and OHS Code.
The statute requires joint health and safety committees at larger workplaces and health and safety representatives at smaller ones. It also requires health and safety programs for employers with at least 20 regular workers or whenever a Director directs. These requirements sit alongside the retained rights to receive hazard information, participate in safety activity and refuse dangerous work.
Refusal, inspections, orders, penalties and appeals
Workers may refuse work where they reasonably believe an undue hazard exists, and employers must investigate, document the refusal and avoid assigning another worker until the hazard is addressed or determined not to exist. The Act protects workers from discipline for exercising statutory rights and allows officers to order reinstatement, back pay and removal of disciplinary records when retaliation is established.
Officers can enter most work sites without a warrant, inspect and seize materials, require records and investigate incidents. They can issue compliance, stop-work and stop-use orders and administrative penalties of up to $10,000 per incident or continuing day. Appeals go to the Labour Relations Board, generally within 30 days; an appeal does not automatically stay most orders, while an appeal of an administrative penalty does.
Offences, disclosure and public accountability
The new Act makes non-compliance, obstruction, false information, failure to report specified incidents and other statutory breaches offences. First offences can attract fines of up to $500,000 and continuing fines of up to $30,000 per day; subsequent offences can attract fines of up to $1 million and $60,000 per continuing day, with possible imprisonment. Failure to comply with a stop-work order carries a maximum $1 million fine or 12 months’ imprisonment.
The Minister must publish information arising from administration of the Act, including employer injury data, orders, administrative penalties, tickets and certain investigation reports. Employers, owners and prime contractors must post relevant orders and make required reports and procedures available in paper or electronic form.
Codes, regulatory flexibility and transition
The Minister can make an OHS Code covering technical safety rules, medical requirements, committees, licensing, exposure limits and incorporated secondary codes. Directors can issue time-limited acceptances, allowances, approvals and inter-jurisdictional recognitions, and may vary, suspend or revoke them. The Act also authorizes information-sharing, surveillance programs and agreements involving the Workers’ Compensation Board and other public bodies, including provisions dealing with health information.
The statute contains detailed transition rules for prior approvals, licences, orders, penalties, investigations, refusals and appeals. It repeals the former Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Radiation Protection Act when the new regime comes into force, while preserving specified treatment for matters that arose under the earlier legislation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- First responders, correctional officers and their dependants gain access to a dedicated $100,000 death benefit, subject to the program’s eligibility rules and annual funding cap.
- Workers at larger or multi-employer sites gain formal committee or representative structures, access to written investigation records and a statutory process for refusing dangerous work.
- Employers and operators using equipment or standards recognized in another Canadian jurisdiction may obtain regulatory flexibility through Director-issued acceptances, allowances and inter-jurisdictional recognitions.
- Parties to workers’ compensation claims gain a consolidated review route covering both compensation decisions and assessments, including administrative penalties and potential interim relief.
- The public and workplace participants gain access to published safety orders, penalties, employer information and certain investigation material.
Who Bears the Cost
- Employers must fund training, safety programs, committees or representatives, medical examinations in specified cases, incident investigations and compliance with potentially overlapping duties across multiple workplace roles.
- Prime contractors, owners, contracting employers and staffing agencies assume direct statutory responsibilities that may require new contracting, onboarding, hazard-sharing and oversight procedures.
- Workers may face reduced or suspended compensation if they fail to mitigate earnings loss, cooperate with rehabilitation or remain available for a required vocational program.
- The Workers’ Compensation Board must administer the new review, fairness, medical-panel, grant-publication and Heroes’ Compensation functions, with some costs reimbursed from the Accident Fund and others from public revenue.
- Claimants and employers face shorter or more structured review pathways, including one-year Workers’ Compensation appeal limits and a 30-day deadline for many OHS appeals.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Bill 47 tries to make workplace safety more flexible and responsibility more widely shared while tightening enforcement and worker-cooperation requirements. The same flexibility that lets regulators recognize safer alternatives and adapt compensation administration can reduce the predictability of statutory entitlements, particularly for injured workers whose reinstatement and benefit protections are replaced by broader, more discretionary rules.
The bill’s central compliance model is broad responsibility rather than a single accountable employer. That can close gaps on complex worksites, especially where owners, prime contractors, staffing agencies and service providers divide control.
It can also make incident response and contractual allocation more difficult: several parties may owe similar duties, while the statute relieves duplication only when one party’s compliance does not increase risk. Businesses will need to map operational control carefully rather than assume that a contract transfers statutory exposure.
The bill also trades fixed statutory safeguards for administrative flexibility. The Board may set compensation ceilings and cost-of-living adjustments by order, while Directors can authorize alternatives to OHS Code requirements and the Minister can regulate substantial technical detail through the OHS Code.
That approach can make the system more responsive, but it places greater importance on unpublished practices, guidance, conditions attached to approvals and the consistency of discretionary decisions.
The Workers’ Compensation changes create a sharper balance between worker cooperation and employer obligations. Repealing detailed reinstatement and health-benefit duties may reduce rigid obligations for employers, but it also removes specific statutory remedies for injured workers.
The replacement duties to mitigate, cooperate and pursue early return to work may improve rehabilitation in appropriate cases, yet their application depends heavily on Board assessments of reasonableness, good reason and available suitable employment.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.