Bill 23 would establish a single Professional Governance Act for a broad group of Alberta professions, including architects, engineers, geoscientists, accountants, land surveyors, agrologists, foresters, planners, biologists and veterinarians. It would continue 22 existing professional regulatory organizations under a common statutory structure and repeal several profession-specific Acts.
The bill standardizes registration, continuing competence, complaints, discipline, appeals, public reporting and restricted-title enforcement. It also gives the Minister and Lieutenant Governor in Council substantial control over regulatory models, professional organizations, bylaws, amalgamations, administrators and designation revocations.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill creates common rules for professional regulatory organizations, including mandatory governing bodies, registration committees, complaints inquiry committees, tribunals, continuing competence programs, public registers and appeal rights. It permits different regulatory models—such as voluntary or mandatory registration, restricted activities, exclusive scopes of practice and restricted titles—to be established by regulation. It replaces existing profession-specific statutes listed in section 267 and carries existing registrants, proceedings, orders and professional organizations into the new framework through detailed transitional rules.
Who It Affects
The framework directly affects the 22 professional regulatory organizations continued under section 3, their registrants, applicants, business entities, public members, investigators, tribunal participants and complainants. It also affects employers and clients who rely on professional titles, practice permits, public registers and disciplinary records. The Alberta Minister responsible for the Act gains powers to establish regulatory models, direct or disallow bylaws and standards, appoint public members, recommend administrators and propose amalgamations. Municipalities and Métis settlements would be barred from requiring separate licences for professionals regulated under the Act.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts professional regulation from a collection of separate statutes to a common, centrally supervised framework. That should make core processes more consistent, but it also creates a much more visible ministerial role in matters traditionally managed by professional self-regulatory bodies. The practical impact will depend heavily on later regulations and bylaws. The Act sets the architecture, while those instruments would determine profession-specific scopes of practice, registration requirements, business structures, specialties, fees, standards and many operational details.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Part 2 establishes the institutional framework. The Act continues 22 named organizations and allows other professional associations to apply for designation as regulators, subject to review by a professional governance officer, ministerial recommendation and an order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council.
The Minister establishes each organization’s regulatory model, which can combine voluntary or mandatory registration with restricted titles, restricted activities or an exclusive scope of practice. The Minister may also change an organization’s model or name by regulation.
The bill gives the government intervention tools when a regulator is not complying with the Act or is no longer serving the public interest. A professional governance officer may inspect an organization and issue compliance directions.
Following a designation review, the Minister may direct corrective action, recommend an administrator or recommend revoking the organization’s designation. An administrator may receive some or all of the organization’s powers, including powers otherwise held by its governing body, committees, tribunals or officials.
An affected organization may seek judicial review of specified directions, orders and refusals within 30 days.Parts 4 through 7 create common governance and professional-practice obligations. Each regulator must maintain registration and discipline systems, rules of professional conduct, a code of ethics, practice standards, a mandatory continuing competence program and transparent procedures.
Governing bodies must include registrant members and Minister-appointed public members. Discipline and appeal tribunals must include at least 25% public members.
The bill requires public registers, directories of officials, annual reports and websites, while allowing confidentiality protections for competence information, investigations and private hearing material.The registration and enforcement machinery is detailed. Applicants must demonstrate competence and, unless an exception applies by regulation, Canadian citizenship or authorization to work in Canada.
Registrars generally have 30 days to confirm whether an application is complete and 120 days after completion to decide it; failure to decide within that period is deemed a refusal that can be appealed. Temporary registration may last up to one year and may be renewed.
Registrants must periodically demonstrate continuing competence, insurance where required, compliance with conditions and payment of fees, fines and costs.Parts 8 through 16 govern complaints, discipline, business arrangements and enforcement. Any person may submit a written complaint, and the regulator retains jurisdiction over relevant former registrants.
Investigators can compel attendance and information, inspect professional premises and seek court orders for compliance. Discipline tribunals may impose conditions, supervision, training, practice restrictions, suspension, cancellation, fee repayment and fines of up to $100,000 for an individual or $500,000 for a business registrant for each finding.
Appeals generally proceed to an appeal tribunal and, for discipline and incapacity matters, ultimately to the Court of Appeal. The Act also gives the Minister extensive regulation-making powers and gives regulations priority over conflicting bylaws.Part 17 manages the transition from the repealed statutes.
Existing organizations, registrants, approvals, conditions, suspensions, applications and proceedings generally continue under the new framework, with different rules for matters already underway. Existing regulations, bylaws, codes and standards are generally repealed on commencement, although the Minister may temporarily preserve bylaws and professional standards on request.
Transitional regulations may address confusion or inconsistency for up to five years.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act continues 22 named professional regulatory organizations, including APEGA, the Alberta Association of Architects, CPA Alberta and the Alberta Veterinary Medical Association, while repealing the profession-specific statutes listed in section 267.
The Minister establishes each regulator’s regulatory model and may prescribe mandatory or voluntary registration, restricted activities, exclusive scopes of practice, restricted titles and conditions on registrants through regulation.
Registration applicants generally receive a completeness notice within 30 days and a decision within 120 days after the application is complete; failure to decide within that period is deemed a refusal and can be appealed.
A discipline tribunal must include at least 25% public members and may impose individual fines of up to $100,000 or business-registrant fines of up to $500,000 for each finding of unprofessional conduct.
A professional regulatory organization must retain specified registration, competence, practice-review, complaint, incapacity, discipline and appeal records for at least 10 years.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Common framework, regulatory models and amalgamation
These Parts define the new institutional vocabulary and set the Act’s purpose: protect the public interest and public safety, safeguard life, health, the environment, property and economic interests, and promote professional competence. The framework applies to existing organizations, newly designated organizations and organizations created through amalgamation.
The Minister decides the regulatory model for each organization. The model can preserve existing rules temporarily, but future changes can come through ministerial regulations. The Minister may also propose an amalgamation without an application from the affected organizations. Once approved, the successor organization assumes the predecessor organizations’ property, records, liabilities, claims and proceedings.
Inspection, administration and revocation powers
Professional governance officers may investigate whether a regulator is complying with the Act, maintaining effective standards, protecting the public and enforcing competence requirements. They may issue directions requiring corrective action. A designation review can lead to no further action, a compliance direction, appointment of an administrator or revocation of the organization’s designation.
The administrator provisions are unusually consequential for self-regulatory bodies. An order may remove the authority of a governing body, committee, tribunal or official in whole or in part and may require the organization to pay the administrator’s remuneration and expenses. Judicial review is available for specified directions, administrator orders, revocation orders and certain ministerial refusals, but the bill sets a 30-day filing period.
Governance, public members and accountability
Regulators must establish registration, competence, complaint, discipline and appeal systems that are transparent, objective, impartial and procedurally fair. They must cooperate with the Minister and professional governance officers, comply with domestic trade agreements and applicable international treaties, and promote collaboration across professions. Regulators may not set or negotiate professional fees or act as certified bargaining agents; the Minister may regulate their advocacy activities.
The governance model combines profession-selected registrants with Minister-appointed public members. Public members must be Alberta residents and cannot be registrants, former registrants or people who meet the requirements for registration in the relevant profession. Governing bodies must publish annual reports, official directories, rules of professional conduct, codes of ethics and practice standards. The Minister may later disallow or require amendments to those instruments.
Registration, competence and practice review
The bill creates common categories for individual, temporary and—where authorized—business registrants. Registration rules must address competence, insurance where required, work authorization, character, language proficiency and regulatory standing in other jurisdictions. The framework accommodates labour mobility and recognized equivalent qualifications, while allowing conditions, restrictions, deferred decisions and appeals.
Every regulator must operate a mandatory continuing competence program for individual registrants. A practice review committee, where established, may conduct non-disciplinary reviews and require mentoring, professional development, examinations, supervised improvement or a follow-up review. Persistent or serious problems can be referred into the complaints process. Information about program participation is confidential, subject to limited disclosure for regulatory proceedings.
Complaints, investigations and discipline
Any person may make a written complaint about a registrant or former registrant. A CIC secretary, CIC chair and complaints inquiry committee each have authority to screen out matters that are outside jurisdiction, trivial, without merit, made in bad faith or not in the public interest. The process also supports voluntary communication, mediation, settlements, sanction agreements and resignation in place of continuing proceedings.
Investigators may require answers under oath, demand records and inspect professional premises, with court authorization required to enter a private dwelling. Discipline tribunals are not bound by ordinary judicial rules of evidence and may compel witnesses. They can address conduct occurring outside Alberta and can discipline failures to cooperate, breaches of undertakings, lack of competence, misleading advertising or representation, and violations of other Acts.
Sanctions, appeals and court enforcement
The sanction range includes reprimands, supervision, practice restrictions, treatment, education, competence assessments, fee repayment, suspension and cancellation. A discipline tribunal may fine an individual up to $100,000 or a business registrant up to $500,000 for each finding. Costs can include investigation, hearing and legal expenses; unpaid costs can trigger immediate cancellation unless a tribunal directs otherwise.
Discipline decisions can be appealed to an appeal tribunal within 30 days. The appeal tribunal may confirm, vary, reverse or replace the decision. A further appeal to the Court of Appeal is available for final decisions arising from discipline proceedings and certain incapacity decisions, generally on the record. The bill allows regulators to enforce tribunal and incapacity decisions in the Court of Queen’s Bench once appeal rights have expired or been exhausted.
Confidentiality, public information and practice prohibitions
The Act protects information obtained through registration, practice review, complaints, discipline, appeals and incapacity processes, while requiring public access to registers, specified disciplinary information and regulator websites. Hearings are generally public, but bodies may close proceedings to protect security, privilege or sensitive personal, financial or commercial information. Registrants must report serious concerns about other registrants, including significant risk, unprofessional conduct and indictable charges or convictions.
The Act prohibits unauthorized practice within an exclusive scope, restricted activities and restricted titles. It also prohibits misrepresenting registrant status, using professional organization names misleadingly, practicing with suspended or disciplinarily cancelled persons without permission and misleading advertising. Contraventions can lead to injunctions, regulatory discipline or offences carrying escalating fines and, for repeat offences, possible imprisonment.
Ministerial rules, bylaws and transition
The Minister may make regulations on nearly every operational element, including registration categories, competence, business registrants, practice arrangements, specialties, public members, complaints, incapacity, records and regulatory models. Governing bodies retain extensive bylaw powers but must consult on proposed bylaws and standards. Regulations prevail over inconsistent bylaws, and the Regulations Act does not apply to bylaws, professional rules, codes or practice standards.
The transitional provisions preserve existing registrations, approvals, restrictions, conditions, undertakings, applications and most ongoing proceedings while moving them into the new system. They also establish replacement committees and tribunals, including joint bodies for APEGA and the Association of Science and Engineering Technology Professionals of Alberta. Existing regulations generally end on commencement, while the Minister may temporarily continue specified bylaws, codes and standards.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Members of the public who rely on professional services gain standardized complaint, discipline, registration and public-information mechanisms across participating professions.
- Applicants moving between Canadian jurisdictions benefit from express recognition of domestic trade agreements, labour mobility rules, decision deadlines and appeal rights for registration decisions.
- Complainants receive written reasons when regulators close matters, a 30-day appeal route in specified cases, access to public hearings and notice of approved sanction agreements.
- Clients and employers can use public registers and required disclosures to check registration status, restrictions, suspensions, disciplinary decisions and recognized specialties.
- Regulators that amalgamate or operate across related professions gain a statutory mechanism to transfer assets, records, liabilities, proceedings and governance functions into a single organization.
Who Bears the Cost
- Professional regulatory organizations must rebuild governance, registration, competence, complaint, tribunal, records, website and reporting systems to comply with a common Act and later regulations.
- Registrants face mandatory continuing competence obligations, expanded reporting duties, cooperation requirements, public disclosure of specified disciplinary information and potential liability for costs, fines and compliance measures.
- Business registrants, where authorized, face entity-level registration, insurance, ownership and quality-control requirements and can face fines of up to $500,000 per finding.
- Applicants and registrants may bear application, reinstatement, appeal-record, investigation and discipline costs, including legal costs and costs ordered after unsuccessful or improper appeals.
- Professional associations and governing bodies lose some policy autonomy because the Minister can set regulatory models, disallow or dictate bylaws and standards, appoint public members, order corrective action and recommend administrators or revocation.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill tries to make professional regulation more consistent and publicly accountable without eliminating profession-specific expertise. Central ministerial control can address weak governance, inconsistent standards or regulatory failure, but it can also reduce the independence that allows professional bodies to make technical decisions insulated from political direction. The practical balance will depend on how broadly the Minister uses regulation, disallowance, amalgamation and administrator powers.
The Act’s central operational detail sits outside the statute. Ministerial regulations and profession-specific bylaws will determine the actual scope of regulated practice, registration criteria, business-entity rules, specialty titles, fees, continuing-registration consequences and much of the complaints process.
That creates flexibility, but it also makes the eventual compliance burden difficult to assess from the Act alone and gives regulations priority over bylaws.
The government’s oversight powers are broad enough to affect the independence of professional regulators. The Minister can disallow or prescribe professional rules, codes, standards and bylaws, direct a governing body’s actions, propose amalgamations and recommend an administrator or revocation.
The bill ties those powers to public interest and public safety, but it provides limited statutory detail about evidentiary thresholds, procedural safeguards or the limits of ministerial intervention.
The enforcement model also creates competing pressures. Public registers, published decisions, mandatory reporting and open hearings improve transparency and help clients identify risk, while confidentiality rules protect sensitive personal and commercial information.
Discipline can continue against former registrants and can follow findings from other jurisdictions, but the breadth of the definitions of conduct and unprofessional conduct may expose registrants to regulatory consequences for conduct not directly connected to current professional services. The transition is similarly complex: old proceedings continue under former Acts in some cases, while new complaints about earlier conduct move under the new Act.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.