Bill 12 (Motor Vehicle Amendment Act, 2025) makes targeted changes to the Motor Vehicle Act that reshape how novice drivers move through the licensing system, expands administrative powers for the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC), creates new regulatory authority to require motorcycle protective clothing, and alters the scope of the prohibition against using electronic devices while driving for certain licence classes. Several powers are left to the Lieutenant Governor in Council (LGIC) to set different experience thresholds, waiting periods and transitional reclassifications by regulation.
The practical effect: the bill shifts many operational decisions from statute into regulations and ICBC practice — letting the government and ICBC tailor experience requirements by class, approve driver-education courses that shorten mandatory waiting periods, and determine equivalency for out-of-province licences and offences. It also creates new compliance obligations for riders in prescribed classes and narrows the cellphone-use exception to cover specific learner and novice classes, with transitional rules and regulatory discretion to manage the rollout.
These are administrative and enforcement changes that will matter to driver trainers, commercial and novice drivers, ICBC, and policing agencies.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds regulatory authority to prescribe different driving-experience requirements by class, requires specified knowledge, road, vision and medical tests when ICBC or the superintendent so directs, and permits LGIC to set minimum waiting periods before novices may retest or apply for other licence classes. It also authorizes regulations that mandate motorcycle protective clothing for prescribed classes and narrows an exception to the cellphone-use prohibition to list specific licence classes.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include novice and learner drivers (Class 6/7/8 variants), driver training schools seeking ICBC approval, ICBC (new approval and equivalency powers), medical and testing providers, and police/enforcement agencies tasked with the cellphone and protective-equipment rules.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts discretion from statute to regulation and to ICBC, enabling tailored requirements by vehicle class and greater use of approved driver education to shorten waiting periods. That creates both compliance opportunities (reduced wait via approved courses) and administrative risks (ICBC discretion, regulatory complexity) for industry and regulators.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 12 rewrites several parts of the Motor Vehicle Act to give the government and ICBC more granular control over who qualifies for which licence and when a driver may move between licence classes. It inserts explicit regulatory authority to prescribe different amounts of driving experience for different classes of persons, and rewrites the tests a person must submit to when ICBC or the superintendent requires them — separating ICBC-mandated knowledge/road/signs tests from superintendent-mandated vision, medical or other exams.
The bill creates a new statutory hook allowing the Lieutenant Governor in Council to impose minimum waiting periods on novice drivers before they can retake an ICBC-required exam or apply for another licence class, while authorizing ICBC to approve licensed driver training courses that shorten those waiting periods. It also grants ICBC discretionary powers to reduce prescribed time periods for restrictions where a driver completes an approved course, and lets the LGIC delegate to ICBC the authority to determine whether an out-of-jurisdiction licence or offence is equivalent to a BC class or offence.On safety rules, the Act adds a new motorcycle provision that permits regulations to require protective clothing, footwear and other protective equipment for prescribed classes or licence-holders; it also clarifies that riders under 16 who fail those requirements do not commit an offence.
Separately, the bill narrows the statutory exception to the prohibition on using electronic devices while driving so that the exception will not apply to holders of specified learner/novice licence classes, and it includes transitional rules allowing the government to reclassify certain existing Class 7 or Class 8 licences or to exempt some pre-existing licences from the new rule during rollout.Finally, the Act allows the LGIC to make implementing and transition regulations and brings the Act into force by regulation, which gives the executive latitude over timing and detailed design features. It also repeals a 2010 amendment provision, a technical cleanup that accompanies the substantive changes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 23(2.11) lets the Lieutenant Governor in Council prescribe different amounts of driving experience for different classes of persons (i.e.
different minimum experience thresholds by class).
Section 25 recasts testing: ICBC can require knowledge, road or road-signs tests; the superintendent can require vision, medical or other exams; and LGIC may set minimum waiting periods before novices may retake exams or apply for other licence classes (new s.25(8.01)).
ICBC gains explicit authority to approve licensed driver-training courses to reduce prescribed waiting periods and, under delegated regulation, to determine whether out-of-province licence classes or foreign/offence equivalents match BC classes or motor-vehicle-related Criminal Code offences (s.25(10.12)–(10.14)).
Section 194 adds s.3.1 allowing regulations to require protective clothing, footwear and other protective equipment for prescribed classes or licence-holders when operating or riding a motorcycle, while exempting riders under 16 from criminal liability for contravening those subsections.
Section 214.41 is rewritten so the cellphone-use exception in subsection (1) will not apply to drivers under certain classes (listed as Class 6L, 7, 7L, 8 and 8L); transition rules let the LGIC deem or grandfather some pre-existing Class 7/8 licences or exclude older licences from the new rule during rollout.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
LGIC may set different driving-experience thresholds by class
This single-line addition gives the Lieutenant Governor in Council explicit power to prescribe different minimum driving-experience amounts for different classes of persons when making regulations under the Act. Practically, it allows the government to set tailored experience requirements (for example, higher-hour thresholds for commercial categories or lower thresholds for some novice categories) without amending the statute each time.
Tests, waiting periods, and ICBC approval of driver-education reductions
Section 25 is substantially reworked. It separates the tests that ICBC can require (knowledge, road, road-signs) from those the superintendent can require (vision, medical, other exams). The Act adds s.25(8.01) permitting LGIC regulations to prescribe a minimum waiting period before a novice can retake ICBC-required tests or apply for another licence class. The Act also formalizes ICBC's role approving licensed driver-training courses and allowing reduced waiting periods for those who complete approved courses (s.25(8.1) and (10.12)). Those changes create a compliance pathway: licensed training schools can design courses to meet ICBC approval, and successful students can shorten statutory waiting times.
Delegation and equivalency determinations for out-of-jurisdiction licences and offences
New subsections allow the government to delegate to ICBC the power to decide whether a class of licence issued elsewhere is similar to a BC class and whether an out-of-jurisdiction offence corresponds to a BC Motor Vehicle Act offence or a motor-vehicle-related Criminal Code offence. The LGIC may also confer discretion on ICBC for these determinations. That centralizes technical equivalency decisions within ICBC, rather than requiring administrative or statutory equivalence rules.
Adjusts age reference in statute from under 19 to under 18
This amendment changes one statutory age reference from 'under 19 years of age' to 'under 18 years of age.' It's a targeted numeric change that will affect any age-based eligibility or restriction tied to that particular provision; practitioners should check cross-references to confirm downstream effects on other age-based rules.
Regulatory power to require motorcycle protective equipment and age-based non-offence
The Act adds s.3.1 to permit regulations requiring prescribed protective clothing, footwear and other equipment for a prescribed class of persons or licence-holders riding motorcycles. It also changes the penalty structure so that a person under 16 who contravenes the helmet/equipment provisions does not commit an offence. The regulations (s.194(6)(b.1)) will define the clothing/equipment; until those regulations exist, the statutory duty is a framework rather than a specific equipment standard.
Narrows the cellphone-use exception for certain learner/novice classes and provides transition tools
Section 214.41(2) is replaced to specify that the exception to the electronic-device prohibition does not apply to drivers holding licences in listed classes (6L, 7, 7L, 8, 8L). Transitional section 8 carves out an exemption during rollout for some pre-existing licences (those not Class 7 or 7L issued before the section comes into force). Section 9 authorizes LGIC regulations to reclassify some existing Class 7 or Class 8 licences to Class 5 or Class 6 respectively for transition purposes. Section 10 lets the LGIC make further implementing regulations, giving flexibility on timing and application.
Technical repeal and commencement by regulation
The bill repeals section 1 of the Motor Vehicle Amendment Act, 2010 as a consequential cleanup. It also specifies that the Act comes into force by LGIC regulation, meaning the executive will set the implementation date and can phase in provisions through the regulatory process.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Novice drivers who complete ICBC‑approved driver education — they may face reduced minimum waiting periods before retesting or applying for other licence classes, enabling faster progression through licensing stages.
- Driver training schools that obtain ICBC approval — approved providers can market course-based time reductions and may see higher enrollment from students seeking expedited licensing.
- ICBC and the provincial regulator — the Act centralizes equivalency and course‑approval powers at ICBC and in regulation, enabling administrative flexibility to adapt requirements by class without repeated statute changes.
- Police and road-safety planners — clearer statutory hooks for protective-equipment rules and a narrowed cellphone-use exception for learner/novice classes provide tools to target enforcement and safety messaging.
Who Bears the Cost
- Driver training schools seeking ICBC approval — they will need to meet whatever standards ICBC sets, incurring curriculum, instructor or administrative costs to obtain and maintain approval.
- ICBC and ministry administrators — new responsibilities to approve courses, determine equivalencies, and administer delegated discretions will require policy, adjudicative and record-keeping resources.
- Drivers in specified novice/learner classes (6L, 7, 7L, 8, 8L) — they face tighter cellphone prohibitions and potential new equipment mandates (if prescribed), and may need to meet additional testing or waiting-period requirements during transition.
- Enforcement agencies (police) — new equipment regulations and class-targeted cellphone rules may increase enforcement complexity and training needs; ambiguity in 'prescribed classes' and transition status could raise on-road discretion questions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill trades statutory uniformity for regulatory and administrative flexibility: it lets LGIC and ICBC tailor experience thresholds, shorten waiting periods via approved courses, and make equivalency determinations — all useful for nimble policy — but that same concentration of discretion risks opaque, inconsistent decision‑making, weaker procedural safeguards for affected drivers and businesses, and a heavier administrative burden on ICBC and training providers.
The Act intentionally moves substantive detail into regulations and grants ICBC significant discretionary authority. That approach speeds policy responsiveness but raises predictable implementation questions: what objective standards will ICBC use to approve courses and determine licence/offence equivalence; how transparent will those decisions be; and what rights of review or appeal will drivers or training schools have?
Because the LGIC can prescribe different experience amounts by class, stakeholders should expect a patchwork of class‑specific rules rather than a single uniform novices' progression. That increases the importance of clear regulations and guidance to avoid unfair or inconsistent application.
The motorcycle-equipment provision is framework-level: it creates a power to require specific clothing and footwear but defers the technical specifications to regulation. Until regulations appear, riders and enforcement agencies lack clarity on what will be required.
The carve-out that makes non-compliance by persons under 16 a non‑offence produces an odd age-based asymmetry: younger riders are not criminally liable, while older riders are. That may produce enforcement and public-safety trade-offs.
Finally, by making commencement and numerous specifics subject to LGIC regulation — including transitional deeming of licence classes — the legislature gives the executive high discretion over timing and substance, which concentrates policy detail in regulation rather than statute and can complicate stakeholder planning.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.