This bill amends section 4.3(1.1) of British Columbia’s Income Tax Act to change the statutory basic personal amount from $9,713 to $22,462. The change is purely numeric: the Act’s definition is altered and the bill contains a commencement clause that leaves the effective date to regulation by the Lieutenant Governor in Council.
Although the amendment is short, it materially alters the base used to compute the provincial basic personal tax credit. That will reduce provincial income tax liabilities for many earners and create a measurable revenue shortfall for the provincial treasury; how big and when depends on the government’s chosen commencement date and administrative implementation steps.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill replaces the dollar figure that defines BC’s ‘‘basic personal amount’’ in the Income Tax Act, increasing it from $9,713 to $22,462. The statute will rely on that higher figure when calculating provincial non‑refundable tax credits and related tax computations.
Who It Affects
Individual income taxpayers who pay BC provincial income tax are the primary group affected; the change also touches the Ministry of Finance (for budgeting and regulation), the Canada Revenue Agency (which administers provincial returns), and any programs or benefits that reference the provincial basic personal amount.
Why It Matters
Raising the basic personal amount changes how much income is sheltered from provincial taxation without altering tax rates. It is a blunt instrument for tax relief that shifts revenue away from government coffers, can be implemented quickly by regulation, and raises questions about indexation and targeting of relief.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill does one concrete thing: it replaces the current dollar value used in the Income Tax Act to calculate the province’s basic personal tax credit. In BC’s tax system that statutory number is the starting point for a non‑refundable credit that reduces the provincial tax an individual owes.
By setting that number at $22,462 rather than $9,713, the province increases the credit base available to taxpayers.
Because the basic personal amount produces a non‑refundable credit, the extra allowance reduces tax payable for people who actually face provincial income tax; it does not create a direct cash payment to people with no provincial tax liability. The bill does not change tax rates, add refundable payments, or create phase‑outs.
It simply raises the dollar exemption used in existing calculations.The bill contains no automatic indexation, transitional rules, or specified tax year for application: it says the Act ‘‘comes into force by regulation of the Lieutenant Governor in Council.’’ That means the government will decide the timing and practical mechanics through the regulatory process, and tax administrators (principally the Canada Revenue Agency under existing collection arrangements) will need to update forms, programming and taxpayer guidance to reflect the new amount.Operationally, the change is straightforward for tax software and return processors to apply once an effective date is set. The larger policy and fiscal questions—how much revenue is foregone, whether relief is targeted to those most in need, and whether the amount should be indexed—are left to the political and budgetary process rather than to the statutory amendment itself.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends section 4.3(1.1) of the Income Tax Act to change the basic personal amount from $9,713 to $22,462 (an increase of $12,749).
The Act contains only that numeric amendment plus a commencement clause; it does not change tax rates, introduce refundable credits, or add indexing language.
The basic personal amount in BC functions as the dollar base for a non‑refundable provincial tax credit; raising it increases the credit available when computing provincial tax payable.
The bill provides no automatic indexing for future years, so the new figure will not adjust for inflation unless the legislature or regulations do so later.
The commencement clause makes the change effective by regulation, leaving the government discretion to select the effective date and to coordinate implementation with tax filing and administration cycles.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Replaces the dollar value used to define the basic personal amount
This clause edits the statutory definition by striking ‘‘$9,713’’ and inserting ‘‘$22,462.’’ Practically, that single line change alters the base used throughout provincial tax calculations wherever the Income Tax Act references the basic personal amount. Tax-return calculations, tax software, and credit formulas that rely on the Act’s definition must use the new figure once it is in force.
Effective date left to regulation by the Lieutenant Governor in Council
The bill does not set a calendar date; it authorizes the Lieutenant Governor in Council to bring the amendment into force by regulation. That gives the executive flexibility to coordinate the change with the tax year, filing deadlines and administrative readiness, but it also leaves open the possibility of retrospective or future‑dated commencement (subject to legal and policy constraints on regulations).
Bill contains no ancillary changes or implementation provisions
The explanatory note confirms that the bill only alters the definition of the basic personal amount. There are no accompanying changes to indexing, credits, tax brackets, or transitional rules. Administrators must therefore rely on existing statutory frameworks and routine regulatory instruments to give effect to the new figure.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Low‑ and middle‑income taxpayers who currently pay provincial income tax — raising the basic personal amount increases their non‑refundable credit and reduces provincial tax payable, producing an immediate tax cut for those with positive provincial tax liabilities.
- Working individuals with modest taxable incomes — because the basic personal amount is non‑refundable, people near the bottom of the tax schedule who currently pay some provincial tax will see the largest relative reductions in tax burden.
- Households where multiple earners each claim the basic personal amount — each taxpayer’s provincial tax calculation uses the basic personal amount, so multi‑earner households gain per taxpayer as long as each has tax payable.
Who Bears the Cost
- The provincial treasury — higher basic personal amounts reduce provincial tax revenues and create budgetary pressure that the government must address through spending adjustments, other tax changes or borrowing.
- Ministry of Finance and tax administrators — they must plan for, draft and publish the regulation, update guidance, and coordinate implementation with the Canada Revenue Agency and software vendors.
- Taxpayers who pay no provincial income tax — because the credit is non‑refundable, people with no provincial tax payable receive no cash benefit, meaning the policy shifts dollars away from revenue without directly reaching the very lowest‑income households.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between delivering broad, easy‑to‑administer tax relief through a single statutory number and achieving progressive, targeted support: raising the basic personal amount reduces taxes quickly for many, but it distributes benefits unevenly (favoring those who already pay tax) and forces the government to accept a revenue loss rather than using funds for targeted, refundable measures that reach the lowest‑income households.
The bill solves tax relief with the simplest possible instrument — change one number — but that simplicity hides trade‑offs. A higher basic personal amount is administratively cheap and immediately delivers tax savings to taxpayers with positive provincial tax liabilities, yet it is a blunt tool: it does not target the lowest incomes, it does not produce cash for people who pay no provincial tax, and it can be less efficient than a refundable credit or direct transfer for poverty‑focused policy objectives.
Leaving commencement to regulation is administratively convenient but raises legal and political questions. The government can choose the effective date and could coordinate the change with a tax year or make the regulation retrospective within limits, which affects budgeting and compliance cycles.
The bill also omits indexation language, meaning the protection against inflation erosion will depend on future legislative or regulatory choices. Finally, while the numeric change is straightforward to implement in tax software, how the government communicates the change—who benefits, who does not, and when—will shape public and stakeholder reaction more than the statutory text does.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.