This bill requires each health authority to submit a standardized monthly report on long‑term‑care (LTC) access, including waitlist counts, wait time statistics, alternate level of care (ALC) patient counts, hospice bed availability, and home support access data. The minister must compile those submissions into a publicly accessible monthly report, produce an annual analysis, and create a plan to improve timely access to LTC and hospice beds.
For administrators and compliance officers, the bill creates recurring operational reporting obligations, public transparency expectations, and a statutory deadline for a ministerial placement plan. It stops short of prescribing enforcement penalties, funding for capacity increases, or numeric access targets, which concentrates attention on data quality and the plan's practical feasibility rather than on immediate service expansions.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill obliges health authorities to deliver monthly data to the minister within one month after each reporting month. The minister must publish a consolidated monthly report online, submit an annual report with trend analysis and capacity assessment, and produce a long‑term‑care placement plan within one year of the Act coming into force and then update it annually.
Who It Affects
Provincial health authorities (data owners and reporters), the Ministry of Health (collation, publication, and planning), hospitals with ALC patients, hospice providers, home support programs, and residents/families who rely on placement choices and timely admission to LTC or hospice beds.
Why It Matters
The bill creates routine, comparable visibility into wait times and ALC burdens across health authorities and forces a government‑level planning process. That transparency can inform operational decisions and public scrutiny but will also expose gaps in capacity, data systems, and funding assumptions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act sets a simple architecture: health authorities gather specified monthly metrics about people approved for long‑term care and send that data to the minister within one month after each calendar month. The specified metrics are broad and operational — totals on waitlists, median and maximum wait times, counts of ALC patients, admissions, deaths while waiting, breakdowns of how long people have waited (over 30, 60, 90, and 180 days), transfer‑list statistics for preferred facilities, hospice bed supply and demand, and basic home support access indicators.
The bill also allows regulations to add or refine required items.
Once the minister receives those inputs, she or he must prepare and publish a consolidated monthly report on a publicly accessible website. Separately, the minister prepares an annual report covering waitlist trends, cumulative ALC numbers, actions taken to improve access, and an assessment comparing current and projected LTC capacity against projected population growth.
The Act requires tabling or depositing that annual report in the legislature within six months of the fiscal year it covers.Alongside reporting, the minister must develop a placement plan to improve timely access to LTC and hospice beds. The plan must target reductions in ALC patients and wait times; the first plan must be ready within one year of the Act coming into force and must be reviewed and updated at least once a year thereafter.
The Act gives the Lieutenant Governor in Council regulatory authority to define terms, designate hospice beds, and prescribe additional reporting details. Notably, the Act expressly excludes application of section 5 of the Offence Act, and it comes into force either by regulation or automatically 12 months after Royal Assent, whichever occurs sooner.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Each health authority must submit a monthly report to the minister within one month after the reporting month that includes a prescribed set of metrics (waitlist totals, median and maximum wait times, ALC counts, admissions, deaths on a waitlist, waits over 30/60/90/180 days, transfer‑list metrics, hospice bed supply/demand, and home support access).
The minister must publish a consolidated monthly report on a publicly accessible website containing the information provided by every health authority.
The minister must prepare an annual report that summarizes waitlist trends, totals of ALC patients, actions taken to improve access, and an assessment of current and projected LTC capacity against projected population growth, and table or deposit it within six months after the fiscal year ends.
The minister must develop a long‑term‑care placement plan within one year after the Act comes into force and update that plan at least annually; the plan must include measures to reduce ALC patients and wait times for LTC and hospice beds.
The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations defining terms, prescribing additional reporting items, and designating hospice beds, and the Act expressly excludes the application of section 5 of the Offence Act to this statute.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions that shape reporting and scope
Section 1 defines operational terms that determine who and what gets counted: 'alternate level of care patient', 'waitlist', 'preferred facility', 'hospice bed', and the kinds of residential settings included under 'long term care.' Those definitions matter because they establish the unit of measurement (e.g., patients assessed and approved for LTC but still in hospital) and the set of facilities subject to reporting. Compliance teams will need to map local patient classification and facility lists to these statutory definitions to produce consistent data.
Monthly reporting obligations and required metrics
Section 2 requires each health authority to provide a monthly report within one month after the reporting period, and it itemizes the data fields that must be included. The list combines counts (waitlist totals, ALC counts, admissions), timing measures (median and maximum wait times, time on transfer lists), outcome indicators (deaths while waiting), and supply metrics for hospice beds and home support. Because the statute specifies both medians and maxima and multiple categorical wait thresholds, health authorities will need systems capable of disaggregating timestamps and tracking patient movement (preferred facility choices, transfers), not just aggregate headcounts.
Minister must compile and publish consolidated monthly reports
Section 3 obliges the minister to prepare a monthly report that consolidates each health authority's submissions and to publish it on a publicly accessible website. The provision creates a single public source for cross‑jurisdictional comparison. Operationally, the Ministry must decide standard publication formats, data quality checks before publication, and how to present potentially sensitive counts while maintaining privacy and comparability across health authorities.
Annual report: trends, actions, and capacity assessment
Section 4 requires an annual report that goes beyond monthly snapshots to analyze trends, inventory ALC patients for the fiscal year, document actions taken to improve access, and assess current and projected LTC capacity relative to population growth. The statute also imposes a six‑month deadline to table or deposit the report in the Legislative Assembly. That timetable puts pressure on the Ministry to move from raw monthly data to an audited, policy‑oriented review and to be explicit about capacity forecasting assumptions.
Placement plan, enforcement carve‑out, regulations, and commencement
Section 5 requires a ministerial placement plan within one year of the Act coming into force and annual updates thereafter; the plan must include measures to reduce ALC patients and wait times. Section 6 removes application of section 5 of the Offence Act (the bill does not incorporate that default Offence Act provision), and Section 7 authorizes the Lieutenant Governor in Council to make regulations — including designating hospice beds and prescribing report contents. Section 8 sets commencement by regulation or automatically 12 months after Royal Assent. Together, these provisions give the executive authority to fill details by regulation while leaving enforcement and funding mechanisms largely to policy and administrative instruments rather than the statute itself.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Patients on waitlists and their families — gain regular, comparable public information about wait times, transfer‑list status and hospice capacity that can inform care decisions and advocacy.
- Health system planners and policy analysts — receive standardized monthly inputs and an annual capacity assessment intended to support resource planning and targeted interventions to reduce ALC rates.
- Hospice and home support program coordinators — will get clearer, system‑level visibility of demand trends that can justify resource requests or operational changes.
- Legislators and public accountability actors — obtain a statutory source of information (monthly and annual reports) for oversight and to monitor government action on LTC access.
Who Bears the Cost
- Health authorities — must build or adapt data collection, tracking, and reporting systems to generate the prescribed monthly metrics and to ensure consistency with provincial definitions.
- Ministry of Health — takes on collation, quality assurance, website publication, and the workload of producing an annual report and a ministerial placement plan on statutory timelines.
- Hospitals and acute care units — may face pressure to reduce ALC patients without concurrent capacity increases in LTC or hospice, shifting discharge and placement burdens back to hospitals.
- Private and not‑for‑profit LTC operators — may experience increased operational scrutiny and requests for transfers, and could face reputational effects if their facilities are frequently listed as non‑preferred placements.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between transparency/accountability and operational capacity: the Act forces public visibility and a planning duty but does not supply funding, enforceable targets, or uniform data standards — so it may expose system shortfalls and create political pressure without immediately improving bed supply or home support capacity.
The Act creates sustained transparency but leaves several operational questions unresolved. First, the statute prescribes many metrics but does not set data standards, audit requirements, or an explicit mechanism to reconcile inter‑authority differences; inconsistent data definitions or collection practices could undermine comparability and lead to misleading trends.
Second, while the Act requires a ministerial plan and annual updates, it does not attach funding, timelines, or numeric access targets to those plans. That makes the planning obligation meaningful for reporting and policy discussion but weak as a direct lever to increase bed capacity or home support services.
There is also a governance tension around enforcement. By excluding section 5 of the Offence Act, the bill removes a default prosecutorial or penalty route tied to that provision (the bill does not create alternative statutory penalties).
That suggests the drafters intended administrative rather than criminal enforcement, but it leaves open how non‑compliance with reporting obligations will be handled. Finally, transparency can create perverse incentives: health authorities might prioritize speed over patient choice (increasing non‑preferred placements) to lower waitlist counts, or hospitals may be pushed to shift ALC patients into interim placements that don't solve long‑term capacity issues.
These outcomes would produce short‑term metric improvements without delivering sustainable access gains.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.