Bill C-211 replaces subsection 210(1) of the Canada Labour Code to alter bereavement leave entitlements for employees under federal jurisdiction. The bill keeps the existing leave for immediate-family deaths (up to 10 days within a six‑week window) but adds a higher‑duration entitlement when the deceased is a child, creates an eight‑week leave for stillbirth, and a three‑day leave for miscarriage.
It also defines “child,” “miscarriage,” and “stillbirth,” tying the child definition in part to the Income Tax Act caregiver credit.
These changes matter for employers and HR teams covered by the Code (for example, banks, telecoms, federally regulated transportation, and federal Crown employers) because they expand the durations and timing windows during which employees can be absent. The bill leaves unanswered practical questions about pay, documentation and how these leaves interact with other statutory or collective agreement entitlements — matters that will drive operational and compliance consequences if the amendments are enacted.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill revises subsection 210(1) to: preserve a 10‑day bereavement leave for most immediate‑family deaths (usable within a six‑week window), create an up‑to‑eight‑week leave for the death of a child, provide an up‑to‑eight‑week leave for stillbirth, and grant a three‑day leave for miscarriage. It also adds definitions for child, miscarriage and stillbirth and establishes that the child provisions take precedence over the general rule.
Who It Affects
All employees and employers governed by the Canada Labour Code — including federally regulated private‑sector employers, Crown corporations and federal departments — will be subject to the new leave lengths and timing rules. HR, payroll and occupational health professionals will need to update policies and processes for granting and tracking these leaves.
Why It Matters
The bill sets a federal minimum standard recognizing longer recovery time after the death of a child and after stillbirth, and it explicitly acknowledges miscarriage as a short leave entitlement. Even though it does not itself create a paid‑leave requirement, the statutory extension of time off will affect workforce planning, collective‑bargaining priorities and benefits administration at federally regulated workplaces.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill replaces the Canada Labour Code’s existing subsection 210(1) to recalibrate bereavement leave entitlements. It keeps the baseline rule that an employee is entitled to up to 10 days’ leave after the death of an immediate family member (or a family member for whom the employee is on certain other leaves), to be taken within a period that starts on the day of death and extends to six weeks after the latest funeral, burial or memorial service.
That baseline remains but is explicitly subordinated to three newly inserted, more specific entitlements.
First, the bill creates a distinct entitlement when the deceased is a child of the employee or of the employee’s spouse or common‑law partner. That entitlement is up to eight weeks of leave, available from the day the death occurs and up to 12 weeks after the last funeral, burial or memorial service.
Second, the bill treats stillbirths as a separate category and grants up to eight weeks’ leave under the same 12‑week window calculated from the date of the stillbirth. Third, it creates a short, three‑day leave that begins on the day a miscarriage occurs.The bill also inserts definitions: “child” means someone under 18 years of age or someone for whom the employee (or spouse/partner) qualifies for the Canada caregiver credit under paragraph 118(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act; “miscarriage” is defined as loss of an embryo or fetus of less than 500 g from natural causes before the 20th week of pregnancy; and “stillbirth” is defined as expulsion or extraction on or after the 20th week or of a fetus of at least 500 g with no signs of life.
Those definitions determine who can access the child/stillbirth/miscarriage leaves and create a statutory link to a tax‑code caregiver test for some cases involving older or dependent children.Notably, the text focuses on entitlement and timing; it does not add language granting paid leave, nor does it set out verification or benefit‑continuation rules. That omission means employers and unions will need to decide, or regulatory guidance will need to clarify, whether statutory benefit continuation, pay or medical documentation apply during these leaves and how the new entitlements interact with other leaves or collective‑agreement provisions.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill replaces subsection 210(1) to keep a general bereavement leave of up to 10 days, usable from the day of death through six weeks after the latest funeral, burial or memorial service.
When the deceased is a child (under 18 or someone qualifying for the Income Tax Act caregiver credit), the bill creates an up‑to‑eight‑week leave that can be taken from the day of death through 12 weeks after the last funeral, burial or memorial service.
The bill gives employees up to eight weeks’ leave for a stillbirth, with the same 12‑week window measured from the date of the stillbirth and any subsequent funeral or memorial service.
For miscarriage, the bill grants a three‑day leave that is available as of the day the miscarriage occurs; the bill defines miscarriage as loss before 20 weeks or of a fetus under 500 g.
The statutory definitions tie the ‘child’ category to age (under 18) or to eligibility for the Canada caregiver credit, and define stillbirth and miscarriage by week and weight thresholds (20 weeks and 500 g) rather than by medical terminology alone.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Rewrites the core bereavement‑leave entitlement and establishes precedence language
This provision substitutes the existing text of subsection 210(1), preserving a 10‑day leave for deaths of immediate family members but inserting an introductory clause that the newly added subsections (1.01)–(1.03) take precedence. Practically, that means the specialized child/stillbirth/miscarriage rules override the 10‑day rule where they apply. Employers must therefore apply a layered logic when an absence request is tied to the death of a child or to pregnancy loss, rather than treating all bereavements under a single 10‑day standard.
Eight‑week leave specifically for the death of a child
This subsection establishes an up‑to‑eight‑week entitlement where the deceased is the employee’s child or the child of the employee’s spouse/common‑law partner. The leave window opens on the day of death and closes 12 weeks after the last funeral, burial or memorial service, which expands the period during which leave can be taken compared with the general six‑week window. Employers will need to track longer absence windows and determine how this extended leave interacts with scheduling, benefits continuation and any available paid leave top‑ups.
Eight‑week leave for stillbirth
The bill creates parity between stillbirth and the death of a child by granting up to eight weeks’ leave following a stillbirth, using the same 12‑week measurement from the date of the event and related services. By treating stillbirth separately, the Code explicitly recognizes pregnancy‑loss bereavement; employers should expect requests for extended absences that may not involve a living child but are nevertheless covered by statute under this definition.
Three‑day leave for miscarriage
This short, immediate leave applies when the employee or their spouse/common‑law partner experiences a miscarriage and is available as of the day the miscarriage occurs. Its limited duration signals a different policy choice than the eight‑week stillbirth or child‑death leaves, but it still creates a statutory right to time off on the day of the event — a change employers must reflect in absence‑management protocols.
Definitions: child, miscarriage and stillbirth
The bill adds statutory definitions that determine eligibility. ‘Child’ covers persons under 18 and persons for whom the employee (or spouse/partner) is entitled to the Canada caregiver credit, thereby linking eligibility to an Income Tax Act criterion in some cases. ‘Miscarriage’ and ‘stillbirth’ are defined by week and weight thresholds (20 weeks and 500 g), which grounds eligibility in concrete, measurable standards but may raise practical and medical interpretation issues. These definitions will be central to disputes over entitlement and to employer verification practices.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Employees who lose a child: Parents (including those with a deceased child of their spouse or common‑law partner) gain a clear statutory right to up to eight weeks off and a 12‑week window in which to take it, giving more time for recovery and family arrangements.
- Employees who experience stillbirth: The creation of an eight‑week leave recognizes pregnancy loss and provides an extended recovery window similar to that for child death.
- Employees who experience miscarriage: Individuals get an explicit, immediate three‑day right to be off work starting the day the miscarriage occurs, offering short‑term protection and time to seek medical care or begin arrangements.
- Employees caring for older or dependent children: The child definition’s tie to the Canada caregiver credit means some employees who provide care for disabled or dependent children (beyond age 18) may qualify for the child‑death leave if the tax‑code condition is met.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federally regulated employers (banks, telecoms, air carriers, federal Crown corporations): These employers must accommodate longer absences and may face operational disruption or replacement‑hiring costs when employees take up to eight weeks off.
- Small federally regulated employers: Smaller workplaces with thin staffing levels will be disproportionately affected by extended absences and may struggle to provide backfill without increased overtime or temporary hires.
- HR, payroll and benefits administrators: Employers will incur compliance costs updating policies, administering new absence categories, and resolving ambiguities around benefit continuation or integration with other leaves.
- Collective bargaining counterparts and labour relations: Unions and employers will need to negotiate how these statutory entitlements interact with collective‑agreement sick leave, bereavement, and short‑term disability provisions, potentially triggering bargaining disputes or reopener clauses.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing statutory recognition of deeply traumatic family events — by granting extended time off — against the operational, financial and administrative burden that longer, broadly‑defined absences impose on federally regulated employers. The bill shifts the balance toward employee leave rights without resolving who pays, how eligibility is proved, or how these leaves fit with other entitlements, leaving a difficult trade‑off between compassion and clarity on one side and cost and manageability on the other.
The bill supplies durations and timing windows but leaves several operational and legal questions open. It does not specify whether employers must pay wages during these leaves or continue benefits, nor does it set out what documentation an employer may reasonably request.
That silence will force employers, unions and tribunals to interpret how these leaves interact with existing paid‑leave schemes, short‑term disability and benefit plans — a fertile ground for disputes and inconsistent outcomes across employers.
The statutory definitions use week and weight thresholds and a tax‑credit‑based test to determine who qualifies as a child for the extended leave. Those choices make eligibility more administrable in some cases but risk excluding employees whose medical circumstances or caregiving roles do not fit neatly into those criteria.
The 12‑week windows for child deaths and stillbirths create scheduling flexibility for employees but complicate workforce planning for employers, especially where funeral or memorial services occur long after the event or across jurisdictions. Finally, the bill’s precedence language (making the child/stillbirth/miscarriage rules override the general 10‑day rule) requires careful policy drafting by employers to avoid double‑counting leave or mistakenly denying longer entitlements.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.