Bill C‑346 amends the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 to add a limited new category of persons who may hold a certificate of competency: a foreign national who holds a diploma from a prescribed Canadian maritime institution and whose application for permanent residence is being processed. The change inserts that category into the Act’s definition of a "qualified person" and into the list of who may hold a certificate of competency, and it gives the Minister the explicit power to designate Canadian maritime institutions for that purpose.
This is a targeted regulatory change: it does not create a new immigration status or remove other certification requirements (such as examinations, sea service or safety standards), but it creates an earlier point at which certain foreign graduates can be legally certified and employed in seafaring roles while their immigration files remain open. That has immediate implications for maritime employers, Transport Canada’s credentialing procedures, and maritime training providers.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts a new eligibility class into section 2 and replaces subsection 88(1) so that, in addition to Canadian citizens and permanent residents, Transport Canada may issue a certificate of competency to a foreign national who holds a diploma from a "prescribed Canadian maritime institution" and who has a permanent residence application under IRPA being processed. It also amends section 100 to authorize designating those maritime institutions.
Who It Affects
Directly affected are foreign nationals who graduated from Canadian maritime institutions and have filed for permanent residence, Transport Canada (which issues certificates), and the maritime training institutions that may be prescribed. Secondary effects will touch employers who hire certificated seafarers, immigration counsel managing PR applications, and provincial/port labour markets relying on seafarer supply.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a pathway to put trained maritime graduates into certificated roles earlier, potentially easing labour shortages in crewing and vessel operations. It shifts administrative work to Transport Canada (to verify diplomas and PR‑application status) and establishes a new regulatory lever—the power to prescribe approved maritime institutions—that will shape who can benefit.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Under current law, only Canadian citizens and permanent residents may hold certificates of competency issued under the Canada Shipping Act, 2001. Bill C‑346 inserts a third class: a foreign national who holds a diploma from a Canadian maritime school that the Minister has prescribed and who has a permanent residence application under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act being processed.
The text does not grant immigration status; it only creates eligibility to receive a certificate while the immigration process is ongoing.
The amendment happens in two places. First, the definition of "qualified person" in section 2 gains an additional paragraph creating the new class.
Second, subsection 88(1), which lists who may hold a certificate of competency, is rewritten to list three categories explicitly: Canadian citizens, permanent residents, and the new foreign‑national class. A separate amendment to section 100 adds the explicit regulatory power to designate Canadian maritime institutions for the purpose of subsection 88(1), which means the Minister will publish or otherwise set criteria for which schools count as "prescribed." Practically, a Canadian‑trained foreign student who applies for permanent residence but has not yet received it could obtain the statutory certificate once the institutional and immigration conditions are met.
The bill does not remove existing technical requirements attached to certificates of competency—such as examinations, minimum sea time or medical fitness—so graduates will still need to satisfy those standards. What changes is the timing: eligible foreign nationals can become certificated earlier than under the current citizenship/PR‑only rule.
Transport Canada must develop or adapt verification and administrative processes to confirm diplomas, prescribed status of institutions, and the existence of a pending PR application.The amendment is narrowly framed and administrative in character. It relies on regulation or designation to define which maritime schools qualify and on operational rules at Transport Canada to validate an applicant’s immigration status in progress.
That design leaves several practical questions to future regulatory or guidance work, rather than resolving them in the statute itself.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill inserts paragraph (a.1) into the definition of "qualified person" in section 2 to add a new class of foreign national eligible for a certificate of competency.
It replaces subsection 88(1) so the Act will explicitly allow Canadian citizens, permanent residents, and a foreign national with a diploma from a prescribed Canadian maritime institution and a pending PR application to hold a certificate.
Section 100 is expanded to give the Minister authority to designate which Canadian maritime institutions count as "prescribed" for the new eligibility path.
The change does not repeal or alter technical certification requirements (exams, sea service, fitness) in the Act—those requirements remain in force and must still be met by applicants.
Eligibility under the new category requires two conditions: a diploma from a minister‑prescribed Canadian maritime institution and an active permanent residence application; the bill does not define further procedural proof or timelines.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Adds a new qualified‑person category for certain foreign nationals
This amendment adds paragraph (a.1) to the Act’s definition of "qualified person," explicitly including a foreign national (as defined under IRPA) who has a diploma from a prescribed Canadian maritime institution and whose PR application is being processed. Mechanically, that expands the pool of people who can meet the statutory "qualified person" test used elsewhere in the Act to justify certification. Practically, it means Transport Canada must accept documentary proof of a prescribed diploma plus evidence that a PR application is pending when assessing eligibility.
Rewrites who may hold a certificate of competency
Subsection 88(1) is redrafted to enumerate three explicit categories of certificate holders: Canadian citizens, permanent residents and the new foreign‑national class. The replacement clarifies that the Act’s entitlement to a certificate is categorical rather than based on implicit interpretation. For compliance officers and employers, this makes eligibility determinations more document‑centric: citizenship, PR status, or the new combination of prescribed diploma plus pending PR application.
Gives the Minister power to designate Canadian maritime institutions
By adding paragraph (c.1) to section 100, the bill creates an explicit regulatory power to name or set criteria for "prescribed Canadian maritime institutions." That delegation matters: the statute does not list schools or criteria, so the scope and effect of the policy will be realized through regulations or Ministerial instruments. Transport Canada will need to develop a designation process and possibly publish a list or standards for recognition.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Foreign graduates of Canadian maritime institutions who have applied for permanent residence — they gain earlier eligibility to be certificated and therefore to work in roles that require a certificate of competency while their immigration file is pending.
- Canadian shipowners and vessel operators facing crew shortages — they gain access to an expanded pool of trained, immediately deployable candidates who completed Canadian maritime programs.
- Prescribed Canadian maritime institutions — inclusion as a prescribed institution makes their diplomas more valuable in labour market terms and could increase enrolment demand from international students.
Who Bears the Cost
- Transport Canada — it will need to create criteria, verification processes and administrative capacity to designate institutions and confirm both diplomas and the existence of pending PR applications.
- Employers and crewing agencies — they will have an enhanced duty to verify documentary eligibility and may face short‑term staffing risks if verification is disputed or delayed.
- Non‑prescribed foreign training providers and international maritime programs — their graduates remain excluded from this streamlined path and may face competitive disadvantages.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between expanding immediate labour supply by allowing Canadian‑trained foreign nationals to be certificated while their PR is pending, and maintaining rigorous, consistent standards for seafarer competence and immigration integrity; resolving one objective increases administrative burden and risk to the other.
The bill leaves key implementation details to regulation or administrative practice. It does not define what counts as a "diploma," how long a PR application must have been pending, or what documentary proof suffices to show an application is "being processed." Those gaps create room for uneven application across regions and employers unless Transport Canada issues clear standards.
The practical effect depends heavily on how fast and transparently the Minister moves to prescribe institutions and how Transport Canada integrates verification with Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) systems.
There is also a safety and competency tension. The statute opens eligibility earlier, but it does not waive technical certification requirements; employers and regulators will need to ensure that expedited eligibility does not lead to under‑qualified personnel aboard vessels.
Finally, relying on a prescribed‑institution list risks excluding smaller or newer programs unless criteria are sufficiently inclusive and applied promptly, which could create a two‑tiered pathway among graduates.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.