Bill C-13 amends a suite of Canadian statutes to implement the Protocol on the Accession of the United Kingdom to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans‑Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The bill updates statutory definitions, replaces Schedule IV to the Bank Act, creates a new Customs Tariff treatment called the Comprehensive and Progressive United Kingdom Tariff (CPUKT) with specified staging schedules, and lists the accession protocol in the CPTPP Implementation Act.
Why it matters: the bill operationalizes preferential market access between Canada and the UK under CPTPP, changes how foreign banks and regulated entities are identified for several financial statutes, and imposes concrete tariff‑reduction timelines and rounding rules that will affect customs classification, importer duties, and regulatory compliance. It also builds a standing review requirement into the CPTPP Implementation Act to reassess UK accession every three years.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts the UK accession protocol into Canada’s CPTPP legal framework, creates a separate tariff column (CPUKT) with staged duty reductions (including three staging categories X78, X79 and X80 and exact reduction dates), replaces Schedule IV to the Bank Act, and harmonizes definitions of “regulated foreign entity” across financial statutes. It gives the Governor in Council order‑making authority to amend tariff entitlement lists and Schedule IV for trade obligations.
Who It Affects
Importers and customs brokers handling goods covered by the CPUKT (including many agricultural, food, textile and vehicle tariff lines), Canadian banks and their foreign subsidiaries, trust companies and insurers that rely on the Bank Act/Schedule IV for foreign‑entity treatment, and the Canada Border Services Agency and Finance for implementation and tariff administration.
Why It Matters
The bill converts a multilateral accession protocol into domestic law, creating predictable duty‑reduction pathways for many goods and altering which foreign banks qualify for exceptions under Canadian banking and insurance law. It therefore shifts market incentives, compliance obligations and administrative work across trade and financial regulatory systems.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill C‑13 translates the UK’s accession to the CPTPP into Canadian law through targeted amendments across trade and financial statutes. On trade, it creates a new tariff treatment label — the Comprehensive and Progressive United Kingdom Tariff (CPUKT) — and inserts CPUKT entries into the List of Countries and the List of Tariff Provisions.
For items listed under CPUKT the bill sets out how to apply “A” (final Free), staged “F” reductions, and three specific staging categories labelled X78, X79 and X80, each of which comes with explicit percentage or calendar‑based reduction steps and final dates when tariff rates become “Free.” The bill also prescribes rounding rules and a rule that any reduced ad valorem rate below 2% (except for specified motor vehicle lines) is immediately converted to “Free.”
On customs administration the bill empowers the Governor in Council, on the Minister’s recommendation, to extend CPUKT entitlement to goods that originate in a CPTPP country and to make such orders retroactive (subject to an overall non‑retroactivity limit tied to when the CPTPP is in effect between Canada and the UK). It amends the Customs Tariff schedules to identify which tariff items receive CPUKT treatment, which are staged, and which are unaffected.On the financial side, the bill harmonizes the definition of “regulated foreign entity” across the Trust and Loan Companies Act, Insurance Companies Act and the Bank Act by making them refer to the Bank Act’s definition and by replacing Schedule IV to the Bank Act.
Practically, that change — plus new text allowing the Governor in Council to amend Schedule IV to implement international trade obligations — affects which foreign banks and their subsidiaries qualify for statutory exceptions under a number of banking provisions. The Insurance Companies Act and Trust and Loan Companies Act receive parallel updates to align with that approach.Finally, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans‑Pacific Partnership Implementation Act is amended to expand the statutory definition of the Agreement to include any accession protocol listed in its schedule; the accession protocol for the UK is added to the new Schedule.
The Act also gains a new statutory requirement for a House of Commons committee to conduct a comprehensive review of the UK’s accession three years after entry into force and every three years thereafter, with a six‑month deadline to report findings back to the House. The bill comes into force by order‑in‑council.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a new Customs Tariff treatment called CPUKT (Comprehensive and Progressive United Kingdom Tariff) and inserts it into the List of Tariff Provisions and the List of Countries.
Staging categories X78, X79 and X80 set explicit duty‑reduction steps and final “Free” dates (examples: X78 phases to Free by Jan 1, 2028; X79 reaches Free by Jan 1, 2029; X80 reaches Free by Jan 1, 2029 for certain items).
Rounding and elimination rules: fractional specific or ad valorem reductions are rounded down (to nearest 0.01¢ or 0.1%), and any reduced ad valorem rate under 2% (except specified motor vehicles) is converted immediately to Free.
The bill replaces Schedule IV to the Bank Act and authorizes the Governor in Council to amend Schedule IV by order to implement international trade obligations, changing which foreign banks and subsidiaries qualify for statutory exceptions.
The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans‑Pacific Partnership Implementation Act gets a three‑year recurring review requirement: a designated House of Commons committee must review UK accession three years after coming into force and every three years thereafter, reporting within six months.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Update statutory references to include accession protocols
This change broadens how the CPTPP is cited in the Financial Administration Act by explicitly including accession protocols listed in the CPTPP Implementation Act schedule. Practically, any future accession protocol that the Implementation Act lists will be recognized by reference in federal financial authorities that rely on Schedule VII, avoiding the need to amend those authorities each time an accession occurs.
Replace Schedule IV and harmonize 'regulated foreign entity' definitions
The bill replaces Schedule IV to the Bank Act with a new Schedule and changes the definition of 'regulated foreign entity' in the Trust and Loan Companies Act and Insurance Companies Act to cross‑reference the Bank Act. It also amends several Bank Act provisions to clarify that exceptions for subsidiaries of foreign banks apply where the parent bank is incorporated in a Schedule IV jurisdiction. The Governor in Council is given explicit authority to amend Schedule IV by order to implement Canada’s international trade obligations, which creates a mechanism for adding accession countries (like the UK) to the list without separate primary‑law amendments.
Create CPUKT, add staging and technical tariff rules
This is the technical core for customs. The bill adds CPUKT as a distinct tariff treatment, inserts CPUKT notations into the List of Countries and the List of Tariff Provisions, and sets out how to apply CPUKT entries. It defines the meaning of 'A' (final Free), 'F' staging and three staging codes (X78, X79, X80) with precise reduction schedules and dates. It also supplies rounding rules for specific and ad valorem rates and a rule that reduces rates under 2% (with motor‑vehicle exceptions) immediately to Free. Schedules 2 and 3 enumerate tariff items that receive N/A or staged CPUKT treatment and list many specific agricultural, food, textile and vehicle lines and their initial and final rates.
Treat accession protocols as part of the Agreement and add review duty
The Act’s definition of the Agreement is amended to explicitly include any accession protocol listed in its schedule; the bill adds the UK accession protocol to that schedule. It also clarifies that a listed accession protocol is approved for Canadian purposes. Notably, the bill inserts a mandatory, recurring review: a House of Commons committee must undertake a comprehensive review of the UK’s accession three years after the Act comes into force and every three years thereafter, and report within six months of completing that review. This creates a statutory oversight cadence for the accession’s domestic effects.
Entry into force by order in council
The Act comes into force on a day fixed by the Governor in Council. That means Canada’s CPUKT tariff treatments, Schedule IV changes and the Implementation Act amendments become active only after an order‑in‑council is made, giving the executive timing control over coordination with operational readiness at CBSA, Finance, and financial regulators.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- UK exporters: Gain preferential market access to Canada under CPTPP tariff schedules for listed goods, improving price competitiveness on lines that phase to Free.
- Canadian importers and downstream manufacturers: Lower duties on many agricultural, food, textile and component tariff lines (per Schedules 2 and 3) reduce input costs where CPUKT applies.
- Foreign banks incorporated in newly listed Schedule IV jurisdictions: Subsidiaries of those banks may qualify for statutory exceptions under the Bank Act and related provisions once Schedule IV is updated, easing cross‑border banking operations.
- Customs brokers and trade advisors: Clear CPUKT classifications and staging rules create commercial opportunities for advisory and compliance services as businesses seek to use preferential treatment correctly.
Who Bears the Cost
- Competing Canadian producers (especially in sectors listed in Schedules 2 and 3): Face increased competition from duty reductions that phase in over set dates and eventual tariff elimination on many lines.
- Canada Border Services Agency and Finance: Must update tariff databases, classification systems and guidance, and manage retroactive order provisions and rounding rules — an operational and IT implementation burden.
- Banks, insurers and trust companies: Must update compliance frameworks and internal policies because the definition of 'regulated foreign entity' changes and Schedule IV is now subject to executive amendment for trade purposes.
- Parliamentary committees and House of Commons staff: Will carry recurrent workload for statutory three‑year reviews and the follow‑up reporting obligations imposed on the review committee.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill seeks to deliver predictable, scheduled tariff liberalization and cross‑statute legal alignment to operationalize UK accession, but it does so by moving substantive qualification rules (Schedule IV and tariff entitlements) into executive orders and ministerial discretion — trading legislative clarity and permanence for administrative flexibility and faster implementation, with consequences for predictability and stakeholder planning.
The bill folds the UK accession protocol into multiple domestic regimes, but it leaves several practical questions unresolved. First, the interaction between CPUKT entries and other preferential treatments (including the earlier Canada–UK Trade Continuity Agreement and existing CPTPP provisions) will require detailed guidance on rules of origin, cumulation and document requirements; the bill updates tariff labels and rates but not the operational customs guidance that importers rely on.
Second, the Governor in Council’s authority to amend Schedule IV and to extend CPUKT entitlement (including limited retroactivity) centralizes discretion in the executive branch; that expedites technical updates but increases regulatory unpredictability for market participants who prefer stable, legislated lists.
Implementation logistics also carry tension: the staged reductions include precise rounding and a hard‑floor rule that wipes out small ad valorem rates (<2%) except for specified motor vehicles. That rule can produce abrupt duty elimination for certain lines once the staged reduction crosses the threshold, which may have outsized market effects for narrow product lines.
Finally, harmonizing the 'regulated foreign entity' definition by cross‑reference strengthens coherence across financial statutes but shifts substantive qualification criteria into Schedule IV and executive orders, which may complicate judicial review or stakeholder forecasting of which foreign parents will trigger exceptions.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.