Bill S-213 inserts a new Subdivision C into the Canada Elections Act that obliges certain registered federal parties to publish on their websites the rules, programs and progress related to diversifying candidate selection — including women-specific targets and nomination rules for open and close-race ridings. The bill also restores and expands statutory authority for the Chief Electoral Officer to issue a voluntary self-identification questionnaire to candidates, nomination contestants and leadership contestants and to publish anonymized demographic reports.
These measures aim to create a public record of party-level diversity practices and to generate standardized demographic data for analysis of who runs for office and who wins. For practitioners, the bill creates new compliance tasks for qualifying parties, new data-collection and reporting work for Elections Canada, and privacy-management obligations around voluntary self-identification and anonymized public reporting.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates legal duties for registered parties above an electoral threshold to post candidate-selection rules, diversity programs, implementation measures, assessment methods, progress reports and a contact for related concerns; requires the Chief Electoral Officer to offer a voluntary self-ID questionnaire to candidates and certain contestants and to publish anonymized demographic reports.
Who It Affects
Registered federal parties meeting the statutory vote thresholds, candidates and nomination/leadership contestants, Elections Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), and civil-society researchers and watchdogs who use electoral data.
Why It Matters
It builds a public accountability mechanism at the party level while producing a standardized, anonymized dataset on candidate demographics — material for compliance officers, party organizers, researchers and diversity advocates assessing representation in Canadian federal politics.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill does two distinct but related things. First, it adds a new Subdivision C to the Canada Elections Act that targets registered parties that meet an electoral-size test and requires them to publish, on their websites, the internal rules and programs they use to select candidates, how those programs operate, how they will be assessed and the party’s cumulative progress toward those goals.
The provision includes a women-specific strand that asks parties to state targets or target ranges for the nomination of women, and to make public any nomination rules that apply in open seats or where the previous result was within a 10-percentage-point margin.
Second, the bill replaces the old, repealed section on demographic collection and gives the Chief Electoral Officer explicit statutory authority to provide a self-identification questionnaire to (a) filed candidates, (b) reported nomination contestants and (c) registered leadership contestants. The CEO may design the questionnaire to gather disaggregable and intersectional variables and must include variables relevant to the Employment Equity Act’s designated groups.
Responses are voluntary, treated as confidential, and limited in use to the required reports. The reports themselves must be anonymized before publication.On timing and publication, the bill sets a specific deadline for one major report: Elections Canada must publish the general-election demographic report within 90 days after the return of the writ.
It also requires parties to refresh the website disclosures once per calendar year. If a party has no diversity program, plan or relevant nomination rule, it must publish a statement explaining why and, if available, a timeline for adopting such measures.
Parties must also identify a contact person for concerns about these obligations.The bill couples disclosure obligations with enforcement teeth by amending the deregistration-procedure provision so that failures to meet the new Subdivision C obligations are among the obligations the Chief Electoral Officer can enforce under the Act’s non-voluntary deregistration process. Finally, the measure that creates the party-disclosure Subdivision is set to come into force two years after royal assent, giving parties a grace period before the website-publishing obligations begin.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The new Subdivision C applies only to registered parties that in the most recent general election won at least 2% of valid votes nationally, or at least 5% of valid votes in the districts where they endorsed candidates.
Parties must post on their websites not only diversity programs but concrete implementation measures, how those measures are assessed, cumulative progress by designated group, and an annual update cycle.
A women-specific requirement obliges parties to publish targets (numbers, percentages or ranges) and to disclose rules for nominating women in open seats and in ridings where the party’s previous candidate lost by 10% or less.
Elections Canada must offer a self-identification questionnaire to candidates, nomination contestants and leadership contestants, collect intersectional and disaggregable variables (including Employment Equity Act groups), and publish anonymized reports.
The Chief Electoral Officer must publish the general-election demographic report within 90 days after the return of the writ; responses to the questionnaire are voluntary and are to be used only for the report.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definition: designated groups tied to Employment Equity Act
The bill adds a statutory definition of “designated groups” by referencing section 3 of the Employment Equity Act rather than enumerating the groups in the Elections Act itself. Practically, this imports the Employment Equity Act’s group categories into electoral reporting and disclosure without duplicating language; parties and Elections Canada will therefore rely on an existing federal framework to decide which demographic variables are required or relevant for reporting and analysis.
Links non-compliance to deregistration procedure
This amendment expands the list of obligations that can trigger the Chief Electoral Officer’s non-voluntary deregistration process to include failures under the newly inserted Subdivision C (the parties’ diversity-disclosure obligations). That change gives the CEO a statutory pathway to notify and, ultimately, pursue deregistration if a party persistently omits required disclosures, though the bill does not create a separate new penalty regime — it folds enforcement into existing administrative procedures under section 415.
Subdivision C: which parties must publish what, and annual maintenance
Subdivision C defines the eligibility threshold for the disclosure duties and enumerates the items parties must make public on their websites: selection rules, diversity programs and policies, program descriptions by group, implementation measures (for example, whether formal search committees are required), methods for assessing effectiveness, and cumulative progress. It also establishes an explicit annual-update cadence. If a party lacks a program or plan, the party must publish a statement explaining the absence and any proposed timeline for adoption. Finally, parties must list a named contact and contact information for concerns about these obligations, creating a channel for public or regulator complaints.
Elections Canada self-ID questionnaire and reporting framework
The bill restores and replaces the previous provision on demographic collection. It requires the Chief Electoral Officer to provide a voluntary self-identification questionnaire to three cohorts (filed candidates, nomination contestants reported in nomination contest reports, and registered leadership contestants). The CEO is authorized to collect any variables that support disaggregation and intersectional analysis, must include variables relevant to the Employment Equity Act’s designated groups, and must treat responses as confidential. The bill also creates a statutory reporting obligation: an anonymized general-election report to be published within 90 days after the return of the writ, and separate publication requirements for by-elections and leadership contests at the CEO’s discretion.
Parliamentary submission route for the CEO's reports
This technical amendment requires the Speaker of the House of Commons to submit reports the Chief Electoral Officer provides under the enumerated sections — now including the newly numbered demographic-report section — to the House without delay. The change formalizes the parliamentary route for the CEO’s demographic reporting to reach elected members and committees.
Two-year delayed start for party-disclosure obligations
The bill specifies that the provision adding Subdivision C (the party website disclosure obligations) comes into force on the second anniversary of royal assent. Other amendments are not given a delayed commencement date in the text and therefore would typically come into force on royal assent unless regulations or proclamation specify otherwise; the two-year window gives parties time to prepare policies, websites and administrative procedures.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Women candidates and aspirants — the women-specific targets and mandatory reporting on nomination rules increase transparency about party-level efforts to recruit and nominate women, giving advocates and prospective candidates a clearer basis to pressure or work with parties.
- Members of federally recognized designated groups (per the Employment Equity Act) — standardized questionnaire variables and anonymized reporting make it easier for researchers and advocates to track representation trends for racialized people, Indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities and other designated groups.
- Researchers, think tanks and watchdog organizations — the statutory duty for Elections Canada to collect disaggregable data and publish anonymized reports creates a repeatable dataset for analyzing candidate diversity and electoral outcomes.
- Voters and civic organizations focused on accountability — public party disclosures on selection rules and progress provide comparative information to evaluate party commitments and reputations on diversity.
- Party compliance and diversity teams (for qualifying parties) — while they bear new duties, these teams gain a clear, statutory framework to formalize practices and to demonstrate progress publicly.
Who Bears the Cost
- Registered parties that meet the vote thresholds — they must develop, document and publish policies, measure progress, update annually, and maintain a public contact; smaller party machinery and volunteer-run associations may find this administratively demanding.
- Elections Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) — designing, distributing and processing voluntary self-ID questionnaires, ensuring confidentiality/anonymization, and producing timely reports (including the 90-day general-election deadline) will require staff time and possible new systems.
- Nomination contestants and candidates — even though participation is voluntary, parties and the public will scrutinize demographic patterns; campaigns will need to advise candidates on privacy, consent and messaging around self-identification.
- Electoral district associations and local nomination organizers — parties’ national-level publication of rules and assessment methods may require local associations to align their procedures and data collection practices, increasing administrative coordination.
- Privacy and IT resources within parties and Elections Canada — safeguarding voluntary self-ID data and publishing anonymized aggregate findings will impose technical and legal compliance costs (data security, anonymization protocols, and potential legal review).
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill tries to reconcile two legitimate goals — public accountability about party candidate-selection practices and protection of individuals’ privacy and choice — but those aims pull in opposite directions: the more transparent and granular the publicly released data, the greater the risk to individual privacy and the higher the implementation and compliance cost for parties and Elections Canada.
The bill creates useful transparency tools but leaves important implementation choices open. It makes self-identification voluntary and confidential, which protects individual privacy but guarantees incomplete participation; without minimum response-rate rules or mandated follow-up, published aggregates may suffer from non-response bias and limit the reports’ analytic value.
The requirement that any collected variables “support disaggregation and analysis of intersecting variables” is permissive; it places on Elections Canada the task of instrument design, variable selection and disclosure-threshold rules (for example, small-cell suppression), none of which the bill specifies.
The enforcement approach ties failures to disclose into section 415’s deregistration machinery instead of creating a tailored penalty or remedial process for disclosure lapses. That linkage poses practical questions: what constitutes sufficient non-compliance to trigger deregistration steps, how will the CEO and parties handle borderline cases, and will courts or Parliament get involved if a party disputes the process?
Finally, the two-year delayed commencement for party website obligations softens immediate disruption but also means the next general election cycle could proceed without uniform party disclosures, fragmenting data across timelines and complicating before-and-after comparisons.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.