The bill amends Manitoba’s Employment Standards Code to let employees who do not observe Good Friday or Christmas Day request in writing that an employer substitute one day of religious observance within 12 months of the holiday. It places time limits on requests and responses, makes the substituted day a general holiday for pay purposes, and sets specific wage rules depending on whether the business operates on the original holiday.
Separately, the bill replaces language that referenced Sunday as a protected day for retail employees with the broader concept of a "day of religious observance," creates a new division requiring employers to reasonably accommodate religious practices during the workday and religious clothing (subject to safety laws), and amends The Remembrance Day Act accordingly. Employers face new scheduling, pay, and accommodation duties; employees gain clearer statutory protections for religious observance.
At a Glance
What It Does
Allows an employee who does not observe Good Friday or Christmas to request in writing that the employer substitute one 'religious observance day' within 12 months; requires employer response within seven days and reasonable accommodation unless it causes undue hardship. Establishes pay rules for substituted days and for work performed on the original holiday.
Who It Affects
Province-wide private-sector employers in Manitoba (including retail establishments), employees who observe religious holidays other than Good Friday or Christmas, workplace health and safety officers (for clothing exceptions), payroll and HR teams managing holiday pay calculations, and adjudicators resolving disputes.
Why It Matters
It converts a mostly case-law and human-rights framework into explicit statutory entitlements and employer duties, changing payroll exposure and scheduling practices for weekend-heavy sectors and clarifying that religious clothing is a distinct accommodation issue tied to safety regulation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a new definition: a "religious observance day" is a day for religious holiday observance by the denomination with which the employee is affiliated. For Good Friday and Christmas Day only, an employee who does not observe the general holiday may request in writing that the employer substitute one religious observance day within 12 months after the holiday.
The written request must be made no later than 30 days before the general holiday and must identify which general holiday is being substituted and the proposed substitute date. Employers must respond in writing within seven days and, if they deny the request, provide reasons.
When a substitute is approved, that substituted day becomes a "general holiday" under the Code. The bill sets two wage rules: if the employer operates on the original holiday (Good Friday or Christmas), the employee who requested substitution receives holiday pay for the substituted day and the regular wage for hours worked on the original holiday; if the employer does not operate on the original holiday, the employer pays holiday pay for either the original holiday or the substituted day but not both.
Those mechanics create concrete payroll outcomes and a need for employers to track substituted-day status across pay periods.The bill also expands retail protections and religious accommodation. It replaces earlier language that singled out Sunday and allows a retail employee to refuse to work on a Friday, Saturday or Sunday as a "day of religious observance" if the employee gives at least 14 days' notice (or as much notice as is reasonable if scheduled less than 14 days ahead).
A new Division 12.1 requires employers to reasonably accommodate observance of religious practice during the workday and to reasonably accommodate religious clothing, provided that the accommodation does not unduly restrict business operations and complies with The Workplace Safety and Health Act and other applicable laws.Finally, the bill updates cross-references (including The Remembrance Day Act) so that 'day of religious observance' replaces references to 'Sunday,' and it comes into force on royal assent. In short, the bill formalizes several claimable rights for employees around substitutions, refusals, and clothing, while leaving the core legal standards—reasonable accommodation and undue hardship—for future interpretation and enforcement by tribunals and courts.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill defines "religious observance day" as a day for religious holiday observance by the religious denomination with which an employee is affiliated.
An employee who does not observe Good Friday or Christmas Day may request in writing that the employer substitute one religious observance day within 12 months after the holiday; the request must be submitted no later than 30 days before the general holiday.
The employer must provide a written decision within seven days of receiving the request and must reasonably accommodate the employee unless the accommodation causes undue hardship.
If a business operates on Good Friday or Christmas Day and an employee obtains a substituted religious observance day, the employer must pay holiday pay for the substituted day and the employee’s regular wages for hours worked on the original holiday; if the business does not operate that day, employer pays holiday pay for either the general holiday or the substituted day, but not both.
Retail employees may refuse to work on a Friday, Saturday or Sunday for religious observance with at least 14 days' notice (or reasonable shorter notice if scheduled within 14 days), and employers must reasonably accommodate religious clothing so long as it complies with workplace safety laws.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Minor amendment to section heading (adds 'by employer')
This technical change inserts "by employer" after "holiday" in the heading to subsection 28(1). It signals a narrower focus on employer obligations tied to holidays and prepares the statute for the new substitution provisions that follow. Practically, the change doesn't alter entitlement mechanics but aligns headings with the new content.
Substitution framework for Good Friday and Christmas
Sections 28.1 and 28.2 set up the core substitution mechanism. They define "religious observance day," permit written substitution requests for Good Friday and Christmas within 12 months, require requests to be submitted at least 30 days before the holiday, and obligate employers to respond in writing within seven days and to reasonably accommodate unless undue hardship results. The substituted day becomes a general holiday for Code purposes, and the statute prescribes how holiday pay and wages are calculated depending on whether the employer operated on the original holiday. Employers must therefore track which employees have obtained substitutions and adjust payroll and scheduling accordingly.
Reframes retail protections toward religious observance days
The bill replaces the Division 12 heading to emphasize a retail employee’s right to refuse work on a day of religious observance rather than naming a specific day (Sunday). That heading change signals the statutory shift away from a fixed weekly day toward a religious-observance-based standard and affects how employers and tribunals interpret retail scheduling protections.
Retail employee right to refuse work on Friday, Saturday or Sunday
Subsection 81(1) now allows a retail employee to refuse to work on a Friday, Saturday or Sunday as a day of religious observance if they give the employer at least 14 days' notice, or shorter reasonable notice if scheduled less than 14 days ahead. The provision preserves a notice requirement but broadens the protected basis to religious observance days; employers must factor this into weekend staffing models and collective-agreement obligations.
Employer duty to reasonably accommodate religious practice and clothing
Division 12.1 creates two specific duties: to reasonably accommodate religious observance during the workday and to reasonably accommodate religious clothing. Both duties are subject to the limitation that accommodation must not unduly restrict business operations and, for clothing, must comply with The Workplace Safety and Health Act and any other applicable enactments. This ties accommodation obligations explicitly to workplace safety rules and shifts some determinations about acceptable exceptions to overlap between employment-standards enforcement and occupational-safety regulators.
Cross‑statute language changes including The Remembrance Day Act
The bill updates language in clause 92(1)(b.1) and amends The Remembrance Day Act by replacing references to "Sunday" with "a day of religious observance." That substitution broadens the statutory vocabulary across multiple provisions, which could affect when statutory protections attach (for instance, in statutes that previously treated Sunday specially) and will require government guidance to harmonize cross-references.
Coming into force
The Act comes into force on royal assent. There is no phased implementation or regulatory schedule in the text, so operationalization (forms, templates, payroll guidance, and interaction with collective agreements) will depend on immediate administrative measures by employers and the provincial government.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Employees who observe religious holidays other than Good Friday or Christmas — they gain a statutory mechanism to substitute a day for observance and clearer entitlement to holiday pay for the substituted day.
- Retail employees with weekend observance obligations — the statutory right to refuse Friday/Saturday/Sunday work with notice provides a direct workplace protection that can reduce coercive scheduling.
- Employees who require religious clothing — they get an explicit statutory right to accommodation for religious clothing, subject to compliance with workplace safety laws.
Who Bears the Cost
- Private-sector employers (especially those open on Good Friday or Christmas) — they face additional payroll costs when an employee who requested substitution works the original holiday (holiday pay plus regular wages) and will need to update payroll systems and rostering practices.
- Retail businesses with concentrated weekend operations — last-minute refusals or a wave of 14‑day notices can increase scheduling complexity and labour costs, particularly in small or thinly staffed stores.
- HR, payroll teams and occupational-safety officers — they must develop procedures to process written substitution requests, meet the seven‑day response deadline, reconcile substituted-day status with payroll, and assess safety exceptions for religious clothing.
- Adjudicators and tribunals — the undefined standards of "reasonable accommodation" and "undue hardship" will generate disputes that require interpretation, increasing workload for labour boards and courts.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing the statutory protection of individual religious observance against employers’ legitimate needs for predictable operations, workplace safety, and manageable payroll costs: the bill strengthens individual rights but leaves open how far employers must go before an accommodation becomes an undue hardship.
The bill leaves key adjudicative standards—"reasonable accommodation" and "undue hardship"—unquantified. That invites litigation and tribunal interpretation to determine how much operational disruption or cost qualifies as undue hardship in different sectors.
The seven‑day response requirement creates a tight administrative window for employers to investigate operational impacts, verify proposed substitute dates, and coordinate with payroll and scheduling systems; employers without prepared processes may be found non-compliant on procedural grounds even where denial would have been substantively justified.
The religious clothing accommodation is expressly tied to the Workplace Safety and Health Act, but the bill does not set a process for safety assessments or identify which party bears the cost of implementing technical safety accommodations (for example, adapting PPE for head coverings). The substitution mechanics for holiday pay introduce accounting complexity: employers that operate on the original holiday must pay both holiday pay for the substitute and regular wages for hours worked, which can materially increase labour costs for businesses that remain open on those two holidays.
Finally, the substitution framework applies only to Good Friday and Christmas Day; the choice to limit to those two holidays creates an uneven landscape of protection across other statutory holidays and could prompt similar future amendments.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.