Bill 36 amends The Drivers and Vehicles Act and The Highway Traffic Act to give the registrar clearer power to suspend and disqualify people from driving pending medical or impaired‑driving reports, and to require an impaired‑driver assessment (and any recommended education or treatment) before a licence can be returned. It also narrows parental consent to a single approver for 16–17‑year‑olds' licences and registrations, adds the licence class/subclass to the searchable licence database, and makes it an offence to authorize non‑qualified or false vehicle inspection certificates.
Procedurally, the bill removes a requirement under The Highway Traffic Act that applicants surrender their licence while seeking review of a suspension or disqualification, and makes a consequential repeal in The Off‑Road Vehicles Act. The changes shift operational burdens onto registries, assessment providers and inspection systems while prioritizing road safety and inspection integrity.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill allows the registrar to suspend a licence and disqualify a person from driving (including off‑road vehicles) until required medical or assessment reports are supplied and the registrar acts. It bars reinstatement until a recognised impaired‑driver assessment is provided and any recommended program is completed, tightens rules for minor registrations, expands searchable licence data to include class/subclass, and creates offences for improper issuance of safety inspection certificates.
Who It Affects
Driver licensing authorities and registrars, drivers subject to medical or impaired‑driving reviews, assessed drivers and the recognized agencies that perform impaired‑driver assessments, inspection stations and mechanics, and parents or other approvers for 16‑ and 17‑year‑old applicants.
Why It Matters
The bill raises the administrative and compliance stakes for anyone dealing with licence suspensions, reinstatements and vehicle inspections: registrars gain enforcement levers, assessment and treatment providers become gatekeepers for licence return, and inspection‑certificate procedures carry criminal risk if certificates are issued improperly.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 36 redraws how Manitoba handles licence suspensions tied to medical or impaired‑driving concerns and how licences are returned. Where the registrar issues a notice under the Drivers and Vehicles Act, the registrar may now also immediately disqualify the person from driving — including off‑road vehicles — by written notice.
That suspension/disqualification remains effective until the person supplies the medical or assessment reports the registrar requested and the registrar takes follow‑up action under the statutory review provisions.
If the grounds for suspension or disqualification are linked to impaired driving under specified sections of The Highway Traffic Act (or an equivalent out‑of‑province offence), the bill requires the person to provide an impaired‑driver assessment from a recognised agency before the registrar will reinstate or issue a licence. Where that agency recommends education or treatment, the applicant must successfully complete the program before the licence is returned.
In practice this turns assessment providers into a procedural gatekeeper for licence restoration.The bill also simplifies parental involvement for young applicants: a single parent or guardian (or, when the registrar approves, another responsible person) may sign for a 16‑ or 17‑year‑old’s licence, identification card or vehicle registration, and that approver can ask the registrar to cancel a registration issued to someone under 18. On the inspections side, the Act now creates an offence for authorizing or permitting a non‑qualified mechanic to issue a safety inspection certificate or for allowing issuance of a certificate that is false, misleading or omits material facts.Finally, the Highway Traffic Act changes remove the current requirement to surrender a driver's licence when applying for a review of a suspension or disqualification order, and the drivers' searchable records will now include the class and subclass associated with a licence number.
The Act comes into force on royal assent, and a narrow consequential repeal is made to The Off‑Road Vehicles Act.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The registrar’s suspension and disqualification of driving privileges stays in effect until the person provides the reports required under the registrar’s notice and the registrar acts under the applicable review/subsection provisions.
The registrar must not reinstate or issue a licence to someone suspended or disqualified for impaired‑driving grounds under The Highway Traffic Act (sections 263.1 or 263.2) until the person provides an impaired‑driver assessment from a recognized agency and completes any educational or treatment program that agency recommends.
A 16‑ or 17‑year‑old’s vehicle registration or licence application requires the approval and signature of only one parent or guardian (or another responsible person approved by the registrar), and that approver can request cancellation of a registration issued to a person under 18.
The bill makes it an offence to authorize, permit or acquiesce in a non‑qualified person issuing a vehicle inspection certificate, or to permit issuance of a false or misleading inspection certificate or one that omits a material fact.
The searchable drivers’ database will now include the class and subclass associated with a licence number, adding a new searchable element to licence records.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Registrar power to suspend and disqualify by written notice
The bill replaces the existing subsection to permit the registrar, when issuing a medical or report notice, to suspend a person’s licence and separately disqualify them from driving or operating off‑road vehicles by written notice. Practically, this creates two linked but distinct effects—suspension (administrative interruption of licence privileges) and disqualification (prohibition on driving)—and keeps both in force until the registrar receives the required reports and takes the statutorily prescribed follow‑up action.
Reinstatement conditional on impaired‑driver assessment and programs
This replacement provision instructs the registrar not to reinstate or issue a licence to persons suspended or disqualified for specified impaired‑driving offences until they supply an impaired‑driver assessment from a 'recognized agency' and, if that agency advises, successfully complete recommended education or treatment. The practical implication is a mandatory administrative and clinical checkpoint before licence return, with discretion resting largely on what qualifies as a 'recognized agency' and on the agency’s program recommendations.
One‑approver rule for minors and cancellable registrations
The Act reduces the consent requirement for 16–17‑year‑olds so that a single parent or guardian (or another responsible person the registrar approves) may sign licence, ID or vehicle registration applications. It also adds explicit age thresholds: no vehicle registration under 16, and a process to cancel registrations issued to under‑18s if the approver requests cancellation. This streamlines applications but creates a direct mechanism for an approver to revoke a young person’s registration.
Database fields and new inspection‑certificate offences
The changes add the class and subclass of a driver’s licence to the set of licence information that can be searched and retrieved by number, increasing the granularity of public records for enforcement and administrative checks. Separately, the Act expands offence language to criminalize authorizing or permitting a non‑qualified person to issue a safety inspection certificate and to criminalize issuing a certificate that is false, misleading or omits material facts, exposing shops and supervisors to new penal liability.
Repeal of surrender requirement and technical clean‑up
The bill repeals the section that required applicants to surrender their driver’s licence while a suspension/disqualification review was pending, so a person no longer must give up their physical licence during review. It also tightens cross‑references in the impaired‑driving provisions to align with the Drivers and Vehicles Act changes, removing an outdated clause and adjusting related subsection cross‑references.
Consequential repeal and immediate commencement on assent
The Act makes a consequential repeal to section 13 of The Off‑Road Vehicles Act to reflect the new disqualification language and comes into force the day it receives royal assent. That means administrative systems and enforcement practices must be updated immediately after assent, without a delayed implementation window.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Road safety and enforcement agencies — gain clearer authority to suspend and disqualify drivers and to keep unsafe drivers off the road until appropriate assessments and programs are completed, simplifying enforcement.
- Recognized impaired‑driver assessment agencies — become gatekeepers for licence reinstatement and will see increased referrals and a clearer statutory role in determining fitness to drive.
- Parents or guardians of 16–17‑year‑olds — can approve a licence or registration with a single signature and can request cancellation of an under‑18 registration, giving them more direct control over young drivers' registrations.
Who Bears the Cost
- Drivers subject to suspension or disqualification — face additional time, assessment, and potentially program costs to regain licence privileges, and may experience longer periods off the road while meeting requirements.
- Driver licensing offices and registrars — must handle new administrative steps: tracking required reports, managing cancellations at approvers' requests, updating searchable records to include class/subclass, and implementing new offence enforcement processes.
- Mechanics and inspection stations — face criminal exposure and compliance costs because authorizing non‑qualified staff or issuing misleading inspection certificates can now be an offence, requiring tighter supervision and recordkeeping.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits public safety—keeping medically or impairment‑risk drivers off the road and tightening inspection integrity—against procedural fairness and administrative burden: it requires assessments and program completion before licence return and adds offences that broaden liability, but it leaves key definitions and implementation logistics to regulators, creating a trade‑off between precautionary enforcement and consistent, timely, transparent reinstatement.
The bill centralizes significant operational discretion with the registrar and with 'recognized agencies' that provide impaired‑driver assessments. The statutory phrase 'recognized agency' is not defined in the amending text, which creates an implementation question: will the registrar publish formal recognition criteria, require accreditation, or rely on informal lists?
That ambiguity affects uniformity—different registries or adjudicators could apply the requirement unevenly, producing inconsistent reinstatement timelines.
Criminalizing the authorization of non‑qualified or false inspection certificates targets bad actors but is also broad. Employers, supervisors and multi‑mechanic shops will need to tighten supervision and documentation to avoid liability where an uncertified staff member completes work or where recordkeeping gaps make it difficult to prove who signed an inspection certificate.
Similarly, giving a single approver the power to cancel a minor’s registration is administratively simple but creates a potential route for disputes or retaliatory requests; the Act does not add procedural safeguards or appeal routes tied directly to cancellation requests by approvers.
Finally, adding class/subclass details to searchable licence data improves enforcement granularity but raises privacy and access‑control considerations for who may query and retain those records. Together, these provisions advance road‑safety and inspection integrity goals but shift practical burdens and legal risk to registries, assessment providers, mechanics and affected drivers without spelling out administrative standards or transition processes.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.