Bill 48 amends The Real Property Act and The Planning Act to create a clear mechanism for granting and registering statutory easements over land that has been set aside for public purposes (public reserves). The bill modifies language in The Real Property Act to acknowledge registered instruments that include statutory easements and adds a new Planning Act provision that lets eligible authorities grant rights over public reserve land for activities referenced in The Real Property Act.
For practitioners, the statute shifts how public-reserve land can be used and recorded: municipalities (and specified provincial authorities) receive explicit authority to grant rights to eligible grantees, those rights become statutory easements once registered under the land titles framework, and municipal works are added to the list of permitted uses under the Planning Act. That creates new pathways for infrastructure and service providers — and new questions about procedure, consultation and the preservation of public-use objectives for reserve land.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill changes The Real Property Act’s treatment of encumbrances by referring to registered instruments (now explicitly including statutory easements) and amends the Planning Act to allow designated authorities to grant rights over public reserve land for certain activities. It also adds "works of municipalities" to the list of authorized uses for land set aside for public purposes.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include municipalities, the minister responsible for Northern Manitoba, the Crown in unorganized territory, eligible grantees identified by The Real Property Act, and land titles administrators who will record the new statutory easements. Infrastructure operators and planners working with public reserves will also see operational impacts.
Why It Matters
By creating a registration route that converts granted rights into statutory easements, the bill reduces legal uncertainty about how infrastructure rights over public reserves are established and recorded, potentially accelerating projects that require access or rights across those lands while changing the balance between reserving land for public use and permitting infrastructure.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 48 makes two related changes: it tightens the language in The Real Property Act about what counts as an instrument against title, and it adds a short but important power into The Planning Act that governs land set aside for public purposes. The Real Property Act edits replace older wording about "filed or" documents with language focused on "registered instruments," and explicitly recognizes registered statutory easements alongside other registered instruments — except for pipeline easements — when dealing with title to streets and public reserves.
On the planning side, the bill inserts "works of municipalities" into the catalogue of permitted uses of land set aside for public purposes, and then creates a new section that defines who may grant rights over those public reserves. Rather than a private individual or external party granting an interest directly, the statute identifies three grantors depending on where the reserve sits: the municipality for land inside municipal boundaries, the relevant minister for Northern Manitoba, and the Crown in right of Manitoba where land lies in unorganized territory.
The bill ties the concept of an eligible grantee back to The Real Property Act’s own definition, rather than redefining it in the Planning Act.Crucially, the legislative text makes registration the operative event: once a right is registered in the land titles system in accordance with the referenced Real Property Act provision, that registered right is expressly a statutory easement under the land title framework. That means the land titles register — not informal arrangements or regulatory permitting alone — will determine the legal status and priority of the right.
The Act comes into force on royal assent, so there are no delayed or phased implementation rules in the bill itself.Although compact, the amendments reallocate decision-making authority over public-reserve lands and standardize how those rights appear on title. The practical consequence for planners, municipalities and infrastructure proponents is a clearer route to secure and record rights over public reserves; the practical consequence for users of public reserves is that some public-purpose parcels may carry registered, permanent rights for third-party activities once the statutory steps set out in the Acts are followed.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill removes the phrase "filed or" from subsection 119(1) of The Real Property Act and replaces certain references to "encumbrances" with "registered instruments," explicitly including statutory easements as registered instruments for title to streets and public reserves.
The Planning Act now lists "works of municipalities" as an authorized use of lands set aside for public purposes, clarifying that municipal infrastructure projects may occupy or use public-reserve land.
A new section 138.1 in the Planning Act lets specified authorities grant a right over public reserve land for activities referenced in The Real Property Act: the municipality (if inside a municipality), the minister for Northern Manitoba, or the Crown for unorganized territory.
The bill ties the grant mechanism into the land titles system: once a right over public reserve land is registered in accordance with section 111.1 of The Real Property Act, that right becomes a statutory easement under the Act.
The Act contains no delayed start or transitional provisions: it comes into force on the day it receives royal assent, making the new grant-and-registration regime immediately available.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Removes 'filed or' and shifts focus to registration
Striking "filed or" narrows the statutory language to focus on registration rather than earlier filing/formalities. Practically, this means the statute privileges registered instruments recorded in the land titles system as the defining source for rights affecting streets and reserves, rather than other kinds of filings that may have existed under older practice.
Recognizes statutory easements among registered instruments
The amendment replaces the section heading and changes wording so that references to exceptions now read "registered instruments other than a pipeline easement or statutory easement." That phrasing clarifies that statutory easements will be treated as instruments on title for the purposes of determining title to streets and Crown/public reserve land, and it updates the statutory vocabulary to align with the land titles regime.
Adds municipal works to permitted public-reserve uses
By adding "works of municipalities" to the enumerated list of permitted uses for land set aside for public purposes, the Act removes a textual obstacle that could have been read to exclude municipal infrastructure from acceptable reserve activities. The change is short but consequential for planning decisions and for municipal capital projects that rely on reserve land.
Creates grant powers and sets effect of registration
Section 138.1 defines "eligible grantee" by reference to The Real Property Act and sets out three grantors depending on location: the municipality, the minister for Northern Manitoba, or the Crown in unorganized territory. It then confirms that when such a right is registered under the referenced Real Property Act provision, it will operate as a statutory easement — i.e., the interest will be recorded and will carry the legal characteristics of an easement under the land titles framework.
Immediate effect on royal assent
The Act specifies that it comes into force on the day it receives royal assent. There are no staged commencement dates or transitional rules included, so affected authorities and land titles administrators must prepare to apply the new registration and grant processes as soon as the Act is in force.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Municipalities — gain explicit statutory authority to permit and grant rights over public-reserve land for municipal works, simplifying access for infrastructure and service projects.
- Eligible grantees (as defined in The Real Property Act) — receive a clearer legal pathway to obtain registered statutory easements, improving certainty and enforceability for utilities or service providers that need rights over reserve land.
- Provincial authorities responsible for Northern Manitoba and the Crown in unorganized territories — obtain explicit grant powers that mirror municipal authority, which can streamline regional infrastructure delivery.
- Planners and land titles professionals — benefit from clearer statutory signals about how reserves and easements are recorded, reducing ambiguity in title searches and registration practice.
Who Bears the Cost
- Users of public-reserve land (residents and recreation users) — may face reduced access or altered use when reserves are encumbered by registered easements or municipal works, since easements will be permanent and registered.
- Municipal governments — assume administrative, legal and political costs of granting rights, including negotiating terms, handling public consultation and managing competing local priorities.
- Land Titles Office and registry staff — must accommodate registration of a new class of statutory easements and ensure consistent processing, which may require updated forms, practice notes and staff training.
- Other public bodies and adjacent landowners — may face changed property relations or service footprints where registered easements affect drainage, access, or land use rights on or adjacent to reserve land.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill resolves a procedural bottleneck—making it easier to formalize infrastructure rights on public-reserve land—while creating a policy trade-off between conserving land for open public uses and enabling infrastructure that may permanently encumber that land; speeding project delivery risks eroding the protective character of public reserves unless procedural safeguards are added.
The bill provides a compact legal mechanism but leaves important implementation details unanswered. It does not set out notice, public consultation, or compensation procedures for converting a portion of public-reserve land into a registered statutory easement.
The authority to grant rights is allocated by geography (municipality, minister for Northern Manitoba, Crown in unorganized territory) but the Act does not specify internal municipal procedures, council approvals, or thresholds for when a grant is appropriate.
The amendments also create potential registry and priority questions. Treating statutory easements as registered instruments clarifies their legal status, but the bill does not address how new statutory easements will interact with pre-existing encumbrances, unregistered interests, or special regimes such as pipeline easements beyond excluding pipeline easements from the listed exceptions.
Finally, the text ties the concept of "eligible grantee" to The Real Property Act’s definition without restating it here, which forces practitioners to cross-reference; the absence of transitional rules or guidance risks short-term uncertainty for projects that were already negotiating informal access to reserve lands prior to royal assent.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.