This statute requires employers and bargaining agents for ambulance workers to produce an essential ambulance services agreement covering which work and which classifications must continue during labour disruptions, how workers will be assigned, and notice procedures. Where parties cannot agree the Labour Relations Board can settle the agreement and can ultimately refer disputes about bargaining impasses to binding arbitration.
The law also bars strikes and lockouts in specified circumstances, compels employers to file agreements with the minister, continues pre-existing pay and terms for ambulance workers in many situations, and creates a range of criminal-summary fines for contraventions. For labour counsels, EMS providers and compliance officers, the Act remaps negotiation timelines, shifts dispute resolution power toward the Board and arbitration, and tightens enforcement of emergency-service continuity.
At a Glance
What It Does
Sets mandatory negotiation windows (180 days before expiry for incumbent collective agreements; 20 days for first agreements), requires an agreement that lists essential functions and the exact numbers and classifications of required staff, and empowers the Labour Relations Board to settle agreements and, after review, order binding arbitration to resolve bargaining deadlocks.
Who It Affects
Applies to employers, employers’ organizations, trade unions and councils acting in bargaining units that include paramedicine providers, dispatchers and any other workers prescribed as ambulance workers under regulation, except where the Public Service Collective Bargaining Act governs the parties.
Why It Matters
The bill replaces a bilateral bargaining default with a statutory backstop that can produce Board-set agreements and compel binding arbitration, reducing the scope for work stoppages in life‑critical services but also narrowing the practical strike and lockout tools available to both sides.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act begins by defining the covered universe: ambulances, paramedicine providers, dispatchers and any additional classes designated in regulation, and it applies where the Labour Relations Act governs collective bargaining (with an explicit carve-out for public service bargaining). That means the statute targets the labour relations framework for civilian ambulance services across the province, not unrelated health‑care staff in hospitals unless regulations add them.
Part I makes negotiation of an essential ambulance services agreement mandatory for employers and bargaining agents who are negotiating or bound by collective agreements. The agreement must identify the specific emergency functions that will continue in a work stoppage, list classifications and the number of workers by location required at any time, and set procedures for assigning staff — including an immediate-assignment mechanism to respond to changing needs and a required written notice from the employer when additional staff or functions are invoked.If parties cannot reach agreement, either side may ask the Labour Relations Board to settle the terms; the Board must form a three‑person panel (chair plus employer and employee representatives) and issue an order within set timelines (shorter timelines apply in some first‑agreement situations).
The Board also has a distinct power to decide whether the scope of required activity in an agreement deprives either side of a "meaningful" right to strike or lock out; where it finds such deprivation it can amend the agreement, direct conciliation, or refer unresolved issues to binding arbitration. Binding arbitration is conducted by a three‑person arbitration board (or a single arbitrator by agreement) appointed quickly, must begin within 30 days of appointment, and must render a decision within 90 days absent extension.The statute contains several prohibitions designed to keep essential ambulance services running.
If no essential‑services agreement is in place, neither employer nor union may initiate a lockout or strike involving ambulance workers; once an agreement exists, those required to work under it may not strike and employers may not lock them out. The Act preserves pre‑existing rates and terms for ambulance workers in many circumstances until a collective agreement is in force, requires employers to file agreements with the minister, and sets monetary penalties for individuals and organizations that authorize prohibited strikes or lockouts or otherwise breach the Act.
Finally, the Lieutenant‑Governor in Council may prescribe additional ambulance worker classes, services, and factors for the Board to consider, and the Act amends the Labour Relations Act to give the Board explicit jurisdiction over matters arising under this statute.
The Five Things You Need to Know
An employer and bargaining agent must begin negotiating an essential ambulance services agreement no later than 180 days before an existing collective agreement expires; first-time bargaining pairs must begin no later than 20 days after notice or first meeting.
If negotiation fails, either party can apply to the Labour Relations Board, which must settle an agreement within 90 days (45 days for applications tied to the requirement to negotiate a first agreement).
The Board may determine that an agreement deprives parties of a 'meaningful right to strike or lock out' and can order binding arbitration; an arbitration board must start proceedings within 30 days of appointment and normally decide within 90 days.
The Act prohibits strikes or lockouts involving ambulance workers where an essential ambulance services agreement is not in effect and also prohibits strikes or lockouts for workers required to work under an in‑force agreement; employers must file each agreement with the minister.
Penalties include fines up to $1,000 per day for employers or unions that authorize unlawful lockouts or strikes, up to $10,000 for officers who authorize them, and up to $1,000 for individual ambulance workers who participate in prohibited strikes.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title, definitions and scope
These opening provisions define critical terms (ambulance, paramedicine provider, dispatching services, essential ambulance services) and set the statute's application to parties covered by the Labour Relations Act while excluding those under the Public Service Collective Bargaining Act. Practically, that gives the province flexibility to add classes or services by regulation and ensures this Act overrides conflicting Labour Relations Act provisions where they clash.
Mandatory essential ambulance services agreements — content and negotiation
This Part compels employers and bargaining agents to negotiate an agreement that identifies essential functions, the classifications and exact numbers of workers required at each location and procedures for immediate assignment when service needs change. It imposes concrete negotiation windows (180 days pre‑expiry; 20 days for first agreements), a good‑faith bargaining duty, filing of agreements with the minister, and continuity rules that generally keep pre‑existing wages and terms in place for ambulance workers who continue to work under the agreement.
Dispute resolution: Board intervention, 'meaningful right' review and binding arbitration
Disputes about interpretation or the inability to conclude an agreement can be brought to the Labour Relations Board, which must hear and settle terms within prescribed timeframes. The Board is given a special review power to assess whether the level of required activity in an agreement impacts the parties' meaningful industrial rights; it can amend agreements, order conciliation, or direct outstanding issues to binding arbitration. Arbitration procedures (appointment of members, replacement rules, fee allocation, start and decision deadlines) are tightly specified to compress the timeline for resolving impasses.
Prohibitions, continuity rules and penalties
The Act shuts down strikes and lockouts in two scenarios: where no essential services agreement exists, and where an agreement is in force and certain workers are required to work. It preserves pay and terms for ambulance workers during these periods in stated circumstances, clarifies the effect on ongoing strikes when the Act commences, and establishes a graduated fine regime for individuals, officers and organizations that authorize prohibited actions or otherwise breach the Act.
Amendment to Labour Relations Act jurisdiction
Section 31 inserts a clause into the Labour Relations Act requiring the Board to consider and decide matters within the scope and intent of this new Act, formally aligning Board jurisdiction and signalling that Board procedures under the Labour Relations Act apply unless inconsistent with the new statute.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Patients and the public — by design the statute reduces the risk of ambulance service interruptions during labour disputes by legally mandating staffing continuity and a backstop dispute‑resolution mechanism.
- Employers of ambulance services — gain clearer statutory tools to ensure minimum staffing, immediate assignment procedures for surges, and a mechanism (Board settlement or arbitration) to break deadlocks.
- Provincial government and health system planners — benefit from mandatory filing of agreements and regulatory levers to define covered classes and services, improving oversight of emergency coverage.
- Non‑ambulance employees and communities reliant on EMS — receive indirect protection because the framework prioritizes continuity of life‑saving transport and dispatching.
Who Bears the Cost
- Bargaining agents and unions representing ambulance workers — lose practical strike leverage for workers required to remain on duty, face fines for unauthorized strikes, and must negotiate mandated agreements on government timelines.
- Ambulance workers required to work under an agreement — face restrictions on industrial action and criminal‑summary fines for participation in prohibited strikes.
- Employers and employers’ organizations — must staff to the numeric obligations in agreements, potentially reassign staff immediately during disruptions and risk per‑day fines if they unlawfully lock out workers.
- Labour Relations Board and arbitration resources — will absorb increased caseloads and compressed timelines to settle agreements and run binding arbitrations, creating administrative and capacity pressures.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is straightforward but acute: ensure uninterrupted, life‑critical ambulance coverage by limiting labour disruption, or preserve robust collective bargaining tools, including the right to strike and lockout leverage. The Act prioritizes continuity and substitutes Board settlement and binding arbitration for much of the bargaining conflict, but that choice constrains labour leverage and shifts consequential policy judgments to the Board and the regulatory regime.
The Act threads a narrow path between continuity of emergency services and protection of labour rights, but it leaves significant implementation work and interpretive questions to the Board and to regulation. "Essential ambulance services" must be defined in practice through agreements and potentially regulations; that creates incentive for one or both parties to push for expansive definitions (e.g., broad job classifications, large staffing complements) that could undercut strike effectiveness. The Board's discretionary ability to amend agreements or order binding arbitration addresses that risk, but those remedies depend on timely, resource‑intensive proceedings and on regulatory guidance about factors to consider.
Another practical tension is the statutory continuity of wages and terms for workers who continue to perform duties: while the Act preserves existing rates in many circumstances, it also enables immediate assignment of additional staff during emergencies. That can create disputes over who is required to work, how additional assignments are determined, and whether preserved terms properly reflect changed duties.
Finally, enforcement mechanics rely on fines and the Board's orders; policing secondary actors (third parties that might impede compliance) and ensuring swift remedial relief for frontline service shortfalls will test administrative capacity and may prompt litigation over the definition of "meaningful right to strike."
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.