Bill 60 amends the House of Assembly Accountability, Integrity and Administration Act to add targeted administrative flexibility, modernize language, and broaden enforcement options. The changes let the Speaker (with Management Commission consultation) delegate the clerk’s administrative authority to named officers when the clerk is absent or the post is vacant; they also let audit committees appoint an acting chair from their members and alter which officer serves as the audit committee secretary in some circumstances.
The bill is largely technical, but it has practical implications: it realigns who can perform core parliamentary administrative functions (including giving the chief financial officer specific accounting responsibilities), clarifies statutory roles for the law clerk and parliamentary counsel, replaces gendered wording throughout the Act, and creates a route for private parties to seek mandatory court orders when duties under the Act are allegedly ignored. The Act is retroactive to July 20, 2023.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act lets the Speaker, after consulting the Management Commission, designate a principal clerk, the law clerk and parliamentary counsel, or the chief financial officer to exercise the clerk’s administrative powers and to be secretary to the commission when the clerk is absent or the office is vacant. It allows audit committees to name an acting chair and clarifies who serves as audit committee secretary when delegations occur. The Act also updates monarchal and gendered language and revises enforcement and auditing references.
Who It Affects
Primary actors affected are the Clerk of the House, chief financial officer (CFO), principal clerk, law clerk and parliamentary counsel, the Management Commission and audit committee members. Secondary impacts reach Members of the House of Assembly, House of Assembly staff, the Auditor General’s office, and the province’s Supreme Court.
Why It Matters
This bill changes where administrative authority can land in a vacancy or incapacity, which matters for continuity and internal checks. Allowing originating applications to the Supreme Court for mandatory orders raises the prospect that internal parliamentary duties could be subject to judicial relief. The gender-neutral and role-clarifying edits reduce ambiguity but also shift day-to-day office responsibilities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill replaces the Act’s provision on an absent or incapacitated clerk with a new scheme that splits accounting and administrative roles. It makes the chief financial officer explicitly the accounting officer when the clerk cannot act, and gives the Speaker, after consulting the Management Commission, the power to designate either a principal clerk, the law clerk and parliamentary counsel, or the chief financial officer to perform the clerk’s remaining administrative functions, act as secretary to the Management Commission and serve as chief parliamentary advisor to the Speaker.
If the Speaker assigns both accounting and administrative duties to the CFO, the CFO performs them concurrently.
For the audit committee, the bill permits the committee to choose an acting chair from among its members whenever the chair is absent or the position is vacant. It keeps the law clerk and parliamentary counsel as the default secretary to the audit committee but creates an exception: if the law clerk and parliamentary counsel has been designated under the new delegation rule, the Speaker will designate a principal clerk to serve as audit committee secretary.Across the Act the bill systematically replaces gendered pronouns with gender-neutral terms and updates references to the sovereign.
It repeals the standalone oath provision for a clerk assistant, adds the law clerk and parliamentary counsel into several statutory lists of officers, and amends cross-references tied to financial administration and auditing responsibilities. Finally, the bill rewrites the enforcement provision to allow a person who in good faith believes a duty under the Act has not been observed to begin a proceeding in the Supreme Court by originating application seeking a mandatory order and related relief.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Speaker, after consulting the Management Commission, may designate a principal clerk, the law clerk and parliamentary counsel, or the chief financial officer to exercise the clerk’s administrative powers and to act as secretary to the Management Commission when the clerk is absent or the office is vacant.
The chief financial officer becomes the explicit accounting officer whenever the clerk is absent or unable to act; if given both accounting and administrative responsibilities, the CFO performs them concurrently.
Section 23 lets the audit committee appoint an acting chair from among its members when the chair is absent or the post is vacant and keeps (but modifies) who serves as the committee’s secretary.
Section 53 is rewritten so any person who reasonably believes a duty under the Act is being ignored may start an originating application in the Supreme Court seeking a mandatory order that the duty be complied with, plus consequential or declaratory relief.
The Act is retroactive: it is declared to have come into force on July 20, 2023, and it replaces or repeals several provisions (including the clerk assistant oath and certain subsection cross‑references).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Update to oath language and sovereign reference
This section replaces gendered phrasing used in the member oath provision and updates the reference from Queen Elizabeth II to King Charles III. Practically, it is a textual modernization: it does not change who must swear an oath or the substantive content of the oath, but it standardizes language for consistency across later edits.
Who acts when the clerk cannot: split of accounting and administrative duties
This is the operational core of the bill. The new text makes the chief financial officer the accounting officer when the clerk is absent or the post is vacant. For the clerk’s remaining administrative powers—such as being secretary to the Management Commission and advising the Speaker—the Speaker may designate among three options: a principal clerk, the law clerk and parliamentary counsel, or the CFO. The section explicitly allows the CFO to hold both accounting and administrative responsibilities concurrently if both are assigned. That creates a legally authorized route for temporary reassignment of duties without appointing an acting clerk under section 7.
Audit committee: acting chair and secretary rules
The bill lets the audit committee designate an acting chair from its own members when the chair is absent or the post is vacant. It retains the law clerk and parliamentary counsel as the default secretary to the audit committee but inserts a contingency: if the law clerk and parliamentary counsel have been designated under the delegation in section 10, the Speaker must designate a principal clerk to serve as secretary. This preserves a functioning secretariat while avoiding conflicts when an officer has been reassigned.
Enforcement: court access for alleged breaches of duties
The amendment retools enforcement by allowing any person who in good faith believes a statutory duty is not being observed to start proceedings in the Supreme Court by way of originating application seeking a mandatory order and related relief. That shifts certain compliance disputes from purely internal parliamentary processes to a judicial forum, subjecting the enforcement of internal statutory duties to potential court orders and declaratory remedies.
Public Service Commission listing and retroactivity
The bill amends the Public Service Commission Act list to explicitly include the Clerk, Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel and Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Assembly, clarifying their status in the public service framework. It also states that the Act is considered to have come into force on July 20, 2023, making the statutory adjustments retroactive to that date and potentially validating delegations or actions taken since then.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Speaker of the House — gains a formal mechanism to ensure administrative continuity by designating officers to exercise the clerk’s functions during absences, reducing reliance on ad hoc arrangements.
- Audit committee members — can maintain leadership continuity by appointing an acting chair internally, reducing delays for audit oversight and decision-making.
- Chief Financial Officer — receives statutory clarity that the CFO is the accounting officer when the clerk cannot act, which centralizes budgeting and financial reporting responsibility during vacancies.
- Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel — are explicitly maintained in key statutory roles and may be designated for administrative duties, strengthening their formal standing in House administration.
- Members of the House and the public — gain a clearer enforcement pathway (Supreme Court originating applications) to compel compliance with duties under the Act, which can increase accountability if internal remedies fail.
Who Bears the Cost
- Clerk and House of Assembly service staff — may face dilution of traditional clerk functions and routine shifts in reporting relationships when duties are reallocated, complicating workflow and institutional memory.
- Chief Financial Officer — may incur additional workload and legal/operational responsibility when assigned concurrent accounting and administrative duties, potentially without added resources.
- Management Commission and Speaker’s office — gain responsibility for making designation decisions, which could invite scrutiny and politicize what were formerly neutral administrative appointments.
- Supreme Court and litigation budgets — may face a modest increase in originating applications as the new enforcement route is used to resolve internal compliance disputes.
- Auditor General’s office and other oversight bodies — must navigate the Act’s amended exemptions and role listings, potentially changing audit access and scope for certain House offices.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill trades administrative flexibility and enforceability for potential encroachment on parliamentary independence: it makes it easier to keep House business running and to force compliance through courts, but it concentrates designation power in the Speaker and opens internal duties to judicial review—creating a choice between functional continuity and preserving the traditional separation between parliamentary administration and external oversight.
The bill prioritizes continuity over a single permanent substitute for the clerk, but it leaves important implementation details unspecified. It does not set criteria, timelines, or a written process for how the Speaker and Management Commission choose among a principal clerk, the law clerk and parliamentary counsel, or the CFO.
That creates room for inconsistent practice and potential challenges about whether a designation was appropriate or procedurally fair.
Opening enforcement to the Supreme Court invites judicial involvement in what have historically been internal parliamentary matters. The bill does not define standards of review, procedural timelines, or whether courts should defer to internal parliamentary remedies.
That raises questions about justiciability and about how courts will balance parliamentary privilege and institutional autonomy against the statutory rights created in Section 53. Retroactive commencement to July 20, 2023, also creates legal uncertainty: actions taken under ad hoc delegations since that date will be validated, but retroactivity may complicate ongoing disputes about decisions made before the amendment was drafted.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.