This bill amends the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act to replace the heading for item 19 in Schedule A — currently "GREAT SLAVE" — with the name "TINDEE." The change is limited to the Act’s schedule and takes effect on dates set by order of the Commissioner.
Although the amendment is short, it matters because the Act is the primary territorial statute that lists constituencies by name. Renaming a district in statute creates immediate obligations for election administrators, records managers, legal drafters, and public signage; it also risks temporary inconsistency across other statutes, regulations, and databases unless followed by consequential updates.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill replaces the heading "GREAT SLAVE" with "TINDEE" in item 19 of Schedule A to the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act. It does not specify an automatic effective date; the amendment comes into force on whatever day(s) the Commissioner orders.
Who It Affects
Territorial election administrators, government departments that reference constituency names, legal counsel citing territorial statutes, local governments and service providers that use official district names, and residents of the affected district. Suppliers of maps, GIS services, and electoral materials will also need to update records.
Why It Matters
A statutory name change is both symbolic and operational: it alters the legal identity of the district and therefore the language of statutes, electoral documents, and government systems. Because the bill does not include consequential amendments or transitional instructions, practical implementation will require targeted administrative work to avoid inconsistent references.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill performs a single, specific edit to territorial statute: it replaces the English heading "GREAT SLAVE" with "TINDEE" in item 19 of Schedule A to the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act. The French text mirrors that change.
The text confines itself to the schedule heading and does not purport to redraw boundaries or change any electoral mechanics.
The amendment does not include any transitional or consequential clauses. That means it does not instruct other statutes, regulations, or administrative materials to update cross-references; it does not provide rules about how to treat past documents that cite "Great Slave"; and it does not set an automatic commencement date.
Instead, the Act will come into force on dates set by the Commissioner, which leaves the timing of the legal name change to a proclamation.Operationally, a statutory renaming triggers a set of discrete administrative tasks: Elections NWT will need to ensure ballots, voter information, and official communications use the new name; departmental legal services will have to identify and update statutes, regulations, and internal policies that mention the old name; property and registry systems, mapping services, and public signage may need revision; and lawyers and courts will need to interpret when a historical reference to "Great Slave" should be read as referring to the newly named constituency. The bill does not create funding or a mandated implementation plan for these tasks.Because the bill only amends the schedule heading, it preserves existing boundaries and electoral processes unless separate legislation changes them.
The lack of consequential amendments means administrators will need to coordinate a clean rollover from the old name to the new one to avoid a period where different official sources use different names.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill replaces the heading "GREAT SLAVE" with "TINDEE" in item 19 of Schedule A to the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act.
The change is confined to Schedule A’s heading and does not redraw electoral boundaries or alter voting procedures.
The Act (or parts of it) comes into force on days to be fixed by order of the Commissioner; there is no automatic or fixed effective date in the bill text.
The bill is bilingual: the amendment appears in both English and French versions of the statute.
The text contains no transitional or consequential amendment clauses directing other statutes, regulations, or administrative systems to update references to the old name.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Formal amendment declaration
This provision is standard legislative boilerplate: it declares that the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act is amended by this Act. Practically, it signals that the subsequent changes are to be read into the named Act rather than creating a standalone new enactment.
Rename the Schedule A heading for item 19
This is the operative clause: it instructs the statute to strike the words "GREAT SLAVE" from the heading to item 19 in Schedule A and substitute "TINDEE." Because it targets the heading specifically, the change alters the legal name under which the territorial constituency is listed without touching the descriptive or boundary language (if any) elsewhere. The practical consequence is that any reliance on the statute as the definitive list of constituency names will now reflect "TINDEE."
Commencement by Commissioner order
Rather than setting a fixed date, the bill makes the amendment come into force on a day or days appointed by order of the Commissioner. That gives the executive the flexibility to coordinate the legal change with administrative readiness, but it also places the burden on officials to schedule and communicate the effective date to avoid legal and operational confusion.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Residents and communities within the affected district — they receive the official adoption of a new constituency name that may better reflect local identity or preferences.
- Legislative drafters and the Assembly — the Act will reflect current naming choices, reducing one source of mismatch between public usage and statute.
- Records managers and archivists — a clear statutory instruction makes it possible to standardize how the district is cited in official records going forward.
- Local branding and communications teams (municipal, community organizations) — they can align outreach and materials to a legally recognized name once the commencement date is set.
Who Bears the Cost
- Elections NWT and territorial election administrators — they must update ballots, voter information packages, websites, and outreach materials to reflect the new name, and may need to issue clarifying guidance.
- Government departments and legislative counsel — departments will need to review statutes, regulations, policy documents, and contracts for references to the old name and coordinate amendments or interpretive guidance.
- Registry, mapping, and GIS service providers — public-facing maps, property and service delivery databases, and third-party geographic datasets will require updates.
- Political parties and candidates — they may incur rebranding costs for campaign materials and communications tied to the constituency name.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between symbolic/local recognition (giving the constituency an updated, locally meaningful name) and legal-administrative coherence (the need to keep statutes, regulations, records, signage, and systems synchronized). The bill solves the symbolic problem directly but leaves the harder administrative and legal coordination work to others.
The bill trades simplicity of drafting for complexity in implementation. By limiting the change to a schedule heading and leaving commencement and consequential updates to administrative processes, the legislature avoids a longer bill but shifts the real work to implementers.
That approach risks inconsistent references across statutes, regulations, court filings, and public materials if there is no coordinated program to update cross-references and databases.
The absence of transitional language also raises questions about legal interpretation: for example, whether a statute or contract that refers to "Great Slave" should be read as referring to "Tindee" after proclamation will depend on interpretive principles unless administrators proactively amend or issue clarifying guidance. Finally, there is a practical fiscal trade-off: renaming is symbolically inexpensive for the legislature but can create modest but spread-out costs across multiple government units and external stakeholders, with no funding or timetable built into the bill.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.