Bill 75 repeals the Status of Women Council Act and establishes the Council for Women and Gender Diversity. The new statute broadens the advisory body's remit to include women and gender diverse persons, sets its objects and powers (including commissioning research, publishing reports, advising the Minister, and contracting), and updates administrative rules governing membership, leadership, staffing and finances.
Practically, the Act creates a small, semi-autonomous body: 5–9 appointed members, a ministerial appointment process with 1–3 year terms and a two-consecutive-term limit, an Executive Director who is explicitly not a territorial public servant, and staff who are likewise outside the public service. The bill also amends schedule entries in the Financial Administration Act and the Ombud Act and contains transitional provisions that carry existing members and employees into the new Council.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill repeals the old Status of Women Council Act and continues that body as the Council for Women and Gender Diversity, defining its objects to promote equality, gender equity and inclusivity and granting it powers to receive submissions, commission research, recommend policy or legislation, publish reports and enter into contracts. It also authorizes bylaws, hiring, and fundraising for the Council.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include the Minister Responsible for Women and Gender Diversity, territorial departments that will receive gender-equity reviews and advice, current Status of Women Council members and staff (who transfer into the new structure), and civil-society groups that engage with or seek funding from the Council. The Legislative Assembly and the territorial financial oversight regime are implicated by the reporting and schedule amendments.
Why It Matters
The statute embeds gender-equity analysis into a standalone advisory agency with operational autonomy: the Council can produce public reports and contract for services, but it sits outside the public service. That combination changes how policy review, accountability and administrative oversight will operate for gender-related policy across the Northwest Territories.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 75 replaces the existing Status of Women Council with a renamed and re-framed Council for Women and Gender Diversity. Its stated purpose is to promote equality for women and gender diverse persons and to advise the Minister and government bodies on policies and programs.
The Act spells out a substantive set of objects—public awareness, community attitude change, stakeholder engagement, policy review through gender-equity analysis and collaboration with relevant organizations.
The Council’s powers are practical and operational: it can receive submissions from the public, commission or conduct research, recommend and participate in programs, propose legislative or policy changes, publish studies and reports, present reports to the Minister for tabling in the Legislative Assembly, enter into contracts, and make internal bylaws and procedures. Those powers make the Council both an evidence-gathering body and a public-facing advocate and advisor.On governance, the Council is deliberately compact: five to nine members appointed by the Minister for one- to three-year terms, with reappointment capped at two consecutive terms and a provision allowing a return after a one-year break.
The Minister designates a chairperson and co-chairperson from among members. If membership falls below five, the Minister must fill vacancies within 90 days, and outgoing members whose terms expire remain in place until replacements are appointed.The Act establishes an Executive Director as the Council’s chief executive, explicitly placing that director and Council staff outside the territorial public service.
The Executive Director can enter agreements on the Council’s behalf, delegate duties to staff and take measures necessary to fulfill the Act’s purposes. The Council may employ necessary staff, set remuneration for members and employees subject to directives under the Financial Administration Act, accept grants/donations, and has a fiscal year running April 1 to March 31.
It must prepare an annual report that the Minister will cause to be tabled in the Legislative Assembly.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Council must have between five and nine members; the Minister appoints each member for one to three years.
A member may be reappointed once (two consecutive terms max); a former member may be reappointed after at least a one-year break.
If vacancies reduce membership below five, the Minister must fill the vacancy within 90 days and outgoing members stay on until replacements are appointed.
The Council appoints an Executive Director who is explicitly not a public servant; that director can sign contracts for the Council, delegate duties, and manage staff who are also outside the territorial public service.
The Council may commission research, publish reports for tabling in the Legislative Assembly, enter into contracts and accept grants or donations; the Act also amends schedules in the Financial Administration Act and the Ombud Act and repeals the old Status of Women Council Act.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and purpose
These opening sections set the statutory frame: they define ‘‘Council,’’ ‘‘member’’ and ‘‘Minister’’ and give a concise purpose focused on equality for women and gender diverse persons and the promotion of gender-inclusive government policy. The purpose clause signals the Act’s scope—legislative and program review, public awareness, and stakeholder engagement—so every later power and duty is read against an explicit mandate to affect government policy and programs.
Continuation of the body
Section 3 transitions the existing Status of Women Council into the new Council for Women and Gender Diversity. Legally, this is a continuity clause: it keeps the institutional vehicle in place while enabling the expanded mandate and revised governance rules that follow, rather than creating a brand‑new agency from scratch.
Objects and powers
This is the operational center of the Act. It lists the Council’s objects—public awareness, attitude change, stakeholder engagement, advising the Minister and conducting gender-equity analysis—and then enumerates powers such as receiving submissions, conducting or commissioning research, recommending legislation or policy, publishing reports, contracting, and making bylaws. Taken together, these clauses give the Council both advisory authority and the levers of an operational agency: evidence production, public advocacy, and contractual autonomy.
Representation and regional regulations
Section 5 requires members to represent women and gender diverse persons, cultural diversity, and prescribed regions. It also delegates to the Commissioner—on the Minister’s recommendation—the power to make regulations defining the regions. That mix of representational requirements plus delegated regional definition creates a tension between prescribed representational goals and flexible regulatory implementation.
Composition, appointment and term limits
This section fixes Council size at five to nine members, gives the Minister appointment power and sets terms between one and three years. It caps consecutive service at two terms but allows reappointment after a one-year break. The Act also contains a 90‑day rule to refill vacancies when membership falls below five and keeps expiring members in post until a replacement is appointed—practical rules meant to avoid functional shortfalls.
Remuneration, liability, leadership and staff
Members receive remuneration and expenses as the Council determines but subject to directives under the Financial Administration Act. Members are shielded from personal liability for Council debts and from suits for good-faith acts. The Minister designates a chair and co-chair from among members. Critically, the Council must appoint an Executive Director, who is not a territorial public servant; the director supervises staff (who are also outside the public service), can enter into contracts for the Council, delegate tasks and otherwise manage operations.
Meetings, funding and reporting
The Council must meet at least twice yearly, may meet electronically, and has a quorum of three. It may receive grants, contributions and donations and its fiscal year runs April 1 to March 31. The Council must produce an annual report under the Financial Administration Act framework, and the Minister must cause that report to be tabled in the Legislative Assembly—formalizing a public-accountability channel.
Transitional and consequential provisions
Transitional provisions deem current Status of Women Council members and the president to be members and chair under the new Act, continue employees under existing employment contracts, and require the Minister to designate a new co‑chair. The Act amends Schedule A of the Financial Administration Act and the Ombud Act schedule to replace references to the old Council with the new Council, and then repeals the Status of Women Council Act. These changes align oversight, financial reporting and ombud jurisdiction with the new entity.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Women and gender diverse persons in the Northwest Territories — the Act creates a statutory body mandated to advance equality, perform gender-equity analyses of government policy, and raise public awareness about issues affecting these groups.
- Community and advocacy organizations focused on gender equity — they gain a formal, statutory channel to submit evidence and recommendations, collaborate on programs, and have an independent body amplify their findings to government and the public.
- Legislative Assembly and territorial policymakers — they receive formal gender-equity reviews, commissioned research and reports that can inform lawmaking and program design, creating a centralized source of evidence and recommendations.
Who Bears the Cost
- Territorial government (the Minister and departments) — must engage with the Council’s reviews and recommendations, potentially change program design or resource allocations, and ensure timely appointment of members when vacancies occur.
- Public purse and oversight bodies — the Council’s operational independence, hiring outside the public service, and ability to accept grants mean funding and oversight arrangements must adapt; directives under the Financial Administration Act could limit or complicate remuneration and spending.
- Employees and prospective staff — being outside the public service alters employment terms, benefits and labour protections compared with public servants, which can affect recruitment, retention and labour relations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between independence and accountability: the Act equips a small advisory agency to operate flexibly—contracting, hiring outside the public service and fundraising—so it can produce independent gender-equity analysis, yet those same choices reduce the automatic reach of public-service accountability, procurement and employment safeguards, forcing policymakers to choose between agility and formal public oversight.
The Act deliberately places the Council and its staff outside the territorial public service while giving it contracting, hiring and fundraising powers. That structure creates a trade-off: operational flexibility and the ability to pursue independent research and partnerships on the one hand, and reduced application of public‑service transparency, procurement, human‑resource and pension rules on the other.
The statute relies on the Financial Administration Act framework for some financial oversight, but the precise contours of accountability—procurement rules, conflict-of-interest limits for contracted work, access-to-information treatment of Council records—are left to implementation and regulation.
The expanded mandate to include ‘‘gender diverse persons’’ is administratively and substantively significant but also imprecise in statute: the Act does not define that term or set criteria for representational appointments beyond broad cultural and regional diversity. That leaves two open questions for implementation—how the government and Minister operationalize representation across Indigenous, cultural and regional groups in a very small jurisdiction, and how the Council prioritizes issues with finite staff and limited meeting frequency (minimum two per year).
Finally, the Minister’s power to appoint the chair and members is routine but invites scrutiny over political influence versus independence, especially since the Council can publish reports and recommend legislative change.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.