This Act overhauls the Real Estate Agents’ Licensing Act by renaming it the Real Estate Professions’ Licensing Act and adding home inspectors and property managers into the regulated framework. It makes it an offence to perform or present oneself as a home inspector without a licence, sets a minimum age of 19 and requires prescribed education, training and examination, and requires applicants to submit a superintendent‑approved application and fee.
The Act also gives the superintendent explicit authority to adopt and publish a code of conduct, approve mandatory forms for trade and inspections, and prescribe licensing forms, qualifications and exemptions. Several small drafting and gender-neutral language changes are included, and an existing section of the Qualifications Regulations is repealed.
Provisions come into force on a date set by the Commissioner.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act creates a licensed category of ‘home inspector’ and forbids anyone from conducting or holding themselves out as a home inspector without that licence. It expands the definition of ‘salesperson’ to expressly include property managers and empowers the superintendent to issue codes of conduct and mandatory forms.
Who It Affects
Existing and prospective home inspectors, property managers, real‑estate agents and brokerages, inspection firms, and the Department’s licensing and compliance staff are directly affected. Consumers buying or renting residential property will be affected indirectly through regulated standards for inspections and forms.
Why It Matters
Regulating home inspections and property management brings two previously loosely governed activities under the territorial licensing regime, creating clearer professional standards and enforcement tools but also new compliance costs and administrative requirements for individuals and firms in the sector.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act changes the statute’s scope and vocabulary to treat a broader set of real‑estate occupations as regulated professions. Renaming the law signals a shift from focusing solely on agents to regulating a set of linked activities — trading in real estate, managing property, and inspecting homes — under a common licensing framework.
Most practically, the Act introduces a new offence: conducting a home inspection for compensation, or representing oneself as a home inspector, without holding a licence. The text requires applicants to be at least 19 and to meet “prescribed” education, training and examination requirements; those details are left to regulation.
The superintendent will receive applications, fee payments, and any additional information required to issue licences.To create consistent conduct and paperwork across the sector, the Act allows the superintendent to adopt a code of conduct for agents, salespersons (now defined to include property managers), property managers themselves and home inspectors, and to publish that code online. It also authorizes the superintendent to approve and require particular forms for both real estate transactions and home inspections, making their use mandatory for licensed professionals.Regulatory drafting powers in the Act are expanded to include prescribing licence forms, the education and exam qualifications for each class of professional, exemptions and the class of persons who may be exempted.
The Act simultaneously modernizes gendered language throughout the statute and repeals a provision in the Qualifications of Agents and Salespersons Regulations, implicitly clearing the way for the new regulatory scheme. Finally, the Act does not set an automatic commencement date; it will come into force by Commissioner’s order, allowing the government to phase in regulations and administrative processes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 4.1 makes it an offence to perform or present as a home inspector for compensation unless licensed.
Section 10.1 sets eligibility: individuals must be at least 19 and meet prescribed education, training and examination requirements to obtain a home‑inspector licence.
Sections 70.1–70.2 give the superintendent authority to adopt and publish a mandatory code of conduct and to approve forms, and require licensed professionals to use those forms.
The definition of “salesperson” is revised to explicitly include property managers, bringing leasing, rent collection and property maintenance activities under licensing rules.
Paragraphs substituted in section 78 expand the superintendent’s regulatory powers to prescribe licences, qualifications, exemptions and the form of licences for agents, salespersons, property managers and home inspectors.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Statute renamed to reflect multiple real‑estate professions
Replacing the Act’s title with “Real Estate Professions’ Licensing Act” is more than cosmetic: it signals an intent to regulate a set of related occupations rather than only agents and salespersons. Practically, the new title removes ambiguity about which activities fall under the statute and supports regulatory measures that apply across those professions.
New definitions for home inspection, home inspector and property manager
The Act adds precise, limited definitions: a home inspection is a primarily non‑invasive assessment of readily accessible dwelling components; a home inspector is an individual engaged to carry out such inspections; a property manager is defined by contract activities including leasing, advertising, maintenance and rent collection. Critically, the Act also makes a property manager a type of salesperson, which pulls traditionally separate landlord/manager functions into the licensing regime and exposes them to the Act’s duties and discipline provisions.
Licensing requirement and offence for home inspections
This new section creates a bright‑line prohibition: anyone who inspects homes for compensation or represents themselves as a home inspector must be licensed. The provision criminalizes unlicensed practice under the Act’s administrative enforcement framework (licensing sanctions and contraventions) rather than creating a separate criminal penalty, placing enforcement responsibility on licensing mechanisms and the superintendent’s processes.
Minimum age and delegated qualification requirements; application mechanics
Applicants must be 19 and satisfy education, training and examination criteria ‘prescribed’ by regulation — the Act delegates these critical details to the superintendent and the forthcoming regulations. Applications require an approved form, a fee, and any additional superintendent‑requested information, which gives the regulator latitude to set documentation standards and vetting procedures.
Superintendent can issue mandatory conduct rules and forms
The superintendent can establish a code of conduct for agents, salespersons, property managers and home inspectors, must publish it on a departmental website, and may approve forms for both trade and inspections. The Act then requires licensed professionals to use those approved forms, creating uniform paperwork but also a compliance obligation that will matter in transaction, disclosure and dispute contexts.
Expanded regulation‑making authority for licences, qualifications and exemptions
The substitution in paragraph 78(c)–(f) explicitly authorizes regulations to prescribe licence formats, qualification criteria, exemptions and the classes of persons who may be exempted. That language gives the superintendent broad regulatory reach to set the professional architecture (who needs a licence, what proof they need, and temporary or permanent exemptions) without embedding those specifics in the statute.
Gender‑neutral language updates and removal of a qualifications rule
Multiple sections are updated to replace gendered pronouns with neutral terms, simplifying interpretation and aligning wording with modern drafting norms. The Act also repeals section 3.1 of the Qualifications Regulations, which likely clears a legacy provision that would conflict with the new, consolidated qualification framework — a change that will have to be tracked when regulations are published.
No automatic commencement — start date by Commissioner’s order
The Act comes into force on days fixed by the Commissioner, allowing the territory time to draft and publish regulations, forms and codes and to plan a phased implementation. That administrative flexibility matters because many obligations depend on regulatory detail that does not exist in the statute itself.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Residential consumers and tenants — They gain access to a regulated home‑inspection market and mandatory forms and codes, which can improve disclosure, comparability and recourse when inspections or management activities fall short.
- Licensed home inspectors and professional inspection firms — Licensure creates formal recognition, potentially improving market trust and allowing firms to advertise regulated credentials; it may also create scope for premium pricing tied to regulated standards.
- Regulators and government — The superintendent receives clearer statutory tools (codes, mandatory forms, prescriptive regulations and explicit offences) to set, publish and enforce professional standards, simplifying oversight and discipline.
Who Bears the Cost
- Prospective and current home inspectors — They face education, training, examination and application fees, plus potential transitional costs to meet new competence requirements and paperwork obligations.
- Property managers and small landlord‑operators — By classifying property managers as salespersons, smaller managers who previously operated informally may now need licences, insurance, and to comply with mandatory forms and conduct rules.
- Department of Municipal and Community Affairs (licensing unit) — The superintendent’s office must develop regulations, forms, a public code, application processes and enforcement capacity, which will require staffing, systems and possibly new IT or administrative resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals — strengthening consumer protection and professional standards in real‑estate services versus minimizing regulatory barriers and costs for practitioners — by giving the superintendent wide regulatory discretion to set the line between the two; that discretion can produce better tailored rules but also creates uncertainty and administrative burden until those rules are issued.
The Act delegates most technical detail to the superintendent and regulations: prescribed education, training and examination requirements, the form and content of licences, classes of exemptions, and the specific conduct standards and inspection forms. That delegation speeds legislative passage but leaves crucial questions — the content and cost of qualification pathways, transitional grandfathering for experienced practitioners, and mutual recognition of out‑of‑territory credentials — unanswered until regulations and guidance are published.
Mandatory approved forms and a public code of conduct create clarity but also rigidity. Standardized forms can improve comparability and reduce disputes, but they can also lock in practices that do not fit all transaction types (for example, rural, Indigenous or informal rental arrangements common in the Northwest Territories).
Enforcement will hinge on how the superintendent implements discipline for code breaches and form‑use failures; the Act adds contraventions to the list of disciplinary grounds but leaves penalties and remedial mechanisms to subordinate instruments or administrative policy.
Finally, importing property managers into the ‘salesperson’ category raises scope‑of‑regulation questions. The statutory definition covers broad property management activities — from rent collection to repairs — which may sweep in community housing caretakers, on‑site managers of small multi‑unit buildings, or individuals managing a single rental property.
Unless exemptions are carefully drafted, the change could produce unintended burdens on small operators and require significant outreach and transitional relief.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.