This private member bill requires the Government of Nova Scotia to align provincial laws with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (the Declaration), prepare an action plan in cooperation with Indigenous peoples, and report annually on progress. It also authorizes the Executive Council to enter agreements with Indigenous governing bodies that can create joint decision-making or consent arrangements over statutory powers of decision.
The Act is procedural and enabling: it sets consultation and publication rules, timelines for tabling plans and reports, and regulatory authority for the Governor in Council. It does not purport to override section 35 of the Constitution and takes effect January 1, 2026.
For public-sector managers, municipal governments, and regulated industries, the bill signals potential changes to permitting, licensing and other statutory decision processes where agreements with Indigenous governing bodies are negotiated.
At a Glance
What It Does
Affirms that the UN Declaration applies to provincial law, requires a government action plan prepared in consultation with Indigenous peoples, mandates annual progress reports, and empowers Executive Council members to negotiate agreements with Indigenous governing bodies including consent or joint-decision arrangements.
Who It Affects
Provincial ministries that exercise statutory decision-making (permits, licences, benefits), the newly named Minister of L'nu Affairs, Indigenous governing bodies in Nova Scotia, municipalities and other local decision-makers, and regulated sectors subject to decision-making statutes.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a formal, province-level pathway for Indigenous consent and co-decision arrangements without directly rewriting substantive statutes; that procedural pathway could change how licences and approvals are issued and how government measures are reviewed and reported.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act starts by declaring that the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples applies to Nova Scotia law and directs the government to take ‘‘all necessary measures’’ to make provincial law consistent with the Declaration. It places emphasis on consultation and co-operation with Indigenous peoples throughout implementation and insists that the Province consider the diversity of Indigenous languages, governance and legal traditions.
Operationally, the bill requires the government to prepare an action plan — developed with Indigenous peoples — that maps out how the Declaration's objectives will be achieved and sets a deadline to begin reviewing that plan. The Minister of L'nu Affairs must table the action plan in the House of Assembly or file it with the Clerk within 15 days of completion, and the Minister must produce an annual report assessing progress.
The first report is due for the period ending March 31, 2026, and must be tabled by June 30, 2026, with the same annual cadence thereafter.On agreements, the Act allows members of the Executive Council to enter into written agreements with Indigenous governing bodies for the purpose of implementing the Act. Critically, the Governor in Council may authorize negotiation of agreements that provide either for joint exercise of statutory powers of decision or for prior consent by an Indigenous governing body before a statutory power is exercised.
The bill requires public notice about who will be consulted during negotiations, and it makes any such agreement ineffective until published in the Royal Gazette and on the government’s website.The Act includes a compact definition of ‘‘statutory power of decision’’ — any decision conferred by statute that affects rights, obligations, or eligibility for benefits or licences — which is the lever for consent and co-decision arrangements. Finally, it gives the Governor in Council a broad regulation-making power to define undefined terms and to carry out the Act’s intent.
The Act expressly preserves section 35 rights and states it does not delay the Declaration’s application to provincial law; it comes into force January 1, 2026.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act requires the Government to prepare an Indigenous‑consulted action plan to implement the UN Declaration and to table that plan within 15 days of finalization.
The Minister of L'nu Affairs must prepare an annual report (first covering the period ending March 31, 2026) assessing progress and table or file it by June 30 each year.
The Governor in Council may authorize Executive Council members to negotiate agreements that allow joint exercise of statutory decision‑making or require an Indigenous governing body's consent before exercising a statutory power of decision.
Any agreement under the consent/joint‑decision authority must be published in the Royal Gazette and on the Government's website and is not effective until publication.
The Act defines ‘‘statutory power of decision’’ to include decisions that affect rights, obligations, or eligibility for benefits or licences and grants the Governor in Council a broad regulation‑making power to implement the Act.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Purpose and scope: affirming the Declaration
This section states the Act’s threefold purpose: to affirm the Declaration applies to provincial law, to contribute to its implementation, and to strengthen relationships with Indigenous governing bodies. Practically, it frames every subsequent obligation as moving toward alignment with the Declaration rather than creating new, standalone substantive rights in the Act itself.
Definitions, Minister and interpretive rules
Section 3 names the Minister of L'nu Affairs as responsible and provides operative definitions — notably ‘‘statutory power of decision’’ and ‘‘Indigenous governing body.’' It also requires the Government to consider Indigenous diversity and clarifies that the Act does not abrogate section 35 rights or delay UNDRIP’s application. For administrators, the definition of statutory power of decision is consequential because it determines the scope of decisions that could be placed into consent or joint‑decision agreements.
Obligation to align provincial laws with UNDRIP
This short but sweeping provision obliges the Government to take ‘‘all necessary measures’’ to ensure provincial laws are consistent with the Declaration, to be carried out in consultation and co‑operation with Indigenous peoples. The phrase ‘‘all necessary measures’’ is broad and operationalizes the duty to reform statutes, regulations, and administrative practices, but the Act does not specify enforcement mechanisms or timelines for that alignment beyond the action plan and reports.
Action plan: preparation, consultation and tabling
Section 5 mandates that the Government prepare an action plan in consultation and co‑operation with Indigenous peoples and requires the plan to include a deadline to initiate review. It obliges tabling in the House of Assembly within 15 days of preparation (or filing with the Clerk if the Assembly is not sitting) and permits the Government to replace the plan with a new one following the same process. The mechanics create public accountability but leave substantive content and timelines to negotiation with Indigenous partners.
Annual reporting and Minister’s assessment
Section 6 requires the Minister to prepare and table an annual report assessing progress toward implementing Section 4 measures and achieving the action plan’s goals. The first report must cover the year ending March 31, 2026, with tabling due by June 30, 2026, and the same annual schedule thereafter. This establishes a predictable reporting cadence for legislators and stakeholders, which departments will need to integrate into planning and data collection.
Agreements with Indigenous governing bodies; consent and joint decisions
Section 7 permits Executive Council members to enter agreements with Indigenous governing bodies for purposes of the Act. Section 8 expands that power where authorized by the Governor in Council to include negotiating agreements that create joint exercise of statutory decisions or require Indigenous consent prior to exercise of such decisions. It also requires the negotiating minister to publicize who they intend to consult and makes agreements ineffective until published. These provisions create a statutory pathway for co‑governance and consent arrangements but leave negotiation, scope, and limits to the parties and any authorization instruments.
Regulation‑making power
Section 9 gives the Governor in Council authority to define undefined terms and to make any regulations considered necessary to carry out the Act. Because the Act leaves much of the detail to regulation or agreement, this clause is the practical lever to fill gaps — but it also concentrates discretion in the executive, potentially shaping the scope and speed of implementation.
Commencement
The Act comes into force on January 1, 2026. Departments and Indigenous governing bodies will need to coordinate quickly to meet the first reporting and action‑plan timelines set elsewhere in the Act.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Indigenous governing bodies: The Act creates a statutory route to negotiate consent and joint‑decision agreements that can transfer or share decision authority over licences, permits and benefits.
- Indigenous communities and rights‑holders: A province‑level action plan and required consultation structures increase the visibility of UNDRIP principles in policy and administrative practice.
- Legislators and oversight bodies: Regularly tabled action plans and annual reports provide a public record for legislative scrutiny and oversight of implementation progress.
Who Bears the Cost
- Provincial ministries and agencies: Departments will face new planning, consultation, reporting and potentially administrative restructuring costs to align laws and to participate in joint‑decision arrangements.
- Municipalities and local decision‑makers: Public notice of intended consultation and the possibility of consent/joint‑decision agreements could complicate local permitting processes and require additional coordination and legal review.
- Private sector applicants and regulated industries: Businesses applying for licences or permits may encounter longer or procedurally different approval processes where an agreement requires Indigenous consent or joint decision‑making, increasing transaction costs and timelines.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between respecting Indigenous self‑determination through negotiated consent and co‑decision mechanisms and preserving the existing statutory and administrative architecture: the Act facilitates transfers or sharing of decision authority but leaves open how far provincial law and administrative practice should be altered, who decides the limits, and how to balance timely public administration with the duty to consult and obtain free, prior and informed consent.
The Act creates a procedural framework for alignment with the Declaration rather than prescribing substantive legal remedies or precise changes to specific statutes. That design leaves implementation heavily dependent on the content of the action plan, the scope of agreements negotiated with Indigenous governing bodies, and any regulations the Governor in Council enacts.
Because the Act delegates significant detail to future action plans, agreements and regulations, different ministries and Indigenous partners could interpret implementation priorities or timelines very differently, producing uneven outcomes across sectors.
The definition of ‘‘statutory power of decision’’ is broad and could reach anything from social‑service eligibility rules to major resource‑approval regimes; yet the Act does not set boundaries or a dispute‑resolution process for contested agreements. The publication requirement for agreements creates transparency but the requirement that an agreement not be effective until published could delay implementation or incentivize late publication.
Finally, the Governor in Council’s open regulation‑making power centralizes discretion in the executive branch, which accelerates implementation options but raises questions about parliamentary and Indigenous oversight of consequential regulatory details.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.