The Justice Administration Amendment (2025) Act repackages several procedural and substantive changes across Nova Scotia’s justice statutes. Key moves: abolish the standalone Family Court and fold its work into the Supreme Court (Family Division); change who must be served and how in Adult Capacity proceedings (including naming the Public Trustee as a respondent and requiring affidavit-proof of filings); and overhaul the Powers of Attorney regime to permit remote witnessing, tighten fiduciary rules, set mandatory compensation mechanics, and add liability protections.
The Act also institutes an automatic repeal mechanism for unproclaimed legislation and carves out specific offshore/oil-and-gas statutes from that regime.
For practitioners and public agencies this is an operational bill. It shifts case management and governance (new Chief Judge powers, Judicial Council composition and complaint rules), creates fresh compliance duties for attorneys acting under POAs, and places procedural burdens on courts and the Attorney General’s office to identify and either proclaim or repeal dormant laws.
Much of the day‑to‑day effect will flow from regulations the Governor in Council is authorized to make—so expect the substance of some changes to be realized only when regulations appear.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act abolishes the Family Court and treats references to it as references to the Supreme Court (Family Division); it amends the Adult Capacity and Decision‑making Act to name the Public Trustee a respondent, require filings to be proved by affidavit, and add bond‑reduction criteria; it changes the Powers of Attorney Act to allow remote witnessing, prohibit co‑mingling, permit delegation of investment authority, set compensation and accounting rules, and add liability protections; and it creates an automatic repeal process for unproclaimed Acts while exempting two offshore/oil statutes.
Who It Affects
Family law judges and court administrators (moving work into the Supreme Court Family Division), the Public Trustee’s office (now a named respondent in capacity applications), all attorneys acting under powers of attorney and their financial institutions, the Attorney General’s office (statute‑maintenance reporting), and the Provincial Court governance bodies (new Chief Judge authorities and Judicial Council composition).
Why It Matters
The package recasts judicial administration and fiduciary regulation in ways that change daily operational practices: who gets notified and named in proceedings, how POAs are executed and reimbursed, and how dormant statutes are purged. It centralizes administrative authority (Chief Judge, regulation‑making) and shifts many implementation details from statute into forthcoming regulations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act reorganizes court architecture and complaint processes. By abolishing the Family Court and directing all references to it to the Supreme Court (Family Division), the legislature consolidates family‑law jurisdiction within the Supreme Court framework.
At the same time, the Provincial Court Act is amended to expand the Chief Judge’s administrative reach—setting sittings, offices, directives, education requirements, and even a summary suspension power—while revising Judicial Council membership and how judicial complaints proceed.
Adult capacity proceedings receive procedural tightening: the Public Trustee must be named as a respondent in these applications, and most documents (other than notices, pleadings, or draft orders) must be proved and filed by affidavit. The Court gets explicit guidance on when it may waive or reduce bonds for representatives, listing factors such as the representative’s authority, relationship to the adult, value and source of property, and any regulation‑prescribed matters.The Powers of Attorney regime is substantially reworked to increase usability and set clearer fiduciary rules.
The statute allows remote witnessing under regulations, forbids attorneys from co‑mingling their property with a donor’s except for limited pre‑existing patterns, and permits an attorney to delegate investment duties to qualified specialists subject to trustee standards. It creates a default entitlement to compensation and reimbursement (with a regulatory fee schedule and a prohibition on taking compensation from government income assistance), mandatory accounting on termination or death, limits on who must receive notice of an attorney acting, and liability protections for third parties who reasonably believe an attorney had authority.
The statute also clarifies that bankruptcy does not terminate a power of attorney and adds new standing and notice rules for applications seeking declarations of incapacity.Perhaps the most structural reform is the statute‑maintenance mechanism: the Chief Legislative Counsel must annually list unproclaimed Acts or provisions assented to at least nine years before the calendar year, the Attorney General tables the list, and any listed item is repealed on December 31 of the year the list is tabled unless the Assembly resolves to retain it, the Act is proclaimed, or the Governor in Council delays repeal up to three additional years. Two major resource‑related Acts are explicitly exempted from this process.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Family Court for Nova Scotia is abolished and its statutory references are redirected to the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Family Division).
The Public Trustee must be named as a respondent in any Adult Capacity and Decision‑making Act proceeding, and most court filings (other than notices, pleadings, or draft orders) must be proved by affidavit.
A new statutory process triggers repeal of unproclaimed Acts: the Chief Legislative Counsel lists candidates annually and any listed provision is repealed on December 31 of the reporting year unless the Assembly or Governor in Council acts to preserve it.
The Powers of Attorney Act now allows remote witnessing by regulation, prohibits co‑mingling of donor and attorney finances (with narrow exceptions), and creates a default entitlement to attorney compensation set by regulation, which may not be taken from government income‑maintenance funds.
The Chief Judge of the Provincial Court gains broad administrative powers including designating sittings and offices, issuing directives and education requirements, and temporarily suspending judges when immediate action is necessary; Judicial Council composition and quorum rules are also revised.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Adult Capacity proceedings: Public Trustee, affidavits and bond criteria
The Act amends the Adult Capacity and Decision‑making Act to require the Public Trustee to be named as a respondent in every proceeding and to mandate that most documents filed with the Court be proved by affidavit and included in that affidavit. It rewrites the bond‑dispensing authority so courts must consider enumerated factors—such as the representative’s authority, relationship to the adult, the value and source of property (including transfers without consideration) and any regulatory matters—before reducing or waiving bonds, and it authorizes regulations to add considerations. Practically, this increases the Public Trustee’s visibility in cases and shifts evidentiary practice toward formal affidavit records while giving judges a structured checklist for financial safeguards.
Abolition of the Family Court and transitional continuity
The Family Court Act is repealed and the Family Court itself is abolished, but the statute expressly preserves the validity of pre‑existing Family Court orders. All statutory and documentary references to the Family Court are remapped to the Supreme Court (Family Division). That approach is administrative rather than retroactive: ongoing matters and prior orders remain effective, but future filings and governance will follow Supreme Court procedures, which will require administrative changes (docketing, registry procedures and possible reallocation of support staff and judges).
Interpretation Act: Section headers and automatic repeal of unproclaimed laws
The Interpretation Act receives two changes: a terminology tweak (adding the word “Section” before ‘headers’) and, more substantively, a new Section 25A that creates a multi‑step, annual process to identify and automatically repeal Acts or provisions that were assented to at least nine years earlier yet still unproclaimed. The Chief Legislative Counsel lists candidates early in the calendar year, the Attorney General tables the list when the Assembly next sits, and listed items are repealed on December 31 unless proclaimed, the Assembly votes to retain them, or the Governor in Council postpones repeal for up to three more years. The Offshore Petroleum Resources Act and the Oil and Gas Operations (Nova Scotia) Act are explicitly exempted.
Powers of Attorney: remote witnessing, fiduciary limits, compensation and liability rules
This part permits remote witnessing of POAs under regulation, tightens fiduciary duties by banning co‑mingling except where co‑mingling pre‑existed incapacity, and allows delegation of investment authority to qualified specialists consistent with trustee standards. It establishes a statutory entitlement to compensation and reimbursement (default amounts by regulation), requires compensation not be drawn from government income‑maintenance funds, mandates accounting on termination or death, widens notice recipients if immediate family cannot be located, and creates statutory protections for third parties who reasonably rely on an attorney’s authority. It also states bankruptcy does not terminate a power of attorney and adjusts court‑application standing and notice rules for incapacity declarations. Many implementation details—fee schedules, remote witnessing processes, contents of notices and bond considerations—are left to regulations, shifting fine print to regulatory instruments.
Provincial Court governance: Chief Judge powers, Judicial Council and complaints
The Provincial Court Act is amended to allow appointment of one or two Associate Chief Judges and to clarify succession during absences. Judges must now take a new oath; eligibility for appointment increases from five to ten years’ standing as a barrister. The Chief Judge’s administrative authority is significantly expanded (designating sittings and offices, issuing directives and education requirements) and empowered to suspend judges in urgent circumstances, with a requirement to promptly request a Judicial Council investigation. The Judicial Council’s composition is reset to include the Chief Justice as chair, a mix of judges, bench and bar representatives, and public appointees, and quorum and complaint processes are reworked to reflect the new structure.
Coming into force
The Act provides that Parts II (Family Court abolition) and VI (Powers of Attorney reforms) come into force on proclamation by the Governor in Council. Other provisions either take effect immediately on Royal Assent or as otherwise specified. The use of proclamation authority means operational timing for significant elements—family‑court consolidation and POA rules—will depend on executive scheduling and associated regulations being in place.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Donors and their families who need flexible execution options — Remote witnessing and clearer delegation rules reduce logistical barriers to creating and administering powers of attorney, aiding donors with mobility or geography constraints.
- Public Trustee — Being named a respondent in adult capacity applications gives the office earlier notice and statutory standing to protect vulnerable adults’ financial interests and to participate in bond and safeguard assessments.
- Estate administrators and personal representatives — Mandatory accounting on termination or death clarifies transition duties and creates a formal record for estate settlement, reducing future disputes.
- Provincial Court administration — Consolidation of family jurisdiction into the Supreme Court and expanded Chief Judge authority create opportunities for standardized administrative practices, continuing education, and centralized case management.
- Creditors and third parties transacting with donors — The statutory protection for third parties who reasonably rely on an attorney’s apparent authority reduces their transactional risk when accepting instruments executed under a power of attorney.
Who Bears the Cost
- Public Trustee — Added workload and costs from being automatically named in capacity proceedings and from potential increased involvement in bond and safeguard assessments.
- Attorneys acting under powers of attorney — New duties (no co‑mingling, accounting, notice requirements), potential regulatory fee schedules limiting remuneration, and exposure to stricter oversight mean higher compliance costs and possible exposure to contested accounts.
- Attorney General’s office and legislative counsel — The new annual listing, tabling and publication duties create administrative work and require judgment calls about which unproclaimed Acts to preserve or let lapse.
- Provincial Court judges and registry staff — Changes to jurisdictional allocation, new directives and administrative duties from the Chief Judge, and transitional logistics when mapping Family Court matters into the Supreme Court will impose operational burdens.
- Financial institutions and third parties — Though given protection, they will need new verification processes to accept remote‑witnessed POAs and to confirm an attorney’s authority in light of the liability provisions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The Act tries to reconcile two legitimate but conflicting aims: make the justice system more modern and manageable by consolidating courts, simplifying POA use, and pruning dormant laws, while simultaneously protecting vulnerable people and judicial independence. Each efficiency gain—remote witnessing, automatic repeal, stronger Chief Judge authority—reduces friction but shifts risk onto fiduciary oversight, legislative safety nets, or the procedural protections available to judges and litigants; resolving that trade‑off depends heavily on how regulations and administrative guidance are drafted and applied.
The Act pushes important implementation choices into regulations and administrative practice, which concentrates policy impact in forthcoming Governor in Council instruments. Clause‑level lists (bond factors, fee schedules, remote‑witnessing processes, and notice contents) will control much of the real effect, so stakeholders must monitor regulation drafting closely.
That creates uncertainty between Royal Assent and proclamation: the statutory framework is broad, but the operational details that determine costs, liability and evidentiary sufficiency are not yet fixed.
The automatic repeal mechanism cleans the statute roll but risks unintended losses. Legislators commonly leave technical or enabling provisions unproclaimed for legitimate reasons (funding, policy sequencing, or pending federal coordination); an automatic clock raises the chance that useful but dormant provisions vanish unless a conscious decision is taken to protect them.
The carve‑outs for offshore and oil‑and‑gas Acts signal legislative judgment but also create an administrable exception set that may spawn debates about which Acts merit exemption.
On the court‑administration side, centralizing powers in the Chief Judge and recasting Judicial Council composition streamlines governance but raises checks‑and‑balances questions: the Chief Judge can suspend judges and set binding administrative standards, yet the suspension triggers only a later Judicial Council review. Likewise, abolishing the Family Court and folding cases into the Supreme Court Family Division preserves prior orders but will require mapping caseloads, case management rules and enforcement procedures—an administrative project with litigation risk if practitioners contest new procedures or transitional rulings.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.