This bill adds a new leave category to Nova Scotia’s Labour Standards Code for employees who experience gender‑based violence. It defines “gender‑based violence,” sets a three‑month employment eligibility threshold, and creates two entitlements: up to ten days per calendar year (intermittent or in one block) and up to sixteen weeks in one continuous period.
The bill limits what employers can demand by deferring evidentiary rules to regulations: employers may require an employee to identify the purpose of the leave and to provide prescribed supporting information only where the regulations permit. The Governor in Council must also amend the General Labour Standards Code Regulations to require employers to pay up to ten days for this and an existing related leave, shifting short‑term wage costs onto employers rather than the worker or the state.
These design choices matter for survivor confidentiality, employer cash flow (especially for small businesses), and regulatory detail to follow.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts a statutory definition of “gender‑based violence” and creates an unpaid statutory leave for eligible employees to address medical care, counselling, relocation, legal and victim‑service needs arising from gender‑based violence. It allows up to 10 days per year (intermittent or continuous) and up to 16 weeks in a single continuous block, and gives the executive authority to prescribe additional purposes and documentation rules.
Who It Affects
Employees in Nova Scotia with at least three months’ service, their employers (private and public sector), victim services organizations and health and counselling providers who will support leave uses, and the Department responsible for drafting accompanying regulations. Small employers and HR/compliance teams will be the most operationally affected.
Why It Matters
This fills a statutory gap by naming gender‑based violence as a specific, codified ground for leave and creates a two‑tier entitlement (short‑term paid under regulations and longer unpaid continuous leave). The bill also centralizes key decisions in regulations, which means the practical scope of the leave will be determined after enactment and will shape employer obligations and survivor protections.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a new statutory scheme in the Labour Standards Code called “Leave for Victims of Gender‑Based Violence.” It starts by defining gender‑based violence to include physical, sexual, emotional or psychological abuse, coercion, stalking, harassment, sexual harassment and financial control, and it makes clear the abuse must be based on the person’s gender, gender expression, gender identity or perceived gender. That definition is the gateway: it determines who can claim the new leave.
Eligible employees—those employed at least three months—may take the leave for a circumscribed set of reasons: medical attention for injuries, services from victim services or police victim‑service staff, counselling, temporary or permanent relocation, or seeking legal or law‑enforcement assistance (including participation in legal proceedings). The statute also allows the regulations to prescribe additional purposes.
In each calendar year an employee can take up to ten days (either intermittently or in one continuous block) and may also take a single continuous leave of up to sixteen weeks. The text preserves other existing leave entitlements so employees can stack or choose leaves where appropriate.On process, the bill requires employees to give written notice “as soon as possible” of planned leave, or, if leave begins urgently, to notify the employer as soon as they can.
Employers must pay employees for any part‑day worked. The employer may treat a part of a day taken as leave as a whole day for counting purposes.
The law lets employees shorten certain leaves early with notice, with a 14‑day written notice requirement where the leave is the longer continuous form unless both parties agree otherwise.Crucially, the bill does not itself set detailed documentary requirements; instead it gives the Governor in Council explicit powers to put those rules in regulations. Employers may require employees to identify which specific reason from the statute applies and may require prescribed supporting information only if and to the extent the regulations permit.
The bill also amends several existing Labour Standards Code cross‑references so these new leave rights receive the same procedural and enforcement treatment as other statutory leaves. Finally, the Governor in Council must amend the General Labour Standards Code Regulations to require that employers pay up to ten days for this new leave (and a related earlier leave), meaning the short‑term paid portion will be implemented by regulatory change rather than by the statute itself.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill defines “gender‑based violence” to include physical, sexual, emotional or psychological abuse, coercion, stalking, harassment, sexual harassment and financial control tied to gender, gender expression, gender identity or perceived gender.
Employees become eligible after three months of employment to take the leave; that is the statutorily required service threshold for entitlement.
The new leave permits up to ten days per calendar year (which may be taken intermittently or in one block) and a separate entitlement of up to 16 weeks in one continuous period.
Employers may require the employee to identify the statutory purpose of the leave and to provide supporting information only where the regulations allow it; the bill gives the Governor in Council power to prescribe the nature, form, content, timing and circumstances for such information.
The Governor in Council must amend the General Labour Standards Code Regulations to require employers to pay employees for up to 10 days of leave under the existing sexual‑assault‑related leave and the new gender‑based violence leave; the statute also treats part‑days taken as leave as whole days for counting and requires payment for any part‑day worked.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Regulatory delegation on purposes and documentation
This amendment adds three specific regulatory powers to Section 7: the Governor in Council can (1) prescribe additional allowable purposes for the leave, (2) set the nature, form, content and timing of information an employee must provide to an employer, and (3) prescribe the circumstances under which an employer may require that information. Practically, that means the statute establishes the framework but leaves the details — especially evidentiary limits and privacy protections — to regulation. The placement inside Section 7 centralizes executive rulemaking authority rather than spelling out those limits in primary legislation.
Fold new leave into existing enforcement and protection rules
These technical amendments substitute references so that the new Section 60ZD is included wherever similar leaves are listed. In plain terms, protections, complaint procedures, and enforcement mechanisms that apply to other statutory leaves will also apply to the gender‑based violence leave. That avoids creating a separate enforcement silo and means remedies, timing rules and reprisal protections already in the Code will govern disputes about this leave.
Statutory definition of gender‑based violence
Section 60ZC provides a working definition of gender‑based violence tied to types of abuse (physical, sexual, emotional, psychological) and to gender‑based motivations or perceptions. The wording intentionally includes ‘perceived gender,’ expanding protection to people targeted because of how others read their gender. This definition will matter for both eligibility and for the scope of what the regulations must address.
Entitlement: eligibility, purposes, and duration
Section 60ZD creates the leave: employees with at least three months’ service are entitled to an unpaid leave when they experience gender‑based violence and need time for defined purposes (medical care, victim services, counselling, relocation, legal or law‑enforcement assistance) or any additional purpose the regulations prescribe. Subsection (2) sets two duration bands: up to ten days per calendar year (intermittent or continuous) and up to 16 weeks in one continuous period. The statute also confirms employees can still use other statutory leaves regardless of when the violence occurred, preventing unintended forfeiture of other entitlements.
Operational rules: notice, scheduling, part‑day treatment and early return
Section 60ZE requires employees to advise employers in writing “as soon as possible” about planned leaves and permits urgent starts with later notice. It asks employees to make reasonable efforts to schedule appointments during non‑work hours and allows employers to count any portion of a day taken as leave as a full day for the annual 10‑day cap while requiring pay for any part‑day actually worked. It also provides a mechanism for employees to end leaves early, with a 14‑day written notice requirement for the longer continuous leave unless agreed otherwise.
Documentation: employer requests limited to what regulations permit
Section 60ZF conditions employer requests for information on the regulations: employers may require employees to identify which statutory purpose applies and to provide prescribed supporting information only to the extent the regulations permit. It also resolves a conflict by making the employer‑requested duration information prevail over an employee’s earlier anticipated dates where there is inconsistency. In practice, this section creates a two‑step control: statute permits employer inquiry but regulation will set the boundaries and formats to protect confidentiality and avoid onerous demands.
Regulatory duty to require short‑term pay
Section 8 directs the Governor in Council to amend the General Labour Standards Code Regulations so that employers must pay employees for up to 10 days of a leave taken under the existing section for sexual‑assault‑related leave and the new gender‑based violence leave. The statute does not itself set the wage payment mechanics; instead the regulations will specify who is covered, timing of pay and any technical rules. The parliamentary text therefore enacts entitlement and delegates the wage‑payment design to regulatory rulemaking.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Employees who have experienced gender‑based violence — gain statutory permission to take time for medical care, counselling, relocation or legal processes, with a guaranteed short‑term leave and a longer continuous leave option.
- Survivors in precarious jobs or with limited sick leave — the statutory leave creates a backstop where employers previously could have denied time off or required use of other leave banks that employees might prefer to conserve.
- Victim services organizations and qualified counsellors — these providers will see clearer pathways to support clients because the statute explicitly names their services as valid grounds for leave, likely increasing referrals and service demand.
Who Bears the Cost
- Employers — the regulations must require up to 10 days’ pay for short‑term leave, imposing direct wage costs and administrative burdens to track intermittent days and manage return‑to‑work notices.
- Small businesses and employers with tight cash flow — mandatory short‑term payments and potential unpredictability of intermittent leave create liquidity and scheduling pressures disproportionate to larger employers with HR capacity.
- Provincial government departments and regulators — drafting, consulting on and enforcing the promised regulations (including setting evidentiary thresholds and payment mechanics) will require staff time and resources, and disputes will likely increase initial administrative and tribunal caseloads.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between maximizing access and confidentiality for survivors (limiting documentation and making leave readily available) and protecting employers from fraud and undue operational burden (requiring evidence and managing paid short‑term absences). The bill leans to a regulatory approach to reconcile those goals, but the balance will ultimately depend on choices the executive makes when it prescribes permissible documentation and payment mechanics.
The bill leaves critical operational detail to regulation, which creates both flexibility and uncertainty. By delegating the form, timing and circumstances for employer requests to the Governor in Council, the statute avoids hardcoding evidentiary tests but also concentrates power in the executive to define what documentation survivors must produce.
That delegation is a double‑edged sword: sensible regulations can protect survivor privacy and limit unnecessary demands; overly permissive rules could force employees to disclose sensitive evidence or face denial of leave.
Another implementation tension concerns the decision to make the statutory leave unpaid while simultaneously directing the Governor in Council to require up to 10 days paid by employers via regulations. The result is that the short‑term paid piece will be implemented administratively, not legislatively, which raises timing and predictability issues for employers and employees alike.
Small employers will feel the immediate cash impact; the statute contains no transitional funding or tax credit, so the cost falls on employers unless the regulations provide alternative mechanics (for example, payroll‑tax‑backed reimbursement). There are also practical questions the bill does not answer: how “qualified person” and “victim services organization” will be defined, how confidentiality will be safeguarded when employers request documentation, and how this leave will interact with collective agreements and other statutory leaves in day‑to‑day scheduling and benefit accruals.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.