This bill establishes an Office of the Small Business Commissioner with a mandate to help small businesses resolve commercial disputes, review systemic barriers, and advise government on policy impacts. It creates a low-cost mediation pathway for business-to-business disputes and for disputes between small businesses and public bodies.
The Act also imposes new limits on landlords’ use of demolition/redevelopment termination clauses in commercial leases: landlords must give prescribed written notice, show evidence of genuine redevelopment intent, and compensate tenants for relocation costs, unamortized leasehold improvements and other prescribed losses. The legislation leaves many operational details to Governor in Council regulations and requires funding by legislative appropriation.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes an independent Small Business Commissioner to provide information, investigate systemic barriers, appoint mediators and run mediation services for commercial disputes. It requires parties to attempt Commissioner mediation before turning to court and makes mediated settlement agreements binding on parties.
Who It Affects
Small corporations with up to 100 employees (or a threshold set by regulation), commercial tenants and landlords, provincial public bodies, and ADR service providers. It also affects policymakers because the Commissioner can review proposed government measures for impacts on small businesses.
Why It Matters
It shifts many small-business commercial disputes from immediate litigation into an administrative mediation pathway, embeds tenant protections for redevelopment-driven lease terminations, and hands the executive wide regulatory power to define scope and thresholds—changing how tenancy disputes and B2B claims are handled in the province.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act creates a statutory Office of the Small Business Commissioner whose job is to make it easier and cheaper for small businesses to solve commercial problems. The Commissioner must provide information on rights and obligations, look into systemic barriers, publish findings and recommendations, and advise government on the small-business impact of legislation and policies.
For dispute handling the Commissioner may appoint mediators and run mediations that are meant to be timely, affordable and accessible. If mediation produces a settlement, that settlement is binding on the parties.
The bill requires parties to attempt mediation through the Commissioner before bringing a court proceeding over a covered commercial dispute, and instructs courts to decline to hear a dispute unless mediation has been tried—subject to narrow exceptions for inappropriateness or urgency.The Act gives the Commissioner a specific role in disputes with public bodies: the Commissioner can request information, facilitate mediation and make recommendations, and the statute requires public bodies to cooperate. The Commissioner must also report annually to the Minister of Growth and Development, and these reports are tabled in the House of Assembly or filed with the Clerk.Section 11 tackles a common commercial problem: lease termination for redevelopment.
Where a lease explicitly allows a landlord to end the lease for demolition, redevelopment or major renovation, the landlord must provide written notice within a regulation-prescribed period and produce evidence the termination is genuinely for that purpose. The landlord must compensate tenants for relocation costs, the unamortized value of leasehold improvements and other prescribed losses; additional compensation becomes payable if the landlord fails to carry out the stated redevelopment within a prescribed time.
The Act leaves the details—employee thresholds, notice periods, qualifying losses and timelines—to Governor in Council regulations, and it conditions funding on appropriation by the Legislature.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Commissioner is appointed by the Governor in Council for a five-year term and may be reappointed (Section 4).
Parties must attempt Commissioner-run mediation before starting court proceedings for a covered commercial dispute; courts must decline to hear such proceedings unless mediation was attempted or an exception applies (Section 8).
When mediation produces a mediated settlement agreement under the Act, that agreement is binding on the parties (Section 7(3)).
If a lease lets a landlord terminate for demolition/redevelopment, the landlord must give written notice within the regulation-prescribed period and provide evidence of genuine redevelopment intent; the landlord must pay specified compensations including relocation costs and unamortized leasehold improvements (Section 11).
Key parameters—what counts as a commercial dispute, the employee threshold for ‘small business’, notice periods, compensable losses and timelines for redevelopment—are left to Governor in Council regulations (Section 13).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Statutory purposes
This section sets the Act’s objectives: fairness and efficiency in commercial relationships, accessible dispute resolution, an independent commissioner role, and a requirement that government measures avoid unnecessary burdens on small businesses. Practically, those purposes frame how the Commissioner will justify investigations and recommendations and give the office a broad mandate to assess legislation and policy impacts.
Office established; appointment, term and independence
The Office of the Small Business Commissioner is created and the Governor in Council appoints the Commissioner for a five‑year term, with a possibility of reappointment. The Governor in Council also sets remuneration and expense reimbursement. Although the Act declares the Commissioner independent in performing functions, appointment and pay by the executive plus funding tied to appropriation mean operational independence will depend on how the government uses those powers and budget allocations.
Information, systemic reviews and mediation powers
The Commissioner must provide information to small businesses, investigate systemic barriers and publish reports. The office may appoint mediators and run mediations that the Act requires to be timely, affordable and accessible. The statute explicitly makes mediated settlement agreements binding, meaning the Act treats successful mediation as producing enforceable obligations between parties without additional judicial approval language.
Mandatory mediation before court with narrow exceptions
A party to a covered commercial dispute must attempt Commissioner mediation before commencing court proceedings. Courts are required to decline jurisdiction where parties have not attempted such mediation unless mediation would be inappropriate or urgent judicial intervention is required. This provision shifts initial dispute processing out of courts and into an administrative ADR track and creates a potential new procedural bar for litigants who skip mediation.
Disputes with public bodies — information, mediation and recommendations
Small businesses can apply to the Commissioner for disputes with public bodies that materially affect operations. The Commissioner can request information from the public body, facilitate mediation and make recommendations; public bodies must cooperate. The section gives the Commissioner a practical role in government-business friction points but stops short of giving binding remedial powers against public bodies.
Limits on redevelopment termination clauses and compensation rules
When a lease expressly permits termination for demolition, redevelopment or major renovation, landlords must follow prescribed notice requirements and produce evidence of genuine intentions before exercising the right. The statute mandates compensation for relocation, unamortized leasehold improvements and other prescribed losses, and it requires additional compensation if the landlord does not undertake the stated works within a prescribed period. The provision constrains landlords’ flexibility and introduces new recovery items for tenants, but leaves compensable items and timing to regulation.
Reporting, regulations and appropriations
The Commissioner must submit an annual report to the Minister of Growth and Development for tabling. The Governor in Council receives broad regulation‑making authority—defining commercial disputes, the small-business employee threshold, mediator qualifications, mediation procedures, notice periods and compensable losses. Finally, the Act explicitly makes implementation contingent on money being appropriated by the Legislature, creating a fiscal checkpoint for the office’s operation and staffing.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Small commercial tenants (retail, services, non-residential charities) — gain a low‑cost ADR pathway, clearer protections when a landlord ends a lease for redevelopment, and potential compensation for relocation and leasehold improvements.
- Small businesses in B2B relationships (suppliers, contractors, professional services) — get an accessible mediation forum to resolve unpaid invoices, unfair contract practices and supply‑chain disputes without immediate litigation expense.
- ADR professionals and mediator firms — stand to receive work from Commissioner-appointed mediations and related administration of the new office.
- Policymakers and regulators — receive systematic reports and targeted recommendations on how laws and policies affect small businesses, improving evidence for future policy design.
Who Bears the Cost
- Landlords and property developers — face new procedural hurdles before terminating leases for redevelopment, plus compensation obligations and possible additional payments if redevelopment does not proceed within prescribed timelines.
- Provincial public bodies — must cooperate with Commissioner investigations and mediations, requiring staff time and disclosure of information; they may face recommendations without a binding enforcement mechanism.
- The provincial government (Treasury) — bears appropriation and operational costs for establishment, staffing and running of the Commissioner’s office and mediation services.
- Courts and litigators — may see a shift in case intake, with some disputes rerouted into mediation and new procedural motions about whether mediation was attempted, increasing pretrial work.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between protecting small businesses (by steering disputes into accessible mediation and imposing tenant compensation for redevelopment terminations) and preserving property holders’ flexibility and predictability (developers and landlords who rely on redevelopment rights and contractual certainty); resolving that tension requires regulatory detail and funding choices that the Act leaves to the executive and the Legislature.
The Act delegates extensive detail to Governor in Council regulations: what constitutes a commercial dispute, the maximum employee count for small-business status, notice periods, compensable loss categories and redevelopment timelines. Those regulatory choices will determine how broad the Act’s coverage is in practice and could substantially change the balance of rights between tenants and landlords depending on the thresholds set.
The statute makes mediated settlement agreements binding but does not set out specific enforcement procedures (for example, mechanisms to convert a mediated agreement into a court order or administrative enforcement remedy). That gap could create uncertainty about remedies if a party refuses to comply with a mediated settlement.
Similarly, the Commissioner can make recommendations to public bodies but the Act stops short of giving the office binding remedial powers, meaning the effectiveness of remedies may depend on political will and informal pressure rather than statutory compulsion.
Operational independence is ambiguous. The Commissioner is declared independent yet is appointed and paid by the Governor in Council with funding dependent on legislative appropriation.
That structure risks political influence over priorities and resourcing. Finally, the Act’s requirement that parties attempt mediation before suing could delay urgent relief in some cases; while the bill carves out urgency and inappropriateness exceptions, implementation will hinge on how courts interpret those exceptions and how quickly the Commissioner can provide timely mediations.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.