The bill adds cooling to the definition of “vital services” in Ontario’s Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 and supplies a statutory description of what that means for rental units during the warmer months. It also creates a regulation-making power to manage transitional issues that arise when this new duty comes into force.
This is not merely symbolic: by folding cooling into the Act’s existing framework for vital services the bill brings tenant protections and the Landlord and Tenant Board’s remedies into play for failures to provide cooling. At the same time, the bill builds in a long lead time and gives the Lieutenant Governor in Council broad authority to phase in or modify the new obligations, which shifts much of the detail to regulation rather than the statute itself.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill makes cooling a “vital service” under the Residential Tenancies Act and sets a seasonal obligation for maintaining indoor temperatures. It also permits the government to make transition regulations to delay, phase-in or otherwise adapt implementation across the province.
Who It Affects
Owners and operators of rental housing (purpose-built, small landlords, non-profits and co‑ops), tenants in those units, HVAC contractors and property managers will be directly affected. Municipalities, public health units and utilities may see indirect impacts from changes in cooling demand and enforcement activity.
Why It Matters
Adding cooling into the Act imports the Act’s enforcement and remedy tools for vital services into a climate-adaptation context, forcing choices about capital upgrades, tenant access to safe indoor temperatures, and how costs are allocated — with the government reserving power to manage uneven readiness across the province.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill changes one definition in the Residential Tenancies Act: it adds “cooling” to the list of services the Act treats as vital. Rather than leaving the term vague, the statute describes when and how cooling must be provided during warmer months.
Making cooling a vital service means the same legal architecture that currently governs heat, hot water and other essential services — including tenant remedies and Board enforcement — will now apply.
The new text specifies the seasonal frame for the obligation and links compliance to the tenant’s ability to regulate temperature. That creates a split between units where the tenant controls a thermostat and units where the landlord controls the building systems.
The bill also explicitly allows the government to create transition regulations: it can delay or phase in the obligation by geography or housing type, continue prior rules for a time, and address how pending disputes are treated.Finally, the bill sets an implementation timetable in statute but also leaves room for regulatory adjustments. The effect is a statutory baseline standard for cooling paired with administrative flexibility to handle practical realities — older buildings, electricity capacity, and the varied readiness of landlords.
Practically, expect landlords and operators to review mechanical systems, tenancy agreements, and maintenance plans; expect tenant advocates and public-health actors to press for robust enforcement; and expect the government to use the regulation-making power to tailor rollout in ways that will determine winners and losers in the short run.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds “cooling” to the RTA’s definition of “vital services” and ties it to a seasonal requirement for indoor temperature during summer months.
A new clause deems the cooling requirement met if the tenant can regulate the temperature to a maximum level but chooses not to do so.
The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make transition regulations that can delay the effect of the new provision in parts of the province, continue old rules temporarily, or address pending proceedings related to the change.
The statute specifies a delayed commencement for the cooling amendment — creating a long lead time before the obligation takes effect — while leaving final timing and phased-in approaches to regulation.
The cooling standard in the bill applies to “any room intended for tenants to live in,” making the duty unit- and room-specific rather than limited to common or mechanical spaces.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Amendment to the definition of “vital services”
This provision inserts “cooling” into the list of services the Act treats as vital. Practically, that places cooling in the same legal bucket as heat and hot water — so failures can trigger the Act’s existing remedies and Board jurisdiction. The statutory change is narrow in form but consequential in effect because it changes legal categorization rather than creating a standalone enforcement regime.
Statutory description of cooling and 'deemed met' rule
Subsection 2(5) sets out when and how cooling must be provided (a seasonal frame and an indoor-maximum temperature for rooms intended for tenants). Subsection 2(6) creates a rule saying that if a tenant can set the temperature to the statutory maximum but declines to do so, the requirement is taken as satisfied. That is an important allocation of responsibility: it distinguishes landlord-controlled system failures from tenant-controlled thermostat settings and limits landlord liability where tenants have control.
Transition regulation-making authority
Section 241.6 grants the Lieutenant Governor in Council broad power to make regulations that address transitional matters arising from the amendment. The regulation power is explicit about three tools: postponing commencement in geographic areas, keeping old rules running for a defined period or in defined circumstances, and governing how pre-existing court or Board proceedings are handled. This is a deliberate choice to vest discretion in government rather than to fix phased implementation timelines in the statute.
Commencement mechanics
The Act contains a general commencement clause and a special delayed start for the cooling amendment, ensuring the legislature can provide a long implementation horizon. Because the statute couples an explicit later start date with the regulation-making power, the executive has two levers — timetable in the statute and further tailoring by regulation — to manage rollout.
Short title
The short title codifies the bill’s public name. While purely formal, including a succinct title signals policy intent and frames the measure as a climate-adaptation and tenant-safety initiative; that framing can influence regulatory and enforcement priorities once the statutory machinery activates.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Heat-vulnerable tenants (seniors, medical conditions, low-income households): they gain a statutory baseline for indoor cooling, creating routes to relief and enforcement if units fail to meet the standard.
- Tenant advocacy groups and public-health agencies: they receive a clear statutory benchmark to press for compliance and to link cooling needs to health-protection programs and outreach during heat events.
- HVAC and retrofit industries: contractors, mechanical engineers and suppliers will see increased demand for installation, upgrades and maintenance as landlords respond to the new legal standard.
Who Bears the Cost
- Landlords and property owners (especially operators of older buildings): they face capital upgrades, increased maintenance and potentially higher energy bills to meet cooling obligations in units that lack adequate systems.
- Small landlords and non-profit/co-op housing providers: entities with limited capital reserves will confront disproportionate financial strain, especially where central air or adequate ventilation is absent.
- Provincial enforcement bodies and the Landlord and Tenant Board: the Board and associated administrative structures may see increased caseloads and will need resources and guidance to adjudicate disputes about measurement, control and compliance.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill tries to balance tenant health and safety against the technical and financial realities of retrofitting a diverse rental stock: it establishes a protective, measurable standard but gives government latitude and a long runway to phase it in — a trade-off between immediate, uniform protection for tenants and practical feasibility for landlords and the housing system.
The statute sets a clear baseline but leaves crucial detail to regulation and adjudication. Measurement — where and how temperature is read, whether the standard is an ambient or surface reading, and the timing and frequency of checks — is unspecified and will determine how enforceable the standard is in practice.
The deemed-compliance rule reduces frivolous landlord liability where tenants control thermostats but could incentivize landlords to design systems that push control to tenants, shifting responsibility without improving overall resilience.
The transition regulation-making power is administratively practical but politically powerful: it allows the executive to tailor the rollout (by geography or housing type) but also risks uneven protection across the province. The combination of a long lead time in the statute and open-ended regulatory discretion creates uncertainty for stakeholders trying to plan budgets, retrofit schedules and tenant communications.
Finally, the statutory focus on rooms “intended for tenants to live in” leaves open questions about shared spaces, accessory units, and mixed-use buildings — areas where disputes and enforcement complexity are most likely to arise.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.