Bill 31 inserts a new paragraph into section 24(1) of Ontario’s Marriage Act authorizing a member of the Legislative Assembly (an MPP) who has given written notice to the Minister to solemnize marriages under the authority of a licence. The amendment also adds a provision that the authorization continues for 12 months after the person ceases to be an MPP.
The change creates a straightforward path for current and recently former MPPs to act as licensed officiants without any additional qualifications or administrative detail in the Act. That raises immediate operational questions for the Minister’s office and municipal registrars about notice handling, licence verification, oversight and potential conflicts of interest where public office and private officiation intersect.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds paragraph 3.1 to s.24(1) of the Marriage Act to make members of the Legislative Assembly eligible to solemnize marriages if they submit written notice to the provincial Minister. It also adds a subsection preserving that eligibility for 12 months after the MPP leaves office.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include MPPs (current and those recently out of office), the Minister’s office (which receives and records notices), municipal clerks and registrars who process marriage licences and returns, and couples seeking officiants. Licensed religious and civil officiants will also see a modest change in the pool of available officiants.
Why It Matters
The bill expands the class of persons authorized to solemnize marriages without setting procedural safeguards, qualification criteria, or a denial/revocation scheme in the Act. That shifts the administrative burden to implementing bodies and introduces potential conflicts between public roles and private officiation that officials must manage.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Marriage Amendment Act, 2025, changes who the province treats as a valid officiant. It does this by adding a new category inside section 24(1): any member of the Legislative Assembly who gives written notice to the Minister indicating an interest in solemnizing marriages becomes authorized to do so under a licence.
In short, the statute now names MPPs explicitly as potential licensed officiants when they notify the Minister.
The Act also deals with the transition out of political life: the authorization does not evaporate the moment someone stops being an MPP. Instead, subsection (2) says the authorization continues for 12 months after the person ceases to be a member.
That is a temporal carve‑out—newly former MPPs retain the ability to act as licensed officiants for one year unless other regulatory rules intervene.Notably, the law is concise and procedural detail is sparse. The Act requires written notice but does not specify a form, information requirements, fee, training, criminal record check, or a process for refusing or revoking the authorization.
It also ties the authorization to the existence of a licence—so standard licence rules (issuance of licences, recordkeeping, and the requirement that solemnization occurs under a licence) still apply—but those operational rules live outside the amendment. The result is a statutorily permitted category of officiants whose practical participation will depend on how the Minister and municipal registrars implement notice handling and licence verification.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds paragraph 3.1 to section 24(1) of the Marriage Act to list "a member of the Assembly who has given written notice to the Minister indicating an interest in solemnizing marriages" as an authorized officiant.
The authorization is contingent on the officiant having authority under a licence—so the change interacts with existing licence issuance and recordkeeping rules.
A new subsection makes the authorization continue for 12 months after the person ceases to be an MPP, creating a one‑year post‑service window.
The Act requires only written notice to the Minister; it does not specify the notice’s content, form, fees, screening, or a denial/revocation process in the statute.
The law comes into force on Royal Assent (it is enacted as Statutes of Ontario, 2025, chapter 20).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Adds MPPs as potential licensed officiants (paragraph 3.1 to s.24(1))
This clause inserts paragraph 3.1 into s.24(1) of the Marriage Act, explicitly naming a member of the Legislative Assembly who gives written notice to the Minister as an authorized officiant. Practically, that means MPPs who follow the notice step will be treated the same, under the Act’s text, as other authorized marriage officiants—subject to any licence requirements. The provision is narrowly drafted: it conditions the status on giving written notice and on the existence of a licence.
12‑month continuation after ceasing to be an MPP
This subsection preserves the paragraph‑3.1 authorization for a period of 12 months following the day the person ceases to be a member of the Assembly. The practical implication is that someone who leaves office does not immediately lose the ability to solemnize marriages under this statutory route; they may continue for a defined, limited period without needing any additional legislative action.
Commencement on Royal Assent
Section 2 states that the Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent. That removes implementation lag and places the administrative onus immediately on the Minister’s office and registrars to accommodate the new category of officiant as of enactment.
Short title
Section 3 sets the short title as the Marriage Amendment Act, 2025. This is formal but indicates the amendment stands as a distinct statutory change to the Marriage Act recorded in the 2025 statutes.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Current and recently former MPPs: The amendment gives them a clear, statutory route to become licensed officiants by submitting written notice and securing a licence, and permits continued officiation for 12 months after leaving office—useful for MPPs who wish to offer officiant services without seeking separate, detailed legislative authority.
- Couples seeking officiants: The pool of available licensed officiants will expand slightly, potentially improving access to celebrants—particularly in communities where civil officiants are in short supply.
- Political staff or constituency offices arranging ceremonies: Staff who facilitate constituent requests or celebratory events gain another internal option to propose an MPP as an officiant, simplifying arrangements for some ceremonies.
Who Bears the Cost
- Minister’s office (policy and records function): The Minister must receive, record and manage written notices; without prescribed procedures, the office will need to decide formats, retention, and verification practices, creating new administrative work.
- Municipal clerks and registrars: Those who issue marriage licences and record solemnizations will need to verify that an officiant who is an MPP has provided notice and holds a licence; this could increase verification tasks and recordkeeping complexity.
- Existing licensed officiants and religious organizations: They may face modest competition and potential public confusion about qualifications, since the Act does not require additional training or screening for MPPs beyond the standard licence.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between expanding flexibility and access to officiants by authorizing MPPs to solemnize marriages, and protecting the integrity, neutrality and administrative clarity of the marriage‑solemnization system; the bill solves the access question simply but leaves unresolved how to prevent politicization, ensure consistent oversight, and operationalize notices and licence checks.
The Act is sparse on procedural and substantive safeguards. It mandates written notice to the Minister but says nothing about what the notice must include, how the Minister should record or publish notices, whether the Minister can refuse or revoke recognition, or whether background checks or technical training are required.
That means much of the implementation detail will fall to regulations, administrative policy, or the existing licence framework—none of which the Act amends directly.
The 12‑month continuation raises governance and ethics questions. Allowing recently former MPPs to officiate for a year creates a predictable window but also invites strategic timing (for example, aligning resignation with paid private officiations).
The statute does not address conflicts of interest, commercial solicitation by former MPPs, or whether political activity connected to officiating (campaign fundraising, party visibility) should be constrained. Finally, the amendment increases the administrative burden on the Minister’s office and municipal registrars without providing funding or procedural direction, which can produce inconsistent practices across municipalities and possible gaps in verification and oversight.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.