The bill requires the Solicitor General to ensure Ontario’s 9‑1‑1 service is technically and operationally capable of connecting any caller to the right emergency service and of sharing information across police, ambulance and fire. It mandates interoperable computer‑aided dispatch (CAD) features (including an immediate information‑share capability, a re‑bid for caller location, and escalation controls), access to updated cellular location data, bi‑directional CAD feeds to responders, and the identification of municipal water‑rescue resources for dispatchers.
The Act imposes operational duties on entities that operate 9‑1‑1 call centres: staffing levels that free supervisors from front‑line calls, mandatory training and industry certifications, mental‑health supports, continuous CAD monitoring, and a written policy (with specified topics) for handling non‑verbal callers, direct responder communication, tiered medical responses, accountability for dispatch delays, supervisor consultations and mandatory internal reviews after deaths. The bill also amends the Ombudsman Act to create an Assistant Ombudsman for 9‑1‑1 who will assist investigations, disclose certain findings to close relatives, run a public awareness campaign, study misuse, and publish an annual report.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires provincial action to build interoperable 9‑1‑1 infrastructure and compels call centres to adopt compatible CAD systems, staff and train personnel, and follow specified policies. It also creates an Assistant Ombudsman role focused on 9‑1‑1 oversight and public reporting.
Who It Affects
Provincial ministries, municipal 9‑1‑1 call centres and dispatch providers, police/EMS/fire services, cellular service providers, and the Ombudsman’s office. Call‑centre operators and CAD vendors face concrete technical and operational deadlines.
Why It Matters
Sets hard dates and functional requirements for interoperability rather than voluntary guidance, creates a formal oversight role with disclosure powers to families, and places new operational obligations on local call centres—shifting where technical, training and funding burdens fall.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act places a statutory duty on the Solicitor General to ensure that any person across Ontario who dials 9‑1‑1 reaches the appropriate call centre or local police service and that the technical systems used by those services are compatible. It spells out functional CAD capabilities the province must enable—immediate sharing of information between services, a re‑bid feature to request updated caller location, and escalation features to highlight critical information—and requires bi‑directional CAD data to be available to responders on mobile terminals.
Operational responsibilities fall to any person or entity that runs a 9‑1‑1 call centre. The bill requires adequate staffing so supervisors can remain supervisory, mandatory training and any industry certifications the Minister prescribes, continuous monitoring of CAD information, and supports for staff mental health and post‑traumatic stress.
Call centres must be on the compatible CAD system by January 1, 2027, and the province must drive the broader CAD interoperability by December 2026.The Act also addresses specific operational risks: it forces call centres to adopt a written policy covering non‑verbal communication methods, when first‑responders may speak directly with callers, how medical tiered responses are triggered, who is accountable for dispatch delays, when supervisors must be consulted, how critical radio information is identified, and mandatory internal reviews when a death occurs or a provider raises service concerns. The province must also establish an interoperable radio channel for multi‑agency responses and make municipal water‑rescue resources available to dispatchers.Finally, the bill amends the Ombudsman Act to require an Assistant Ombudsman dedicated to 9‑1‑1 oversight.
That official assists investigations into 9‑1‑1 services, may disclose investigation information to close relatives in cases of death despite otherwise applicable privacy rules, leads public education about 9‑1‑1 and alternative non‑emergency contacts, studies misuse of 9‑1‑1, and issues an annual public report on activities.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The province must enable CAD interoperability with specific features—including immediate information sharing, a re‑bid for caller location, and escalation controls—by December 2026.
Every 9‑1‑1 call centre must operate on the compatible CAD system by January 1, 2027, and maintain capacity to monitor CAD information at all times.
The Act requires call‑centre staffing that frees supervisors from taking calls, mandatory training/certification as set by the Minister, and provision of mental‑health and PTSD supports for staff.
The Ombudsman must designate an Assistant Ombudsman for 9‑1‑1 who may disclose investigation information to close relatives in death cases and must publish an annual report by April 1.
The Minister must establish technical links to obtain updated caller location information from cellular providers and build a bi‑directional CAD feed so responders receive real‑time dispatch data on mobile devices.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and ministerial responsibility
Section 1 designates the Solicitor General (or a Minister assigned that duty) as the official responsible for administering the Act. That identification centralizes authority for coordination, procurement and regulatory action required to meet the Act’s technical and operational deadlines.
Core infrastructure and functional CAD requirements
This subsection lists the infrastructure goals the Minister must deliver: universal routing of 9‑1‑1 calls to the appropriate call centre or local police; interoperable CAD features (instant sharing, re‑bid for location, escalation); access to cellular location updates; bi‑directional CAD feeds for responders; and compiling municipal water‑rescue resources for dispatcher use. Each item is a functional mandate rather than prescriptive technical specs, leaving design choices to implementation but giving the province clear outcomes to achieve.
Interoperable radio channel and communications improvements
The Minister must establish an interoperable radio channel for multi‑agency responses that includes the Ministry of Health alongside police, ambulance and fire. The section also instructs the Minister to investigate equipment and facilities to improve listening and comprehension for call‑takers and to obtain support from other ministers as required—an explicit recognition that cross‑government cooperation is necessary for system upgrades.
Call‑centre operational duties and mandatory policy topics
Section 3 imposes concrete obligations on call‑centre operators: adequate staffing, supervisor training on used software, continuous CAD monitoring, industry‑recognized certifications where required by the Minister, mental‑health supports, and operation on the province’s compatible CAD by a set date. It also mandates a written policy covering seven enumerated issues—from non‑verbal communication methods to mandatory internal reviews after deaths—requiring training on that policy. This creates both operational standards and audit points for oversight.
Crown bound
The Act explicitly binds the Crown, removing uncertainty about whether provincial bodies or Crown agencies fall within its scope. That clause ensures provincial ministries and agencies are subject to the same duties and timelines as non‑Crown operators.
Assistant Ombudsman for 9‑1‑1 oversight and disclosure rule
Amendments require the Ombudsman to designate an Assistant Ombudsman for 9‑1‑1 who assists investigations, provides investigation information to close relatives in death cases, runs public awareness campaigns, studies misuse, and issues an annual public report. Clause (1.3) clarifies that the Assistant Ombudsman’s duty to disclose to relatives applies despite a privacy exemption in the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, which creates a statutory channel for family disclosure.
Commencement and short title
The Act comes into force on Royal Assent and is formally titled the 9‑1‑1 Everywhere in Ontario Act, 2025. There are no phased or delayed commencement dates beyond the operational deadlines embedded elsewhere in the text.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- People who call 9‑1‑1 anywhere in Ontario, especially mobile and rural callers: improved routing and access to updated cellular location increases the likelihood of faster, accurate dispatch.
- Front‑line emergency responders (police, fire, EMS): interoperable CAD and bi‑directional data feeds give responders real‑time situational information on mobile terminals, improving coordination and response decisions.
- Close relatives of people who die where 9‑1‑1 was involved: the Assistant Ombudsman can disclose investigation information and requires mandatory internal reviews in qualifying cases, creating structured transparency and follow‑up.
- Call‑centre personnel: mandated training, supervisor staffing protections, and explicit mental‑health and PTSD supports acknowledge operational burden and set minimum workplace standards.
- Municipalities and dispatch planners: a standardized approach to identifying water‑rescue resources and interoperable radio channels reduces ambiguity during multi‑agency incidents.
Who Bears the Cost
- Provincial government (Solicitor General’s office): responsible for coordinating upgrades, establishing interoperability, creating the interoperable radio channel and arranging cellular‑provider interfaces—large central coordination and capital costs.
- Municipalities and independent 9‑1‑1 call‑centre operators: must migrate to the compatible CAD system by Jan 1, 2027, upgrade software/hardware, train supervisors and staff, and maintain required staffing and supports.
- Cellular service providers: expected to provide updated caller location information on request, which can require technical interfaces, data‑sharing agreements and potential legal/privacy frameworks.
- Ombudsman’s office: must dedicate staff to an Assistant Ombudsman role, run public campaigns and produce annual reports—an operational cost and staffing commitment.
- Small or outsourced emergency dispatch vendors: compliance with certification, interoperability and policy requirements could impose disproportionate implementation and training expenses.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill seeks rapid, provincewide interoperability and increased transparency for 9‑1‑1 services while relying on decentralized municipal operators, private cellular carriers and the Ombudsman’s investigatory capacity—forcing a trade‑off between faster technical/operational change and the practical limits of funding, local autonomy and privacy safeguards. Achieving the Act’s goals requires reconciling central mandates with disparate systems, costs and legal constraints.
The Act sets outcomes and deadlines but leaves technical design, procurement, and resourcing decisions to the Minister and to local operators. That drafting avoids locking the province into specific vendors or architectures but shifts the hard work—and the costs—into implementation planning.
The December 2026 and January 1, 2027 dates create compressed timelines for interoperability and full call‑centre migration; vendors, municipalities and the province will need to coordinate procurement cycles and data‑sharing agreements quickly.
Privacy and legal authority are under-specified for the cellular location requirement and the Assistant Ombudsman’s disclosure power. The Act requires the Minister to obtain updated cellular location information and separately allows the Assistant Ombudsman to provide investigation information to close relatives despite a FOIPPA privacy exemption.
Both provisions presume the existence of technical interfaces and legal arrangements to share sensitive data; they do not specify whether or how provincial law will compel private carriers to respond, nor do they detail limits, retention, or oversight of location or investigative disclosures. That gap raises operational and Charter‑related questions that could slow implementation.
Finally, the bill establishes accountability norms (policies on who is accountable for dispatch delays and mandatory internal reviews) but does not create enforcement tools, penalties, or an explicit audit regime tied to those norms. The Assistant Ombudsman is an oversight mechanism, but the Act provides no mechanism for remedial orders or financial penalties against non‑compliant call centres—implementation will therefore depend on administrative follow‑through, funding allocations, and potential future regulation to give the duties teeth.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.