Ontario’s Improving Dementia Care in Ontario Act, 2024 requires the Minister of Health to develop and publish a provincial framework aimed at improving access to dementia care across hospitals, home care, long-term care homes, hospices and community services. The framework must address person-centred care, provider training, research, data, equity and consistency across the province.
The Act also requires the Ministry of Colleges and Universities to review Ontario’s Personal Support Worker Standard. The review must consider deeper dementia education, hands-on placements involving people with dementia, and communication and de-escalation techniques.
The Act creates reporting and publication duties, but it does not itself impose new clinical standards or directly require changes to PSW curricula.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act directs the Minister of Health to develop a provincial dementia-care framework after consulting providers, ministries, the federal government and other relevant parties. It also requires reports on the framework and the state of dementia care, plus a separate review of the Personal Support Worker Standard.
Who It Affects
Health-care providers and caregivers across hospitals, home care, long-term care, hospices and community services will be considered within the framework. PSW education providers, students, employers and people living with dementia may be affected by any changes that follow the ministry’s review.
Why It Matters
The Act creates province-wide planning and transparency obligations without prescribing a single delivery model. Its practical impact will depend heavily on the content of the future framework, the findings of the PSW review and whether those documents lead to operational or educational changes.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section 1 treats access to quality dementia care as a province-wide policy objective and assigns responsibility for a coordinated framework to the Minister of Health. The framework must cover multiple care settings rather than focusing only on hospitals or long-term care.
It must promote and define person-centred dementia care, identify training needs for health professionals and other caregivers, and identify ways to support the people who provide care.
The required framework also has a system-design function. It must address dementia research and common data elements, consider existing standards and best practices, and review Quality Health Ontario’s community dementia-care quality standard.
It must also address equitable and consistent access throughout Ontario, including awareness of programs such as the Alzheimer Society of Ontario’s First Link program. The Act specifically directs attention to women, francophone patients and people diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer’s dementia.The Minister must consult dementia-care providers, affected ministries, the federal government and other people or entities, and must begin those consultations in a timely manner.
After developing the framework, the Minister must table and publish it, then prepare a separate report on the state of dementia care in Ontario and publish that report as well. The Act does not set a fixed deadline for these Health Ministry actions; it uses the term “timely” instead.Section 2 addresses the workforce pipeline rather than directly changing the PSW standard.
The Ministry of Colleges and Universities must review whether the standard should require in-depth person-centred dementia education, practical placements with people living with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias, and training in communication and de-escalation methods, including gentle persuasive approaches or other accredited techniques. The ministry must report the review’s results to the Legislative Assembly within one year after the Act comes into force and publish the report within 10 days after tabling it.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The dementia-care framework must cover hospitals, home care, long-term care homes, hospices and community care services rather than a single health-care sector.
The framework must define person-centred dementia care and identify education and training needs for both health-care providers and other caregivers.
The Act specifically requires attention to women, francophone people and patients with early-onset Alzheimer’s dementia.
The PSW review must consider experiential placements involving people living with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias, as well as communication and de-escalation training.
The PSW review report has a fixed publication window: the Ministry of Colleges and Universities must post it on a government website within 10 days after tabling it, although the Health Ministry’s framework reports must be handled only in a “timely” manner.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Create a province-wide dementia-care framework
This provision makes improved access to quality dementia care the purpose of the framework and assigns its development to the Minister of Health. The framework must span institutional, home-based and community settings, which pushes the province toward coordination across services that are often funded, staffed and administered differently.
Its required content is broad: person-centred care, provider and caregiver education, provider supports, research, common data elements, equitable access and consistent access. The framework must also account for existing quality standards and the needs of specified populations, giving the future document both a planning role and a reference point for assessing gaps in care.
Require consultation before the framework
The Minister must consult dementia-care providers, affected ministries, the federal government and other relevant persons or entities. The Minister must also consider feedback from earlier consultations and begin the required process in a timely manner.
The provision requires engagement but does not prescribe a consultation format, minimum number of participants, response obligations or a deadline measured in days. That leaves the scope and influence of consultation to the ministry’s implementation choices.
Table and publish two Health Ministry reports
The Minister of Health must table a report setting out the framework in the Legislative Assembly and publish it on a Government of Ontario website. The Minister must then prepare a separate report on the state of dementia care in Ontario, table it after the framework report and publish it online.
The two-report structure separates the province’s intended approach from its assessment of current conditions. The Act does not specify the indicators, data sources, performance measures or publication format that the state-of-care report must use, so those details will shape how useful the reporting becomes for oversight and service planning.
Review the Personal Support Worker Standard
The Ministry of Colleges and Universities must review whether Ontario’s PSW Standard should change. The review must consider three types of additions: in-depth learning about person-centred dementia care; experiential placements with people living with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias; and training and practice in communication and de-escalation techniques, including gentle persuasive approaches or other accredited techniques.
This is a review mandate, not an automatic curriculum amendment. The provision does not require the ministry to adopt any of the listed changes, but it creates a formal record of the ministry’s conclusions and requires that record to be reported to the Assembly within one year and published within 10 days of tabling.
Set commencement and short title
The Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent. Section 4 gives it the short title Improving Dementia Care in Ontario Act, 2024. The immediate commencement rule starts the reporting and review obligations without a separate proclamation process.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- People living with dementia and their families may benefit from more coordinated access across hospitals, home care, long-term care, hospices and community programs if the framework produces consistent provincial practices.
- Women, francophone patients and people with early-onset Alzheimer’s dementia receive explicit consideration in the framework mandate, which can make population-specific access gaps harder to overlook.
- Personal support worker students may receive more relevant preparation for dementia-related communication, behavioural support and daily care if the ministry adopts changes identified through the review.
- Dementia-care providers and organizations gain a formal channel to inform the provincial framework and a potential basis for more consistent supports, training and data collection.
- Researchers, health-system planners and policymakers may benefit from the framework’s focus on common data elements and a separate report on the state of dementia care.
Who Bears the Cost
- The Ministry of Health must coordinate consultations, develop the framework and produce two reports without a legislated funding formula or detailed implementation schedule.
- Dementia-care providers, ministries and other consultees will spend time and staff resources participating in consultations and supplying information for the framework and state-of-care reporting.
- The Ministry of Colleges and Universities must complete the PSW Standard review and prepare, table and publish its findings within the Act’s reporting timetable.
- PSW education providers and placement partners could face additional curriculum, instructor, supervision and placement demands if the review leads to new training requirements.
- Health-care employers and service operators may face future training, data-collection or coordination costs if the framework is translated into operational expectations, although the Act itself does not impose those requirements directly.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The Act seeks province-wide consistency in dementia care while relying on a future framework and review rather than prescribing enforceable standards now. That approach allows the government to adapt policy to different care settings and patient populations, but it also means the Act’s practical protections, costs and accountability will depend on decisions made after the legislation takes effect.
The Act creates a planning and accountability architecture, but leaves many consequential choices open. It does not define a minimum service level, establish funding, create enforceable patient entitlements, set measurable access targets or assign responsibility for implementing the eventual framework across the various care settings.
The phrase “timely manner” also gives the Health Ministry flexibility over when the two reports are prepared and published.
The PSW provision has a similar limitation. It identifies concrete educational subjects and experiences for review, but it does not require the ministry to amend the standard or require employers and schools to implement any particular curriculum.
Practical placements and de-escalation training may improve readiness, but they also require qualified instructors, suitable placement sites, supervision and consistent accreditation. The Act does not specify who would finance or coordinate those requirements.
The framework’s emphasis on common data elements could improve comparability across regions, but collecting consistent information across hospitals, home care, long-term care and community services may expose differences in systems, privacy practices and provider capacity. The Act asks the framework to improve consistency while accommodating distinct populations and existing programs; resolving that tension will depend on the framework’s definitions, measures and governance decisions.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.