The Improving Real Estate Management Act, 2024 amends a collection of Ontario statutes to restrict when public agencies and Crown corporations can acquire or dispose of freehold interests in land. Several entities now need either the Minister’s or the Lieutenant Governor in Council’s approval before buying or selling freehold property, and a subset of agencies is explicitly bound by limits set out in section 11.0.1 of the Ministry of Infrastructure Act, 2011.
This consolidates control over provincial real estate decisions: approvals and regulatory teeth move upward to the executive, and some bodies lose the ability to dispose of freehold property at all. The changes matter for institutional boards, facility managers, potential private partners, and provincial officials who will administer approvals and any disposal regulations the government adopts.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act amends multiple statutes to require prior approval before acquiring or disposing of freehold interests, and it makes several agencies’ capacity to hold land subject to limits in section 11.0.1 of the Ministry of Infrastructure Act, 2011. For a small set of institutions the Act outright bars dispositions of freehold interests.
Who It Affects
Crown agencies, public corporations and boards named in the Act (e.g., Algonquin Forestry Authority, McMichael Canadian Art Collection, Royal Ontario Museum, Science North, convention centres, Connecting Care/Service Organization, Centennial Centre, Niagara Escarpment Commission, Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion). The Ministry of Infrastructure and relevant portfolio ministers will gain new oversight roles.
Why It Matters
The bill centralizes stewardship of provincial land assets, altering transaction pathways for acquisitions, disposals and redevelopment. That changes timing, negotiation leverage and compliance obligations for boards, municipal partners and private developers engaging with these public institutions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act stitches a common constraint into a disparate group of Ontario public bodies: before they can buy or sell freehold land they generally must secure either ministerial approval or approval from the Lieutenant Governor in Council. The requirement is not uniform — some bodies are barred from disposition entirely, some can acquire only with executive approval, and others are made subject to external limits contained in section 11.0.1 of the Ministry of Infrastructure Act, 2011.
The text repeatedly uses the same two mechanisms — approval by minister or LGIC and reference to section 11.0.1 — to bring different statutes into the same control framework.
Practically, the Act changes who signs off on property deals and where the risk sits. Institutions that previously could transact in their own name now need to route proposals upward for political or ministerial sign-off.
For the Royal Ontario Museum the Act goes further: the Museum cannot acquire freehold land without LGIC approval, cannot dispose of it without LGIC approval, and any disposal must comply with regulations the Lieutenant Governor in Council may make. The McMichael is allowed to acquire freehold land only with LGIC approval and is expressly barred from disposing of freehold interests.The Act also ties several entities’ capacity to hold land and buildings to the Ministry of Infrastructure Act’s section 11.0.1.
That section—left unchanged by this Act—operates as an external cap or rulebook; affected agencies will need to consult it when planning holdings or transactions. There is a conditional drafting adjustment linked to a separate Bill (Bill 135): if that Bill becomes law, the Connecting Care provisions will be adjusted so the Service Organization is likewise subject to section 11.0.1.
Finally, the Act comes into force by proclamation, meaning the government controls the timing of these new approval requirements and any consequential administrative rollout.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Algonquin Forestry Authority now cannot acquire or dispose of any freehold interest in real property without the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry (new subsection added).
The McMichael Canadian Art Collection may acquire freehold land only with Lieutenant Governor in Council approval, and it is expressly forbidden from disposing of any freehold interest.
The Royal Ontario Museum cannot acquire freehold property without LGIC approval and cannot dispose of freehold property except with LGIC approval and in compliance with any LGIC regulations governing disposals.
Several statutory bodies (Centennial Centre of Science and Technology, Connecting Care/Service Organization, Niagara Escarpment Commission, Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion) are made subject to limits imposed by section 11.0.1 of the Ministry of Infrastructure Act, 2011, which will constrain their capacity to hold land and structures.
The Act’s amendments take effect by proclamation, and one Connecting Care clause is conditional: if Bill 135 becomes law, wording for the Service Organization will be substituted to reference the same section 11.0.1 constraint.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Algonquin Forestry Authority: Ministerial approval for freehold transactions
Adds a prohibition that the Authority shall not acquire or dispose of a freehold interest without the Minister’s approval. That turns any land transaction into an approval matter for the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry, creating a political checkpoint on property deals tied to the Authority’s mandate.
Entities bound by Ministry of Infrastructure Act limits (section 11.0.1)
The Centennial Centre, the Niagara Escarpment Commission and the Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion are each rewritten so their statutory capacity to hold property is expressly subject to any limits the Ministry of Infrastructure may impose under section 11.0.1. Practically, this means the Ministry can set numeric or categorical limits (or other constraints) on holdings without further amending these individual Acts.
Connecting Care / Service Organization: capacity tied to section 11.0.1 (with conditional drafting)
Replaces the Agency’s general powers clause to add an explicit limitation referencing section 11.0.1. A related provision says if Bill 135 is enacted, the Service Organization’s analogous clause will likewise reference section 11.0.1 — a drafting hook that ensures new organizational forms created under separate legislation inherit the same limits.
McMichael Collection: LGIC approval to acquire; no dispositions allowed
Rewrites the McMichael’s property powers so it can only acquire a freehold interest with Lieutenant Governor in Council approval and cannot dispose of freehold interests. That combination allows acquisitions with high-level approval while blocking any later sale, constraining the Corporation’s ability to monetize or repurpose land.
Metropolitan Toronto and Ottawa Convention Centres: prohibitions on freehold acquisitions and disposals
Both convention centre statutes are amended to add blanket prohibitions on acquiring or disposing of freehold interests. The change removes from each corporation the ability to independently manage freehold real property, effectively requiring the province to approve any such transaction through other mechanisms.
Royal Ontario Museum: LGIC approval plus regulatory regime for disposals
The ROM cannot acquire freehold land without LGIC approval and cannot dispose of freehold land except with LGIC approval and in compliance with regulations the LGIC may make. The regulatory power lets the government set detailed conditions and procedural rules (e.g., public notice, valuation, priorities) on any future disposal by the Museum.
Science North: LGIC approval to acquire; no dispositions permitted
Requires LGIC approval before the Centre or its Board may acquire a freehold interest, and prohibits disposition of freehold interests altogether. This mirrors the pattern in other cultural/science institutions but combines both acquisition restriction and an absolute disposal ban.
Commencement by proclamation
The Act does not come into force immediately; it takes effect on a day named by proclamation. That gives the government discretion to coordinate implementation, draft guidance, and set administrative processes before the approval regime binds institutions.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Ministry of Infrastructure and portfolio ministers — gain centralized oversight tools to limit and coordinate provincial land holdings and to approve or block acquisitions and disposals.
- Provincial treasury and taxpayers — benefit from increased control intended to prevent uncoordinated sales or transfers of public land that could reduce long-term asset value.
- Private counterparties and developers — receive clearer upstream constraints on whether a public partner can complete a deal, reducing some legal risk by forcing early clarity about approval requirements.
- Boards and senior management of affected agencies — gain statutory clarity about the limits on their authority, which reduces legal uncertainty though it also restricts discretion.
Who Bears the Cost
- Named public bodies (museums, science centres, convention centres, agencies and commissions) — lose autonomy to manage or monetize real estate and face additional procedural steps, delays and uncertainty when planning capital projects or redevelopments.
- Portfolio ministries and the Lieutenant Governor in Council — inherit an administrative and decision-making burden to process approvals, draft and enforce disposal regulations, and adjudicate contested transactions.
- Municipal partners and private sector developers — may see project timelines extend and negotiating leverage shift as provincial approvals become gating items for land deals.
- Legal and compliance teams of affected organizations — will need to redesign transaction workflows, prepare applications for executive approvals, and perhaps defend against political or policy-driven transaction outcomes.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between provincial stewardship and institutional autonomy: the Act strengthens centralized control to protect public assets and align holdings with government strategy, but it simultaneously strips agencies of flexibility to manage, redevelop or monetize property quickly — a trade-off between accountability at the executive level and operational agility at the institutional level.
The Act centralizes authority without laying out approval criteria, timelines or appeal mechanisms. That creates implementation risk: approvals by the Minister or the Lieutenant Governor in Council are political and discretionary, so boards that depend on timely land transactions for capital plans face uncertainty about standards and speed.
The power to make regulations for ROM disposals is consequential because regulations can set procedural hurdles or financial conditions that materially affect the feasibility of a sale or transfer.
The cross-reference to section 11.0.1 of the Ministry of Infrastructure Act imports an external rulebook without reproducing its content here. Affected entities must consult section 11.0.1 to understand the substantive limits they will face, but the Act gives the Ministry latitude to modify those limits over time.
The conditional wording tied to Bill 135 indicates the government intends a consistent framework for new organizational forms, but it also creates drafting complexity where multiple statutes interact depending on whether other bills pass. The Act is silent about existing or in-progress transactions, approval standards, and any grandfathering; absent guidance, parties will have to assume transactions could be halted or require retroactive approvals.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.