The Rent Stabilization Act, 2022 amends Ontario’s Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 to (1) clarify and broaden landlord repair obligations, (2) let tenants apply to the Landlord and Tenant Board when landlords fail to comply with prior orders or mediated settlements, (3) set new rules limiting the rent a landlord may lawfully charge a new tenant, (4) expand tenant remedies where rent charged exceeds the lawful maximum, and (5) create a public rent registry with mandatory landlord filings and penalties for non‑compliance. The Act also amends the Legal Aid Services Act, 2020 to mandate legal representation before the Landlord and Tenant Board for tenants directly affected by applications to raise rent above the guideline.
These changes shift enforcement from occasional adjudication to regular administrative oversight: landlords face filing obligations, daily administrative fines and rent abatements for non‑compliance, and restrictions on taking increases unless they meet registry and repair conditions. The package raises compliance costs for landlords and administrative demands on the Board and Legal Aid while increasing transparency and formal remedies for tenants and prospective renters.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill redefines landlord responsibility for repairs as an absolute duty to maintain fit and habitable rental complexes, creates a new Board application route for tenants when landlords ignore mediated settlements or prior orders, prescribes how lawful rent for a new tenancy is calculated, and establishes a rent registry with mandatory statements filed within 30 days of a lease and within 30 days of any rent change. It also authorizes the Board to impose administrative fines up to $1,000 per day, order rent abatements, and require landlords to rebate overcharged rent.
Who It Affects
All landlords and property managers operating rental units in Ontario, the Landlord and Tenant Board (which must run the registry and enforce new powers), tenants (current, former within 12 months, and prospective), and Legal Aid Ontario, which must provide representation in specified rent-increase disputes.
Why It Matters
The Act creates durable, record‑level transparency about municipal rents, narrows landlords’ ability to reset rents at re‑leasing, and equips tenants with faster enforcement tools and guaranteed legal representation in above‑guideline increase disputes — a structural change to how rent enforcement and discovery will operate in the province.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill recasts the landlord’s repair duty as an unequivocal, ongoing obligation: landlords must provide and maintain rental complexes and units in a good state of repair and fit for habitation and comply with applicable health, safety, housing and maintenance standards. The new language makes clear that a landlord is in breach even if the landlord says it tried to maintain the property — breaches turn on the condition of the premises, not on landlord effort.
When a settlement reached through Board mediation or a previous Board order requires repairs or other work and a landlord does not complete that work within the specified period, the tenant can now apply to the Board without giving prior notice. The Board may issue orders that include administrative fines (capped at $1,000 per day), rent abatements until work is done, or an abatement equal to the tenant’s reasonable costs to complete the work.
The Board can also amend prior settlements or orders where appropriate, and the new route is subject to timing rules tied to review periods for work orders.On rents, the bill limits what a landlord may lawfully charge a new tenant. If the unit was rented within the prior 12 months, the lawful first rent cannot exceed the last lawful rent for that unit.
If the unit was vacant for more than 12 months, the lawful first rent is capped at an amount equal to the prior lawful rent plus all permitted increases the landlord would have been allowed to take during the vacancy minus any decreases the landlord would have been required to make. Units never previously rented are an exception: the landlord may charge the first rent negotiated.
Tenants (other than certain new tenants) can apply to the Board to determine the lawful maximum rent; if the Board finds overcharging, it must order a rebate.To support transparency and enforcement the Board must create and maintain a rent registry. Landlords must file a prescribed statement within 30 days after entering into a lease and must notify the Board within 30 days after any rent change takes effect.
The registry will include unit addresses, rents and effective dates, copies of statements and notices, and specified Board orders; limited disclosure is available to landlords, current and recent tenants, and prospective tenants, while summary rent data (addresses and rents with effective dates) is publicly accessible online. The Board may share registry data with tax authorities, and providing false information or failing to file the required statement is explicitly listed as an offence.Finally, the Legal Aid Services Act is amended so Legal Aid Ontario must provide legal representation before the Board to tenants directly affected by an application that seeks a rent increase above the guideline.
That service is excluded from the usual eligibility conditions and applicants cannot be required to contribute toward its cost, removing means-testing and contribution rules for these proceedings.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Board can order an administrative fine up to $1,000 per day for each day a landlord remains non‑compliant with a settlement or prior Board order.
Landlords must file a prescribed statement with the Board within 30 days after entering a lease and must file a notice within 30 days after any rent change takes effect; failure to file can block rent increases and become an offence.
When a unit was last rented within 12 months, the first rent for a new tenancy cannot exceed the last lawful rent; if vacant for more than 12 months, the cap equals the prior lawful rent plus permitted increases the landlord would have had and minus required decreases.
If the Board finds a landlord charged rent above the lawful maximum, it must order the landlord to rebate the excess rent to the tenant.
Legal Aid Ontario must provide representation to tenants directly affected by an application seeking a rent increase above the guideline, and the usual eligibility and contribution rules do not apply to that service.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Absolute landlord duty to maintain fit, safe rental housing
The bill replaces subsection 20(1) to clarify that landlords are responsible for providing and maintaining rental complexes and units in a good state of repair, fit for habitation and in compliance with health, safety, housing and maintenance standards. Subsection 20(3) makes breach independent of landlord effort: courts and the Board must assess the condition itself. Practically, that raises the evidentiary bar for landlords asserting they tried to comply and shifts enforcement focus toward building condition and outcomes rather than documented maintenance attempts.
Direct tenant applications for landlord non‑compliance with settlements and prior orders
Section 31.1 lets a tenant apply to the Board without prior notice when a landlord has not finished specified repairs or other work within the timeframe set out in a mediated settlement or prior Board order. The tenant must attach the settlement/order and an affidavit listing unfinished work. The Board’s toolbox includes daily administrative fines, rent abatements, or orders allowing tenants to recover reasonable costs to complete the work. The provision also permits the Board to modify the original settlement or order where appropriate and contains a timing rule tied to work‑order review windows to avoid premature applications.
How the lawful rent for a new tenant is calculated
Section 113 now prescribes three distinct scenarios: (a) if the unit was rented within the last 12 months, the lawful incoming rent cannot exceed the previous lawful rent; (b) if vacant for more than 12 months, the lawful incoming rent is the prior lawful rent adjusted by all increases the landlord would have been allowed and all decreases the landlord would have been required to make during the vacancy; and (c) if the unit has never been rented, the landlord may charge the first rent negotiated. This creates a statutory method for reconstructing a lawful ceiling after extended vacancy rather than permitting an unconstrained market reset.
Expanded tenant applications and conditional post‑repair rent increases
The Act broadens who can ask the Board to set the lawful maximum rent and directs the Board to order rebates when overcharging is found. It also allows a landlord to take an increase without giving the usual notice where a prior Board order under paragraph 8 of s.30(1) had prohibited increases, but only after the landlord completes the work in related work orders and in paragraph 4 orders tied to serious breaches; the increase takes effect on the first rental period after completion. This balances tenant protections while enabling landlords to recover lost entitlement once compliance is demonstrably achieved.
Creation and operation of a public rent registry
Part XI.1 requires the Board to establish a rent registry covering all rental units under the Act. The registry must include statements and notices landlords file, and certain Board orders; the Board must publish municipal addresses and rents with effective dates online. Access rules allow landlords, current and recent tenants, and prospective tenants to obtain unit-specific data, while the public can view summary rent information. The Board may share registry data with tax authorities; it must also take reasonable steps to keep records accurate and can correct or require refiling where inaccuracies are found.
Mandatory landlord filings and tenant verification powers
Every landlord must file a Board‑approved statement within 30 days of entering a lease and must provide tenants with a copy; landlords must notify the Board within 30 days of any rent change. Tenants have a 60‑day window to challenge the accuracy of a statement for their unit. The Act makes failure to file a statement a listed offence and prevents landlords who have not filed from increasing rent for that unit until they do. Those mechanics create a direct compliance checkpoint tied to the ability to take increases.
Mandatory legal representation for tenants in above‑guideline increase proceedings
The Legal Aid Services Act is amended to compel the Corporation to provide legal representation before the Board to tenants directly affected by applications seeking increases above the guideline. The amendment removes usual eligibility criteria and bars contributions by the assisted tenant. That places an immediate service delivery obligation on Legal Aid Ontario for a defined class of tenancy disputes and alters the procedural playing field in those Board proceedings.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Current tenants facing landlord non‑compliance — gain a faster enforcement path: they can apply to the Board without notice when a landlord breaches a mediated settlement or prior order and may obtain daily fines against the landlord, rent abatements, or compensation for completing repairs.
- Prospective and recent tenants — obtain access to a public rent registry showing municipal addresses and historical rents with effective dates, improving market transparency when evaluating rental options or negotiating leases.
- Tenants subject to above‑guideline increase applications — receive Legal Aid representation without means testing or contribution requirements, which enhances legal support in disputes with potentially large financial implications.
- Tenant advocacy groups and compliance monitors — gain a durable public dataset and formal avenues to identify and press cases against systematic non‑compliance by landlords.
Who Bears the Cost
- Landlords and property managers — face new administrative duties (30‑day filing windows, update notices), potential criminal/administrative penalties for false or missing filings, exposure to $1,000/day fines and rent abatements, and limits on rent resets after prolonged vacancies.
- Small or non‑resident landlords — may carry disproportionate compliance costs to collect and file required information, verify filings and respond to tenant challenges, and may lack scale to absorb fines or rebates.
- The Landlord and Tenant Board — will need additional operational capacity to run and maintain the registry, verify requests, adjudicate tenant applications under the new pathway, and manage corrected filings, increasing administrative workload.
- Legal Aid Ontario / provincial budget — must fund and staff expanded duty counsel and representation services for above‑guideline rent disputes without applying normal eligibility screens, creating a material new service obligation and budgetary pressure.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between stronger tenant protections and transparency (registry, guaranteed legal representation, fines and abatements) and the compliance, administrative and enforcement burdens those protections impose on landlords, the Board and Legal Aid. The bill prioritizes tenant safeguards and recordkeeping, but achieving those goals without creating perverse incentives or overwhelming administrative systems will require careful rulemaking and resourcing.
The bill creates clear policy objectives but leaves implementation complexity. The rent registry promises transparency but depends on timely, accurate filings and Board capacity to verify submissions; incomplete or erroneous filings could generate a flood of tenant challenges and contested corrections that require adjudication.
Allowing the Board to disclose registry data to tax authorities raises privacy and data‑matching issues that will require careful procedural guardrails and IT safeguards.
Enforcement tools such as $1,000/day administrative fines and rent abatements are powerful on paper but difficult in practice: collecting fines from insolvent or absent landlords and calibrating abatements to fairly reflect tenant losses are operational challenges. The statutory method for reconstructing a lawful rent after a long vacancy (adding permitted increases and subtracting required decreases) invites technical disputes about which hypothetical increases or decreases “would have been” applicable, potentially spawning complex historical rent‑reconstruction litigation.
Finally, mandating Legal Aid representation removes means‑testing but creates an immediate service capacity question — without clear funding increases, LAO’s ability to meet demand and the timing of representation in fast‑moving Board proceedings are uncertain.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.