The Act directs the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs to prepare a strategic action plan to protect Ontario’s farmland and arable land from development pressure, aggregate extraction and market-driven land-use shifts. The Minister must consult relevant stakeholders when preparing the plan and submit a report setting out the strategy within the statutory timeframe.
The Act also creates the Farmland and Arable Land Advisory Committee to advise the Minister on preventing land degradation and securing short- and long-term food security. The law prescribes how committee members are selected and requires regular reporting to the Minister and tabling in the Legislative Assembly.
The statute is procedural and advisory: it mandates planning and reporting rather than prescribing regulatory controls or funding for implementation.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act requires the Minister to develop a strategic action plan focused on protecting farmland and arable land and to consult with stakeholders while doing so. It establishes an advisory committee to produce biannual advice and requires the Minister to publish and table committee reports and the Minister’s strategy report within the statutory schedule.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the provincial Ministry of Agriculture, municipal planning authorities, farmers and farming associations, aggregate (mining and quarry) operators, and land developers; conservation and outdoors groups are explicitly listed as stakeholders. The selection process also involves members of the Legislative Assembly who appoint the advisory committee.
Why It Matters
The Act formalizes provincial attention on farmland preservation by creating a statutory planning and advisory architecture. Although it does not itself change land-use law, its strategy and recurring committee reports have the potential to influence municipal planning, aggregate approvals and provincial policy priorities affecting housing, resource extraction and food security.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The statute begins narrowly: it defines “arable land” to include land suitable for cultivation, pasture and cropland, signaling the government’s intent to treat a broad set of productive soils as policy objects. Rather than amending the Planning Act or imposing new prohibitions, the Act requires the Minister to produce a strategic action plan aimed at protecting those lands from development, aggregate mining, and pressures driven by commodity-price volatility and the availability of vacant land.
When preparing the plan the Minister must engage in consultations with a list of named stakeholder groups — farmers, municipal planners, the outdoors community and others the Minister deems relevant — and must produce a written report that is to be shared with the advisory committee and published on a government website. The statute sets a firm trigger for the process: the duty to act begins on Royal Assent and the plan must be delivered within the timeframe specified in the Act.The Act establishes a permanent advisory mechanism: the Farmland and Arable Land Advisory Committee.
Membership is chosen by a selection committee of legislators with a prescribed political balance. The Committee itself is capped at an odd number of members no larger than 11 and must be representative of farming, real estate and outdoors interests (and any other constituencies the selectors consider appropriate).
Its mandate is research and advice: reviewing land-use policy, past legislation, municipal bylaws, tax policy and best practices in farming, and providing recommendations to the Minister.Reporting is regimented. The Committee must report at least every six months; the Minister must table those reports in the Legislative Assembly.
The statute stops short of creating enforcement tools, financial programs or direct changes to municipal zoning or aggregate permitting; it creates a structured advisory and planning cycle designed to generate evidence, recommendations and political accountability that could inform later regulatory or funding decisions.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act defines “arable land” to include pasture land as well as cropland, widening the statutory scope beyond cultivated fields to grazing areas.
A selection committee of up to seven members of the Legislative Assembly — including two government members, two opposition members and one from another party plus up to two independents if applicable — selects advisory committee members.
The advisory committee must be an odd-numbered body of no more than 11 members and must include representatives from the farming community, the real estate industry and the outdoors community.
The Committee’s legislative duty is advisory and reporting: it must prepare findings and recommendations at least every six months and deliver them to the Minister for tabling in the Assembly.
The Act contains no enforcement provisions, regulatory amendments or dedicated funding stream; it mandates planning, consultation and reporting rather than creating new land-use prohibitions or financial supports.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and scope
This section sets the operative vocabulary for the Act. The key definitional move is to treat “arable land” broadly — including pasture and cropland — which frames the strategy’s coverage. For implementers, the definition matters because it determines what lands must be considered in mapping, data collection and policy recommendations; it does not, however, itself change land-use entitlements or property rights.
Minister’s strategic action plan and consultations
Section 2 obliges the Minister to design a strategic action plan aimed at protecting farmland from development, extraction and market pressures and requires consultations with named stakeholders. Practically, this creates a top-down policy document that can recommend regulatory, fiscal or planning measures—but the section itself simply mandates study, consultation and publication rather than prescribing specific remedies. The section also sets a statutory timeline for producing the report after Royal Assent and requires that the report be published on a government website and provided to the advisory committee, which affects transparency and public accountability.
Establishment, mandate and powers of the Advisory Committee
Section 3 creates the Farmland and Arable Land Advisory Committee and outlines its mandate to review land-use policy, municipal bylaws, tax policy and farming best practices and to advise the Minister. The Committee’s role is evaluative and advisory; it has no regulatory authority. Its remit to review both provincial policy and municipal bylaws creates an expectation that its reports will address intergovernmental coordination issues and potential gaps in existing legal frameworks.
Selection process, composition and reporting cadence
Subsections specify that a selection committee made up of up to seven MPPs (with a prescribed party balance) chooses members, and that the Committee itself must be an odd number up to 11 and representative of specific stakeholder groups. The statute also requires the Committee to issue reports at least every six months. These mechanics shape who sits at the table (and who does not), how often advice arrives, and how politicized appointments may become — all of which will influence the credibility and content of recommendations.
Commencement and short title
The Act comes into force on Royal Assent and is cited by its short title. That immediate commencement timetable means the Minister and selection committee are on the clock as soon as the law is enacted; it also means stakeholders should be prepared for consultations and appointments without a phased implementation period.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Farmers and farming associations — they gain a provincially mandated forum for raising concerns about land conversion, aggregate activity and market pressures, and the strategy could produce recommendations that improve long-term land availability and stewardship.
- Conservation and outdoors organizations — the Act explicitly lists the outdoors community as a consultative interest and gives such groups a recurring platform to influence provincial land-use thinking and policy recommendations.
- Municipal planners and regional planning bodies — they receive a provincially coordinated strategy and periodic committee findings that can inform local official plans, mapping of prime soils and municipal approaches to protecting agricultural lands.
Who Bears the Cost
- Developers and landowners seeking to convert farmland — they may face new policy constraints, increased scrutiny or future regulatory changes inspired by the strategy and committee recommendations.
- Aggregate (mining/quarry) operators — the statute targets aggregate mining as a driver of arable land loss, so operators can expect sustained policy attention and potential calls for tighter controls or offsets.
- The provincial Ministry of Agriculture — the Ministry must lead consultations, prepare the strategic report on a statutory schedule and manage an ongoing advisory process, imposing administrative workload and potential unbudgeted costs if the government does not allocate resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between creating a non‑binding, consultative strategy that preserves flexibility and political buy‑in, versus the desire for immediate, enforceable protections for finite arable land—protecting farmland could require constraints on development and resource extraction that conflict with housing targets, economic development and existing property rights, and the Act deliberately chooses an advisory path rather than resolving that conflict with regulatory mandates.
The Act creates a structured policy and accountability loop without granting new regulatory powers or money. That design has trade-offs: a strategy and advisory reports can marshal data, raise political pressure, and shape future law, but they cannot directly stop land conversion or change municipal zoning.
Implementation will depend on the political appetite for follow-through and whether future regulations or funding measures flow from the recommendations.
The selection and composition rules cut both ways. Requiring a legislative selection committee and an odd-numbered, capped advisory body aims to balance perspectives, but it also opens appointments to political bargaining and could skew representation away from smaller or marginalized stakeholders.
The Act’s six‑month reporting cadence ensures frequent input but risks producing repetitive reports without resourcing or clear criteria for impact. Finally, the Act is silent on how it interacts with Indigenous interests and existing provincial instruments (e.g., the Planning Act, aggregate licensing processes), which creates legal and policy ambiguities that will surface quickly once recommendations are pursued.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.