Bill 66 establishes an annual provincial observance: the month of October is proclaimed as Kids’ Online Safety and Privacy Month. The Act is short and procedural — it sets a recurring awareness month, includes a preamble listing online risks to children, names the short title, and takes effect on Royal Assent.
The law does not create regulatory duties, funding streams, enforcement powers, or new programs. Its practical effect will be political and programmatic: ministries, school boards, public-health units, privacy offices and non-profit organizations can use the proclamation as a hook for campaigns, curricula and partnerships, but any substantive changes will rely on separate policy or budgetary action.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act proclaims October of each year as Kids’ Online Safety and Privacy Month, comes into force on Royal Assent, and provides a short title. The operative text is one sentence long and creates an annual observance rather than regulatory obligations.
Who It Affects
The proclamation primarily affects provincial ministries, school boards, teachers, child-serving NGOs, public health units and privacy/regulatory bodies that run awareness and education activities. It imposes no compliance duties on private companies or citizens.
Why It Matters
A formal proclamation makes it easier for public bodies and civil society to coordinate outreach, frames policy discussions, and can be cited in grant applications or communications plans. It also raises expectations about provincial attention to online harms even though it does not itself allocate resources or change legal standards.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 66 is a short, declaratory statute that designates October as Kids’ Online Safety and Privacy Month in Ontario. The Act contains a preamble that lists common online risks to children — such as cyberbullying, grooming and exploitation — and explains the government's rationale for prioritizing education and parental engagement.
The only operative provision proclaims October as the designated month.
The Act comes into force immediately upon Royal Assent and includes a short title for citation. That means the observance is legally established but the text creates no new powers for ministries, no reporting obligations, no funding, and no regulatory standards for industry or schools.
In legal terms the statute functions like other commemorative proclamations: symbolic authority and a coordination signal rather than an instrument of direct policy change.Where this matters in practice is programmatic. Ministries (for example, Education, Health, Children and Social Services), the Ontario Privacy Commissioner, school boards and community organizations can build campaigns, lesson plans, or conferences around the month.
Municipalities and industry bodies may also plan events or pledges that reference the proclamation. Any sustained policy or enforcement change — curriculum amendments, regulation of platforms, or dedicated provincial funding for online-safety programs — would require separate legislative or budgetary initiatives.The bill’s preamble and title give official weight to concerns about children’s online safety and privacy, which can be useful in advocacy and interagency planning.
At the same time, stakeholders should treat the Act as an enabling communications tool rather than as a source of legal obligations; its value will depend on follow-up action, coordination, and resources allocated by government and partners.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 1 proclaims the month of October in each year as Kids’ Online Safety and Privacy Month — an annual observance codified in statute.
Section 2 makes the Act come into force on the day it receives Royal Assent, so the first observance is effective immediately after enactment.
Section 3 provides the short title: the Kids’ Online Safety and Privacy Month Act, 2025, for citation and reference in official materials.
The Act’s preamble lists online risks (cyberbullying, grooming, exploitation, trafficking) and emphasizes education, parental supervision, and community responsibility but does not create operational duties.
The statute contains no funding, enforcement mechanisms, reporting requirements, or regulatory amendments — it establishes a commemorative month, not a new program or regulatory regime.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Statement of purpose and concerns about online risks
The preamble sets the political and rhetorical frame: it enumerates perceived online harms to children and positions education and parental supervision as primary responses. Legally the preamble does not create obligations, but it signals legislative intent and priorities that ministries and agencies can cite when proposing programs or budget items.
Proclamation of the annual observance
This single operative provision declares October each year to be Kids’ Online Safety and Privacy Month. Its mechanics are simple: it places an annual date on the statute books that public bodies can reference. Because the provision is declaratory, its main practical effect is to provide an official timestamp for awareness activities and to lend statutory legitimacy to related communications.
Commencement on Royal Assent
The Act takes effect immediately upon receiving Royal Assent. There is no staged or delayed commencement, so government and non-governmental actors may begin planning or advertising October activities in the same legislative year. That immediacy matters for calendar-year planning and any existing programs that want to align with the proclamation.
Short title and citation
The short title lets agencies, partners, and communications teams cite the Act succinctly in materials, grants, and press releases. While procedural, the short title standardizes references across documents and is useful for legal citation and archival purposes.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Parents and caregivers — gain an official, recurring platform for guidance materials and outreach campaigns that can help them supervise and educate children about online risks.
- School boards and educators — receive a provincially recognized timing for curriculum materials, assemblies, digital-safety lessons and professional development tied to a named month.
- Child-focused NGOs and advocacy groups — get a statutory hook for fundraising, awareness campaigns, coalition-building and partnerships with government bodies.
- Privacy and child-protection agencies (including the Ontario Privacy Commissioner) — can use the month to amplify guidance, produce public resources, and coordinate stakeholder initiatives with greater visibility.
- Local public-health units and municipalities — may align community workshops and services with the proclamation to reach parents, children and at-risk populations.
Who Bears the Cost
- Provincial ministries and agencies — may need to allocate staff time and small amounts of operating budget to plan, promote or coordinate events tied to the month.
- School boards and teachers — could face programmatic and administrative burdens if boards expect curricular activities or assemblies without additional funding or time allowances.
- Non-profit organizations and community groups — may experience pressure to deliver events or campaigns during October, absorbing volunteer and program costs unless grant support materializes.
- Communications teams across government — will likely need to prioritize messaging, which can displace other outreach work and require design, translation and distribution resources.
- Businesses and industry groups (voluntary) — may be asked to participate in pledges or public-private activities, incurring reputational and resource commitments despite no legal mandate.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is symbolic recognition versus substantive action: the Act officially spotlights children's online safety and privacy, which helps advocacy and coordination, but by design it avoids committing funding, regulation or enforceable duties — raising expectations that only further policy choices and resources can satisfy.
The Act is symbolic: it creates an official observance but leaves substantive policy, funding and enforcement decisions to other instruments. That raises a practical challenge — the proclamation can elevate expectations among parents and advocates without specifying who must act or who will pay for outreach, training or curriculum changes.
Implementation will depend on follow-through by ministries, school boards and civil society, and on whether the government allocates resources to turn awareness into durable changes.
Another tension concerns measurement and accountability. Because the statute contains no reporting or outcome metrics, assessing whether the proclamation improves safety or privacy is left to voluntary evaluation.
There is also a risk of duplication with existing federal initiatives, municipal campaigns, or private-sector programs; without coordination, October could become a crowded month of disconnected activities that produce publicity but limited systemic impact. Finally, the preamble’s substantive language gives advocates rhetorical leverage but creates no regulatory obligations — courts typically treat preambles as interpretive aids rather than sources of enforceable rights, so the text's listed harms are persuasive, not prescriptive.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.