This private Act (1955274 Ontario Inc. Act, 2026) revives a corporation that was voluntarily dissolved on June 23, 2022 and restores it to the exact legal position it held on the date of dissolution.
The statute re-establishes the corporation’s property, rights, privileges and franchises, and reinstates its liabilities, contracts, disabilities and debts as if the dissolution had never occurred, subject to rights acquired by others after dissolution.
For lawyers and compliance officers, the Act is a narrow, retroactive fix: it clears the corporate status obstacle that would prevent the company from enforcing contracts, holding title or defending claims in its name. At the same time, it preserves the legal position of third parties who obtained rights after the dissolution, which reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of litigation over transactions that took place while the corporation was not legally extant.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act revives 1955274 Ontario Inc. and restores it to the legal status it had at the moment of its voluntary dissolution, explicitly reinstating both assets and liabilities. The revival is qualified: it does not disturb rights acquired by other parties after the dissolution date.
Who It Affects
Directly affected are the revived corporation and its sole director/applicant, Antonio Valerio Henriques; creditors, counterparties and anyone who transacted with the business after June 23, 2022; and registries or government bodies that administer corporate status. Legal counsel for those parties must reassess enforcement, title and liability issues.
Why It Matters
Revival fixes practical hurdles—such as enforcing contracts and holding title—created by a dissolution, but it also reintroduces the corporation into a web of pre-existing obligations. The Act is a reminder that private revival is an available, targeted remedy in Ontario and that third-party reliance during a dissolution is expressly preserved.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act is a private, single-purpose statute that restores the dissolved corporation to life. It declares that 1955274 Ontario Inc. is “revived” and placed back into the same legal position it occupied the moment it was dissolved on June 23, 2022.
That restoration is comprehensive on its face: property, rights, privileges and franchises are reconstituted, and the corporation’s liabilities, contracts, disabilities and debts are reinstated.
The Act includes an explicit limit: the revival is “subject to any rights acquired by any person after its dissolution.” In practice, that preserves third-party transactions that occurred during the intervening period—so a purchaser who acquired title from the dissolved corporation after June 23, 2022 may retain whatever rights they obtained, even though the corporation is being restored.The statute takes immediate effect on the day it receives Royal Assent. It does not create a process for administrative filings or address taxation, regulatory compliance, or how enforcement proceedings should be handled; it simply states the legal consequence of revival.
That means affected parties will likely use this Act as the legal basis to bring or defend litigation, to re-register assets, or to advise tax and regulatory authorities that the corporation exists again.Because the Act restores liabilities as well as assets, creditors and claimants who had outstanding claims against the company at dissolution can pursue those claims once the corporation is revived—subject to any competing rights acquired in the interim. Conversely, acts carried out in the corporation’s name while it was dissolved remain a potential source of dispute because the Act does not expressly validate those transactions or provide indemnities for third parties who relied on them.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act revives 1955274 Ontario Inc.
restoring its legal position as of its voluntary dissolution date (June 23, 2022).
The revival explicitly restores the corporation’s property, rights, privileges and franchises and reinstates liabilities, contracts, disabilities and debts as if it had not been dissolved.
The revival is expressly subject to any rights acquired by any person after the date of dissolution, preserving third-party interests obtained during the corporation’s inactivity.
Antonio Valerio Henriques applied for the special legislation and is represented as the sole director at the time of dissolution.
The Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent and is recorded as Statutes of Ontario 2026, chapter Pr2.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Applicant, factual background and legislative basis for revival
The preamble records that the sole director applied for special legislation because the corporation was voluntarily dissolved under the Business Corporations Act on June 23, 2022 and that business continued to be carried on in the company’s name. That factual recital is the constitutional and evidentiary foundation for the private statute: it documents the applicant’s claim of ongoing business activity and explains the reason the Legislature is being asked to intervene with a revival.
Legal effect: full restoration of rights and obligations
Section 1 is the operative clause. It declares the corporation revived and restores its legal position 'as of the date of its dissolution'—including property, rights, privileges and franchises—while also reinstating liabilities, contracts, disabilities and debts. The wording makes revival retroactive to the dissolution moment, which enables the corporation to assert pre-dissolution rights and be subject to pre-dissolution obligations, but it stops short of nullifying bona fide third-party rights acquired after that date.
Immediate commencement on Royal Assent
Section 2 fixes the Act’s commencement to the day of Royal Assent. Practically, that provides a clear legal trigger for parties to take steps—such as re-registering title, reopening corporate bank accounts, or bringing or defending litigation—without waiting for additional administrative orders or regulations.
Citation
Section 3 supplies the Act’s short title (1955274 Ontario Inc. Act, 2026). This is a standard drafting convenience that assists lawyers and registrars in referencing the statute in filings and pleadings.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- The applicant / sole director (Antonio Valerio Henriques): Revival clears the legal obstacle created by dissolution, allowing the corporation to resume formal corporate activities, enforce pre-dissolution contracts and hold title in its name.
- Creditors with pre-dissolution claims: Because liabilities are reinstated, creditors who had enforceable claims at the time of dissolution regain an avenue to pursue those debts against the corporate entity.
- Counterparties and customers seeking contract enforcement: Parties with pre-dissolution contractual relationships can seek performance or remedies from a legally recognized corporate counterparty rather than pursuing individuals who acted during the dissolution period.
Who Bears the Cost
- The revived corporation (and its director): The revival brings back debts, contractual obligations and any regulatory liabilities that existed at dissolution—potentially including tax liabilities, penalties and legacy litigation exposure.
- Third parties who transacted in the company’s name while it was dissolved: Those who entered agreements, transferred property, or represented themselves as dealing with the company may face uncertainty or litigation, because the Act does not validate or indemnify post-dissolution acts and leaves it for courts to sort competing claims.
- Legal representatives and registries: Lawyers, land registries and corporate registrars will bear administrative and advisory burdens to implement the revival—re-titling assets, amending records and advising clients on reopened exposures.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between correcting an apparent injustice to a dissolved company (and its stakeholders) by restoring its legal status, and protecting the certainty of transactions and rights that third parties acquired while the company was legally non-existent; the Act tries to thread that needle by reviving the company but expressly preserving later third-party rights, leaving unresolved trade-offs about which interests prevail in close cases.
The Act is narrowly drafted and achieves only one thing: it restores the corporation to the legal position it held on the date of dissolution, subject to rights acquired by others after that date. That formulation leaves two practical fault lines.
First, the Act revives liabilities as well as assets, which can revive tax debts, regulatory sanctions or claims that the corporation may not have budgeted for; the statute contains no mechanism for settling or prioritizing those revived obligations. Second, the Act preserves third-party rights obtained during the interim but does not expressly validate transactions done in the company’s name while it was dissolved.
That creates procedural and substantive uncertainty: courts may have to decide whether particular transfers or contracts are protected by the clause preserving third-party rights or vulnerable to challenge once the corporation is revived.
Implementation will therefore require collateral steps—communications to registries, possible quiet-title actions, and tax/regulatory confirmations—that the Act does not mandate. The absence of an express administrative route or transitional rules means parties must rely on litigation, negotiation or administrative discretion to resolve conflicts.
That reality increases transaction costs and leaves open questions about priorities between revived claims and post-dissolution rights where competing equitable considerations exist.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.