This short private Act revives P. Gregor Medicine Professional Corporation and restores it to the legal position it held on the date it was dissolved, including its property, rights, franchises and obligations.
The revival is limited by a carve‑out that preserves any rights acquired by third parties after the corporation’s dissolution.
The measure matters because it is a tailored legislative remedy that lets a former director/shareholder re‑establish a dissolved professional corporation to deal with assets held in the corporate name. The decision reintroduces corporate liabilities as well as assets, so it affects creditors, registrars, insurers and anyone who dealt with the corporation after its dissolution.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act restores P. Gregor Medicine Professional Corporation to the legal status it had on the date it was dissolved, transferring back property and reviving contracts, debts and other obligations. It expressly protects rights acquired by other persons after the dissolution.
Who It Affects
The immediate parties affected are the applicant/former director and any creditors or claimants of the corporation, plus registrars (corporate and land/title offices), insurers and professional regulatory bodies with an interest in the corporate entity. Lawyers and estate professionals handling corporate property will also be directly involved.
Why It Matters
This is a private, company‑specific revival rather than a general administrative reinstatement; it restores capacity to enforce or transfer assets held in the corporate name while reimposing liabilities, and thus shifts real legal and commercial exposure back onto the revived corporation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act has three operative elements: a preamble describing the applicant’s request, a revival clause and short administrative provisions dealing with commencement and the short title. The revival clause is the core: it states that the corporation is revived and ‘restored to its legal position’ as of the dissolution date.
Practically, that means title to property held in the company’s name, franchise rights and contractual positions are treated as if the corporate dissolution never happened.
The revival is not absolute. The statute preserves "any rights acquired by any person after its dissolution." In practice, that protects bona fide third‑party purchasers or others who obtained enforceable rights while the corporation was dissolved; it prevents the revival from undoing transactions that third parties relied on after the company ceased to exist.
That limitation will be crucial when determining whether a particular sale, mortgage or transfer can be challenged after revival.Because the Act restores liabilities and contracts as well as assets, creditors and claimants regain the ability to pursue the revived corporation. The Act therefore recreates both legal standing and exposure: the company can resume dealing with property but must also answer for its pre‑dissolution debts and obligations.
The bill takes effect on Royal Assent, so the revival runs from that day forward, and it is narrowly tailored to this single named corporation rather than creating a new general procedure for reviving companies in Ontario.For practitioners, the immediate consequences are administrative and remedial: confirm registrations (corporate and land/title), alert insurers and professional regulators, and assess whether any post‑dissolution transactions are protected under the Act’s carve‑out. For creditors, the statute restores an entity they can sue; for third parties who acquired rights after dissolution, the statute confirms those rights remain intact.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The corporation was voluntarily dissolved on December 2, 2024 under the Business Corporations Act pursuant to articles of dissolution.
The applicant, who says he was the director, officer and shareholder at the time of dissolution, sought legislative revival so the corporation could deal with property held in its name.
Section 1 revives P. Gregor Medicine Professional Corporation and restores it to its legal position as of the date of dissolution, including property, rights, franchises, contracts, liabilities and debts.
The revival expressly leaves intact any rights acquired by other persons after the corporation’s dissolution, protecting third‑party acquisitions made during the period of dissolution.
The Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent and is styled the P. Gregor Medicine Professional Corporation Act, 2026.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Applicant’s representations and legislative purpose
The Preamble records that Paul Gregor applied for special legislation to revive the named professional corporation and that he represented he was the director, officer and shareholder when the corporation was dissolved. The Preamble does two things in practice: it explains the Legislature’s factual basis for acting and narrows expectations about scope—the statute is remedial and company‑specific rather than intended to create a general relief mechanism.
Revival and restoration of corporate legal position
Section 1 is the operative revival clause. It states that the corporation is restored to the legal position it held when it dissolved, bringing back property, rights, privileges and franchises and reimposing liabilities, contracts and debts. The wording means title and contractual capacity flow back into the corporation; at the same time, the clause subjects the revival to the statutory carve‑out protecting rights obtained by others after dissolution, which will be decisive in disputes over post‑dissolution transfers or registrations.
Commencement on Royal Assent
Section 2 sets the start date: the revival takes effect when the Act receives Royal Assent. That timing matters because actions taken between the dissolution date and assent may either be preserved (if they constitute rights acquired by others) or left vulnerable to challenge if they do not qualify as protected rights. Practitioners should treat Royal Assent as the moment the corporation’s legal personality is restored for enforcement and transactional purposes.
Short title
Section 3 provides the Act’s short title. While formal, the naming confirms the statute is bespoke and limited to the single named entity; it signals that similar relief for other corporations would require separate legislative action or a different administrative pathway.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Paul Gregor (applicant): Revival gives him the corporate vehicle he controlled back so he can manage, sell or otherwise deal with property held in the company’s name without starting a new corporation or litigating title issues.
- Creditors and claimants of the corporation: The revival recreates an entity that can be sued or from which pre‑dissolution debts can be collected, restoring avenues for recovery that disappeared with the voluntary dissolution.
- Professional advisors (lawyers, accountants, estate planners): They gain a manageable client structure for resolving outstanding corporate matters, facilitating transactions and closing out legacy issues without resorting to ad hoc conveyancing workarounds.
Who Bears the Cost
- The revived corporation (and its stakeholders): Revival reimposes pre‑dissolution liabilities, so the company (and indirectly its former owner/shareholder) faces renewed exposure for debts, contracts and potential claims.
- Regulatory and registry bodies: Corporate and land/title registries, and possibly professional regulators, must process the revival and reconcile registrations, which creates administrative work and potential legal follow‑ups if records changed during the dissolution period.
- Insurers and indemnifiers: Insurers may see changed exposures where revived liabilities trigger coverage issues for past acts or claims that had been thought extinguished by dissolution, producing disputes over coverage windows and rescission risk.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between restoring legal correction for a former owner—reinstating corporate title so property can be managed or reclaimed—and preserving legal certainty for third parties who transacted in reliance on the corporation’s dissolution; the Act remedies one party’s loss but risks undermining the settled expectations of others unless courts narrowly interpret what counts as protected post‑dissolution rights.
The Act solves a narrow problem but leaves unresolved practical and legal questions. The key ambiguous term is the protection for "rights acquired by any person after its dissolution." The statute does not define what counts as an acquired right: is the protection limited to rights that were legally perfected and registered (for example, registered land titles or mortgages), or does it extend to equitable interests, unregistered contractual claims, or informal arrangements?
That ambiguity will be litigated if a revived corporation seeks to unwind a transaction that a third party claims as their right.
Another tension arises around limitation periods and insolvency rules. The revival reimposes debts, but it does not address whether statutory limitation periods that ran during the dissolution period revive along with the company.
Similarly, creditors who missed claims while the company was dissolved may find that revival reopens enforcement options, creating fairness questions for parties who reasonably relied on the company’s absence. Finally, because this is a private, single‑entity statute, it raises questions about equitable access: individuals with the means to pursue a private bill can obtain legislative relief that ordinary corporations must seek through administrative or court remedies, which may be an awkward policy outcome for the Legislature and for practitioners advising clients on cost‑effective remedies.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.