This amendment inserts a new regulation‑making head of power into clause 25(1)(tt.3) of the Environmental Protection Act to enable detailed rules governing financial arrangements tied to designated materials. The government can now make regulations that set charges and refunds, and it may enter into agreements with approved agents of material stewardship programs to operate systems for collection, remittance and refunds.
For policy and compliance professionals, the change creates a legal foundation for provincially regulated financing mechanisms for recycling and waste diversion — the kind of rules that allocate costs to producers, create refundable deposits for consumers, and formalize relationships with third‑party stewardship agents. The provision is narrowly drafted but broad enough to allow a range of payment‑flow architectures once regulations are made.
At a Glance
What It Does
Gives the Lieutenant Governor in Council authority to make regulations covering financial arrangements related to designated materials, including setting fees, deposits and refunds and creating systems for payment, collection and remittance. It also authorizes entering into agreements with approved agents that operate material stewardship programs.
Who It Affects
Manufacturers, importers and distributors of products classified as 'designated materials' under the Environmental Protection Act; stewardship organizations and approved agents that collect and remit funds; retailers and businesses that may collect deposits or pass fees to consumers; and provincial administrators who oversee compliance and remittance.
Why It Matters
The amendment supplies the statutory basis that the province needs to implement deposit‑refund schemes or producer‑funded stewardship programs with formal third‑party agents. That groundwork changes how the costs of diversion can be assigned and administered across the supply chain.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The amendment is short on text but broad in practical effect. By adding a targeted subclause to the Act’s regulation‑making section, the legislature authorizes the government to design the financial plumbing for managing 'designated materials' — meaning it can prescribe who pays, who collects, how money moves, and how refunds are issued.
The change does not itself set fees or deposits; it simply permits regulations to do so.
Crucially, the authority explicitly reaches agreements with 'approved agents' of material stewardship programs. In practice, that lets the province contract or recognize third‑party organizations to operate collection networks, handle fee collection and remittance, and pay consumer refunds on behalf of producers or regulated parties.
The provision therefore contemplates delegation of operational tasks to non‑government entities while keeping rulemaking and approval under provincial control.Because the new head of power covers 'all other matters in relation to a system for the payment, collection and remittance of fees and deposits and the payment of refunds,' regulations developed under it could specify timing of remittances, accounting and audit requirements, recordkeeping and reporting, eligibility and approval criteria for agents, and dispute or compliance mechanisms. Those are not in the bill text; the amendment simply authorizes the province to set those details by regulation.Operationally, businesses in supply chains for designated materials should expect regulatory instruments that define financial obligations, designate who must enroll in stewardship schemes, and set procedures for consumers to claim refunds.
Municipalities and recycling operators may see changes in who funds and runs collection services. The exact contours — which materials are designated, fee formulas, audit regimes and consumer refund processes — will depend on subsequent regulations and any agreements the government enters into under the new authority.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The amendment inserts a new subclause (x) into clause 25(1)(tt.3) of the Environmental Protection Act authorizing regulations related to financial arrangements for designated materials.
The regulation‑making power explicitly covers fees, deposits and refunds and ‘all other matters’ connected to systems for payment, collection and remittance.
The government may enter into agreements with ‘approved agents’ of material stewardship programs, enabling third‑party operation of collection and remittance functions.
The bill makes minor textual edits to existing subclauses (viii) and (ix) to accommodate the new subclause and to ensure list punctuation is correct.
The authority applies only to ‘designated materials’ under the Act — the set of products or waste streams that the province subsequently identifies in regulation.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Minor textual cleanup to subclause (viii)
The bill removes and replaces a short string of words in subclause (viii) — a punctuation and wording change that prevents grammatical conflict when adding new items to the list. Practically, this has no policy effect; it prepares the statute to bear the additional regulation‑making power being appended later in the clause.
Punctuation change in subclause (ix)
This line changes a semicolon to a comma-plus-conjunction to maintain correct list structure once the new subclause is inserted. Like (a), it is a drafting housekeeping step rather than a substantive policy move, but it’s necessary to ensure the statute reads and operates as intended after insertion of the new provision.
Regulation head of power for financial systems and agent agreements
This is the operative change: the addition of subclause (x) creates a statutory basis for regulations that will govern how money moves in relation to designated materials. The provision is explicit that regulations may address fees, deposits and refunds, and may authorize the Crown to enter agreements with approved agents of material stewardship programs. The clause’s final phrase — covering 'all other matters' concerning a payment/collection/remittance and refund system — grants broad discretion to design administrative rules, including operational and reporting details, though none of those specifics are itself set in the bill text.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Stewardship organizations and approved agents — the provision lets the province formally recognize and contract with third parties to run collection and remittance systems, creating a stable legal route for program operation and funding flows.
- Producers and brand‑owners (of designated materials) — regulation can centralize costs via producer fees or deposits, giving producers a predictable mechanism to meet diversion obligations instead of ad hoc municipal charges.
- Consumers — if the government uses deposit‑refund mechanisms, consumers gain a clearer refund path for returnable items; the law also enables standardized refund processes and accountability through regulation.
- Recycling and collection businesses — a regulated funding stream can stabilize revenues for certified collectors and recyclers that participate in approved stewardship programs.
Who Bears the Cost
- Manufacturers, importers and distributors of designated materials — the likely target for fees or deposit obligations, which will increase compliance and financial responsibilities across the supply chain.
- Small retailers — if required to collect deposits or facilitate refunds at point of sale, retailers may face administrative burdens and cash‑flow impacts unless regulations limit obligations or provide offsets.
- Provincial administration — creating, approving and monitoring approved agents and enforcement of the new regulatory regime will impose administrative and oversight costs on the Department of Environment, Energy and Climate Action.
- Approved agents and stewardship organizations — while they may benefit from formal recognition, they will also inherit compliance obligations (reporting, audits, remittance schedules) that carry implementation costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The core dilemma is between operational flexibility and democratic accountability: giving the executive broad regulation‑making power and the ability to contract with private agents makes it easier to build functioning stewardship systems quickly, but it concentrates discretion over fee design, agent approval and operational rules in the executive branch — raising risks of inadequate oversight, uneven cost allocation and weak protections for small businesses and consumers.
The amendment grants broad regulatory discretion but leaves many high‑stakes details for future instruments and agreements. That opens two practical challenges: first, the economic design of any fees or deposit amounts — who pays, how much, and how refunds are claimed — will determine whether the system improves diversion or merely transfers costs to consumers or small businesses.
Second, building effective oversight over approved agents is technically demanding: the province will need robust approval criteria, audit rights, data standards and enforcement tools to prevent leakage, misreporting or capture by vested interests.
Other unresolved questions include how the new authority will interact with existing municipal waste programs and federal initiatives, how 'designated materials' will be defined in regulation, and what transitional arrangements will apply for products already on the market. The broad 'all other matters' language is efficient from an administrative perspective but risks open‑ended delegation: it can invite litigation over the limits of delegated power and heighten calls for transparent rulemaking and statutory safeguards such as public reporting, performance metrics and review clauses.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.