Bill 27 centralizes authority over collective agreement decrees by moving approval, enactment and amendment powers from government and parity committees to the Minister of Labour, while narrowing some committee reporting and publication obligations. It standardizes a six‑month window for a contracting party to block renewal of a decree and gives the Minister the power to issue binding directives on committee governance.
On the construction side, the bill removes the cost‑of‑work threshold for deploying full‑time health and safety reps and replaces it with presence‑based triggers; it requires principal contractors to notify representative associations when a site will need a full‑time health and safety representative. The measure also enables temporary work authorizations equivalent to competency certificates, allows the CCQ to establish a complementary preventive withdrawal plan for pregnant or breastfeeding workers (administered by CNESST), and permits pilot projects that can vary standards for up to three years (extendable by one).
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill gives the Minister of Labour explicit authority to enact, approve, amend or repeal collective agreement decrees and parity‑committee regulations, and to issue binding governance directives. It creates a power for government regulation of sector‑level labour standards where decrees expire and sets new rules for notification and non‑renewal of decrees.
Who It Affects
Parity committees and their contracting parties (employer and union groups), employers and employees formerly covered by decrees, and regulatory bodies (Minister’s office, Comité consultatif, CCQ, CNESST). In construction, principal contractors, CCQ certificate holders, and site health & safety representatives face new deployment and notification mechanics.
Why It Matters
For labour relations professionals and compliance officers, the bill shifts practical control from tripartite parity committees toward ministerial oversight and regulatory instruments, changing how sectoral standards will be set and contested. For construction stakeholders, the bill changes when and how site safety roles are triggered and creates new administrative pathways (temporary authorizations, pilot projects, withdrawal plans) that affect staffing, training and liability.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill rewrites the decision‑making architecture for collective agreement decrees. It requires the Minister of Labour to enact any amendments or revisions that parity committees or contracting parties apply for, and it explicitly gives the Minister the power to approve, amend or repeal committee regulations.
Before denying an amendment or recommending repeal, the Minister must notify the applicant committee or contracting party and allow them to respond; for repeal recommendations the Minister must also solicit the opinion of the Comité consultatif du travail et de la main‑d’œuvre. Committees remain responsible for preparing their financial documents annually, but the bill removes several previous publication and transmission duties and relocates certain approval steps to the Minister’s office.
The bill standardizes the non‑renewal process: an employer or union contracting party may block renewal by sending a written notice to the Minister during the sixth month before the decree expires, and the decree terminates one year after the Minister publishes a notice in the Gazette officielle du Québec. For representativeness, the Minister must be satisfied that employer and union associations are representative of the trade before recommending a decree be made binding or before amending a decree to extend its scope; the legislation clarifies that employer and union contracting parties constitute those representative associations for this assessment.On construction sites the bill replaces dollar‑value triggers with worker‑presence triggers.
The requirement to designate full‑time health and safety representatives or coordinators now depends on whether at least 10 construction workers are present; these roles are required from the moment that threshold is met and continue until completion except in a final phase where fewer than 10 workers remain and the site will not again reach 10. The bill removes the explicit $12,000,000 (and similar) total‑cost thresholds from the occupational health and safety and construction statutes and requires principal contractors to notify representative associations when a site will entail designating one or more health and safety representatives.The CCQ gains two operational tools.
First, it may, by regulation, issue temporary work authorizations that grant holders the same rights and obligations as competency‑certificate holders, and set criteria for issuing, renewing, reinstating or cancelling those authorizations. Second, it may establish a complementary preventive withdrawal plan for pregnant or breastfeeding workers; administration of that plan is assigned to CNESST under terms set in an agreement between the CCQ and CNESST.
Separately, the Government may authorize pilot projects that adjust standards and sanctions for up to three years (with a one‑year extension option) and prescribe different offences and fines within the pilot framework.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Minister of Labour must enact any amendments or revisions to a decree applied for by a committee or contracting party (new section 6.5).
A contracting party may send a written notice of non‑renewal to the Minister during the sixth month before a decree expires; a decree ends one year after the Minister publishes notice in the Gazette officielle du Québec (new section 8).
The Minister must approve all parity‑committee regulations and any amendments to them; the Minister may also amend or repeal committee regulations (new sections 22.1 and 21).
Health and safety representatives and coordinators are required only once at least 10 construction workers are present on site and remain required until completion except where fewer than 10 workers remain and 10 will never again be present (amendments to sections 212.1 and 215.1).
The Government can authorize pilot projects for construction‑industry matters for a maximum of three years (extendable by one), with the power to set different standards, monitoring rules and fines within the pilot (new section 126.0.3).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Minister becomes the enacting authority for decree amendments
The bill replaces language that previously left enactment or approval steps with government or committee processes and inserts explicit Ministerial responsibility: when a committee or contracting party applies to amend a decree the Minister now enacts the change after following procedural notice and consultation steps. Practically, that means applicants must interact with the Minister’s office (including by providing requested documents), and translation costs for notices and draft decrees are expressly allocated to the committee.
Non‑renewal timetable, regulation approval and binding directives
The non‑renewal window is standardized (notice during the sixth month before expiry) and the statute sets the ministerial publication‑to‑termination lag (one year after Gazette notice). The Minister now approves parity‑committee regulations and amendments and may itself make general regulations about the rules committees may adopt. The bill also authorizes the Minister to publish binding directives aimed at committee governance and inspection practices; those directives are binding from the date specified, giving the Minister an operational tool short of regulation to shape committee administration.
Limits and redefinition of committee funding and reporting duties
The bill narrows the financing mechanisms a committee may use as a recognized training mutual and clarifies that subsidies may be used for workforce skills development without requiring a separate mutual recognition. It revises financing modes (levies and fees) and rephrases budget/reporting obligations: committees must prepare budgetary estimates, audited financial statements and related reports annually, but the legislative text removes several prior requirements around government approval and mandatory publication in newspapers, altering transparency and oversight mechanics.
Sector‑level labour standards when decrees expire
Where a decree ceases to be in force the Government may, after consulting the Commission and the most representative employer and employee associations, fix labour standards by regulation that apply to all employers and employees who would have been covered. The change converts some sectoral protections from decree (tripartite, negotiated instruments) into government regulation when a decree lapses, creating a statutory route for sector‑wide minimum standards independent of an active decree.
Worker‑presence triggers and principal‑contractor notification
The dollar‑based triggers tied to total project cost have been struck. The designation of health and safety representatives and coordinators is now triggered by the presence of 10 construction workers on site. The bill requires the party who designates health and safety representatives to notify all representative associations that such designation will be necessary. The job‑site committee obligation is narrowed for large sites to apply only during periods when designated representatives/coordinators are required.
Temporary work authorizations and complementary withdrawal plan
The CCQ may issue temporary work authorizations that confer the same rights and obligations as competency certificates, and set the criteria and lifecycle for those authorizations. The CCQ may also establish, by regulation, a complementary preventive withdrawal plan for pregnant or breastfeeding workers; CNESST will administer the plan under an agreement with the CCQ, and the legislation requires the regulation to set funding, management and dispute mechanisms, including access to the Administrative Labour Tribunal for appeals.
Government may run time‑limited construction pilot projects
The Government can authorize pilot projects that deviate from statutory or regulatory standards to study or define alternate standards for construction matters. The law lets the Government set project‑specific obligations, sanctions and reporting requirements, fix offences and fines for the pilot, and cap duration at three years with a possible one‑year extension; the Minister may also enter into agreements to implement pilots.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Minister of Labour — Gains centralized control over decree enactment, regulation approval and binding directives, increasing administrative leverage over sectoral standards and committee governance.
- Employers and unions able to demonstrate representativeness — Can obtain sector‑wide coverage through government regulation after decree expiry if the Minister recognizes their representativeness, providing a clearer route to uniform rules.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding construction workers — The CCQ’s new complementary preventive withdrawal plan, administered by CNESST, creates an additional, regulated pathway for protection and compensation beyond reassignment.
- Holders of temporary work authorizations — Individuals issued authorizations by the CCQ have rights equivalent to competency‑certificate holders, opening short‑term labour market access in regulated trades.
- Government policymakers — Pilot projects let the Government test alternative standards and sanctions in a controlled timeframe without immediately changing permanent law.
Who Bears the Cost
- Parity committees — Lose some regulatory autonomy, face ministerial oversight and must absorb translation costs for notices and draft decrees; they also face revised funding rules and reduced publication‑based transparency that may complicate stakeholder legitimacy.
- Minister’s office / Ministry of Labour — Takes on increased administrative, consultation and decision‑making workload (approving regs, enacting amendments, managing directives and consultation requests), likely requiring additional resources.
- Principal contractors and employers on construction sites — Must monitor worker counts closely, notify representative associations when designations are necessary, and adjust staffing plans to meet the 10‑worker trigger for full‑time reps/coordinators.
- CCQ and CNESST — CCQ must design temporary authorization frameworks and complementary withdrawal regulations; CNESST will administer the withdrawal plan, both requiring operational capacity and budgetary arrangements.
- Small projects and subcontractors — Projects that formerly met cost thresholds may now fall below presence triggers or vice versa; employers may face compliance ambiguity during transition and potential temporary staffing or training costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between effective centralized oversight and the loss of sectoral tripartite autonomy: the bill aims to streamline and standardize labour‑standards enforcement by giving the Minister tools to act where decrees lapse or committees falter, but in doing so it replaces negotiated, sector‑based governance with discretionary administrative power that could undermine stakeholder buy‑in and produce uneven regulatory outcomes across industries.
The bill concentrates substantial operational authority in the Minister’s office while removing several transparency and automatic‑renewal safeguards that previously constrained ministerial discretion. Transferring approval of committee regulations to the Minister and allowing ministerial amendment or repeal raises questions about the standard of review and the criteria the Minister will use to determine representativeness or to issue binding directives; the statute requires consultation in some cases but leaves several judgment calls to ministerial discretion.
That discretion will matter in contested sectors where committee legitimacy is already fragile.
On construction, replacing cost thresholds with a presence‑based 10‑worker trigger simplifies some calculations but creates edge cases. For rolling, phased projects the statute creates potential switching points where obligations begin or end mid‑project; project managers will need tight tracking systems to avoid non‑compliance.
The temporary work‑authorization route eases labour shortages but risks diluting the competency‑certificate regime if authorizations are used long term or without harmonized training standards. The complementary preventive withdrawal plan is conceptually protective, but the bill leaves funding, benefit levels and dispute resolution design to regulation and to an agreement between CCQ and CNESST — areas ripe for implementation friction.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.