This bill amends Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act to give consumers stronger rights to repair goods and to discourage manufacturers from designing products to fail prematurely. It imposes new duties on market actors and adds enforcement tools so regulators and consumers can force repairs, replacements or refunds.
For businesses, the bill creates operational obligations — from providing repair information to making parts available — and exposes manufacturers and merchants to both administrative and criminal penalties for deliberate practices that shorten product lifespans. For consumers and repairers it establishes legal protections intended to keep goods repairable and on the market longer, with a recurring government review to assess outcomes.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires a provincially determined sustainability rating for household appliances and mandates clear labelling before sale; it obliges manufacturers and merchants to make replacement parts, tools and repair services available on reasonable terms and to supply repair manuals to certified repairers. It also creates a certification regime for repairers, prohibits warranty denial after certified third‑party repairs, and criminalizes deliberate planned obsolescence with fines and possible imprisonment.
Who It Affects
Appliance and consumer‑electronics manufacturers, retailers selling household appliances in Quebec, independent repair shops that seek certification, the Bureau de normalisation du Québec (BNQ) which will set the rating criteria, and the Office de la protection du consommateur which will certify repairers. Provincial ministries and committees will handle reporting and oversight.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts compliance risk from consumers to manufacturers/retailers by turning repair access and durability into enforceable obligations rather than voluntary practices. It creates new regulatory touchpoints (rating, certification, reporting) that will require changes to product labelling, supply chains, after‑sales support and legal exposure for noncompliance.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts two new statutory definitions: a “sustainability rating” (expressed as a product’s mean time to first failure) and “planned obsolescence” (techniques, including software methods, intended to shorten that metric). The Bureau de normalisation du Québec (BNQ) must both set the criteria and assign the rating for household appliances before they’re offered for sale; the BNQ must also publish its assessment process.
On repair access, the bill replaces the existing repair‑related section with new obligations. Manufacturers and merchants must ensure replacement parts, tools and repair services are available at reasonable price and under reasonable conditions either for as long as the goods remain on the market or for a reasonable period after sale — whichever gives the consumer greater protection.
The text establishes a presumption for what counts as a reasonable price by reference to the market price of similar parts.The bill requires manufacturers to provide repair manuals free to repairers certified by the Office de la protection du consommateur; confidentiality agreements are allowed where a repair manual would disclose a bona fide trade secret. If a manufacturer or merchant cannot meet the parts/repair obligations, they must either replace the good or refund the consumer; where the consumer caused the failure, the supplier can be relieved but may still have to pay partial compensation if the item could have been repaired.On warranties and remedies, the bill stops manufacturers and merchants from denying warranty performance simply because an uncertified third party repaired the good or because a warranty seal was removed — provided the repair was done by a certified repairer.
It also creates procedural protections: debts tied to a disputed good are suspended while the consumer pursues a remedy, and courts are limited in ordering replacement only when repair is not possible within a reasonable time or is prohibitively costly. For enforcement, the bill adds planned obsolescence as an offence with significant fines (with a turnover‑based alternative up to 5% of average annual turnover) and, for natural persons, a possible jail term; repeat convictions carry doubled fine ranges.
Finally, the Minister must report every three years on the effectiveness of the consumer protection mechanisms and the Assembly committee must review the report.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill defines a sustainability rating as the good’s mean time to first failure and assigns responsibility for the rating’s criteria and assignment to the Bureau de normalisation du Québec.
Manufacturers must provide repair manuals free of charge to repairers who are certified by the Office de la protection du consommateur; manufacturers may require confidentiality agreements only to protect genuine trade secrets.
If a supplier cannot make parts or repair services available, it must either replace the defective good or refund the purchase price; if the consumer caused the failure but the good was repairable, the supplier must pay half the purchase price as compensation.
While a consumer pursues a remedy under the Act for a defective good, the bill suspends the payability of debts related to that good for the duration of the recourse.
A conviction for deliberate planned obsolescence carries steep penalties: for businesses fines up to $3,000,000 or, alternatively, up to 5% of average annual turnover, and for individuals fines up to $500,000 and up to 18 months’ imprisonment; repeat convictions double the fine ranges.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
New statutory definitions for durability rules
This section inserts definitions for “sustainability rating” and “planned obsolescence.” Practically, that gives the rest of the Act a durability‑focused lens: subsequent duties and offences are tied to measurable product lifespan (mean time to first failure) and to intentional techniques that reduce it. For compliance teams this means design, firmware updates, and supply‑chain decisions can now be scrutinized under statutory standards rather than only by generic consumer expectations.
Durability label required on household appliances
Section 38 is amended so that household appliances must carry a label showing the BNQ‑assigned sustainability rating before they are offered for sale or lease. That creates a pre‑market labelling obligation: importers, retailers and manufacturers must coordinate to ensure products placed on shelves or online listings display the rating in the prescribed manner, which the government will specify by regulation.
Parts, tools, repair services and remedies when supply fails
The new Sections 39–39.2 set out how long and under what terms parts, tools and repair services must be made available and what happens if producers fail to comply. The choice of duration — while on the market or a reasonable period afterward, whichever favors consumers — shifts the default toward longer support windows. The statute offers a practical reasonableness test (market price for similar items) and requires suppliers unable to meet obligations to replace or refund, subject to consumer responsibility rules and a specific partial compensation formula.
Warranty protection for certified third‑party repairs
Section 46.1 prevents merchants and manufacturers from refusing warranty service solely because a certified third‑party repaired the product or because a warranty seal was removed. Operationally, warranty policies and service contracts will need revision to accept certified repairer work and to avoid blanket exclusions that would now be unlawful.
Offence and penalties for planned obsolescence
Planned obsolescence becomes a listed offence with a two‑tier penalty structure: individuals face high fines and potential imprisonment, while legal persons face larger fines with a turnover‑based alternative (up to 5% of average annual turnover) and higher penalties for repeat convictions. Enforcement will require prosecutors and regulators to demonstrate deliberate practices that shortened product life — an evidentiary and forensic challenge that also elevates the stakes for corporate compliance programs.
BNQ role, certification and reporting
The BNQ must set rating criteria, assign sustainability ratings for household appliances and publish its methodology. The Act also adds ministerial rule‑making powers to prescribe labelling terms and repairer certification requirements, and requires a triennial ministerial report on the Act’s effectiveness to be tabled and reviewed by the Assembly. Section 320.2 (BNQ rating assignment) is given a specific delayed coming‑into‑force date, creating an implementation window for regulators and industry.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Consumers seeking repairs — they get statutory access to parts, tools and repair services for a longer period and protection from warranty voiding when using certified repairers, reducing replacement costs and extending product life.
- Independent repair shops that obtain certification — certification grants them access to repair manuals and a shielded position to perform warranty‑preserving repairs, expanding their legal market and potential revenue.
- Secondary‑market and refurbishment businesses — more available parts and repair support and clearer durability labelling improve prospects for reuse, refurbishment and resale.
- Environmental and sustainability programs — extended product lifetimes and repairability should reduce waste flows and resource consumption, aligning consumer protection with environmental goals.
Who Bears the Cost
- Manufacturers of household appliances and consumer electronics — they must provide parts, tools and manuals, adjust product labelling, and face the legal risk of significant fines or criminal sanctions for deliberate design choices.
- Retailers offering household appliances in Quebec — retailers must ensure labelled products and may need new supply‑chain checks; they can also face liability for offering unlabeled goods.
- Small manufacturers or startups with limited support capacity — the obligation to supply parts and manuals and to fund longer after‑sales support may disproportionately burden smaller producers.
- Provincial agencies (BNQ, Office de la protection du consommateur) — they take on new operational responsibilities for rating criteria, certification of repairers and enforcement, potentially requiring resource increases and new technical capacity.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits two legitimate objectives against each other: protecting consumers and the environment by keeping goods repairable and long‑lasting, versus preserving manufacturers’ legitimate intellectual property, product integrity and incentives to innovate; the law trades stronger consumer protections and heavy penalties for greater regulatory complexity and potential costs that may be passed on to buyers.
The bill creates enforceable durability standards but leaves several implementation details unresolved. Assigning a sustainability rating based on “mean time to first failure” raises methodological questions: how to define failure across categories, how to incorporate software degradation, and how to standardize testing so ratings are comparable and resistant to gaming.
The BNQ must publish its process, but the quality and defensibility of that methodology will determine whether labels are meaningful or merely informational.
Enforcement presents another tension. Proving deliberate planned obsolescence requires tracing design choices, firmware updates, or supply restrictions to an intent to shorten life — an evidentiary burden that could make prosecutions rare or resource‑intensive.
At the same time, broad criminal and turnover‑based penalties create strong incentives for defensive product design, possible over‑prescription of parts availability, or shifting costs into higher upfront prices. Confidentiality carveouts for trade secrets mitigate IP concerns, but the scope of acceptable secrecy and the certification regime for repairers open the door to regulatory capture or restrictive licensing unless criteria are carefully drafted and transparently applied.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.