Bill 39 amends Québec’s municipal and fiscal statutes to widen municipal taxation powers and to set up a province-to-municipality sharing of a portion of Québec sales tax revenues. It lets municipalities create subcategories within the residential residual category, divide territory into sectors with sectoral property‑tax rates, raise the ceiling on serviced vacant‑land rates, and impose a value‑based tax on dwellings deemed vacant or underused.
The bill also allows transfer duties to be paid in instalments, prescribes rules for municipal collection of developer contributions, and formalizes a mechanism to transfer an annual sum tied to Québec sales tax receipts to municipalities.
These changes give local governments more targeted taxation and revenue-sharing tools intended to influence land use and housing supply. For municipal finance officers, property assessors, and housing policy teams the bill creates new rate-setting mechanics, reporting obligations, timetable constraints for assessment rolls, and a set of exemptions and administrative tests that will drive by-law drafting, data collection and appeals activity.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes municipalities to set subcategory- and sector-specific property rates, to levy a tax (up to a statutory cap) on dwellings judged vacant or underused, and to require transfer duties to be payable in instalments under municipal by-law. It also establishes an annual transfer to municipalities equal to the difference between 10% of specified QST revenues and a fixed threshold, with allocation rules to be set by ministerial regulation.
Who It Affects
Local and regional county municipalities (RCMs), municipal finance and assessment bodies, property owners of vacant/underused dwellings and serviced vacant land, inheritors of vacant land, and developers subject to municipal contribution regimes. Provincial ministries that administer assessment, grants and the QST will also play an implementation role.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts substantive fiscal discretion to municipalities, enabling geographically targeted tax signals (via subcategories/sectors and vacancy taxes) while introducing a province-wide revenue transfer tied to QST performance. Practically, expect new by‑laws, altered assessment-roll procedures and increased administrative workload for municipal clerks and assessors; property owners and estates face new tax exposure and compliance choices.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Bill 39 packages a set of amendments that together expand municipal taxing options and sets up a predictable transfer from provincial QST receipts. At the core are changes to the Act respecting municipal taxation that let a local municipality split the residual residential category into subcategories and divide its territory into sectors for the purpose of applying different general property tax rates.
The law creates procedural deadlines for resolutions that establish subcategories or sectors and requires the property assessment roll to identify the applicable subcategory or sector for each unit of assessment when those measures are in force.
On vacancy and underuse, the bill authorizes municipalities, by by‑law, to impose a tax based on property value on immovables that include a dwelling determined to be vacant or underused, subject to safeguards. The rate is capped (the text sets a statutory ceiling of 1% of the taxable value of the unit of assessment), and the statute defines occupancy exceptions (for example, 180‑day occupancy thresholds, temporary evacuation orders, major renovations, and a presumptive secondary‑residence rule limited to one dwelling per owner).
The bill also lists multiple classed exemptions — low‑rental housing, dwellings under certain operating agreements (including those with the Société d’habitation du Québec), housing bureau properties, seasonal chalets and most registered tourist accommodations — limiting the tax’s reach.The municipal taxation amendments also alter vacant‑land treatment: the maximum rate the municipality may set for the category of serviced vacant land increases (the bill raises the previous ceiling to a higher multiplier of the basic rate), and the legislature creates a tax credit available to heirs who acquire vacant land by succession to offset the impact of higher vacant‑land rates for a limited period. The text establishes detailed rules about how rates for subcategories and sectors may vary (standardized rates computed as weighted averages, and bounds such that any set sectoral or subcategory rate must lie between two-thirds and four‑thirds of the standardized rate).
The bill permits municipalities to set higher second rates for non‑residential property beginning at specified taxable‑value thresholds.Outside taxation mechanics, Bill 39 allows municipalities to require contributions as a condition for issuing certain permits or certificates, but gives the Minister of Municipal Affairs the power to regulate which classes of interventions may be conditioned on contributions and which types of infrastructure these funds may finance. The Act also enables transfer duties to be paid in instalments under municipal by‑law (with interest terms allowed), provides a three‑year prescription rule for instalment claims, and updates procurement conflict‑of‑interest exceptions to allow narrow purchases or service contracts from businesses in which an officer or councillor has an interest where no viable alternative exists, subject to transparency and by‑law requirements.
Finally, the bill creates a Division that transfers to municipalities an amount equal to the difference between 10% of specified QST receipts (less solidarity credit payouts) and a fixed benchmark figure; the minister will set the allocation method by regulation and pay municipalities annually.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The municipality may impose a value‑based tax on an immovable that includes a dwelling judged vacant or underused; the statutory rate cap for that tax is 1% of the taxable value of the unit of assessment for the reference year.
The maximum rate specific to the serviced vacant‑land category is increased so that municipalities may set it up to four times the basic rate (previously limited to a lower multiplier).
When municipalities establish subcategories or sectoral rates, any sectoral or subcategory rate must lie between 66.6% and 133.3% of the corresponding standardized rate; standardized rates are computed as weighted averages using the taxable values in the sector or municipality.
The bill creates an annual transfer to municipalities equal to the difference between (a) 10% of revenues from specified Québec sales tax titles (less amounts paid as the solidarity credit) and (b) $1,644,500,000; the calculation must be made no later than 30 September of the preceding fiscal year and the allocated amounts paid by 31 May.
Transfer duties may be paid in several instalments under a municipal by‑law; each instalment is exigible on its due date, the outstanding balance becomes exigible upon a new transfer of the immovable, and claims tied to instalments prescribe three years from each instalment’s exigible date (except where fraud is alleged).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Minister may regulate contributions tied to permits
The bill adds a new power for the Minister under the land‑use act to exempt persons from contributions, to declare classes of work that cannot be subordinated to payment of a contribution, and to specify which infrastructure or equipment may be financed by those contributions. Practically, the Minister can draw regulatory lines around when municipalities may condition permits on payments and what those payments may fund, which centralizes scope and mitigates municipal divergence but leaves fine‑grained design and rate questions to later regulation.
Narrow exceptions where an officer or councillor has an interest
The Act creates mirrored, tightly limited exceptions to conflict‑of‑interest prohibitions so a municipality may buy goods (and in some cases manual services) from a business in which an officer, employee or councillor has an interest where no reasonable alternative exists within the municipality or within a defined 5‑kilometre radius. Each exception is conditioned on the municipality authorizing the option in its contract‑management by‑law and on twice‑annual public reporting (publication on the municipality’s website or a designated site) listing the person, the business and purchases. These provisions open a narrow route for local procurement in thin‑market contexts but pair it with disclosure and by‑law governance to limit abuse.
Power to tax dwellings deemed vacant or underused, with detailed exemptions
Municipalities may adopt by‑laws to tax immovables that include dwellings judged vacant or underused, provided the by‑law specifies dwelling types, criteria for vacancy/underuse and the annual reference period. The statutory ceiling is 1% of the taxable value of the unit of assessment. The text tightly defines non‑vacant status (occupation at least 180 days a year, certain evacuation or health‑related absences, renovations time limits, and owner‑designated secondary residence protections) and lists several exclusions (low‑rent and modest‑rent housing, dwellings under affordable‑housing operating agreements, housing bureau properties, seasonal chalets, most registered tourist accommodations). Those definitions will determine administrative evidence needs and appeal volumes.
Create residential subcategories and sectoral rate framework
The Act allows municipalities to split the residual residential category into subcategories and to divide municipal territory into sectors for property‑tax purposes. Resolutions adopting these measures must meet precise timing rules tied to assessment‑roll deposit schedules (with deadlines ranging from 1 April to 15 September depending on whether a preliminary roll is used). For sectoral taxation the bill introduces standardized rates (weighted averages of sector rates by taxable values) and caps that require any sectoral or subcategory rate be between 66.6% and 133.3% of the standardized rate. The law also permits municipalities to set higher, value‑triggered second rates for non‑residential property in a sector.
Higher vacant‑land ceilings and a succession tax credit
The maximum specific rate for serviced vacant land is raised (the bill replaces the previous 'twice the basic' cap with a higher multiplier — up to four times the basic rate). To soften effects on heirs, the Act creates a tax credit for persons who acquire vacant land by succession when a municipality has set rates above certain thresholds; the credit applies for five years from registration of transmission and can be extended by municipal by‑law for up to five additional years. The credit’s computation is value‑based and designed to offset only the portion of the rate above the statutory benchmark.
Instalment payments, prescription and account disclosures
Municipalities may, by by‑law, permit transfer duties to be paid in instalments and to impose interest on instalments after the first; each instalment becomes exigible on its due date and the outstanding balance becomes exigible on a subsequent transfer of the immovable. The bill adds a three‑year prescription period for claims tied to instalment‑exigible portions (excluding fraud). It also requires the transfer account to inform the transferee of the instalment rules, which raises administrative obligations for registries and municipal receivables teams.
Formula to transfer an annual QST‑linked amount to municipalities
The bill establishes a province‑wide transfer: each fiscal year municipalities receive the amount equal to (a) 10% of revenues from specific Québec sales tax titles (after subtracting solidarity credit payouts) minus (b) $1,644,500,000. The calculation is to be made using public accounts no later than 30 September of the year preceding the fiscal year and rounded to the nearest million; the Minister will fix apportionment rules by regulation and pay allocations no later than 31 May. This creates a predictable cash flow subject to ministerial allocation rules that will determine municipal shares.
Roll timelines, assessor document access and transitional fixes
The bill revises deadlines for depositing preliminary and definitive assessment rolls (assessor deposits by 15 August for preliminary rolls and 1 November for definitive rolls in certain cases), requires rolls to identify subcategories/sectors when adopted, and allows assessors’ documents to be consulted by municipal officers in emergencies, with fees capped by reference to access‑to‑information regulations. Transitional provisions preserve old rules for rolls already in force as of specified dates and regularize historical payments in lieu of taxes for a named institute. These changes matter operationally for clerks, assessors and municipal counsels because timing and access rules affect the validity of rate resolutions and the defensibility of assessments.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Local municipalities: Gain new, geographically targeted revenue tools — subcategories, sectoral rates, vacancy/underuse taxes, higher serviced‑vacant‑land ceilings and the ability to allow transfer‑duty instalments — increasing fiscal flexibility.
- Regional county municipalities (RCMs): Receive explicit powers to own land for reserves and housing and, like local municipalities, can now adopt measures to promote housing supply and share revenues under intermunicipal agreements.
- Heirs who inherit vacant land: Eligible beneficiaries can receive a tax credit for up to five years (extendable by municipal by‑law) to offset the incremental impact of higher vacant‑land rates imposed after succession.
- Municipal finance officers and planners: New instruments allow targeted policy levers to nudge land use and housing outcomes (e.g., taxing underused units, sectoral rates), enabling more calibrated local strategies.
Who Bears the Cost
- Owners of vacant or underused dwellings: Risk new annual taxation (up to the 1% cap) where municipal by‑laws define a dwelling as vacant/underused, unless they meet strict occupancy exemptions, increasing holding costs for some owners and estates.
- Owners of serviced vacant land: Face potentially higher municipal rates (up to four times the basic rate), which increases carrying costs and could accelerate land transactions or intensify appeals.
- Municipal clerks and assessment bodies: Will need to update rolls, implement new preliminary‑roll deadlines, track subcategory/sector assignments, process exemptions and manage disclosure/reporting obligations — increasing administrative workload and potentially costs.
- Municipalities and registries collecting instalment duties: Take on collection risk and must build rules for instalments, interest, recordkeeping and pursue prescribed claims subject to a three‑year limitation, which could complicate revenue forecasting.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between municipal fiscal autonomy and targeted policy tools on one side, and predictability, administrative feasibility and equity on the other: Bill 39 empowers municipalities to fine‑tune tax signals to influence housing and land use, but those same powers impose complex procedural rules, evidence burdens and appeal exposure that can reduce legal certainty, increase operating costs and shift compliance burdens onto property owners — especially small owners and estates.
The bill hands significant discretionary power to municipalities but embeds complex mechanics that will drive administrative, legal and political friction. The vacancy/underuse tax depends on evidence of occupancy over a 180‑day threshold and a catalogue of exemptions (health, renovations, secondary‑residence presumptions, operating agreements).
That creates a heavy evidentiary and privacy footprint: municipalities will need reliable data (leases, utility use, registries) to apply by‑laws defensibly and will face increased appeals and contested assessments. The precise boundary between a legitimately vacant unit and one legitimately unoccupied for personal or maintenance reasons is thin and likely to produce disputes.
The sector and subcategory architecture gives technical rules (standardized weighted averages and 66.6%–133.3% bounds) intended to limit arbitrary rate swings, but it also makes local rate design mathematically complex and sensitive to assessment values. Municipalities must time resolutions to assessment‑roll deadlines or the measures are null — a procedural trap that can invalidate a policy if clerks and councils miss strict cutoff dates.
The QST sharing mechanism delivers a headline number but delegates the allocation method to ministerial regulation; until those regulations appear, municipalities won’t know how the pool will be divided, and smaller municipalities may find the distribution formula decisive to their fiscal benefit.
Allowing transfer duties to be paid in instalments improves taxpayer flexibility but increases collection complexity and credit risk for municipalities; the three‑year prescription for instalment‑related claims reduces long‑term recoverability compared with the current regime, potentially creating revenue leakage. Procurement exceptions that permit purchases or limited service contracts from businesses linked to officers or councillors are narrowly drawn and accompanied by disclosure duties, yet they open a corridor for conflicts of interest in thin markets and place a premium on robust by‑law governance and transparent publication practices.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.