This bill inserts a new chapter into Quebec’s Act to promote access to family medicine and specialized medicine services that prevents private insurers and employee benefit plan administrators from conditioning reimbursement, technical-aid coverage, or continuation of disability payments on requiring an insured person to receive a medical service. It gives Santé Québec authority to audit, investigate and recover costs when insurers or administrators contravene that rule, and creates administrative and penal sanctions.
The bill also amends the Act respecting labour standards to restrict when employers may request documentation for short absences: employers cannot demand a document for the first three periods of absence (each of up to three consecutive days) taken in a year, and may not require a medical certificate when an employee is absent to provide care to a child, parent or other person in their care. The text contains transitional rules for existing insurance clauses and phased effective dates.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill bars insurers and employee benefit plan administrators from requiring an insured person to undergo a medical service as a condition for reimbursement of health services, technical aids, or continued disability benefits, subject to narrow regulation-made exceptions. It establishes oversight and enforcement tools for Santé Québec, including audits, investigations, cost recovery and fines, and creates related penal offences. The labour standards amendments prevent employers from demanding documentation for the first short absences each year and forbid medical certificates for caregiving absences.
Who It Affects
Private health insurers and administrators of group and nongroup employee benefit plans, physicians and other regulated health professionals whose services have been used for benefits verification, employers across Quebec (including those in the construction sector with collective-bargaining coverage), and public agencies—principally Santé Québec and the Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec. Plan sponsors and HR teams will also be directly affected.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts verification power away from requiring medical encounters toward regulator-led oversight and monetary remedies, which could reduce administrative work for clinicians but will change compliance, claims and auditing processes for insurers and plan administrators. Labour-standard changes reduce HR’s ability to demand clinical documentation for routine short absences and caregiving leave, tightening privacy and reducing physician paperwork.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a standalone Chapter III to the Act to promote access to family and specialized medicine services that focuses on insurers and employee benefit plan administrators. It defines a clear prohibition: an insurer or plan administrator cannot, directly or indirectly, make reimbursement of health services, coverage of technical aids, or maintenance of disability benefits conditional on an insured person receiving a medical service, except where government regulation specifically allows it.
The text also treats any contract clause that purports to permit such a requirement as if the insurer or administrator had required the service itself, closing a contractual loophole.
To enforce that prohibition the bill gives Santé Québec several tools. It can order audited compliance reports prepared by an auditor it selects by regulation; inspectors may enter premises to verify practices and investigators may be designated with inquiry powers (similar to public inquiry commissioners, without power to imprison).
Santé Québec can recover from an insurer or plan administrator the cost assumed by the public insurer for any medical services that were improperly required; recovery may be calculated using statistical inference from sampled data. The bill sets a limitation (prescription) for recovery claims, with a suspension mechanism when an investigation notice is issued.The enforcement framework also includes administrative and penal sanctions.
Santé Québec may impose a monetary administrative penalty (set at $5,000 in the text) for contraventions; the penal regime provides fines for offending insurers or administrators (ranging from $10,000 up to $1,000,000). The bill mirrors and adapts procedural provisions from a recent health-system statute to govern notices, claims and penalty procedures, and it permits Santé Québec to seek injunctive relief from the Superior Court without posting security.Separately, the bill amends labour-standards law to reduce employer demands for proof of short absences.
It prohibits employers from requesting the usual attesting document for the first three absence periods per year when each period does not exceed three consecutive days, and it expressly excludes requiring a medical certificate when the absence is to provide care to a close relative or dependent. The text contains transitional rules that allow pre-existing insurance contract clauses that permit such requirements to remain in force until renewal (but no longer than one year after the provision’s coming into force) and sets timing limits for the first regulation under the new prohibition.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 29.1 expressly forbids insurers and employee benefit plan administrators from conditioning (1) reimbursement of health or social-services provider fees, (2) coverage of technical aids, or (3) continuation of disability benefits on an insured person’s receipt of a medical service.
Santé Québec can recover the public cost of medical services that were required in contravention of the prohibition; recovery may be established by statistical inference from sampled data and is subject to a 60‑month prescription that is suspended by notification of an investigation.
The bill authorizes a $5,000 monetary administrative penalty for contraventions and creates criminal fines for insurers or administrators of $10,000 to $1,000,000; obstruction of inspectors or investigators carries separate graduated fines.
Labour standards changes: employers cannot request a document for the first three absence periods not exceeding three consecutive days taken in a year, and may not require a medical certificate when an employee is absent to provide caregiving. Sections implementing these labour changes come into force 1 January 2025.
Transitional and regulatory mechanics: existing contract clauses that would allow insurers to require medical services remain enforceable only until the contract’s next renewal or for a maximum of one year; the first regulation under the new prohibition must wait at least 20 days after publication of its draft in the Gazette officielle du Québec before it can be made.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Prohibition framework against conditioning benefits on medical services
The bill puts the prohibition in a new Chapter III and splits it into divisions addressing use of medical services, control measures, administrative measures, injunctions and penal provisions. The drafting expressly covers both authorized insurers and nonguaranteed employee benefit plans to avoid regulatory gaps between insured contracts and employer-sponsored plans. Compliance officers should read the definition of "employee benefit plan" in the bill—funded or unfunded uninsured plans—to determine applicability to specific workplace arrangements.
Substantive ban and contractual deeming rule
Section 29.1 lists the three prohibited purposes (reimbursement of provider costs, reimbursement of technical aids, maintenance of disability benefits) and reserves narrowly framed exceptions to future regulation. Section 29.2 converts any contractual clause that purports to allow such requirements into a de facto requirement by the insurer/administrator, meaning an insurer cannot hide behind plan language; compliance teams must inventory plan documents and identify clauses that will be treated as contraventions once the chapter is in force.
Audit, inspection and investigative architecture
Santé Québec may demand auditor-prepared compliance reports and apply sections of the Insurers Act to those audits; the bill enables entry and inspection powers modelled on recent health-system legislation and gives investigators significant compulsory-information powers akin to public inquiry commissioners (but without imprisonment authority). Insurers should expect regulator-led reviews of claims practices and prepare data-access and governance processes to respond to auditor and inspector demands promptly.
Cost recovery, sampling, penalties and procedural cross-references
Santé Québec may recover costs that the public insurer assumed for improperly required medical services; the bill allows statistical sampling as a basis for establishing recoverable sums and fixes a 60‑month prescription period, with suspension on notice of investigation. The division also sets a prescribed administrative penalty level, contemplates a separate recovery charge whose parameters Santé Québec will set by regulation, and imports procedural safeguards and notice requirements from the Act to make the health and social services system more effective—meaning recovery and penalty actions will follow an established enforcement playbook but with modifications specific to this chapter.
Injunction authority and penal offences
Santé Québec can seek injunctive relief in the Superior Court to stop contraventions, and the bill creates a two-track sanctioning regime: administrative penalties and criminal fines (starting at $10,000 and rising to $1,000,000 for corporate actors). The text also criminalizes obstruction of inspectors and investigators with separate fines for individuals and organizations, increasing the compliance risk for obstructive behaviour during oversight actions.
Limits on employer documentation requests and transitional timing
Amendments to section 79.2 prohibit employers from requesting the attesting document for the first three short absence periods per year; another amendment removes medical certificates as a permissible requirement when the absence is for caregiving. Transitional clause 11 lets insurers keep pre-existing contract clauses in place until renewal (but not beyond one year), while clause 12 imposes a minimum 20‑day delay after draft regulation publication before the first regulation can be made—details that will affect how quickly insurers and employers must change procedures.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Primary-care physicians and other clinicians — reduced demand to provide medical notes or to perform low‑value verification visits, which should free clinical time and paperwork.
- Patients and insured persons — greater protection from being required to undergo medical appointments solely to secure benefits and from unnecessary out‑of‑pocket encounters.
- Employees with short or caregiving absences — increased privacy and fewer requirements to produce medical documentation for routine absences; this reduces administrative friction with employers.
- Santé Québec and public payers — increased tools to detect and remedy improper insurer practices and to recover public expenditures tied to coerced services.
Who Bears the Cost
- Private insurers and employee benefit plan administrators — potential financial exposure from recoveries, administrative penalties and criminal fines, plus compliance costs for contract redrafting, audit readiness and claims-process redesign.
- Group plan sponsors and employers — administrative burden to revise plan documents and HR policies, and possible higher plan costs if insurers change adjudication practices or premiums to offset risk.
- Health-system administrators and RAMQ (Régie) — operational burden to provide information to Santé Québec on request and to support recovery efforts, even if costs are ultimately reclaimed from insurers.
- Inspectors and judicial system — increased caseload for inspections, administrative hearings, injunction motions and any penal prosecutions, requiring resourcing and procedural coordination.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between eliminating low‑value medical encounters ordered solely to satisfy payers (freeing physician time and protecting patient privacy) and preserving insurers’ ability to verify claims to prevent fraud, overuse or improper payments; enforcement tools that favor deterrence (cost recovery, fines) shift risk and administrative burdens onto insurers and plan sponsors, but they may also prompt defensive practices that reimpose costs on the system in other forms.
The bill trades physician time and privacy protections against insurers’ and plan sponsors’ interest in verifying claims and controlling costs. Making insurers pay back the public cost of improperly required services via statistical inference is administrable, but it raises evidentiary and fairness questions: sampling choices, representativeness and burden of proof will shape outcomes and likely spawn disputes about methodology.
The 60‑month prescription window is generous for recovery but can be paused only by a formal notice of investigation, which creates incentives for both prompt audits and for insurers to challenge notices procedurally.
Operationally, the new powers concentrate responsibility in Santé Québec but depend on coordination with the Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec and on delegated inspection authority derived from other statutes. That patchwork may produce gaps or overlaps—especially where insurer regulation under the Insurers Act, workplace rules under labour law and health-system oversight intersect.
Finally, the transitional rule permitting existing contractual clauses until renewal creates a short-term unevenness across insured populations and could delay the practical effect of the prohibition for many group plans, producing a phased rather than uniform reduction in physician administrative tasks.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.