Bill 92 is a broad omnibus rewrite of Québec’s financial-sector statutes that restructures oversight, strengthens enforcement tools and adjusts governance rules across insurers, securities, derivatives, credit unions and distribution channels. It reorganizes professional regulation, relocates the investor compensation mechanism into the core financial-regulation statute, and layers in new administrative and penal measures.
For compliance teams and legal advisers, the bill raises three practical flags: it increases regulator discretion and sanctions, changes who administers compensation to victims, and introduces governance and transparency requirements that will affect insurers, distributors and federations. The text also contains numerous transitional and repeal clauses that alter where existing rules live and who enforces them.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a single Chambre de l’assurance by amalgamating two professional chambers; moves the Fonds d’indemnisation des services financiers into the Act respecting the regulation of the financial sector with the Autorité des marchés financiers as trustee; empowers the Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal to impose administrative penalties (up to $2,000,000 per contravention) across several financial statutes and raises many criminal and regulatory fine ranges. The AMF may also temporarily allow non‑certificate claims adjusters and set higher maximum claim settlement amounts.
Who It Affects
Insurance companies, brokers and claims adjusters; securities and derivatives registrants (including dealers and advisors); federations of mutual insurers and credit unions; the Autorité des marchés financiers and the Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal; professional orders whose members prepare audits or technical reports (accountants, geologists, engineers).
Why It Matters
The bill centralizes compensation administration and enforcement under the AMF, shifting remedies toward administrative enforcement and larger monetary penalties, while changing governance rules that affect board composition and federation membership. That combination materially raises compliance exposure and alters dispute-resolution routes for firms and clients.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill reorganizes professional self-regulation in the distribution and insurance space by merging the Chambre de la sécurité financière and the Chambre de l’assurance de dommages into a single Chambre de l’assurance. The text sets out transitional governance (ministerial designations for initial chair and CEO, a transition committee, and rules for adopting internal by‑laws and elections) and converts existing operating rules and codes into the new chamber’s operating rules until it replaces them.
It relocates the Fonds d’indemnisation des services financiers into the Act respecting the regulation of the financial sector and makes the Autorité des marchés financiers the fund’s trustee, specifying the fund as a social-trust patrimony, prescribing investment, budgeting, audit and reporting arrangements and authorizing the AMF to set contribution rates by regulation. The AMF is given subrogation rights to recover amounts paid and must reconcile and transfer collected contributions monthly.The bill sharply expands enforcement architecture: the Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal gains explicit power to levy administrative penalties (statutory cap per contravention), and multiple financial-sector Acts receive new penal provisions, increased fine ranges and a rule that continuing contraventions or offences constitute a separate contravention/offence for each day.
Separately, the AMF obtains specific powers to allow certain non‑certified persons to act as claims adjusters in exceptional circumstances and to set higher maximum claim settlement amounts than currently allowed.On governance and market-structure issues, the bill amends insurers’ and federations’ rules to permit admission of “auxiliary companies” (foreign-authorized entities) subject to Authority approval and limits their voting influence at federation meetings; it reduces board sizes in at least one industry association; requires certain insurers that collect a large share of premiums outside Québec to have one‑third Quebec-resident directors (subject to a Canadian-residence majority); and broadens the AMF’s ability to prescribe management rules for firms, partnerships and representatives. It also tightens transparency for damage-insurance brokerage ownership and removes some prior delegation mechanisms with professional orders.Finally, the bill tightens evidence rules insofar as professional secrecy cannot be used by certain professional-order members to withhold documents or information from the AMF during investigations, and it requires recognition of trading platforms by the AMF for derivatives activity.
The Act contains numerous repeal and transitional clauses; many operative dates and certain regulations referenced in the text are left to be set later, so practical effect will depend on those implementing instruments.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal may now impose an administrative penalty up to $2,000,000 for each contravention; continuing contraventions are calculated per day.
The Fonds d’indemnisation des services financiers becomes a social-trust patrimony under the Act respecting the regulation of the financial sector with the AMF as trustee; the AMF may set contributions and must make up any fund shortfall over a maximum of five years.
The AMF may, in exceptional circumstances and for periods it fixes, authorize specified non‑certificate persons to act as claims adjusters and determine maximum claim settlement amounts exceeding $5,000.
Federations of mutual companies may admit auxiliary companies (foreign-authorized insurers with one-member/one-vote structures) but auxiliary-company representatives may not jointly exercise more than 30% of voting rights at federation meetings; admission requires Authority approval and a five‑year minimum admission period.
Several Acts increase penal ranges and create daily-continuing-offence rules; default fines for many contraventions now start in the thousands and escalate up to $1.5M–$2M in aggravated cases or corporate instances, and certain fraud-related contraventions now carry potential prison terms up to five years less one day.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Formation and transition rules for the Chambre de l’assurance
This part folds two existing professional chambers into one legal entity, the Chambre de l’assurance, and applies Part III of the Companies Act to it. The bill prescribes detailed transition mechanics: automatic transfer of personnel and patrimony, ministerial designation of the initial chair and CEO for two‑year terms, a five‑member transition committee with mixed ministerial and elected appointees, deadlines for proposing election procedures and internal by‑laws, and rules for which disciplinary matters remain with the new chamber versus those that must go to the Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal. Practically, this replaces parallel disciplinary and regulatory routes with a single institutional home while preserving temporary continuity of operating rules until the new chamber acts.
Fonds d’indemnisation des services financiers moved to the AMF statute
The compensation fund becomes a social trust patrimony and the AMF becomes its trustee, responsible for collecting contributions, investing fund assets, setting contribution amounts by regulation and reconciling transfers monthly. The bill gives the AMF rule‑making authority for eligibility and indemnity calculation, the power to subrogate and recover paid amounts, and requires integration of the fund’s financials into the AMF’s annual report and audits. The transfer centralizes victim compensation administration in the principal regulator and attaches specific budgeting, accounting and parliamentary-accountability duties to the AMF.
New administrative‑penalty regime and higher criminal/penal ranges
Across the Insurers Act, the Act respecting financial services cooperatives, the Deposit Institutions and Deposit Protection Act, the Trust Companies and Savings Companies Act and related statutes, the bill inserts parallel chapters empowering the Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal to impose administrative penalties (subject to a $2M cap per contravention) and revises criminal/penal provisions to increase minimums, maximums and (in some cases) custodial exposure. It also adds a consistent rule that ongoing contraventions or offences count as separate violations for each day. For regulated entities this shifts greater enforcement toward the administrative apparatus and increases the monetary risk profile for compliance failures.
Admission of auxiliary companies to federations of mutual insurers
The bill creates a regulated path for federations of mutual companies to admit auxiliary companies—legal persons constituted outside Québec and authorized to carry on insurer activities in their home jurisdiction—subject to federation by‑law conditions and AMF authorization. The federation must set admission terms (minimum five‑year admission, financial disclosures, audits, governance safeguards) and the AMF may require expulsion if compliance or sound-practice risks arise. The bill also caps voting influence of auxiliary-company representatives (30% collectively) and adjusts quorum and reporting requirements, integrating foreign-authorized entities while limiting potential governance capture.
Temporary flexibility for claims adjustment
The AMF may, in exceptional circumstances and for time-limited periods, authorize certain persons—agents, brokers holding relevant certificates, former certificate holders or persons authorized outside Québec—to act as claims adjusters and may raise the statutory maximum settlement amount above $5,000. Each decision must be published in the AMF bulletin. This produces a regulatory safety valve for claims handling capacity strains but also creates an exception framework that firms and insurers must monitor and that could complicate licensing compliance and professional-responsibility lines.
Director residency, credit-union supervision and transparency changes
The Insurers Act gains a residence requirement: if an insurer belongs to a financial group that collects more than 40% of premiums outside Québec, one‑third of its directors must be Québec residents (subject to a majority of directors residing in Canada). The Act respecting financial services cooperatives allows federations to allocate surplus to increase‑in‑value reserves and removes the requirement for annual inspections, letting the AMF inspect federations or credit unions 'whenever it considers advisable'. The Fédération des caisses Desjardins must publish the Groupe coopératif Desjardins by‑laws online. Combined, these changes emphasize local governance, flexible supervisory cadence and greater public transparency for key cooperative institutions.
Trading-platform recognition and insider/privilege scope
The Securities Act and related statutes are amended to require recognition by the AMF for derivatives trading platforms that carry on regulated activities; the definition and enforcement scope around privileged information are expanded to include platform participants and subscribers. The bill replaces older terminology (derivatives trading facility → trading platform) and consolidates which titles of the Securities Act apply to certain investment forms. These changes formalize regulatory coverage for electronic trading venues and broaden anti‑insider and market‑abuse reach to platform participants.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Retail victims of fraud and embezzlement — broader, centralized administration of the Fonds d’indemnisation with AMF trusteeship and AMF subrogation powers should speed and standardize eligibility determinations and recovery actions.
- The Autorité des marchés financiers — gains trusteeship, clearer rule‑making for the compensation fund, broader supervisory powers (inspections, governance by‑laws) and enhanced enforcement tools including access to administrative penalties.
- Federations and member mutuals — a regulated pathway to admit auxiliary companies gives federations flexibility to attract foreign-authorized insurers and to organize services for auxiliary members, subject to safeguards.
- Market operators (trading platforms) — explicit recognition in the Securities and derivatives frameworks clarifies the regulatory path for platforms wishing to operate in Québec markets.
- Professional regulators and the new Chambre de l’assurance — consolidation reduces duplicate structures and creates a single institutional interlocutor for distribution and certain discipline matters.
Who Bears the Cost
- Insurers, dealers, brokers and registrants — higher fines, daily‑counting contraventions and elevated penalties increase financial and compliance risk, requiring enhanced compliance programs and recordkeeping.
- Smaller firms and independent representatives — expanded AMF rule-making, governance requirements and potential inspections 'whenever advisable' raise administrative burdens that scale disproportionately for smaller entities.
- Federations admitting auxiliary companies — must meet new AMF approval conditions, provide additional audits and information, and manage the five‑year lock‑in period, creating legal and operational overhead.
- Professional orders and their members — accountants, geologists and engineers lose some claims of professional secrecy in AMF investigations, increasing disclosure obligations and potential liability for report authors.
- The merged chambers’ staff and membership — integration costs, changing governance and transitional appointment rules require resource allocation and adaptation to new operating rules.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill resolves fragmentation by centralizing compensation, supervision and enforcement under the AMF while simultaneously expanding exceptional flexibilities (e.g., temporary adjuster authorizations and admissions of foreign auxiliary companies); the central dilemma is balancing the benefits of unified, potent oversight and faster remedies against the risks of concentrated regulatory power, implementation uncertainty and amplified sanctions that may disproportionately burden smaller or cross‑border market participants.
Centralizing the compensation fund under the AMF modernizes administration but concentrates significant discretion in a single regulator. That concentration reduces institutional fragmentation and may speed claim handling, yet it raises governance questions: the AMF acts both as trustee and as the regulator that sets contribution rules and eligibility criteria, and the law leaves important operational details to upcoming AMF regulations or government approvals, creating dependency on implementing instruments.
Parliamentary oversight provisions are included, but the line between regulatory independence and political accountability will matter in practice.
The expanded administrative‑penalty regime shifts enforcement toward administrative remedies with high monetary caps. Administrative fines of up to $2M per contravention and elevated criminal ranges create a deterrent effect but also risk regulatory overreach or disproportionate impact on smaller market participants.
The daily‑continuing contravention principle multiplies exposure for operational failures (e.g., reporting lapses) and increases the importance of rapid remediation and incident reporting systems. Moreover, allowing the AMF to temporarily authorize non‑certificate claims adjusters and higher settlement limits provides operational flexibility but exposes consumers to uneven competence standards unless the AMF tightly controls the conditions, monitoring and publication of these authorizations.
Transitional complexity is substantial: many provisions defer operative effect to future regulations or unspecified dates; initial governance appointments and special election procedures impose ministerial influence during the early life of the new chamber; multiple repeals relocate obligations across statutes. These design choices will leave the regulated community dependent on a sequence of implementing regulations, guidance and AMF interpretations before the practical compliance perimeter is settled, which creates short‑term legal and business uncertainty.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.