Bill 695 creates the office of a Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) for Québec to provide independent, non‑partisan analysis of the government’s fiscal stance, budget estimates and economic trends. The PBO will produce recurring public reports — including biannual budget portraits, an annual assessment of economic and financial forecasts, and a three‑year cycle intergenerational equity report covering 40 years — and will take responsibility for assurance work on pre‑election financial reports previously handled by the Auditor General.
Beyond public reports, the PBO may conduct research on its own initiative or at the request of the National Assembly, any Member or parliamentary committee, and must confidentially assess the fiscal impact of Members’ proposals on request. The Act gives the office extensive powers to obtain documents and data from government departments and public bodies, establishes confidentiality and immunity protections for staff, and sets out administrative and financial arrangements under the Office of the National Assembly.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates an independent Parliamentary Budget Officer appointed by the National Assembly to prepare biannual and other statutory fiscal reports, perform a pre‑election assurance of the Minister of Finance’s pre‑election report, and provide confidential and public costings of Members’ proposals. The office may initiate research and request information from government entities.
Who It Affects
Members of the National Assembly and parliamentary committees who will receive independent analysis; the Ministère des Finances and departmental officials who must provide data and premises on request; the Office of the National Assembly, which will approve the PBO’s budgets and host administrative arrangements.
Why It Matters
The bill installs a permanent, independent fiscal analyst inside Québec’s parliamentary architecture with statutory access to departmental material and legal protections designed to insulate its work. That shifts some assurance and costing functions away from the Auditor General and creates a new channel for pre‑election verification and parliamentary cost scrutiny.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act establishes a stand‑alone Parliamentary Budget Officer who serves full time and is appointed by the National Assembly following a joint motion of the Premier and the Official Opposition leader and a two‑thirds approval threshold that must include at least two represented parties. The PBO takes an oath and serves a single seven‑year term; removal is limited to cause and follows the same cross‑party approval process.
If the office is vacant or the PBO is unable to act, the government may designate an interim for up to six months after consulting party leaders.
Substantively, the PBO’s core remit is to strengthen parliamentary scrutiny of public finances. The office must produce several recurring outputs: an annual report on economic and financial forecasts with a long‑term viability assessment; at least two objective portraits of the state of public finances and budget estimates each year; and an intergenerational equity report every three years projecting 40‑year fiscal sustainability under demographic, technological and climate scenarios.
The PBO may also initiate or respond to requests for studies and provide analysis to the Assembly, committees or individual Members.The Act assigns the PBO responsibility for the pre‑election assurance currently attached to the Minister’s pre‑election report. The PBO must prepare an assurance report covering at least the first three fiscal years in the pre‑election report (with specific timing rules when the pre‑election report is published in February) and submit conclusions to the Minister within a tight window prior to publication.
The PBO may also publish a detailed assurance work report and must table its reports through the President of the National Assembly for prompt tabling.Operationally, the PBO receives strong statutory powers to access departmental and public‑body documents and data “despite” Québec’s Access to Documents and Protection of Personal Information Act; that provision is drafted to prevail over later Acts unless those Acts expressly say otherwise. The office may assign staff or contracted experts into departments, define personnel duties, delegate many functions, and is bound by secrecy rules for financial and economic data.
The Act grants immunity from prosecution and shields the PBO and its staff from compelled testimony or ordinary provisional remedies related to performance of duties. Budgeting and administrative rules place the PBO within the Office of the National Assembly’s financial framework: the PBO prepares annual and supplementary estimates for approval by that Office and submits audited financial statements and an activity report each year for tabling.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Appointment requires a joint motion by the Premier and the Official Opposition leader and approval of two‑thirds of MNAs representing at least two parties.
The PBO serves a single non‑renewable seven‑year term and can be dismissed only for cause via the same cross‑party two‑thirds procedure.
The Act expressly grants the PBO access to departmental and public‑body documents ‘despite’ Québec’s access‑to‑information statute and states that this provision prevails over later Acts unless expressly overridden.
The PBO must deliver an assurance report on the Minister’s pre‑election report covering at least the first three fiscal years and must submit conclusions to the Minister no later than the Monday before the pre‑election report’s publication.
At any MNA’s written request the PBO must confidentially assess the financial impact of a proposed measure; the MNA can authorize public release of the PBO’s conclusions, and unfinished assessments stop at the end of a legislature.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Appointment, term, acting replacement and conflict rules
This chapter sets the political safeguards around the PBO’s independence: appointment is a negotiated, cross‑party process requiring a joint motion and a two‑thirds supermajority that must draw from at least two authorized parties. The PBO must take an oath, serve full time, and holds a single seven‑year, non‑renewable term; resignation is permitted but dismissal is tightly constrained to protect independence. The government can name an interim for up to six months, which limits prolonged vacancy but leaves open how quickly a permanent replacement must be found.
Regular audits, long‑term viability and intergenerational reports
The Act requires the PBO to produce a set of recurring public products: at least two objective portraits of public finances annually, an annual review of economic/financial forecasts including long‑term viability analysis, and an intergenerational equity report every three years covering a 40‑year horizon. Those deliverables expand parliamentary evidence on structural fiscal risk and bind the PBO to assess policy consequences across demographics, technology and climate scenarios — producing forward‑looking analysis that legislators can use when debating fiscal policy.
Pre‑election assurance shifted to the PBO with tight timing
The bill moves the assurance role for the Minister of Finance’s pre‑election report from the Auditor General to the PBO. It defines minimum coverage (the first three fiscal years reported) and sets a hard deadline: the PBO’s conclusions must reach the Minister by the Monday before the pre‑election report is published. The PBO may also produce a detailed assurance working paper for tabling and public release concurrent with the Minister’s publication, which compresses complex assurance work into a small calendar window and raises practical resource and methodology questions for the office.
Confidential costings for MNAs and procedural requirements
Any MNA may request a written, confidential assessment of the government cost of a proposed measure; requests must specify the proposal, purpose, cost, financing and supporting material. The PBO’s conclusions become public only if the requesting Member so authorizes; requests may be withdrawn and unfinished assessments lapse at the end of a legislature. This creates a controlled channel for Members to obtain independent fiscal advice while preserving Members’ strategic confidentiality.
Powers to access data, assignment into departments and legal protections
The Act authorizes the PBO to place staff or contracted experts inside departments, requires departments and public bodies to provide premises, equipment and access to studies, reports and data, and states that those access rights apply notwithstanding Québec’s access‑to‑information law and prevail over subsequent Acts unless expressly stated otherwise. The PBO and staff are bound to secrecy but enjoy immunity from prosecution for good‑faith acts and are protected from compelled testimony and many judicial remedies — protections intended to secure candid analysis but that also narrow legal recourse for third parties seeking review.
Budget, administrative framework and operational exceptions
Financial management places the PBO within the Office of the National Assembly’s budgetary oversight: the PBO prepares annual and supplementary estimates for that Office’s approval and must follow most Financial Administration Act and Public Administration Act provisions, with explicit carve‑outs. The PBO can ask the Office to provide human, physical and information services free of charge and may seek regulatory exceptions where governmental rules hinder its mandate, subject to tabling of the exception in the Assembly.
Consequential amendments and statutory review
The bill amends the Tax Administration Act and the Act respecting the Ministère des Finances to insert the PBO into existing reporting and information flows (including substituting the PBO for the Auditor General in several pre‑election cross‑references) and repeals a subdivision of the Auditor General Act. It also mandates a statutory implementation review five years after coming into force and every five years thereafter, requiring committee scrutiny of whether the Act should be amended.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Members of the National Assembly — gain a statutory, non‑partisan source of costings and fiscal analysis they can use in debates, committee work and private bill drafting, with the option to keep initial assessments confidential.
- Parliamentary committees — receive independent, recurring fiscal portraits and detailed assurance materials that strengthen committee capacity to question the government on forecasts and long‑term sustainability.
- Research community and journalists — gain regular public products (biannual portraits, annual forecast assessments, triennial 40‑year intergenerational reports) that improve transparency and enable independent scrutiny and comparison of government projections.
Who Bears the Cost
- Ministère des Finances and departmental officials — must deliver draft pre‑election reports, data and premises on compressed timelines and respond to PBO information requests, increasing staff time and coordination costs.
- Office of the National Assembly — takes on budgetary and administrative responsibility for approving the PBO’s estimates and providing services on request, creating demand for additional internal capacity and oversight work.
- Auditor General’s Office — loses certain pre‑election assurance duties and a subdivision of statutory responsibility, requiring internal reprioritization even if no immediate budget change is specified.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances parliamentary need for robust, independent fiscal scrutiny against the risk that concentrating investigative power in a single, politically‑appointed office with expansive access and immunity will trade transparency for insulation: it strengthens legislative capacity to question government forecasts while narrowing judicial and external checks on how the PBO itself obtains and uses information.
The Act packs significant discretion and power into a single office and attempts to secure its independence through both strong appointment safeguards and statutory protections from many forms of judicial review. That design raises implementation questions: how will the PBO establish methodological standards for ‘plausibility’ in pre‑election assurances, and what peer or procedural review will ensure those judgments are intelligible and defensible to Parliament and the public?
The compressed timeline for pre‑election assurance — delivery by the Monday before publication — could force the office to choose between breadth of review and depth of verification, especially when complex models or confidential data are involved.
The bill’s access clause, drafted to prevail over Québec’s access‑to‑information law and subsequent Acts unless expressly stated otherwise, gives the PBO powerful documentary access but also creates a potential legal tension: third parties or departments may dispute the scope of required disclosures or the PBO’s authority to place staff in departments. The parallel obligations of secrecy and the broad immunity provisions protect the office’s staff but reduce typical legal remedies for third parties who claim procedural unfairness or overreach.
Finally, moving pre‑election assurance from the Auditor General to the PBO changes institutional incentives and expertise; the statute does not prescribe resourcing levels or detailed standards, so the effectiveness of the PBO will depend heavily on the initial appointment, the office’s technical hires, and the Office of the National Assembly’s budgetary decisions.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.